Three Concepts Reflecting the Reality of Child Development: Ability to learn, Zone of Proximal Development and Scaffolding

4664

Abstract

The article provides the analysis of the three concepts used in cultural-historical psychology and cultural-historical activity theory: zone of proximal development, ability to learn and scaffolding that describe the reality of a child's development in interaction with an adult. The connections between the three concepts and boundaries of their implementation for solving teaching tasks are described. Scaffolding means an adult's activities that are aimed at a child and arrange his/her zone of proximal development. Ability to learn is a child's capacity to acquire new knowledge advancing through the zone of proximal development with an adult's support and organized scaffolding. Thus ability to learn is the most important characteristic of a child's zone of actual development. The article analyses methods for assessing ability to learn developed by A. Ya. Ivanova, T. V. Rozanova, N. I. Gutkina, A. S. and N. L. Kaufman; discusses their prognostic potential and limitations. The discussed diagnostic methods allow to perform high-quality analysis of individual trajectories of chuldren's development as well as their learning difficulties.

General Information

Keywords: cultural-historical psychology, child psychological development, ability to learn, zone of proximal development, scaffolding.

Journal rubric: Developmental Psychology

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Kotliar I.A., Safronova M.A. Three Concepts Reflecting the Reality of Child Development: Ability to learn, Zone of Proximal Development and Scaffolding. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2011. Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 74–83. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Anan'ev B. G. O problemah sovremennogo chelovekoz-sotrudnichestva // Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya. naniya. M., 1977. 2008. № 4.
  2. Bozhovich E. D. Zona blizhaishego razvitiya: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya ee diagnostiki v usloviyah kosvennogo sotrudnichestva // Kul'turno-istoricheskaja psihologija. 2008. № 4.
  3. Bruner Dzh. Psihologiya poznaniya. M., 1977.
  4. Vygotskii L. S. Psihologiya podrostka. Sobr. soch.T. 4. M., 1984.
  5. Gurevich K. M. Psihologicheskaya diagnostika. Uchebnoe posobie. M., 1997.
  6. Gutkina N. I. Diagnosticheskaya programma po oprede­leniyu psihologicheskoi gotovnosti detei 6—7 let k shkol'nomu obucheniyu. M., 2002.
  7. Davydov V. V. Teoriya razvivayushego obucheniya. M., 1996.
  8. Druzhinin V. N. Psihologiya obshih sposobnostei. SPb., 1999.
  9. Zareckii V. K. Zona blizhaishego razvitiya: o chem ne uspel napisat' Vygotskii? // Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psi­hologiya. 2007. № 3.
  10. Zimnyaya I. A. Pedagogicheskaya psihologiya. M., 2002.
  11. Kalmykova Z. I. K probleme diagnostiki umstvennogo razvitiya shkol'nikov // Voprosy psihologii. 1982. № 2.
  12. Kalmykova Z. I. Produktivnoe myshlenie kak osnova obuchaemosti. M., 1981.
  13. Kravcova E. E. Kul'turno-istoricheskie osnovy zony blizhaishego razvitiya // Psihologicheskii zhurnal. 2001. T. 22. №4.
  14. Ivanova A. Ya. Obuchaemost' kak princip ocenki umstvennogo razvitiya detei. M., 1976.
  15. Menchinskaya N. A. Obuchenie i umstvennoe razvi­tie // Tezisy mezhdunarodnogo psihologicheskogo kongressa. 1966. Vyp. 3: Problemy psihicheskogo razvitiya v social'noi psihologii.
  16. Obuhova L. F., Korepanova I. A. Zona blizhaishego razvitiya: prostranstvenno-vremennaya model' // Voprosy psihologii. 2005. № 6.
  17. Psihologiya razvitiya. Slovar' / Pod. red. A. L. Ven­gera // Psihologicheskii leksikon. Enciklopedicheskii slovar': V 6 t. / Red.-sost. L. A. Karpenko. Pod obsh. red. A. V. Petrovskogo. M., 2006.
  18. Raven Dzh. K., Raven Dzh., Kurt Dzh. H. Rukovodstvo k progressivnym matricam Ravena i slovarnym shkalam. Razd. 1. Obshaya chast' rukovodstva. M., 1997.
  19. Rozanova T. V. Razvitie pamyati i myshleniya gluhih detei. M., 1978.
  20. Torndaik E. L. Principy obucheniya, osnovannye na psi­hologii. M., 1930.
  21. Cukerman G. A. Vzaimodeistvie rebenka i vzroslogo, tvoryashee zonu blizhaishego razvitiya // Kul'turno-istori­cheskaya psihologiya. 2006. № 4.
  22. Daniels H. Vygotsky and Pedagogy. London; N. Y., 2002. P. 198.
  23. Hakkarainen P., Korepanova I. The status of the Vygotsky's «Zone of proximal development» in Russian psy­chology today // Journal of Russian and east European psy­chology. Vol. 47. № 6. 2009.
  24. Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition. Alan S. Kaufman and Nadeen L. Kaufman / AGS Publishing. 2004.
  25. Verenikina I. Understanding Scaffolding and the ZPD in Educational Research / Conference papers, International Education Research Conference. Auckland, New Zealand, 2003 / Australian Association for Research in Education [site] http://www.aare.edu.au/03pap/ver03682.pdf
  26. Wood D., Bruner J., Ross G. The role of tutoring in prob­lem solving // Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1976. Vol. 17. P. 89—100.

Information About the Authors

Inna A. Kotliar, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Research Associate, Dubna State University, Center of Applied Psychological and Pedagogical Studies, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Dubna, Russia, e-mail: iakorepanova@gmail.com

Maria A. Safronova, PhD in Psychology, Dean of the Faculty of Psychology of Education, Research fellow of the laboratory of Theoretical and experimental issues in cultural-historical psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3597-6375, e-mail: mariasaf@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 7008
Previous month: 16
Current month: 0

Downloads

Total: 4664
Previous month: 1
Current month: 0