Analysis of Gnostic Actions Using Eye Tracking as a Method of Studying Insight in Problem Solving

TThe paper focuses on the issue of research methods in studying insight. Since the process of insight is quite difficult to verbalize, researchers are presented with the methodological challenge of its objectifica- tion. One of the possible methods is the analysis of gnostic actions as components of a single integrated system of perceptive and thinking activity aimed at problem solving. The paper analyzes past and present periods in the explorations of insight with this method and suggests that eye tracking in problem solving is the most perspective technology. It reviews the studies of G. Knoblich, J. Ellis, E, Grant and M. Spivey, L. Thomas and A. Lleras, D. Kahneman, J.T. Wang and others. The paper compares various characteristics of eye movements and their content and discusses perspectives for the study on insight using the method of eye movement tracking, that is, testing the theoretical assumptions concerning the mechanisms of insight in problem solving and revealing the processes underlying insight.

1. Barabanshchikov V.A., Zhegallo A.V. Metody regis- tratsii dvizhenii glaz v psikhologii: osnovy uchebno-metod- icheskogo kompleksa [Methods of recording eye movements in psychology: basics educational complex]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental psychology]. 2014. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 132—137. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
2. Venger A.L., Zinchenko V.P., Ruzskaya A.G.Ontogenez pertseptivnykh deistvii (po materialam issledovaniya razvitiya u rebenka vospriyatiya formy) [The ontogeny of perceptual processes (based on studies of the child’s perception of shape)]. In Zaporozhets A. V (ed.) Vospriyatie i deistvie [Perception and action]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1967, pp. 115—161.
3. Vygotskii L.S. Sobranie sochinenii: v 6 tomakh. Tom 3:Problemy razvitiia psikhiki. [Collected Works: in 6 volumes. Volume 3: Problems of Mental Development]. Moscow: Peda- gogika, 1983. 368 p.
4. Dunker K. Psikhologiya produktivnogo (tvorchesk- ogo) myshleniya [Psychology of productive (creative) think- ing].Psikhologiya myshleniya. [Psychology of thinking].Mos- cow: Progress, 1965, pp. 86—234. (In Russ.)
5. Zaporozhets, A. V. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie Trudy V 2-kh t. T.1 Psikhicheskoe razvitie rebenka [Selected psychological works in 2 vol. Vol.2. The childs mental development]: Moscow, 1986. 320 p.
6. Zinchenko V.P. Rol’ motornykh komponentov v protsessakh vospriyatiya. [The role of the motor components in the processes of perception]. In Zaporozhets A.V. (ed.) Vospriyatie i deistvie [Perception and action]. Moscow: Pros- veshchenie, 1967, pp. 70—114.
7. Zinchenko V.P. Teoreticheskie problemy psikhologii vospriyatiya i zadachi geneticheskogo issledovaniya [Theoretical problems of the psychology of perception and objectives of genetic research]. In Zaporozhets A.V. (ed.) Vospriyatie i deistvie [Percep- tion and action]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1967, pp. 7—38.
8. Kaneman D. Vnimanie i usilie [Attention and effort]. Moscow: Smysl, 2006. 288 p. (In Russ.)
9. Pichugina M.O., Spiridonov V.F. Reprezentatsiya igrovykh situatsii u shakhmatistov vysokoi kvalifikatsii. [Representation of game situations from chess players of high qualification]. Chetver- taya mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya po kognitivnoi nauke: Tezisy dokladov V 2 t. (Tomsk, 22—26 iyunya 2010 g.). T. 2. [Fourth Inter- national Conference on Cognitive Science: Abstracts. Vol. 2]. Tomsk: Publ. Tomsk state university, 2010, pp. 477—478.
10. Pushkin V.N. Evristika — nauka o tvorcheskom myshlenii [Heuristics — the science of creative thinking]. Mos- cow: Politizdat, 1967. 272p.
11. Tikhomirov O.K. Psikhologiya myshleniya. [Psychol- ogy of thinking]. Moscow: Publishing of the Moscow Univer- sity, 1984. 270 p.
