The Psychology of Art in Vygotsky’s School of Thought: Issues in Theory and Communicative Practices of Working with Consciousness

The article analyzes modern theatre practices through the concepts developed by Vygotsky’s school of thought. One of the fundamental features of these practices is working with consciousness, which enables an individual to master his/her own behaviour. The central point of these artful theatre practices is the experience of catharsis that becomes real as two affects meet. Theatre practices are compared with educational practices and collective problem-solving practices, in which the same phenomenon of meeting of affects takes place. The article argues that the orientation system of action is neither symmetrical nor parallel to the affective-motivational system of action. Reorganisation and transformation of emotional experience into affect and action implies the following: the ability to represent emotional experiences as idealized objective states of mind and to be susceptible to their language; the ability to observe emotional experiences from the outside using reflection; the ability to re-establish oneself as the actor by recollecting one’s self in the act of doing.

1. Vygotskii L.S. Psikhologiya iskusstva [Psychology of art]. Moscow: Publ. «Iskusstvo», 1968. 576 p.
2. Vygotskii L.S. K voprosu o psikhologii tvorchestva aktera [To the question of psychology of art]. In Vygotskii L.S. Sobr. soch. V 6 t. Nauchnoe nasledstvo. Vol. 6 [Collection of works in 6 Vol. Scientific inheritance. Vol. 6]. Zaporozhets A.V. (eds.). Moscow: Pedagogika, 1984, pp. 319—328.
3. Genisaretskii O.I. Skhematizmy soznaniya [Schematism of consciousness]. In Genisaretskii O.I. Navigator: metodologicheskie rasshireniya i prodolzheniya [Navigator: methodological expansion and continuation]. Moscow: Put’, 2002, pp. 93—96.
4. Gromyko Yu.V. Rol’ vzaimoponimaniya pri reshenii zadach v sovmestnoi deyatel’nosti. Avtopef. diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [The role of mutual understanding in solving problems in joint activities. Ph.D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Moscow, 1985. 27 p.
5. Gromyko Yu.V. Organizatsionno-deyatel’’nostnye igry i razvitie obrazovaniya (Tekhnologiya proryva v budushchee) [Organizational-activity games and development of education (Technology breakthrough into the future)]. Moscow, 1992. 191 p.
6. Gromyko Yu.V. Vygotskianstvo za ramkami kontseptsii L.S. Vygotskogo [Vygotskyism beyond the concept of L.S. Vygotsky]. Moscow: Paideya, 1996. 238 p.
7. Rubtsov V.V. Osnovy sotsial’no-geneticheskoi psikhologii [Fundamentals of Socio-Genetic Psychology]. Voronezh, 1996. 384 p.
8. Rubtsova O.V., Daniels H. The Concept of Drama in Vygotsky’s Theory: Application in Research. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 2016. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 189—207. doi:10.17759/chp.2016120310. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
9. Spinoza B. Sochineniya. V 2 t. T. 1. [Compositions in 2 volumes. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1999. 491 p. (In Russ.)
10. Shchedrovitskii G.P., Kotel’nikov S.I. Organizatsionno-deyatel’nostnaya igra kak novaya forma organizatsii i metod razvitiya kollektivnoi mysledeyatel’nosti [Organizationally-activity game as a new form of organization and method of development of collective thought activity.]. In Lapin N.I. (ed.), Novovvedeniya v organizatsiyakh: Trudy seminara [Innovations in Organizations]. Moscow: VNIISI, 1983, pp. 33—54.
11. DeBrabander F. Spinoza and the Stoics: Power, Politics and the Passions. London, New York: Continuum, 2007. 149 p.
12. Antonio Damasio Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Harcourt, 2003. 355 р.
13. Gilles Deleuze «Spinoza et le probleme de l’expression». Paris, 1968. 336 p.
14. Kramer R. Otto Rank on Emotional Intelligence, Unlearning and Self-Leadership. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 2012. Vol. 72, pp. 326—351.
15. OttoRank Art and Artist: Creative Urge and Personality Development. Norton, 1989. 431 р.