Adaptation of multyafactor questionnaire empathy M.Davis

This article describes the process and the results of the questionnaire adaptation of empathy American social psychologist M. Davis, which is widely used in foreign psychology, researchers recognized the most valid and reliable. Based on analysis of existing foreign and domestic psychology psychodiagnostic means for studying empathy concluded that the multi-factor approach to the measurement of empathy, justify M. Davis, best matches the currently prevailing ideas about its structure. Adaptation procedure is described in detail, demonstrate reliability and construct validity of the test, and presents the results of research conducted with its use.

1. Breslav G.M. Psihologija jemocij. M.: “Smysl”, 2007.
2. Bojko V.V. Jenergija jemocij v obshhenii: vzgljad na sebja i na drugih. M.: “Filin”, 1996.
3. Borisenko S.B. Metody formirovanija i diagnostiki jempatii uchitelej: Avtoref. diss. …kand.psihol.nauk. L.: LGU, 1988.
4. Burlachuk L.F. Psihodiagnostika: Uchebnik dlja vuzov. SPb.: Piter, 2006.
5. Budagovskaja N.A. Adaptacija mnogofaktornogo oprosnika jempatii M. Djevisa: analiz faktornoj struktury. Diplomnaja rabota. M.: MGPPU, 2011.
6. Vasiljuk F.E. Urovni  postroenija perezhivanija  i metody psihologicheskoj nauki // Voprosy psihologii. 1988. № 5. S. 27—37.
7. Gavrilova T.P. Ponjatie jempatii v zarubezhnoj psihologii // Voprosy psihologii. 1975. № 2. S. 147—158.
8. Gavrilova T.P. Jempatija i ee osobennosti  u detej mladshego i srednego shkol'nogo vozrasta. Diss. … kand. psihol. nauk. M., 1977.
9. Demidova L.Ju. Ponimanie jemocional'nyh sostojanij licami, sovershivshimi  seksuA al'nye dejstvija v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnih // Tezisy vserossijskoj nauchnoA prakticheskoj  konferencii  «Psihicheskoe zdorov'e  naselenija kak  osnova nacional'noj  bezopasnosti Rossii» (Pod red. N.G. Neznanova, K.K. Jahina). SPb., 2012. S. 288—289.
10. Dubrovskaja S.V. Adaptacija mnogofaktornogo oprosnika jempatii M. Djevisa: konstruktnaja validnost'. Diplomnaja rabota. M.: MGPPU, 2011.
11. Ivanova A.V. Izmenenie struktury jempaticheskih  sposobnostej v processe obuchenija psihologovAkonsul'tantov. Kursovaja rabota. M.: MGPPU, 2012.
12. Karjagina T.D. Filosofskie i nauchnye konteksty problemy jempatii // Moskovskij psihoterapevticheskij zhurnal. 2009. № 4. S. 50—74.
13. Korotkova N.E. Adaptacija mnogofaktornogo oprosnika jempatii M. Djevisa: osnovnye psihometricheskie pokazateli. Diplomnaja rabota. M.: MGPPU, 2011.
14. Ljusin D.V. Oprosnik na jemocional'nyj intellekt JemIn: novye psihometricheskie danA nye // Social'nyj i jemocional'nyj intellekt / pod. red. D.V. Ljusina, D.V. Ushakova. M.: IP RAN, 2009. S. 264—278.
15. Makejkina A.A. Intellektual'nye i lichnostnye predposylki vybora v situacii kommunikativnoj neopredelennosti. Diplomnaja rabota. М.: MGPPU, 2011.
16. Nasledov  A.D. Matematicheskie metody psihologicheskogo  issledovanija.  Analiz i interpretacija dannyh. Spb.: Rech', 2012.
17. Pankova M.V. Osobennosti jempatii bol'nyh nevrozami. Diss. … kand. psihol. nauk. SPb.., 2003. Sardzhveladze N.I. O balanse proekcii i introekcii v processe jempaticheskogo vzaimodeA jstvija // Bessoznatel'noe: priroda, funkcii, metody issledovanija: V 4 t. (Pod obshh. red. A.S. Prangishvili, A.E. Sherozija, F.V. Bassina) T. 3. Tbilisi, 1978. S. 485—490.
18. Sopikov A.P. Jeksperimental'naja metodika dlja issledovanija jempatii k oshhushheniA jam partnera po obshheniju // Voprosy psihologii poznanija ljud'mi drug druga i obshhenija. Krasnodar, 1978. S. 52—63.
19. Hazova M.V. Vzaimosvjaz'  jempatii  i  gumanisticheskih  cennostej  u predstavitelej pomogajushhih professij. Diplomnaja rabota. M.: MGPPU, 2012.
20. Shishljannikova L.M. Matematicheskoe soprovozhdenie nauchnoj raboty s pomoshh'ju statisticheskogo paketa SPSS for Windows 11.5.0. UchebnoAmetodicheskoe posoA bie M., 2005.
21. Jusupov I.M. Psihologija jempatii. Diss. … dAra psihol. nauk. SPb., 1997.
22. Davis M. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy.// JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1980, 10, 85.
23. Davis M.H., Conklin L., Smith A., & Luce C. (1996). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive  representation of  persons:  a  merging of  self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 4, 713—726.
24. Davis M.H. Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder: Westview Press, 1996.
25. Davis M. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983, 44, р. 113—126.
26. Davis M.H. The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping: a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality, 1983, vol. 52 (2), pp. 167—184. Duan Ch., Hall C. The current state of empathy research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol.43(3), Jul. 1996, pp. 261—274.
27. Hall J., Davis M., Connelly M. Dispositional empathy in scientists and practitioner psyA chologists: group differences and relationship to  selfAreported  effectiveness. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training,  Vol 37 (1), Sep 2000. pp. 45—56. Feshbach  N.D.  Empathy: the formative  years. Implications  for  clinical  practice. Empathy Reconsidered. New Directions in Psychotherapy, p. 33—59. Edited by A.C. Bozarth and L.S. Greenberg. АPA, 1997.
28. Stueber K.  2008. Measuring Empathy. Stanford Encyclopedia of  Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/empathy/measuring.html.