12. Tikhomirov O.K., Vinogradov Yu.E. Emotsii v funktsii evristik [Emotions are a function of heuristics]. In Leont’ev A.N. (ed.) Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. Vyp. 1 [Psychological research.]. Moscow: Publishing of the Moscow University, 1969, pp. 3—24.
13. Tikhomirov O.K., Telegina E.D. Analiz otnosheniya sredstv k tseli kak evristika [Analysis of the relations of means toward goal as heuristics]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of psychology]. 1969, no. 1, pp. 75—90.
14. Tikhomirov O.K., Terekhov V.A. Issledovanie mot- ornykh komponentov umstvennoi deyatel’nosti. Soobshche- nie I. Vozmozhnost’ ispol’zovaniya tsiklograficheskoi meto- diki dlya analiza mekhanizmov myshleniya [Research of motor components of mental activity. Part I. The ability to use cy- clographic techniques for the analysis of mechanisms of think- ing]. Novoe v pedagogicheskikh naukakh [New in Pedagogical Sciences], 1964, no. 3, pp. 133—137.
15. Tikhomirov O.K., Terekhov V.A. Issledovanie mot- ornykh komponentov umstvennoi deyatel’nosti. Soobshchenie Issledovanie osyazatel’nogo poiska kak put’ k analizu evris- tik [Research of motor components of mental activity. Part II. Research of tactile search as a way to analyze the heuristics]. Novye issledovaniya v pedagogicheskikh naukakh. Vyp. VIII. [New in Pedagogical Sciences], 1966, pp. 133—138.
16. Tomasello M. Istoki chelovecheskogo obshcheniya [Sources of human communication]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyan- skih kultur, 2011. 328 p. (In Russ.)
17. Urvantsev L.P. Formirovanie suzhdenii v usloviyakh neopredelennoi vizual’noi stimulyatsii. Avtopef. diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Formation of the judgment in an uncertain vi- sual stimulation. Ph. D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Moscow, 1974. 23 p.
18. Ballard D. H., Hayhoe M. M., Pook P. K.. Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Scienc- es, 1997. Vol. 20 (04), pp. 723—767.
19. Ellis J.J. Using Eye Movements to Investigate Insight Problem Solving. PhD thesis. University of Toronto, 2012. 111 p.
20. Goldwater B.C. Psychological significance of pupillary movements. Psychological bulletin, 1972. Vol. 77 (5), pp. 340—355.
21. Grant E. R., Spivey M. J. Eye movements and prob- lem solving: Guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science, 2003. Vol. 14 (5), pp. 462—466. doi: 10.1111/1467- 9280.02454
22. Jones G. Testing two cognitive theories of insight. Jour- nal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, 2003. Vol. 29 (5), pp. 1017—1027. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.1017
23. Knoblich G., Ohlsson S., Raney G.E. An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 2001. Vol. 29 (7), pp. 1000—1009. doi: 10.3758/BF03195762
24. Litchfield D., Ball L. J. Using another’s gaze as an ex- plicit aid to insight problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2011. Vol. 64 (4), pp. 649—656. doi: 10.1037/a0020082
25. MacGregor J.N., Ormerod T.C., Chronicle E.P. In- formation processing and insight: A process model of perfor- mance on the nine-dot and related problems. Journal of Ex- perimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2001. Vol. 27 (1), pp. 176—201. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.176
26. Metcalfe J., Wiebe D. Intuition in insight and nonin- sight problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 1987. Vol. 5 (3), pp. 238—246. doi: 10.3758/BF03197722
27. Newell A., Simon H.A. Human problem solving. Engle- wood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 1972. 920 p.
28. Reingold E.M., Sheridan H. Eye movements and vi- sual expertise in chess and medicine. Oxford Handbook on Eye Movements. Oxford, GB, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 523—550.
29. Thomas L. E., Lleras A. Covert shifts of attention func- tion as an implicit aid to insight. Cognition, 2009. Vol. 111 (2), pp. 168—174. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.005
30. Wong T.J. Capturing «Aha!» moments of puzzle prob- lems using pupillary responses and blinks. PhD thesis. Univer- sity of Pittsburgh, 2009. 87 p.