Attitude to Loneliness: Behavioral Strategies as Coping Resources



The article deals with the concept of “loneliness” and provides a modern view on the problem of studying the phenomenon. The data of an empirical study on the experience of loneliness and coping behavior in adults is presented. The study involved 256 respondents aged 21 to 73, including 153 women and 103 men. Most of the participants live in Vyborg, Leningrad Region (65.2%). The participants in the study are representatives of different professional environments (university teachers, schools, gymnasiums, medical workers, engineers, civil servants), 216 people have a higher education. It was hypothesized that there may be types of attitudes towards loneliness, differing in the level of severity of the characteristics of the phenomenon, and these types can be regulated in different ways by coping behavior. Also, it was suggested that sociotropism acts as a resource in the experience of loneliness, and problem-oriented coping strategies act as predictors of sociotropy. The research design included the following methods: Differential Loneliness Experience Questionnaire by E.N.Osin and D.A.Leontyev (DOPO-3k); Scale of social and emotional loneliness (SELSA-S) as adapted by O.Yu. Strizhitskaya et al.; Scale of psychological well-being by K.Riff as adapted by E.G.Troshikhina and L.V.Zhukovskaya (short version); Satisfaction with Life Scale E.Dinner; Coping test by R.La- zarus, Scale “Sociotropy — Self-sufficiency”; questionnaire. Four types of attitudes towards loneliness were identified, which differ in the severity of the characteristics of loneliness and their ratio: “adaptive”, “dependent”, “coping”, “self-sufficient”. The differences in the regulation of behavior among respondents with different types of attitudes to loneliness are shown, the structure of the relationship between coping strategies and the characteristics of loneliness is determined. The contribution of problem-oriented strategies to reducing the level of the feeling of loneliness is shown and the ambiguous contribution of the “self-control” strategy to the experience of general loneliness and social-emotional loneliness, depending on the type of experience of the studied phenomenon. As an indirect result, it is indicated that sociotropy can act as a resource in situations when loneliness is experienced.

General Information

Keywords: types of attitudes to loneliness, experiencing loneliness, coping, sociotropism — self-sufficiency

Journal rubric: Empirical and Experimental Research

Article type: scientific article


Funding. The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 19-513-18015.

Received: 05.08.2021


For citation: Petrash M.D., Strizhitskaya O.Y., Murtazina I.R., Vartanyan G.A., Shchukin A.V. Attitude to Loneliness: Behavioral Strategies as Coping Resources. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2021. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 341–355. DOI: 10.21638/spbu16.2021.404. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)


Cacioppo, J.T., Hawkley, L.C., Crawford, L.E., Ernst, J.M., Burleson, M.H., Kowalewski, R.B., Berntson, G.G. (2002). Loneliness and health: Potential mechanisms. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64 (3), 407–417.

Cacioppo, J.T., Hawkley L.C., Ernst, J.M., Burleson, M., Berntson, G.G., Nouriani, B., Spiegel, D. (2006). Loneliness within a nomological net: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 40 (6), 1054–1085.

Cacioppo, S., Grippo, A.J., London, S., Goossens, L., Cacioppo, J.T. (2015). Loneliness: clinical import and interventions. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. , 10 (2), 238–249.

Chen L., Alston M., Guo W. (2019). The influence of social support on loneliness and depression among older elderly people in China: Coping styles as mediators. Journal of Community Psychology, 47 (5), 1235–1245.

Deckx, L., Akker, van den M., Buntinx, F., van Driel, M. (2018). A systematic literature review on the association between loneliness and coping strategies. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 23 (8), 899–916.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575. Ettema, E.J., Derksen, L.D, Leeuwen, van E. (2010). Existential loneliness and end-of-life care: a systematic review. Theor. Med. Bioeth. , 31 (2), 141–169.

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T.B., Baker M., Harris T., Stephenson D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. , 10 (2), 227–237.

Kriukova, T.L. (2016). Coping with loneliness psychology. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 9 (49). (accessed: 01.08.2021). (In Russian)

Leontiev, D.A. (2011). The Existential meaning of loneliness. Ekzistentsial’naia traditsiia: filosofiia, psikhologiia, psikhoterapiia, 2, 101–108. (In Russian)

Luchetti, M., Lee J.H., Aschwanden, D., Sesker A., Strickhouser J.E., Terracciano A., Sutin A.R. (2020). The trajectory of loneliness in response to COVID-19. The American psychologist, 75 (7), 897–908.

Murphy, P., Kupshik, G. (1992). Loneliness, stress and wellbeing: A helper’s guide. New York, Routledge.

Nicolaisen, M., Thorsen, K. (2014). Who are lonely? Loneliness in different age groups (18–81 years old), using two measures of loneliness. Int. J.Aging Hum. Dev. , 78 (3), 229–257.

Osin, E.N., Leontiev, D.A. (2013). Differential questionnaire of the experience of loneliness: structure and properties. Psychology. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 10, 1, 55–81. (In Russian)

Peplau, L.A., Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In: Peplau L.A., Perlman D. (eds). Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy. New York, Wiley.

Strizhiczkaia, O.Iu., Petrash, M.D., Babakova, L.V., Aleksandrova, N.Kh. (2021). Mechanisms of interaction of loneliness and autonomy among Russian and Bulgarian adults. Mir pedagogiki i psikhologii: mezhdunarodnyi nauchno-prakticheskii zhurnal, 08 (61), (accessed: 12.08.2021). (In Russian)

Strizhiczkaia, O.Iu., Petrash, M.D., Murtazina I.R., Vartanian G.A.Adaptation of the methodology “Sociotropicity — self-sufficiency” on the Russian sample of adults and elderly people. Eksperimental’naia psikhologiia. (In print). (In Russian)

Strizhiczkaia, O.Iu., Petrash, M.D., Murtazina, I.R., Vartanian, G.A., Manevskii, F. S., Aleksandrova, N.Kh., Babakova, L.V. (2020). Adaptation of Bulgarian Version of the Short Version of the Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale for Adults and Older Adults. Konsul’tativnaia psikhologiia i psikhoterapiia, 28 (4), 79–97. (In Russian)

Sutin, A.R., Luchetti, M., Terracciano, A. (2020). Has loneliness increased during COVID-19? Comment on “Loneliness: A signature mental health concern in the era of COVID-19”. Psychiatry Research, 291, 1–2, 113295.

Vasserman, L.I., Iovlev, B.V., Isaeva E.R., Trifonova, E.A., Shchelkova O.Iu., Vuks A.Ia., Novozhilova M.Iu. (2009). Methodology for psychological diagnostics of coping methods with stressful and problematic situations for the individual: posobie dlya vrachej i mediczinskikh psikhologov. St. Petersburg, NIPNI im. V.M.Bekhtereva Publ. (In Russian)

Zhukovskaia, L.V., Troshikhina, E.G. (2011). The scale of psychological well-being K.Riff. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 32 (2), 82–93. (In Russian)

Information About the Authors

Marina D. Petrash, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Saint Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID:, e-mail:

Olga Y. Strizhitskaya, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Saint-Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID:, e-mail:

Inna R. Murtazina, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Saint Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID:, e-mail:

Gayane A. Vartanyan, PhD in Psychology, Research Fellow, Saint Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID:, e-mail:

Anton V. Shchukin, PhD in Psychology, St. Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, e-mail:



Total: 306
Previous month: 13
Current month: 0


Total: 210
Previous month: 23
Current month: 1