On the Concept of Zero Meaning of Text



In the semiotic tradition text is considered a sign with its own content. This content is shaped by three meanings within three spaces of sign: semantic, syntactic and pragmatic. It is crucial that text is heterogeneous from the point of view of meaning organization. Three spaces or three spheres of experience integrated within text - existential, rational and communicative - focus upon themselves the narrative, typological and paralogical meanings of text. These meanings constitute the true 'pattern' of text. The world of text is the one created, arranged and thought over in great details. The first layer is the level of the plot of existence. And since text is, by definition, an intertextual determinacy, in communication this level of meaning acts as the initial, or zero, meaning in the process of understanding text. However, understanding content only begins at this point, con¬tinuing through the typological level and, further on, through interpretational practices, finally reaching the paralogical subtleties of understanding. Text is a reality oriented at being understood. And it is the very struc¬ture of meaning of text that shapes the technologies of understanding. One can and must be taught to understand. The paper addresses the concept of zero meaning as the initial, existential layer of meanings that form the subjectness of text.

General Information

Keywords: meaning, content, existential layer of text, schemes of narrative, spaces of text, understanding

Journal rubric: Discussions and Discourses

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2015110211

For citation: Nikitina E.S. On the Concept of Zero Meaning of Text. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2015. Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 108–117. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2015110211. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)


  1. Bart R. Smert' avtora [Death of the author]. In Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika [Selected works: Semio­tika.Poetika]. Kosikov G.K (ed.). Moscow: Publ. Progress, 1989. 616 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Bocharov S.G. ( ed.). Mos­cow: Publ. Iskusstvo, 1979. 424 p.
  3. Bruner Dzh. Zhizn' kak narrative [Life as a narrative]. Postneklassicheskaya psikhologiya. Nauchno­prakticheskii zhur­nal. Sotsial'nyi konstruktivizm i narrativnyi podkhod. [Postnonclassical psychology. Scientific journal. Social construc­tionism and narrative approach], 2005, no. 1(2), pp. 9—30.
  4. Vekker L.M. Psikhicheskie protsessy. Tom 2. Myshlenie i intellekt [Vecker L.M. Mental processes. Thinking and Intelligence]. Leningrad. Publ. Leningradskogo Universiteta, 1976. 343 p.
  5. Vygotskii L.S. Istoriya razvitiya vysshikh psikhicheskikh funktsii [History of development of higher mental functions]. In Vygotskii L.S. Sobranie sochinenii: v 6­ti t. T. 3. Problemy razvitiya psikhiki [Works in 6 volumes. Vol. 3. Problems of men­tal development]. Moscow: Publ. Pedagogika, 1983. 368 p.
  6. Gal'perin P.Ya. K probleme vnimaniya [On the problem of attention]. Khrestomatiya po vnimaniyu [Anthology of atten­tion]. Moscow: MGU, 1976, pp. 220—228.
  7. Gudmen N. Sposoby sozdaniya mirov [How to create worlds]. Lebedev M. V. (ed.). Moscow: Publ. Ideya-Press, Logos, Praksis, 2001. 376 p.(In Russ.)
  8. Lotman Yu.M. Tekst kak semioticheskaya problema [Text as a semiotic problem]. In Lotman Yu.M. Istoriya i tipologiya russkoi kul'tury [History and typology of Russian cul­ture]. Sankt-Peterburg: Publ. "Iskusstvo-SPB", 2002. 768 p.
  9. Nikitina E.S. Variant istorii razvitiya narrativa v litsakh i bez syuzheta [Option history of narrative in the people and without a plot]. Zhurnal prakticheskogo psikhologa. Spetsial'nyi vypusk: tekst kak sub"ekt ponimaniya [Journal of Practical Psychology. Special issue. Text as a Subject of understanding], 2013, no. 3, pp. 78—93.
  10. Novikov A.I. Tekst i ego smyslovye dominanty [Text and its semantic dominant]. Moscow: Institut yazykoznaniya RAN, 2007, 224 p.
  11. Origen O nachalakh [On the basis] [Elektronnyi resurs].Petrov N. (ed.)a. Kazan', 1899 [otd. ottisk iz PS za 1899 g.]. Pereizd.: Riga, 1936; Samara, 1993; Novosibirsk, 1993. //http://azbyka.ru. 05.04.2005. URL: http://azbyka. ru/otechnik/Origen/o_nachalah/ (Accessed 17.01.2015). (In Russ.)
  12. Riker P. Vremya i rasskaz [Time and story]. Slav­ko T.V. (ed.). Moscow; Sankt-Peterburg: TsGNII INION RAN: Kul'turnaya initsiativa: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000. 313 p. (In Russ.)
  13. Sartr Zhan-Pol'. Toshnota [Nausea]. Yakhina Yu. (ed.). Moscow: "AST, Folio". 2001. 320 p. (In Russ.)
  14. Sent-Ekzyuperi A.de. Smysl zhizni [Sense of life].Antuan de Sent-Ekzyuperi. Moscow: Publ. Eksmo, 2013. 224 p.
  15. Uait M. "Otsutstvuyushchee, no podrazumevaemoe" [Absent but implicit] [Elektronnyi resurs]: Material, pred­stavlennyi na konferentsii po narrativnoi terapii i rabote s soob­shchestvami v Adelaide v fevrale 1999 goda. Kutuzova D. (ed.). http://narrlibrus.wordpress.com/10.10.2009.URL: http://narrlibrus.wordpress.com/author/narrlibrus (Accessed 21.02.2013). (In Russ.).
  16. Bruner J.S. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986. 222 p.
  17. Trzebinski J. Narracyjne konstruovanie rzeczywistosci. Narracja jako sposob rosumienia swiata. Trzebinski J. (ed.). Gdansk: Gdanskie Wydawnictwo Psycologiczne, 2002, pp. 17—43.
  18. White, M. Narratives of therapists' lives. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications,1997, pp. 3—24.

Information About the Authors

Elena S. Nikitina, PhD in Philology, Leading Researcher at the Department of Psycholinguistics, Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: m1253076@yandex.ru



Total: 2732
Previous month: 12
Current month: 3


Total: 1246
Previous month: 1
Current month: 0