Psychological Factors of Problematic Internet Use in Adolescent and Young Girls

The article introduces a study of the problematic Internet use (PIU) interrelationship with psychological well-being, psychopathological symptoms, and various personality traits. The study involved 432 females aged 14 to 23 years old (M = 17.2, SD = 2) and evaluated with Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale (GPIUS3), Ten Item Personality Measure (TIPI), Perfectionism Inventory, Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale (HSNS), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), Well-Being Index (WHO-5), and Symptom Check List-90-Revised (SCL-90-R). The results indicate that PIU is associated with various psychopathological symptoms and a decrease in psychological well-being. According to multiple linear regression analysis, hypersensitive narcissism, perfectionism, and phobic anxiety are found to be significant predictors of PIU. Protective factors are Conscientiousness of the Big Five and the level of psychological well-being. The paper suggests risk and protective factors that must be considered when preventing the Problematic Internet Use in adolescent and young girls.

1. VOZ. Indeks obshchego (khoroshego) samochuvstviya/VOZ (variant 1999 g.) [Elektronnyi resurs] [WHO-5 Well-Being Index (1999 Version)]. Available at: https://www.psykiatri-regionh.dk/who-5/Documents/WHO5_Russian.pdf (Accessed 12.06.2019).
2. Voiskunskii A.E. Kontseptsii zavisimosti i prisutstviya primenitel’no k povedeniyu v Internete [Elektronnyi resurs] [Theories of addiction and presence related to behavior on the Internet]. Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii [Medical Psychology in Russia], 2015, no. 4 (33), p. 6. Available at: http://www.mprj.ru/archiv_global/2015_4_33/ nomer07.php (Accessed 12.06.2019).
3. Garanyan N.G. Aprobatsiya metodiki diagnostiki nartsissicheskikh chert lichnosti na vyborke studentov rossiiskikh vuzov [Approbation of measure for narcissism assessment on the sample of Russian university students]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2016. Vol. 24 (4), pp. 8—32. doi:10.17759/cpp.2016240402. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
4. Garanyan N.G., Kholmogorova A.B., Yudeeva T.Yu. Faktornaya struktura i psikhometricheskie pokazateli oprosnika perfektsionizma: razrabotka trekhfaktornoi versii [Factor structure and psychometric properties of perfectionism inventory: Developing 3-factor version]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2018. Vol. 26 (3), pp. 8—32. doi:10.17759/cpp.2018260302. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
5. Garanyan N.G., Shchukin D.A. Chastye sotsial’nye sravneniya kak faktor emotsional’noi dezadaptatsii studentov [Frequent social comparison and emotional maladjustment among students]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2014. Vol. 22 (4), pp. 182—206. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
6. Gerasimova A.A., Kholmogorova A.B. Obshchaya shkala problemnogo ispol’zovaniya interneta: aprobatsiya i validizatsiya v rossiiskoi vyborke tret’ei versii oprosnika [The Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 3 Modified Version: Approbation and Validation on the Russian Sample]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2018. Vol. 26 (3), pp. 56—79. doi:10.17759/cpp.2018260304. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
7. Emelin V.A., Rasskazova E.I., Tkhostov A.Sh. Psikhologicheskie posledstviya razvitiya informatsionnykh tekhnologii [The psychological affects of information technology]. Natsional’nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal [National Psychological Journal], 2012, no. 1 (7), pp. 81—87.
8. Ermolova T.V., Litvinov A.V., Florova N.B. Komp’yuternaya zavisimost’ i komp’yuternaya gramotnost’: dve storony edinogo protsessa [Elektronnyi resurs] [Computer addiction and computer literacy: two sides of the same process]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya [Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology], 2017. Vol. 6 (4), pp. 46—55. doi:10.17759/jmfp.2017060405. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
9. Kornilova T.V., Chumakova M.A. Aprobatsiya kratkogo oprosnika Bol’shoi pyaterki (TIPI, KOBT) [Elektronnyi resurs] [Development of the Russian version of the brief Big Five questionnaire (TIPI)]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological Studies], 2016. Vol. 9 (44), p. 5. Available at: http://www.psystudy.ru/index.php/ num/2016v9n46/1259-kornilova46.html (Accessed: 12.06.2019).
10. Ledovaya Ya.A., Bogolyubova O.N., Tikhonov R.V. Stress, blagopoluchie i Temnaya triada [Elektronnyi resurs] [Stress, Well-being and the Dark Triad]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological Studies], 2015. Vol. 8 (43), p. 5. Available at: http://psystudy. ru/index.php/num/2015v8n43/1185-ledovaya43.html. (Accessed: 12.06.2019).
11. Tarabrina N.V. Praktikum po psikhologii posttravmaticheskogo stressa [A practical work on the psychology of post-traumatic stress]. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2001. 272 p.
12. Kholmogorova A.B., Avakyan T.V., Klimenkova E.N., et al. Obshchenie v internete i sotsial’naya trevozhnost’ u podrostkov iz raznykh sotsial’nykh grupp [Internet communication and social anxiety among different social groups of adolescents]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2015. Vol. 23 (4), pp. 102—129. doi:10.17759/cpp.2015230407. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
13. Kholmogorova A.B., Garanyan N.G. Nartsissizm, perfektsionizm i depressiya [Narcissism, perfectionism and depression]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2004, no. 1, pp. 18—35.
14. Caplan S.E. A Social Skill Account of Problematic Internet Use. Journal of Communication, 2005. Vol. 55 (4), pp. 721—736. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005. tb03019.x
15. Caplan S.E. Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: A two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior. 2010. Vol. 26 (5). pp. 1089— 1097. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.012
16. Casale S., Fioravanti G., Rugai L. Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissists: Who Is at Higher Risk for Social Networking Addiction? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2016. Vol. 19 (8). pp. 510—515. doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0189
17. Davis R.A. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior. 2001. Vol. 17 (2). pp. 187—195. doi:10.1016/S0747- 5632(00)00041-8
18. Demetrovics Z., Király O. Commentary on Baggio et al. (2016): Internet/gaming addiction is more than heavy use over time. Addiction. 2016. Vol. 111 (3). pp. 523— 524. doi:10.1111/add.13244
19. Durak M., Senol-Durak E. Which personality traits are associated with cognitions related to problematic Internet use? Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2014. Vol. 17 (3). pp. 206—218. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12056
20. Gnambs T., Appel M. Narcissism and Social Networking Behavior: A Meta- Analysis: Narcissism and Social Networking Sites. Journal of Personality. 2018. Vol. 86 (2). pp. 200—212. doi:10.1111/jopy.12305
21. Ho R.S., Zhang M.W.B, Tsang T.Y., et al. The association between internet addiction and psychiatric co-morbidity: a meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2014. Vol. 14. pp. 183. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-14-183
22. Huang C. Internet use and psychological well-being: a meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 2010. Vol. 13 (3), pp. 241—249. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0217.
23. Kayiş A.R., Satici S.A., Yilmaz M.F., et al. Big five-personality trait and internet addiction: A meta-analytic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016. Vol. 63, pp. 35—40. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.012
24. Kraut R., Patterson M., Lundmark V., et al. Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 1998. Vol. 53 (9), pp. 1017—1031. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017
25. Laconi S., Rodgers R.F., Chabrol H. The measurement of Internet addiction: A critical review of existing scales and their psychometric properties. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014. Vol. 41, pp. 190—202. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.026
26. Przybylski A.K., Weinstein N. A large-scale test of the Goldilocks hypothesis: Quantifying the relations between digital-screen use and the mental well-being of adolescents. Psychological Science, 2017. Vol. 28 (2), pp. 204—215. doi:10.1177/0956797616678438
27. Puerta-Cortés D.X., Carbonell X. The model of the big five personality factors and problematic Internet use in Colombian youth. Addictions, 2014. Vol. 26 (1), pp. 54—61.
28. Roberts J.A., Pullig C., Manolis C. I need my Smartphone: A hierarchical model of personality and cell-phone addiction. Personality and Individual Differences, 2015. Vol. 79, pp. 13—19. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.049
29. Şenormancı Ö., Saraçlı Ö., Atasoy N., et al. Relationship of Internet addiction with cognitive style, personality, and depression in university students. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 2014. Vol. 55 (6), pp. 1385—1390. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.04.025
30. Servidio R. Exploring the effects of demographic factors, Internet usage and personality traits on Internet addiction in a sample of Italian university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014. Vol. 35, pp. 85—92. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.024
31. Smith M.M., Sherry S.B., McLarnon M.E., et al. Why does socially prescribed perfectionism place people at risk for depression? A five-month, two-wave longitudinal study of the Perfectionism Social Disconnection Model. Personality and Individual Differences, 2018. Vol. 134, pp. 49—54. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.040
32. Taymur I., Budak E., Demirci H., et al. A study of the relationship between Internet addiction, psychopathology and dysfunctional beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016. Vol. 61, pp. 532—536. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.043
33. Wu J.Y.W., Ko H.C., Lane H.Y. Personality Disorders in Female and Male College Students With Internet Addiction. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 2016. Vol. 204 (3), pp. 221—225. doi:10.1097/NMD.0000000000000452
34. Young K.S. Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1998. Vol. 1 (3), pp. 237—244. doi:10.1089/ cpb.1998.1.25