The Natural, the Artificial and Human Sciences

The author analyses the possibilities of transforming human mind in connection with the appearance of “digital civilization” and the development of human sciences, in particular, cognitive and neural ones. The article argues that human sciences can promote human perfection (and will not be used as a means of its degradation) only if they take into account the principal fact: the human being is a natural/artificial creature engaged in activity and culture. In this context the author studies the relationship between individual and collective activity and analyzes different forms of the latter: relative independence of participants, distributed activity, and cooperative activity. Cooperation requires constant communication between the participants. Therefore activity and communication cannot be opposed to each other, as the act of communication matters only in the context of activity, and also because communication itself can be understood as a specific kind of activity. In this connection social constructionism in psychology and other human sciences is criticized.

1. Vygotsky L.S. Sobranie sochinenyi. Problemy razvitiya psikhiki [Collection of works. The problems of psychological development]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983.
2. Davydov V.V. Teoriya razvivayuschego obucheniya [The theory of Developmental Education]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1996.
3. Ilyenkov E.V. 1973. Problema ideal’nogo [The Problem of the Ideal]. Voprosi filosofii [Questions of philosophy], 1973, no. 6, pp. 123—140; no. 7, pp. 145—158.
4. Lektorsky V.A. Vozmozno li post-chelovecheskoe buduschee? [Is the post-human future possible?]. In Lektorsky V.A. Filosofiya, poznanie, kul’tura [Philosophy, cognition, culture]. Moscow: Kanon plus, 2012, pp. 119—124.
5. Leontiev A.N. Deyatel’nost’, soznanie, lichnost’ [Activity, Consciousness, personality]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1977.
6. Rubtsov V.V. Osnovy sotsial’no—genetichyeskoi psikhologii [Foundations of social genetical psychology]. Moscow: Institute of practical psychology publishers, 1996.
7. Falikman M.V., Cole M. “Kul’turnaya revolutsiya” v kognitivnoi nauke: ot neironnoi plastichnosti do geneticheskogo mekhanisma priobretenija kul’turnogo opyta. [“Cultural revolution” in Cognitive science: from neuronal plasticity to genetical mechanisms of acquiring cultural experience]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Kultural-historical psychology], 2014, no. 3, pp. 9—18.
8. El’konin D.B. Psikhologiya igry [Psychology of the game]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1976.
9. Clark A., Chalmers D. 1998.The Extended Mind. Analysis, 1998. Vol. 58, pp. 7—19.
10. Gergen K. 1994. Realities and Relationships: Soundings in Social Constructionism. Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
11. Lektorsky V.A. Realism as the Methodological Strategy in the Cognitive Science. In Agazzi E. (ed.), Varieties of Scientific Realism. Objectivity and Truth in Science. Cham.: Springer, 2017.
12. Malafouris L. Metaplasticity and the human becoming: Principles of neuroarcheology. Journal of Anthropological sciences, 2010. Vol. 88, pp. 49—72.
13. Sarbin T. Ed. Narrative Psychology. New York: Praeger, 1986.