Skip to Main Content

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy
2025. Vol. 33, no. 2, 147–170
doi:10.17759/cpp.2025330207
ISSN: 2075-3470 / 2311-9446 (online)

The revised scale of anger reactions (Dimensions of Anger Reactions — Revised, DAR-R): russian-language adaptation and validation

 
Audio is AI-generated
131

,

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar
Metrics

Abstract

Context and relevance. The seven-point revised scale for measuring anger reactions (Dimensions of Anger Reactions — Revised, DAR-R) is one of the most common and psychometrically based tools for self-reporting the severity of anger and identifying problematic anger. The objective of this study was to adapt, evaluate the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Russian version of the DAR-R scale. Hypothesis. The Russian-language version of the Dimensions of Anger Reactions meets the requirements for reliability and validity, and also meets the criteria of a standardized psychodiagnostic tool. Methods and materials. The study involved 584 respondents (345 women and 239 men, almost half of whom were firefighters, aged 18 to 78 years: M = 27.76; SD = 10.24), the retest sample included 106 people (63 women and 43 men, aged 18 to 74 years: M = 31.22, SD = 12.88). To test the convergent and discriminant validity, the following tools were used: the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ), the Novaco Anger Scale (NAS) and the Ch. Spielberger’s State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). Results. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed and confirmed a two-factor structure similar to the original author’s DAR-R, combining anger response, that is, the frequency, intensity, duration and hostility of anger, as well as the perceived violation of performance, social relations and health by anger. The technique demonstrated good α Kronbach coefficients, the values of which were 0.81 for the Anger Response subscale, 0.74 for the Anger Impairment subscale and 0.85 for the Anger Reaction scale. Women show higher rates of anger response than men. Conclusions. The study showed that the Russian-language version of the questionnaire has all the necessary psychometric characteristics, which means it can be recommended as a psychodiagnostic tool for measuring the intensity of anger reactions in research and counseling.

General Information

Keywords: DAR–R, anger, problematic anger, measuring anger reactions, anger assessment

Journal rubric: Testing and Validating Instruments

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2025330207

Acknowledgements. The authors express their gratitude to the heads of fire and rescue units, psychologists Yulia Shoigu and Anna Suvorova for their help in organizing data collection, as well as to all concerned volunteers who took part in our study.

Received 03.11.2024

Revised 09.03.2025

Accepted

Published

For citation: Shmarina, T.A., Blinova, L.D. (2025). The revised scale of anger reactions (Dimensions of Anger Reactions — Revised, DAR-R): russian-language adaptation and validation. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 33(2), 147–170. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2025330207

© Shmarina T.A., Blinova L.D., 2025

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Гомер. Илиада. Песнь I. Язва. Гнев. URL: https://rvb.ru/homerus/iliada/01text/01.htm (дата обращения: 28.10.2023). Homer. The Iliad. Canto I. The ulcer. Anger. (In Russ.). URL: https://rvb.ru/homerus/iliada/01text/01.htm (viewed: 28.10.2023).
  2. Гуриева, С.Д., Захарова, А.М. (2017). Контроль гнева как компонент межкультурной компетентности. В: Психология XXI века: системный подход и междисциплинарные исследования. Сборник научных трудов участников международной научной конференции молодых ученых: В 2 тт. Т. 2. (с. 306—311). СПб.: Скифия–принт. Gurieva, S.D., Zakharova, A.M. (2017). Anger control as a component of intercultural competence. In: Psychology of the XXI century: a systematic approach and interdisciplinary research. Collection of scientific papers of participants of the international scientific conference of young scientists (pp. 306—311). Saint–Petersburg: Skifia–print. (In Russ.).
  3. Ениколопов, С.Н., Цибульский, Н.П. (2007). Психометрический анализ русскоязычной версии Опросника диагностики агрессии А. Басса и М. Перри. Психологический журнал, 28(1), 115—124. Enikolopov, S.N., Tsibulsky, N.P. (2007). Psychometric analysis of the Russian–language version of the Questionnaire for the diagnosis of aggression by A. Bass and M. Perry. Psychological Journal, 28(1), 115—124. (In Russ.).
  4. Митина, О.В. (2013). Разработка и адаптация психологических опросников. М.: Смысл. Mitina, O.V. (2013). Development and adaptation of psychological questionnaires. Moscow: Smysl. (In Russ.).
  5. Саидов, А.А. (2019). Гнев и агрессивное поведение как результат неудовлетворенности жизнью. Проблемы современного педагогического образования, 62(2), 313—317. Saidov, A.A. (2019). Anger and aggressive behavior as a result of dissatisfaction with life. Problems of modern pedagogical education, 62(2), 313—317. (In Russ.).
  6. Шамшикова, О.А., Белашина, Т.В. (2015). Психометрический анализ опросника «Оценка проявлений гнева» (STAXI–2) Ч.Д. Спилбергера. Мир науки, культуры, образования, 55(6), 269—273. Shamshikova, O.A., Belashina, T.V. (2015). Psychometric analysis of the questionnaire “Assessment of anger manifestations” (STAXI–2) by Ch.D. Spielberger. The World of Science, Culture and Education, 55(6), 269—273. (In Russ.).
  7. Anderson, C.A., Bushman, B.J. (2001). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 27—51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231
  8. Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. N.Y.: The Guilford Press.
  9. Bryant, R.A. (2022). The nature of posttraumatic stress disorder in treatment–seeking first responders. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 13(1), 2011602. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.2011602
  10. Buss, A.H., Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452—459. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.63.3.452
  11. Ceschi, G., Selosse, G., Nixon, R.D.V., Metcalf, O., Forbes, D. (2020). Posttraumatic anger: a confirmatory factor analysis of the Dimensions of Anger Reactions Scale–5 (DAR–5) — French adaptation. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1731127
  12. Eckhardt, C.I., Kassinove, H., Tsytsarev, S.V., Sukhodolsky, D. (1995). A Russian Version of the State–Trait Anger Expression Inventory: Preliminary Data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64(3), 440—455. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6403_4
  13. Feeny, N.C., Zoellner, L.A., Foa, E.B. (2000). Anger, dissociation, and posttraumatic stress disorder among female assault victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 13(1), 89—100. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007725015225
  14. Forbes, D., Alkemade, N., Hopcraft, D., Hawthorne, G., O’Halloran, P., Elhai, J.D., McHugh, T., Bates, G., Novaco, R.W., Bryant, R., Lewis, V. (2014a). Evaluation of the Dimensions of Anger Reactions–5 (DAR–5) Scale in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28(8), 830—835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.09.015
  15. Forbes, D., Alkemade, N., Mitchell, D., Elhai, J.D., McHugh, T., Bates, G., Novaco, R.W., Bryant, R., Lewis, V. (2014b). Utility of the dimensions of anger reactions–5 (DAR–5) scale as a brief anger measure. Depression and Anxiety, 31(2), 166—173. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22148
  16. Gardner, F.L., Moore, Z.E., Dettore, M. (2014). The Relationship Between Anger, Childhood Maltreatment, and Emotion Regulation Difficulties in Intimate Partner and Non–Intimate Partner Violent Offenders. Behavior Modification, 38(6), 779—800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445514539346
  17. George, D., Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics 23 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. N.Y.: Routledge.
  18. Goulart, A.C., Bismarchi, D., Rienzo, M., Syllos, D.H., Wang, Y.P. (2020). Dimensions of Anger Reactions (DAR–5): a useful screening tool for anger in the general population. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 25(4), 421—429. https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2020.1821893
  19. Hawthorne, G., Mouthaan, J., Forbes, D., Novaco, R.W. (2006). Response categories and anger measurement: do fewer categories result in poorer measurement? Development of the DAR–5. Soc Psychiatry Epidemiol, 41(2), 164—172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0986-y
  20. Ijaz, D., Asad, D., Kanwal, S. (2021). Translation and validation of Dimensions of Anger Reactions — Revised. Harf-o-Sukhan, 5(4), 302—307.
  21. Jarvis, K.L., Gordon, E.E., Novaco, R.W. (2005). Psychological distress of children and mothers in domestic violence emergency shelters. Journal of Family Violence, 20(6), 389—402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-7800-1
  22. Kannis-Dymand, L. (2019). Dimensions of Anger Reactions‐Revised (DAR–R): Validation ofa brief anger measure in Australia and Spain. Journal of clinical psychology, 75(7), 1233—1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22757
  23. Kim, H.J., Lee, D.H., Kim, J.H. et al. (2023). Validation of the Dimensions of Anger Reactions Scale (the DAR–5) in non-clinical South Korean adults. BMC Psychology, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01084-8
  24. Kline, P. (2000). Handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.
  25. Meffert, S.M., Metzler, T.J., Henn–Haase, C., McCaslin, S., Inslicht, S., Chemtob, C., Neylan, T., Marmar, C.R. (2008). A prospective study of trait anger and PTSD symptoms in police. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 21(4), 410—416. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20350
  26. Nederlof, A.F., Hovens, J.E., Muris, P., Novaco, R.W. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of a Dutch version of the Dimensions of Anger Reactions. Psychological reports, 105(2), 585—592. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.2.585-592
  27. Novaco, R. (1994). Anger as a risk factor for violence among the mentally disordered. Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment (J. Monahan, H. Steadman, eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  28. Novaco, R.W., Swanson, R.D., Gonzalez, O.I., Gahm, G.A., Reger, M.D. (2012). Anger and postcombat mental health: validation of a brief anger measure with US soldiers postdeployed from Iraq and Afghanistan. Psychological assessment, 24(3), 661—675. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026636
  29. Novaco, R.W. (1975). Dimensions of anger reactions. Irvine, CA: University of California.
  30. Novaco, R.W., Chemtob, C.M. (2002). Anger and combat–related posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 15(2), 123—132.
  31. Speilberger, C.D. (1998). State–trait anger expression inventory professional manual. Odessa (FL): Psychological Assessment Resources.
  32. Spielberger, C.D. (1988). State‐trait anger expression inventory: Professional manual. Wiley.
  33. Tabachnick, B., Fidell, L., Ullman, J. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  34. Turgoose, D., Murphy, D. (2018). Anger and aggression in UK treatment–seeking veterans with PTSD. Healthcare, 6(3), Article 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare6030086

Information About the Authors

Tatiana A. Shmarina, Postgraduate Student, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, senior teacher and trainee researcher Department of Psychology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1585-3084, e-mail: tatyana_shmarina@mail.ru

Liliia D. Blinova, Personnel Training Engineer, Centre for Safety Culture and Human Factor Reliability, Rosatom Technical Academy, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8896-678X, e-mail: blinova.lilia.psy@gmail.com

Contribution of the authors

Tatyana A. Shmarina — ideas; control over the research; annotation, application of statistical, mathematical or other methods for data analysis, visualization of research results, writing and design of the manuscript.

Liliia D. Blinova — conducting the experiment; data collection and analysis; application of statistical, mathematical or other methods for data analysis, visualization of research results.

All authors participated in the discussion of the results and approved the final text of the
manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 413
Previous month: 85
Current month: 80

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 131
Previous month: 26
Current month: 20

 Total

Whole time: 544
Previous month: 111
Current month: 100