Diagnosing the Quality of Life in Psychotherapy: Validation of the Russian Version of the M. Frisch’s Quality of Life Inventory



Quality of life therapy proposed by M. Frisch offers to make the source of psychotherapy and ground its key goals in the life spheres that are important for the per son, but (s)he feels dissatisfied with and unfulfilled in. The aim of this study is the validation of the Russian version of M. Frisch’s Quality of Life Inventory. The study included two samples — students of the psychology faculty (N = 91) and adults living in the Kamchatka region (N = 826). The Inventory’s consistency comprised 0.72 for students and 0.95 for adults, and the overall score was associated with life satisfaction, subjective happiness, increased positive and low negative emotions, hardiness commitment, meaning in life, future orientation, satisfaction of basic needs, including those in studies, as well as intrinsic, identified and positive introjected educational motivation. In the different samples (students and adults) the different spheres of life were prominent for overall satisfaction. After controlling for mean satisfaction, quality of life index (corrected for subjective importance of the spheres) contributed to a better prediction of satisfaction with emotions and communication, future orientation, low fatalistic present, commitment, and (in students) intrinsic educational motivation.

General Information

Keywords: M. Frisch’s quality of life therapy, quality of life, satisfaction with life, M. Frisch’s Quality of Life Inventory, validation

Journal rubric: Empirical Researches

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2019270102

Acknowledgements. Study is supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project 18-18-00480 “Subjective indicators and psychological predictors of quality of life”.

For citation: Rasskazova E.I., Neyaskina Y.Y., Leontiev D.A., Shiryaeva O.S. Diagnosing the Quality of Life in Psychotherapy: Validation of the Russian Version of the M. Frisch’s Quality of Life Inventory. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2019. Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 8–29. DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2019270102. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)


