Psychopathological and pathopsychological features of depressed patients at high risk of psychosis

 
Audio is AI-generated
6

Abstract

Context and relevance. In recent years, the concept of a high risk of psychosis has received considerable attention, with emphasis on early identification and intervention strategies to slow disease progression, delay the onset of symptoms or ameliorate the course of schizophrenia. High impulsivity, a well-documented characteristic of patients with schizophrenia, is also observed in individuals at high risk for psychosis and may contribute to negative long-term outcomes. Despite its clinical importance, however, impulsivity remains understudied in this population. Objective. To assess impulsivity in patients with affective disorders, both with and without high risk of developing psychosis, and to examine the relationship between impulsivity, negative symptoms and cognitive functioning in each group. Hypothesis. People at ultra-high risk for developing psychosis have higher levels of impulsivity than those with non-psychotic depression. They also have more pronounced negative symptoms and severe cognitive impairment, which are associated with increased impulsivity. Methods and materials. The study included 53 female patients, comprising 26 patients diagnosed with depression without high-risk symptoms of psychosis and 27 patients with depression who met the criteria for high risk of psychosis (UHR group). The study groups were matched for gender, age and marital status. The following assessment tools were used: Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), WAIS-IV subtests: “Picture Completion” and “Similarities”. Results. In the non-psychotic depression group, almost all indicators of the SANS scale were significantly associated with three impulsivity factors and the total BIS-11 score. Conversely, in the UHR group, impulsivity correlated mainly with the Attention subscale of the SANS. Notably, the total Barratt score in the UHR group met the threshold for impulse control disorder (above 75 points), whereas the SANS score reflected substantial impairment. Patients in the UHR group scored significantly higher on both scales than those with non-psychotic depression. Although no significant differences were found between the groups in terms of BACS scores or WAIS-IV subtest performance, a greater number of significant correlations were found between impulsivity and cognitive functioning parameters in the UHR group. Conclusions. Patients at high risk for psychosis showed more pronounced negative symptoms, cognitive deficits and significantly higher levels of impulsivity than people with affective disorders without psychotic features. Cognitive impairment in this group was strongly related to impulsivity, whereas negative symptoms, with the exception of attentional deficits, showed minimal association with impulsivity. These findings suggest that impulsivity and negative symptoms may be distinct but co-occurring phenomena in this population, each contributing to broader psychopathological changes.

General Information

Keywords: impulsivity, negative symptoms, cognitive impairments, depression, schizophrenia, clinical high risk for psychosis, ultra-high risk for psychosis

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2026150107

Received 25.03.2025

Revised 06.03.2026

Accepted

Published

For citation: Shulgina, D.I., Kafarov, E.R., Shishkovskaia, T.I., Rupchev, G.E., Oleychik, M.I., Enikolopov, S.N. (2026). Psychopathological and pathopsychological features of depressed patients at high risk of psychosis. Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 15(1), 95–112. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2026150107

© Shulgina D.I., Kafarov E.R., Shishkovskaia T.I., Rupchev G.E., Oleychik M.I., Enikolopov S.N., 2026

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Ениколопов, С.Н., Медведева, Т.И. (2015). Апробация русскоязычной версии методики «шкала импульсивности Барратта» (BIS-11). Психология и право, 3, 75—89. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2015050307
    Enikolopov, S.N., Medvedeva, T.I. (2015). Approbation of the Russian-language version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11). Psychology and Law, 3, 75– (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2015050307
  2. Омельченко, М.А. (2021). Аттенуированные симптомы шизофрении при юношеских депрессиях (клинико-психопатологические, патогенетические и прогностические аспекты): Автореф. дис. … д-ра мед. наук. ФГБНУ НЦПЗ. М.
    Omelchenko, M.A. (2021). Attenuated schizophrenic symptoms in youth depressions (clinical-psychopathological, pathogenetic, and prognostic aspects): Extended abstr. Diss. Dr. Sci. (Med.). Mental Health Research Center. (In Russ.).
  3. Омельченко, М.А., Зинькевич, А.С., Варес, А.Ю. (2023). Импульсивность и агрессия у больных из группы риска развития шизофрении на этапе становления ремиссии после первого депрессивного эпизода. Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С. С. Корсакова, 123(12), 83—92. https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202312312183
    Omelchenko, M.A., Zinkevich, A.S., Vares, A.Y. (2023). Impulsivity and aggression in patients at risk for schizophrenia at the stage of remission after the first depressive episode. S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 123(12), 83—92. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202312312183
  4. Саркисян, Г.Р., Гурович, И.Я., Киф, Р.С. (2010). Нормативные данные для российской популяции и стандартизация шкалы «Краткая оценка когнитивных функций у пациентов с шизофренией» (BACS). Социальная и клиническая психиатрия, 20(3), 13–19.
    Sarkisyan, G.R., Gurovich, I.Y., Kif, R.S. (2010). Normative data for the Russian population and standardization of the “Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia” (BACS) scale. Social and Clinical Psychiatry, 20(3), 13—19. (In Russ.).
  5. Andreasen, N.C. (1989). The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS): conceptual and theoretical foundations. British Journal of Psychiatry, 155(7), 53—58.
  6. Barratt, E.S. (1993). Impulsivity: Integrating cognitive, behavioral, biological, and environmental data. In: McCowan, J. Johnson, M. Shure (Eds.), The Impulsive Client: Theory, Research, and Treatment (pp. 39—56). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10500-003
  7. Bielecki, M., Tyburski, E., Plichta, P., Samochowiec, J., Kucharska-Mazur, J., Podwalski, P., Rek-Owodziń, K., Waszczuk, K., Sagan, L., Michalczyk, A., Rudkowski, K., Karabanowicz, E., Świątkowska, K., Misiak, B., Bąba-Kubiś, A., Mak, M. (2024). Impulsivity and inhibitory control in deficit and non-deficit schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry, 24(1), art. 473. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05918-6
  8. Chan, C.T., Abdin, E., Subramaniam, M., Tay, S.A., Lim, L.K., Verma, S. (2019). Two-year clinical and functional outcomes of an Asian cohort at ultra-high risk of psychosis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, art. 758. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00758
  9. Coalson, D.L., Wechsler, D., Raiford, S.E. (2008). WAIS-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
  10. Dervaux, A., Baylé, F.J., Laqueille, X., Bourdel, M.C., Borgne, M.H., Olié, J.P., Krebs, M.O. (2001). Is substance abuse in schizophrenia related to impulsivity, sensation seeking, or anhedonia? American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(3), 492—494. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.492
  11. Dragt, S., Nieman, D.H., Becker, H.E., van de Fliert, R., Dingemans, P.M., de Haan, L., van Amelsvoort, T.A., Linszen, D.H. (2010). Age of onset of cannabis use is associated with age of onset of high-risk symptoms for psychosis. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(3), 165—171. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371005500308
  12. Duva, S.M., Silverstein, S.M., Spiga, R. (2011). Impulsivity and risk-taking in co-occurring psychotic disorders and substance abuse. Psychiatry Research, 186(2–3), 351—355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2010.08.014
  13. Enticott, P.G., Ogloff, J.R. P., Bradshaw, J.L. (2008). Response inhibition and impulsivity in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 157(1–3), 251—254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2007.04.007
  14. Fekih-Romdhane, F., Ghrissi, F., Abassi, B., Loch, A.A., Cherif, W., Damak, R., Ellini, S., Cheour, M., Hallit, S. (2024). Impulsivity as a predictor of clinical and psychological outcomes in a naturalistic prospective cohort of subjects at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis from Tunisia. Psychiatry Research, 340, art. 116090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116090
  15. Fusar-Poli, P., Raballo, A., Parnas, J. (2017). What is an attenuated psychotic symptom? On the importance of the context. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 43, 687—692. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw182
  16. Ho, B.C., Barry, A.B., Koeppel, J.A. (2018). Impulsivity in unaffected adolescent biological relatives of schizophrenia patients. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 97, 47—53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.11.008
  17. Hutton, P., Bowe, S., Parker, S., Ford, S. (2011). Prevalence of suicide risk factors in people at ultra-high risk of developing psychosis: A service audit. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 5(4), 375—380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7893.2011.00302.x
  18. Hutton, P., Parker, S., Bowe, S., Ford, S. (2012). Prevalence of violence risk factors in people at ultra-high risk of developing psychosis: A service audit. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 6(1), 91—96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7893.2011.00307.x
  19. Iancu, I., Bodner, E., Roitman, S., Sapir, A.P., Poreh, A., Kotler, M. (2010). Impulsivity, aggression and suicide risk among male schizophrenia patients. Psychopathology, 43(4), 223—229. https://doi.org/10.1159/000313520
  20. Keefe, R.S.E., Harvey, P.D., Goldberg, T.E., Gold, J.M., Walker, T.M., Kennel, C., Hawkins, K. (2008). Norms and standardization of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). Schizophrenia Research, 102(1–3), 108—115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2008.03.024
  21. Keefe, R.S.E., Perkins, D.O., Gu, H., Zipursky, R.B., Christensen, B.K., Lieberman, J.A. (2006). A longitudinal study of neurocognitive function in individuals at-risk for psychosis. Schizophrenia Research, 88(1–3), 26—35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2006.06.041
  22. Lee, S.J., Yoo, S.Y., Kang, D.H., Lee, K.J., Ha, T.H., Wee, W., Lee, A.R., Kim, N.S., Kwon, J.S. (2008). Potential vulnerability markers within the affective domain in subjects at genetic and clinical high risk for schizophrenia. Psychopathology, 41(4), 236—244. https://doi.org/10.1159/000125557
  23. Lee, T.Y., Kim, S.N., Jang, J.H., Shim, G., Jung, W.H., Shin, N.Y., Kwon, J.S. (2013). Neural correlate of impulsivity in subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 45, 165—169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.04.008
  24. Lencz, T., Smith, C.W., McLaughlin, D., Auther, A., Nakayama, E., Hovey, L., Cornblatt, B.A. (2006). Generalized and specific neurocognitive deficits in prodromal schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 59(9), 863—871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.09.005
  25. Martin, S., Graziani, P., Del-Monte, J. (2021). Comparing impulsivity in borderline personality, schizophrenia and obsessional-compulsive disorders: Who is ahead? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 77(7), 1732—1744. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23129
  26. Miller, T.J., McGlashan, T.H., Rosen, J.L., Cadenhead, K., Cannon, T., Ventura, J., McFarlane, W., Perkins, D.O., Pearlson, G.D., Woods, S.W. (2003). Prodromal assessment with the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes and the Scale of Prodromal Symptoms: Predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 29(4), 703—715. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007040
  27. Ouzir, M. (2013). Impulsivity in schizophrenia: A comprehensive update. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 247—254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.014
  28. Patton, J.H., Stanford, M.S., Barratt, E.S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51(6), 768—774. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::aid-jclp2270510607>3.0.co;2-1
  29. Pelizza, L., Poletti, M., Azzali, S., Paterlini, F., Garlassi, S., Scazza, I., Rocco Chiri, L., Pupo, S., Pompili, M., Raballo, A. (2020). Suicide risk in young people at Ultra-High Risk (UHR) of psychosis: Findings from a 2-year longitudinal study. Schizophrenia Research, 220, 98—105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2020.03.051
  30. Sagayadevan, V., Satghare, P., Jeyagurunathan, A., Koh, Y.S., Shafie, S., Chang, S., Samari, E., Subramaniam, M. (2023). Mediating effect of symptom severity on the relationship between aggression, impulsivity and quality of life outcomes among patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, art. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1154083
  31. Smith, C.W., Park, S., Cornblatt, B. (2006). Spatial working memory deficits in adolescents at clinical high risk for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 81(2–3), 21—25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2005.09.019
  32. Van Erp, T.G.M., Baker, R.A., