Digital Technologies in Rehabilitation of Patients with Focal Brain Injury

723

Abstract

Focal damage of the brain leads to cognitive impairments, which sufficiently limit the person’s functional capabilities, which, in turn, can lead to secondary disorders of the emotional and personal sphere and social maladjustment. The need to include cognitive rehabilitation in the system of complex treatment methods for patients with focal brain lesions is generally recognized. The article describes methods of neurorehabilitation based on high technologies and indicates their place in the general rehabilitation process. Data yielded by domestic and foreign studies on the effectiveness of digital technologies in the cognitive rehabilitation of patients with focal brain lesions is presented.

General Information

Keywords: stroke, traumatic brain injury, focal brain lesions, cognitive impairment, neurocognitive defect, cognitive rehabilitation, non-invasive brain stimulation, rehabilitation robotics, virtual reality, telerehabilitation

Journal rubric: Research Reviews

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280308

For citation: Kalantarova M.V., Zavaliy L.B., Borisonik E.V., Subotich M.I., Grechko A.V., Shchelkunova I.G., Petrikov S.S. Digital Technologies in Rehabilitation of Patients with Focal Brain Injury. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2020. Vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 122–141. DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2020280308. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Androfagina O.V., Kuznetsova T.V., Svetkina A.A. Meksidol v reabilitatsii bol’nykh v ostrom periode ishemicheskogo insul’ta [Mexidol in the rehabilitation of patients in acute ischemic stroke]. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 2015. Vol. 115 (12—2), pp. 77— 79. DOI:10.17116/jnevro201511512277-79
  2. Belova L.A., Mashin V.V., Abramova V.V., et al. Dinamika kognitivnykh narushenii u bol’nykh s polusharnym ishemicheskim insul’tom v ostrom i rannem vosstanovitel’nom periodakh na fone nizkodoznoi neiroprotektsii preparatom Korteksin [Dynamics of cognitive impairments in patients with hemispheric ischemic stroke in the acute and early recovery periods against the background of low-dose neuroprotection with Cortexin]. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 2016. Vol. 116 (8—2), pp. 40—43. DOI:10.17116/jnevro20161168240-43
  3. Grigor’eva V.N., Kovyazina M.S., Tkhostov A.Sh. Kognitivnaya reabilitatsiya bol’nykh s insul’tom i cherepno-mozgovoi travmoi [Cognitive rehabilitation of patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury]. Nizhny Novgorod: NizhGMA Publ., 2012. 322 p.
  4. Damulin I.V., Ekusheva E.V. Protsessy neiroplastichnosti posle insul’ta [Neuroplasticity processes after stroke]. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics, 2014. Vol. 6 (3), pp. 69—74.
  5. Zhavoronkova L.A., Maksakova O.A., Shevtsova T.P., et al. Reabilitatsiya patsientov s posledstviyami cherepno-mozgovoi travmy, napravlennaya na vosstanovlenie mezhpolusharnoi asimmetrii mozga [Rehabilitation of patients with the consequences of traumatic brain injury, aimed at restoring interhemispheric asymmetry of the brain]. Asimmetriya = Asymmetry, 2018, no. 4, pp. 204—210.
  6. Zavalii L.B., Petrikov S.S., Shchegolev A.V. Metabolicheskaya terapiya pri ishemicheskom insul’te [Metabolic therapy for ischemic stroke]. Zhurnal im. N.V. Sklifosovskogo “Neotlozhnaya meditsinskaya pomoshch’” = Russian Sklifosovsky Journal “Emergency Medical Care”, 2018. Vol. 7 (1), pp. 44—52. DOI:10.23934/2223- 9022-2018-7-1-44-52
  7. Kaplan A.Ya. Neirofiziologicheskie osnovaniya i prakticheskie realizatsii tekhnologii mozg-mashinnykh interfeisov v nevrologicheskoi reabilitatsii [Neurophysiological foundations and practical realizations of the brain-machine interfaces the technology in neurological rehabilitation]. Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 2016. Vol. 42 (1), pp. 118—127. DOI:10.7868/S0131164616010100
  8. Karakulova Yu.V., Selyanina N.V., Zhelnin A.V., et al. Vliyanie antioksidantnoi terapii na neirotrofiny i protsessy reabilitatsii posle insul’ta [Effect of antioxidant therapy on neurotrophins and processes of rehabilitation after stroke]. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 2016. Vol. 116 (8), pp. 36—39. DOI:10.17116/jnevro20161168136-39
  9. Krylov V.V. Lektsii po cherepno-mozgovoi travme [Lectures on traumatic brain injury]. Moscow: Meditsina, 2010. 320 p.
  10. Liburkina S.P., Vasil’ev A.N., Kaplan A.Ya., et al. Pilotnoe issledovanie ideomotornogo treninga v konture interfeisa mozg-komp’yuter u patsientov s dvigatel’nymi narusheniyami [Brain-computer interface-based motor imagery training for patients with neurological movement disorders]. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 2018. Vol. 118 (9—2), pp. 63—68. DOI:10.17116/jnevro201811809263
  11. Lukoyanov M.V., Gordleeva S.Yu., Pimashkin A.S., et al. Effektivnost’ interfeisov mozg-komp’yuter na osnove predstavleniya dvizhenii s taktil’noi i vizual’noi obratnoi svyaz’yu [Efficiency of brain-computer interfaces based on the representation of movements with tactile and visual feedback]. Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 2018. Vol. 44 (3), pp. 53—61. DOI:10.7868/S0131164618030062
  12. Mozheiko E.Yu. Vosstanovlenie kognitivnykh narushenii i tonkoi motoriki posle insul’ta s ispol’zovaniem komp’yuternykh programm i printsipa biologicheskoi obratnoi svyazi. Diss. dokt. med. nauk. [Restoration of cognitive impairments and fine motor skills after a stroke using computer programs and the principle of biofeedback. Dr. Sci. (Medicine) diss.]. Krasnoyarsk, 2014. 216 p.
  13. Morozova E.Yu., Skvortsov D.V., Kaplan A.Ya. Vyrabotka navyka predstavleniya dvizheniya pod kontrolem upravlyaemoi ot EEG nervno-myshechnoi elektrostimulyatsii, vyzyvayushchei kongruentnoe ili nekongruentnoe dvizheniem kisti [Developing the skill of imagining movement under the control of EEG-controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation, which causes congruent or incongruent hand movement]. Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 2019. Vol. 45 (4), pp. 40—45. DOI:10.1134/S013116461904012X
  14. Petrikov S.S., Grechko A.V., Shchelkunova I.G., et al. Novye perspektivy dvigatel’noi reabilitatsii patsientov posle ochagovogo porazheniya golovnogo mozga [New perspectives of motor rehabilitation of patients after focal brain damage]. Zhurnal “Voprosy neirokhirurgii” imeni N.N. Burdenko = Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery, 2019. Vol. 83 (6), pp. 90—99. DOI:10.17116/neiro20198306190
  15. Prokopenko S.V., Mozheiko E.Yu., Zubritskaya E.M., et al. Korrektsiya kognitivnykh narushenii u bol’nykh, perenesshikh cherepno-mozgovuyu travmu [Correction of cognitive impairment in patients with craniocerebral trauma]. Consilium Medicum, 2017. Vol. 19 (2.1), pp. 64—69.
  16. Sidyakina I.V., Dobrushina O.R., Lyadov K.V., et al. Dokazatel’naya meditsina v neiroreabilitatsii: innovatsionnye tekhnologii (obzor) [Evidence-based medicine in neurorehabilitation: innovative technologies (review)]. Voprosy kurortologii, fizioterapii i lechebnoi fizicheskoi kul’tury = Issues of balneology, physiotherapy and physical therapy, 2015. Vol. 92 (3), pp. 53—56.
  17. Uteuliev E.S., Konysbaeva K.K., Zhangalieva D.R., et al. Epidemiologiya i profilaktika ishemicheskogo insul’ta [Epidemiology and prevention of ischemic stroke]. Vestnik Kazakhskogo Natsional’nogo meditsinskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Kazakh National Medical University, 2017, no. 4, pp. 126—129.
  18. Tsvetkova L.S. Vosstanovitel’noe obuchenie pri lokal’nykh porazheniyakh mozga [Rehabilitation training in focal brain injury]. Moscow: MPSI; Voronezh: MODEK, 2010. 376 p.
  19. Aida J., Chau B., Dunn J. Immersive virtual reality in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A literature review. NeuroRehabilitation, 2018. Vol. 42 (4), pp. 441— 448. DOI:10.3233/NRE-172361
  20. Calabrò R.S., Bramanti A., Garzon M., et al. Telerehabilitation in individuals with severe acquired brain injury: Rationale, study design, and methodology [Elektronnyi resurs]. Medicine, 2018. Vol. 97 (50). Available at: https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/fulltext/2018/12140/telerehabilitation_in_individuals_with_severe.15.aspx (Accessed 11.12.2019). DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000013292
  21. Calabrò R.S., Reitano S., Leo A., et al. Can robot-assisted movement training (Lokomat) improve functional recovery and psychological well-being in chronic stroke? Promising findings from a case study. Functional Neurology, 2014. Vol. 29 (2), pp. 139—141.
  22. Corti C., Oldrati V., Oprandi M.C., et al. Remote technology-based training programs for children with acquired brain injury: A systematic review and a meta-analytic exploration [Elektronnyi resurs]. Behavioural Neurology, 2019. Vol. 2019. Available at: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bn/2019/1346987/ (Accessed 21.01.2020). DOI:10.1155/2019/1346987
  23. Dams-O’Connor K., Gordon W.A. Role and impact of cognitive rehabilitation. Psychiatric Clinics, 2010. Vol. 33 (4), pp. 893—904. DOI:10.1016/j.psc.2010.08.002
  24. das Nair R., Cogger H., Worthington E., et al. Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits after stroke [Elektronnyi resurs]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016. Available at: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858. CD002293.pub3/abstract (Accessed 12.12.2019). DOI:10.1002/14651858. CD002293.pub3
  25. De Luca R., Leonardi S., Spadaro L., et al. Improving cognitive function in patients with stroke: can computerized training be the future? Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2018. Vol. 27 (4), pp. 1055—1060. DOI:10.1016/j.jstroke cerebrovasdis.2017.11.008
  26. Des Roches C.A., Kiran S. Technology based rehabilitation to improve communication after acquired brain injury [Elektronnyi resurs]. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2017. Vol. 11. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/ articles/10.3389/fnins.2017.00382/full (Accessed 18.12.2019). DOI:10.3389/ fnins.2017.00382
  27. Fetta J., Starkweather A., Gill J.M. Computer-based cognitive rehabilitation interventions for traumatic brain injury: A critical review of the literature. The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 2017. Vol. 49 (4), pp. 235—240. DOI:10.1097/ JNN.0000000000000298
  28. Fish J., Wilson B.A., Manly T. The assessment and rehabilitation of prospective memory problems in people with neurological disorders: A review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 2010. Vol. 20 (2), pp. 161—179. DOI:10.1080/09602010903126029
  29. Gamito P., Oliveira J., Coelho C., et al. Cognitive training on stroke patients via virtual reality-based serious games. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2017. Vol. 39 (4), pp. 385—388. DOI:10.3109/09638288.2014.934925
  30. Heikkinen P.H., Pulvermüller F., Mäkelä J.P., et al. Combining rTMS with intensive language-action therapy in chronic aphasia: A randomized controlled trial [Elektronnyi resurs]. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2019. Vol. 12. Available at: https:// www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2018.01036/full (Accessed 18.12.2019). DOI:10.3389/fnins.2018.01036
  31. Kettlewell J., das Nair R., Radford K. A systematic review of personal smart technologies used to improve outcomes in adults with acquired brain injuries. Clinical Rehabilitation, 2019. Vol. 33 (11), pp. 1705—1712. DOI:10.1177/0269215519865774
  32. Ledbetter C., Moore A.L., Mitchell T. Cognitive effects of ThinkRx cognitive rehabilitation training for eleven soldiers with brain injury: A retrospective chart review [Elektronnyi resurs]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017. Vol. 8. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00825/full (Accessed 18.12.2019). DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00825
  33. Maggio M.G., Latella D., Maresca G., et al. Virtual reality and cognitive rehabilitation in people with stroke: An overview. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 2019. Vol. 51 (2), pp. 101—105. DOI:10.1097/JNN.0000000000000423
  34. Moreno A., Wall K.J., Thangavelu K., et al. A systematic review of the use of virtual reality and its effects on cognition in individuals with neurocognitive disorders. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, 2019. Vol. 5 (1), pp. 834—850. DOI:10.1016/j.trci.2019.09.016
  35. Neville I.S., Zaninotto A.L., Hayashi C.Y., et al. Repetitive TMS does not improve cognition in patients with TBI: A randomized double-blind trial. Neurology, 2019. Vol. 93 (2), pp. e190-e199. DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007748
  36. Pink A.E., Williams C., Alderman N., et al. The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) following traumatic brain injury (TBI): A scoping review [Elektronnyi resurs]. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 2019. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09602011.2019.1706585?journalC ode=pnrh20 (Accessed 15.01.2020). DOI:10.1080/09602011.2019.1706585
  37. Poulin V., Korner-Bitensky N., Bherer L., et al. Comparison of two cognitive interventions for adults experiencing executive dysfunction post-stroke: A pilot study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2017. Vol. 39 (1), pp. 1—13. DOI:10.3109/0963 8288.2015.1123303
  38. Pugliese M., Ramsay T., Johnson D., et al. Mobile tablet-based therapies following stroke: A systematic scoping review of administrative methods and patient experiences [Elektronnyi resurs]. PLoS One, 2018. Vol. 13 (1). Available at: https:// journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0191566 (Accessed 18.12.2019). DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0191566
  39. Rossetti A., Malfitano C., Malloggi C., et al. Phonemic fluency improved after inhibitory transcranial magnetic stimulation in a case of chronic aphasia. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 2019. Vol. 42 (1), pp. 92—95. DOI:10.1097/MRR.0000000000000322
  40. Sarfo F.S., Ulasavets U., Opare-Sem O.K., et al. Tele-rehabilitation after stroke: An updated systematic review of the literature. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, 2018. Vol. 27 (9), pp. 2306—2318. DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasd is.2018.05.013
  41. Svaerke K.W., Omkvist K.V., Havsteen I.B., et al. Computer-based cognitive rehabilitation in patients with visuospatial neglect or homonymous hemianopia after stroke [Elektronnyi resurs]. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, 2019. Vol. 28 (11). Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/ pii/S1052305719304094 (Accessed 18.12.2019). DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasd is.2019.104356
  42. Talsma L.J., Kroese H.A., Slagter H.A. Boosting cognition: effects of multiple-session transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2017. Vol. 29 (4), pp. 755—768. DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_01077
  43. Teasdale T.W., Emslie H., Quirk K., et al. Alleviation of carer strain during the use of the NeuroPage device by people with acquired brain injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2009. Vol. 80 (7), pp. 781—783. DOI:10.1136/jnnp.2008.162966
  44. van de Ven R.M., Murre J.M.J., Buitenweg J.I.V., et al. The influence of computer-based cognitive flexibility training on subjective cognitive well-being after stroke: A multi-center randomized controlled trial [Elektronnyi resurs]. PLoS One, 2017. Vol. 2 (11). Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/ journal.pone.0187582 (Accessed 12.12.2019). DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0187582
  45. van der Kuil M.N.A., Visser-Meily J.M.A., Evers A.W.M., et al. A usability study of a serious game in cognitive rehabilitation: A compensatory navigation training in acquired brain injury patients [Elektronnyi resurs]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018. Vol. 9. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00846/ full (Accessed 12.12.2019). DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00846
  46. Zaninotto A.L., El-Hagrassy M.M., Green J.R., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects on traumatic brain injury (TBI) recovery: A systematic review. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 2019. Vol. 13 (2), pp. 172—179. DOI:10.1590/1980-57642018dn13-020005

Information About the Authors

Marina V. Kalantarova, Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Clinical and Special Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Medical Psychologist, Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5509-7052, e-mail: kalantarovamv@mgppu.ru

Lesya B. Zavaliy, PhD in Medicine, Senior Researcher, Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8572-7094, e-mail: zavaliylb@sklif.mos.ru

Evgeniya V. Borisonik, Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education (MSUPE), Medical Psychologist, Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4643-239X, e-mail: borisonikev@mppu.ru

Mariya I. Subotich, Junior Researcher, Department of Crisis Conditions and Psychosomatic Disorders, N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5138-3107, e-mail: psysklif@gmail.com

Andrey V. Grechko, Doctor of Medicine, Director, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4133-9708, e-mail: fnkcrr@fnkcrr.ru

Inessa G. Shchelkunova, PhD in Medicine, Associate Professor, Deputy Director, Deputy Director of Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3778-5417, e-mail: selenagrey1@mail.ru

Sergey S. Petrikov, Doctor of Medicine, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor, Director, Sklifosovsky Clinical and Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3292-8789, e-mail: petrikovss@sklif.mos.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 955
Previous month: 23
Current month: 20

Downloads

Total: 723
Previous month: 14
Current month: 8