  1. Gordeeva T.O., Sychev O.A., Osin E.N. Vnutrennyaya i vneshnyaya uchebnaya motivatsiya studentov: ikh istochniki i vliyanie na psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie [Internal and External Motivation of Students: Sources and Effects on Psychological Wellbeing]. Voprosy Psikhologii, 2013, no. 1, pp. 1—11.
  2. Leont’ev D.A. Test smyslozhiznennykh orientatsii [Noetic Orientations Test]. Moscow: Smysl, 2000. 18 p.
  3. Leont’ev D.A., Rasskazova E.I. Test zhiznestoikosti [Hardiness test]. Moscow: Smysl, 2006. 63 p.
  4. Mitina O.V., Syrtsova A. Oprosnik po vremennoi perspektive F. Zimbardo (ZTPI): rezul’taty psikhometricheskogo analiza russkoyazychnoi versii [The Zimbardo time perspective inventory: the results of psychometric analysis of the Russian version] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya [Moscow University Psychology Bulletin. Series 14. Psychology], 2008, no. 4, pp. 67—89.
  5. Osin E.N. Izmerenie pozitivnykh i negativnykh emotsii: razrabotka russkoyazychnogo analoga metodiki PANAS [Measuring Positive and Negative Affect: Development of a Russian-language Analogue of PANAS]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics], 2012. Vol. 9 (4), pp. 91—110.
  6. Osin E.N., Leont’ev D.A. Aprobatsiya russkoyazychnykh versii dvukh shkal ekspress-otsenki sub”ektivnogo blagopoluchiya [Elektronnyi resurs] [Testing of Russian versions of the two scales of a rapid assessment of subjective well-being]. Materialy III Vserossiiskogo sotsiologicheskogo kongressa [Proceedings of the 3-rd National Russian Sociological Congress]. Moscow: Institut sotsiologii RАN, Rossijskoe obshhestvo sotsiologov, 2008. Available at: http://www.isras.ru/abstract_bank/1210190841.pdf (Accessed 25.02.2019).
  7. Rasskazova E.I. Metodika otsenki kachestva zhizni i udovletvorennosti: psikhometricheskie kharakteristiki russkoyazychnoi versii [Evaluation of Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction: Psychometric Properties of a Russian-language Measure]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics], 2012. Vol. 9 (4), pp. 81—90.
  8. Rasskazova E.I. Kachestvo zhizni kak mezhdistsiplinarnaya problema: teoreticheskie podkhody i diagnostika kachestva zhizni v psikhologii, sotsiologii i meditsine [Quality of life as an interdisciplinary problem: theoretical approaches and diagnostics of the quality of life in psychology, sociology and medicine]. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Theoretical and Experimental Psychology], 2012. Vol. 5 (2), pp. 59—71.
  9. Seligman M. Novaya pozitivnaya psikhologiya [New positive psychology]. Moscow: Sofiya, 2006. 368 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 2000. Vol. 11 (4), pp. 319—338. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  11. Diener E., Emmons R.A., Larsen R.J., et al. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985. Vol. 49 (1), pp. 71—75. doi:10.1207/ s15327752jpa4901_13
  12. Diener E., Ryan K. Subjective well-being: a general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 2009. Vol. 39 (4), pp. 391—406. doi:10.1177/008124630903900402
  13. Frisch M. Quality of Life Inventory. Complementary Trial Package. Pearson. 2007.
  14. Frisch M. Quality of Life Therapy. Applying a Life Satisfaction Approach to Positive Psychology and Cognitive Therapy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2006. 368 p.
  15. Frost M.H., Bonomi A.E., Cappelleri J.C., et al. Applying quality of life data formally and systematically into clinical practice. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2007. Vol. 82 (10), pp. 1214—1228. doi:10.4065/82.10.1214
  16. Lyubomirsky S., Lepper H. A measure of subjective happiness: preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 1999. Vol. 46 (2), pp. 137—155. doi:10.1023/A:1006824100041
  17. Martin F., Camfield L., Rodham K., et al. Twelve years’ experience with the Patient Generated Index (PGI) of quality of life: a graded structured review. Quality of Life Research, 2007. Vol. 16 (4), pp. 705—715. doi:10.1007/s11136-006-9152-6
  18. McDowel J. Measuring health. A guide to rating scales and questionnairies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195165678.001.0001
  19. Ritsner M., Kurs R., Gibel A., et al. Validity of an abbreviated Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q-18) for schizophrenia, schizoaffective, and mood disorder patients. Quality of Life Research, 2005. Vol. 14 (7), pp. 1693—1703. doi:10.1007/s11136-005-2816-9
  20. Sheldon K.M., Hilpert J.C. The balanced measure of psychological needs (BMPN) scale: An alternative domain general measure of need satisfaction. Motivation and Emotion, 2012. Vol. 36 (4), pp. 439—451. doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9279-4
  21. Sheldon K.M., Osin E.N., Gordeeva T.O., et al. Evaluating the dimensionality of self-determination theory’s relative autonomy continuum. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2017. Vol. 43 (9), pp. 1215—1238. doi:10.1177/0146167217711915
  22. Seligman M. Positive health. Applied psychology: an international review, 2008. Vol. 57, pp. 3—18. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00351.x
  23. Sirgy M.J., Michalos A.C., Ferris A.L., et al. The quality of life (QOL) research movement: past, present and future. Social Indicators Research, 2006. Vol. 76 (3), pp. 343—466. doi:10.1007/s11205-005-2877-8
  24. Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of Positive and Negativе Affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988. Vol. 54, pp. 1063—1070.
  25. Wettergren L., Kettis-Lindblad A., Sprangers M., et al. The use, feasibility and psychometric properties of an individualised quality of life instrument: a systematic review of the SEIQoL-DW. Quality of Life Research, 2009. Vol. 18 (6), pp. 737—746. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9490-2
  26. Zimbardo P.G., Boyd J.N. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999. Vol. 77 (6), pp. 1271—1288. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271

Information About the Authors

Elena I. Rasskazova, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of Neuro- and Patopsychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Senior Researcher,Mental Health Research Center, Senior Researcher, International Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9648-5238, e-mail: e.i.rasskazova@gmail.com

Yulia Y. Neyaskina, PhD in Psychology, Associated Professor of the Theoretical and Practical Psychology Chair of Vitus Bering Kamchatka State University, Dean of the Faculty of Psychology and Education, Vitus Bering Kamchatka State University, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia, e-mail: neyaskinaju@yandex.ru

Dmitriy A. Leontiev, Doctor of Psychology, Leading Research Fellow, The Laboratory for Comparative Research in Quality of Life, National Research Tomsk State University, Head of International Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation; Professor of Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Psychology, HSE University, Moscow, Tomsk, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2252-9805, e-mail: dmleont@gmail.com

Olga S. Shiryaeva, PhD in Psychology, Assistant Professor of Theoretical and Applied Psychology, Chair of Vitus Bering Kamchatka State University, Vitus Bering Kamchatka State University, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia, e-mail: Ola49@yandex.ru



Total: 3515
Previous month: 29
Current month: 38


Total: 3181
Previous month: 26
Current month: 32