The “Trajectory” graphical method: a tool for assessing life path dynamics

 
Audio is AI-generated
1

Abstract

Context and relevance. The issue of personality changes has become a significant trend in personality research over the past decade. Traditional approaches to assessing the effectiveness of psychotherapeutic work are based on comparing measurement results before and after intervention. Objective. To test the visual “Trajectory” method for assessing the perceived trajectory of individual development and to verify its convergent validity. Methods and materials. The study involved 231 participants of the summer school of the magazine Russky Reporter (M = 20,2, SD = 2,96, 85,9% women). The following methods were used: “Trajectory” method, “Big Five” (BFQ-2), Satisfaction with Life Scale, Brief Differential Perfectionism Inventory, Differential Test of Reflexivity, Differential Loneliness Experience Questionnaire, Purpose-in-Life Test. Results. Significant differences were found between groups of respondents who chose different types of trajectories on the indicators of extraversion, emotional stability, life satisfaction, meaningfulness of life, normal perfectionism, and general experience of loneliness. Conclusions. The “Trajectory” method demonstrates convergent validity and can be used to assess the subjective picture of life path in addition to traditional questionnaires.

General Information

Keywords: personality changes, visual methods, developmental trajectory, individual trajectory, psychodiagnostics, subjective perception

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2026220209

Funding. The study was implemented in the framework of the Basic Research Program at HSE University (HSE-BR-2025-001).

Acknowledgements. The authors thank V. Yu. Kostenko for his help with the statistical analysis of the study data.

Received 10.12.2025

Revised 16.04.2026

Accepted

Published

For citation: Shilmanskaya, A.E., Leontiev, D.A. (2026). The “Trajectory” graphical method: a tool for assessing life path dynamics. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 22(2), 86–97. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2026220209

© Shilmanskaya A.E., Leontiev D.A., 2026

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Артемьева, Е.Ю. (1999). Основы психологии субъективной семантики. М.: Смысл; Наука.
    Artemyeva, E.Yu. (1999). Foundations of the psychology of subjective semantics. Moscow: Smysl; Nauka. (In Russ.).
  2. Бахтин, М.М. (1986). Эстетика словесного творчества (2-е изд.). М.: Искусство.
    Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). Aesthetics of verbal creativity (2nd ed.). Moscow: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.).
  3. Базаров, Т.Ю., Сычева, М.П. (2012). Создание и апробация опросника «Стили реагирования на изменения». Психологические исследования, 5(25), Article 12.
    Bazarov, T.Y., Sycheva, M.P. (2012). Development and testing of the "Response to Change Styles" questionnaire. Psychological studies, 5(25), Article (In Russ.).
  4. Битюцкая, Е.В., Базаров, Т.Ю., Корнеев, А.А. (2021). Опросник «Типы реагирования на ситуацию изменений»: структура шкал и психометрические показатели. Психология. Журнал ВШЭ, 18(2), 297— https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-2-297-316
    Bityutskaya, E.V., Bazarov, T.Yu., Korneev, A.A. (2021). The "Types of Response to a Situation of Change" questionnaire: Scale structure and psychometric properties. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 18(2), 297—316. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-2-297-316
  5. Борхес, Х.Л. (1994). Сочинения: В 3 т.: Том 1. Сад расходящихся тропок. Рига: Полярис. (Оригинальная работа опубликована в 1941 г.).
    Borges, J.L. (1994). Works: in 3 vols. Vol. 1: The garden of forking paths. Riga: Polaris. (Original work published 1941).
  6. Коржова, Е.Ю. (2006). Психология жизненных ориентаций человека. СПб.: Изд-во РХГА.
    Korjova, E.Yu. (2006). Psychology of human life orientation Saint Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy Press. (In Russ.).
  7. Леонтьев, Д.А. (1992). Тест смысложизненных ориентаций (СЖО). М.: Смысл.
    Leontiev, D.A. (1992). Noetic orientations test. Moscow: Smysl. (In Russ.).
  8. Леонтьев, Д.А., Миюзова, А.Е. (2015). Разработка графической методики диагностики индивидуальной траектории развития. В: Н.А. Батурин (Ред.), Современная психодиагностика России. Преодоление кризиса: сборник материалов III Всероссийской конференции по психологической диагностике: Том 1 (с. 186—192). Челябинск: Издательский центр ЮУрГУ.
    Leontiev, D.A., Miyuzova, A.E. (2015) Elaboration of a graphic method of the assessment of an individual developmental trajectory. In: N.A. Baturin (Ed.), Modern Psychodiagnostics in Russia. Overcoming the Crisis: Proceedings of the III All-Russian Conference on Psychological Diagnostics: 1 (pp. 186—192). Chelyabinsk: Publishing Center of South Ural State University. (In Russ.).
  9. Леонтьев, Д.А., Осин, Е.Н. (2013). Дифференциальный опросник переживания одиночества: структура и свойства. Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, 10(1), 55—
    Leontiev, D.A., Osin, E.N. (2013). The Differential Loneliness Experience Questionnaire: Structure and properties. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 10(1), 55—81. (In Russ.).
  10. Леонтьев, Д.А., Осин, Е.Н. (2014). Рефлексия «хорошая» и «дурная»: от объяснительной модели к методике диагностики. Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, 11(4), 110—
    Leontiev, D.A., Osin, E.N. (2014). Good and bad reflection: From an explanatory model to a diagnostic technique. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 11(4), 110—135. (In Russ.).
  11. Манукян, В.Р., Муртазина, И.Р. (2019). Самоизменение: психологический статус и возможности измерения. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология, 9(4), 331— https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2019.401
    Manukyan, V.R., Murtazina, I.R. (2019). Self-change: Psychological status and measurement possibilities. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 9(4), 331—345. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2019.401
  12. Манукян, В.Р., Муртазина, И.Р., Гришина, Н.В. (2020). Опросник для диагностики потенциала самоизменений личности. Консультативная психология и психотерапия, 28(4), 35— https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280403
    Manukyan, V.R., Murtazina, I.R., & Grishina, N.V. (2020). Questionnaire for diagnosis of the potential for self-change. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 28(4), 35—58. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280403
  13. Осин, Е.Н., Рассказова, Е.И., Неяскина, Ю.Ю., Дорфман, Л.Я., Александрова, Л.А. (2015). Операционализация пятифакторной модели личностных черт на российской выборке. Психологическая диагностика, 3, 80—
    Osin, E.N., Rasskazova, E.I., Neiaskina, Iu.Iu., Dorfman, L.Ia., Aleksandrova, L.A. (2015). Operationalization of the five-factor model of personality traits in a Russian sample. Psychological Diagnostics, 3, 80—104. (In Russ.).
  14. Осин, Е.Н., Леонтьев, Д.А. (2020). Краткие русскоязычные шкалы диагностики субъективного благополучия: психометрические характеристики и сравнительный анализ. Мониторинг общественного мнения, 1, 117— https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.06
    Osin, E.N., Leontiev, D.A. (2020). Brief Russian-language scales for subjective well-being assessment: Psychometric characteristics and comparative analysis. Monitoring of Public Opinion, 1, 117—142. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.06
  15. Гришина, Н.В., Манукян, В.Р., Муртазина, И.Р. (Ред.). (2021). Самоизменения личности: проблемы, модели, исследования. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та.
    Grishina, N.V., Manukyan, V.R., Murtazina, I.R. (Eds.). (2021). Self-change of personality: problems, models, research. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University Press. (In Russ.).
  16. Сапронов, Д.В., Леонтьев, Д.А. (2007). Личностный динамизм и его диагностика. Психологическая диагностика, 1, 66—
    Sapronov, D.V., Leontiev, D.A. (2007). Personal dynamism and its assessment. Psychological Diagnostics, 1, 66—84. (In Russ.).
  17. Шильманская, А.Е. (2020). Возможности визуальных методов в качественных исследованиях личности. Культурно-историческая психология, 16(4), 49— https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160405
    Shilmanskaya, A.E. (2020). The potential of visual methods in qualitative personality research. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 16(4), 49—55. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160405
  18. Шильманская, А.Е., Леонтьев, Д.А. (2021). Личностные изменения: новые подходы и перспективы. Вопросы психологии, 67(4), 111—
    Shilmanskaya, A.E., Leontiev, D.A. (2021). Personality changes: New approaches and perspectives. Questions of Psychology, 67(4), 111—120. (In Russ.).
  19. Щукина, М.А. (2014). Субъектный подход к саморазвитию личности: возможности теоретического понимания и эмпирического изучения. Психология. Журнал ВШЭ, 11(2), 7—
    Shchukina, M.A. (2014). A subjective approach to personality self-development: Opportunities for theoretical understanding and empirical study. Psychology. Journal of HSE, 11(2), 7—22. (In Russ.).
  20. Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71— https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
  21. Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13— https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345
  22. Hudson, N.W. (2020). By force or by choice: The predictive power of volitional personality change goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 1153— https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000021
  23. Hudson, N.W., Fraley, R.C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490— https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000021
  24. Hudson, N.W., Fraley, R.C. (2016). Do people's desires to change their personality traits vary with age? An examination of trait change goals across adulthood. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(8), 847— https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616657598
  25. Hudson, N.W., Roberts, B.W. (2014). Goals to change personality traits: Concurrent links between personality traits, daily behavior, and goals to change oneself. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 68— https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.08.008
  26. Lutz, W., Hill, C.E. (2009). Quantitative and qualitative methods for psychotherapy research: Introduction to special section. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4-5), 369— https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300902948053
  27. Lutz, W., De Jong, K., Rubel, J.A. (2019). Measuring, predicting and tracking change in psychotherapy. In: M. Barkham, W. Lutz, L.G. Castonguay (Eds.), Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (pp. 89—133). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  28. Teachman, B.A., Silverman, A.L., Werntz, A.J. (2019). New directions in mental-health treatment and research: Integrating technological and theoretical advances. In: M. Barkham, W. Lutz, L.G. Castonguay (Eds.), Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (pp. 625—660). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Information About the Authors

Alesya E. Shilmanskaya, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Research Intern of the International Laboratory of the Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation, National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University), Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9395-3086, e-mail: amiyuzova@yahoo.com

Dmitriy A. Leontiev, Doctor of Psychology, Head of International Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation; Professor of Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Psychology, National Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE University), Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2252-9805, e-mail: dmleont@gmail.com

Contribution of the authors

Shilmanskaya A.E. — methodology development, data analysis, writing the manuscript.

Leontiev D.A. — methodology development, research concept and design, data collection, writing the manuscript.

All authors participated in the discussion of the results and approved the final text of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent for participation in this study was obtained from the participants.

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 3
Previous month: 0
Current month: 3

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 1
Previous month: 0
Current month: 1

 Total

Whole time: 4
Previous month: 0
Current month: 4