Old and New Dimensions of Playing: Game Specifics of the Virtual World

1346

Abstract

As Yuri Lotman once remarked, «the eternal is always covered in the apparel of time.» Children's play is not an exception. Despite cyber-monsters and extraterrestrial civilisations, plots in computer games turn out to be quite familiar to us. It is the virtual world of computer games that is completely new and unique. Perhaps one would say that the only difference is the form in which a play is being presented. But this results in a new type of one's involvement in play and determines the specificity of play behaviour as well as of perception. Computer games, video game consoles, the Internet, chats, instant messaging programmes, short message services — all these are now widely used by children and have at the same time changed the very image of childhood preserving only the outer appearance of cultural tradition. This paper focuses on the following issues: what is the true novelty of computer games? What's the core difference between them and the variety of games played by children at all times, all around the world? How does virtual reality affect children's play and socialisation? How do computer games affect the development of imagination? What are the real consequences of playing in a strictly determined algorithmic virtual world?

General Information

Keywords: computer games, role play, child development, virtuality

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Tendryakova M.V. Old and New Dimensions of Playing: Game Specifics of the Virtual World. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2008. Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 60–68. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Baiburin A.K. Ritual v sisteme znakovyh sredstv kul'tury // Etnoznakovye funkcii kul'tury. M., 1991.
  2. Vygotskii L.S. Prilozhenie //. El'konin D.B. Psihologiyaigry. M., 1978.
  3. Kon I.S. Otkrytie Ya. M., 1978.
  4. Leont'ev A.N. Problemy razvitiya psihiki. M., 1981.
  5. Leont'ev A.N. Deyatel'nost'. Soznanie. Lichnost'. M., 1975.
  6. Lotman Yu.M. Besedy o russkoi kul'ture. Byt i tradicii russkogo dvoryanstva (XVIII—nachala XIX veka). SPb.,1994.
  7. Miller S. Psihologiya igry. SPb., 1999.
  8. Petrus' G. Agressiya v komp'yuternyh igrah.
  9. Petrus' G. Dai sdachi mne.
  10. Propp V.Ya. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoi skazki.SPb., 1986.
  11. Robbins R.H. Enciklopediya koldovstva i demonologii.M., 1994.
  12. Fomicheva Yu.V., Shmelev A.G., Burmistrov I.V. Psihologicheskie korrelyaty uvlechennosti komp'yuternymi igrami // Vestnik MGU. Ser. 14. Psihologiya. 1991. № 3.
  13. Fromm E. Zdorovoe obshestvo // Psihoanaliz i kul'tu ra. M., 1995.
  14. Shapkin S.A. Komp'yuternaya igra: novaya oblast' psi hologicheskih issledovanii // Psihologicheskii zhurnal. 1999.T. 20, № 1.
  15. Shmelev A.G. Mir popravimyh oshibok // Vychislitel' naya tehnika i ee primenenie // Komp'yuternye igry. 1988. №3.
  16. Heizinga I. Homo Ludens. M., 1992.
  17. El'konin D.B. Psihologiya igry. M., 1978.

Information About the Authors

M. V. Tendryakova, PhD in History, Moscow, Russia

Metrics

Views

Total: 5876
Previous month: 20
Current month: 9

Downloads

Total: 1346
Previous month: 8
Current month: 1