Psychic Phenomena and Discourse: the Social Constructionism Perspective

1394

Abstract

The article analyzes the socioconstructionist view on psyche as a product of discourses. In the social constructionism perspective the psychological concepts are not viewed as «rigid designators». Their function is not to describe the objective processes and states, but to attribute meaning to them in accordance with the context of cultural meanings to which they belong. The social constructionism is focusing on the discursive nature of the psyche and its normative and semantic (not causal) relations. It orients psychology on the interpretational epistemology and on the conceptual and methodological framework construction close to that of the humanities (so called «understanding sciences»). The article also raises the broader issue of interrelation between language (or discourse, i.e. language in its socio-cultural and interactive aspects) and reality. The author argues that due to social constructionism that promotes the radicalization of linguistic nature of human experience, the reflection on discursive construction boundaries becomes relevant. The necessity of analysis of the other — extradiscursive — aspects of the «living world», and especially the practical component of being in the world, the phenomenology of corporeal and emotional connection with the world, and etc is explained.

General Information

Keywords: social constructionism, discursive construction of the psyche, language games, «grammatical analysis» of psychological concepts, the bodysubject, the boundaries of discursive construction

Journal rubric: Discussions and Discourses

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Busygina N.P. Psychic Phenomena and Discourse: the Social Constructionism Perspective. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2009. Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 44–52. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Batler J. Psihika vlasti: Teoriya sub'ekcii. Har'kov; SPb., 2002.
  2. Wittgenstein L. Kul'tura i cennost' // Ludvig Vitgenshtein. Filosofskie raboty (Chast' 1). M., 1994.
  3. Wittgenstein L. Filosofskie issledovaniya // Tam zhe.
  4. Vrigt G. H. Logikofilosofskie issledovaniya. M., 1986.
  5. Gusserl E. Krizis evropeiskih nauk i transcendental'naya fenomenologiya. SPb., 2004.
  6. Dennet D. Vidy psihiki. M., 2004.
  7. Gergen K. Social'nyi konstrukcionizm: znanie i praktika. Mn., 2003.
  8. Kalaya P., Heikinen A. Atribucii v ramkah diskursivnogo podhoda: ob'yasnenie uspehov i neudach v izuchenii angliiskogo yazyka kak inostrannogo // Yazyk, kommunikaciya i social'naya sreda. Vyp. 2. Voronezh, 2002.
  9. Kalmykova E. S., Chesnova I. G. Analiz narrativov pacienta: CCRT i diskursanaliz // Moskovskii psihoterapevticheskii zhurnal. 1996. № 2.
  10. Kasavin I. T. Tekst. Diskurs. Kontekst: Vvedenie v social'nuyu epistemologiyu yazyka. M., 2008.
  11. Konstruktivizm v epistemologii i naukah o cheloveke: Мaterialy «kruglogo stola». Uchastvovali: V. A. Lektorskii, V. F. Petrenko, B. I. Pruzhinin, E. N. Knyazeva, M. A. Rozov, N. M. Smirnova, V. S. Shvyrev, Yu. A. Antonovskii, A. M. Ulanovskii, I. P. Farman, E. L. Chertkova // Voprosy filosofii. 2008. № 3.
  12. Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya. SPb., 1999.
  13. Onuchin A. N. «Novaya paradigma» v social'noi psihologii // Mir psihologii. 1999. № 3.
  14. Petrenko V. F. Konstruktivistskaya paradigma v psihologicheskoi nauke // Psihologicheskii zhurnal. 2002. Т. 23. №3.
  15. Pul'kinen T. O performativnoi teorii pola: Problemati zaciya kategorii pola Yudit Batler // Germenevtika i dekonstrukciya / Pod red. V. Shtegmaiera, H. Franka, B. V. Markova. SPb., 1999.
  16. Ulanovskii A. M. Konstruktivistskaya paradigma v gumanitarnyh naukah // Epistemologiya & Filosofiya nauki. 2006. Т. X. № 4.
  17. Ulanovskii A. M. Fenomenologicheskii podhod kak kachestvennaya issledovatel'skaya metodologiya: Dis. ... kand. psihol. nauk. M., 2005.
  18. Fridman J., Combs J. Konstruirovanie inyh real'nostei: Istorii i rasskazy kak terapiya. M., 2001.
  19. Harre R. Vtoraya kognitivnaya revolyuciya // Psihologicheskii zhurnal. 1996. Т. 17. № 2.
  20. Harre R. Metafizika i metodologiya: nekotorye rekomendacii dlya social'nopsihologicheskogo issledovaniya // Social'naya psihologiya: samorefleksiya marginal'nosti. M., 1995.
  21. Bermudez J. L. The paradox of selfconsciousness. Cambridge, 1998.
  22. Billig M. Arguing and Тhinking. Cambridge, 1986
  23. Churchland P. M. Matter and Сonsciousness. Cambridge, 1988.
  24. Dessler D. The positivistinterpretivist controversy // Qualitative Methods, 2003.
  25. Gergen K. J. Realities and Relationships: Soundings in Social Construction. Cambridge, 1994.
  26. Guba E., Lincoln Y. Competing paradigms in qualitative research // N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (eds.) The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, 1998.
  27. Harre R. Personal Being. Oxford, 1983.
  28. Harre R., Gillet G. The Discursive Mind. L., 1994.
  29. Hepburn A. Teachers and secondary school bullying: a postmodern discourse analysis // Discourse & Society. 1997. Vol. 8 (1).
  30. Kripke S. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, 1980.
  31. Liebrucks A. The concept of social construction // Theory & Psychology. 2001. Vol. 11 (3).
  32. Lutz C. A. Unnatural Emotions. Chicago, 1988.
  33. Maze J. R. Social constructionism, deconstructionism and some requirements of discourse // Theory & Psychology. 2001. Vol. 11 (3).
  34. Merwe W. L. van der, Voestermans P. P. Wittgenstein's legacy and the challenge to psychology // Theory & Psychology. 1995. Vol. 5 (1).
  35. Potter J. Representing Reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London, 1996.
  36. Potter J., Wetherell M. Discourse and Social Psychology. London, 1987.
  37. Putnam H. Representation and Reality. Cambridge, 1988.
  38. Ratner C. Cultural Psychology: Theory and method. N. Y., 2002.
  39. Shotter J. Social Accountability and Selfhood. Oxford, 1984.
  40. Strasser S. The Idea of Dialogical Phenomenology. Pittsburgh, 1969.
  41. Wetherell M. Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and poststructuralism in dialogue // Discourse & Society. 1998. Vol. 9 (3).

Information About the Authors

Natalya P. Busygina, PhD in Psychology, Assistant Professor, Department of Counselling and Clinical Psychology, Chair of Individual and Group Psychotherapy, Moscow State University of Psychology an Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2344-9543, e-mail: boussyguina@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 4194
Previous month: 25
Current month: 6

Downloads

Total: 1394
Previous month: 12
Current month: 0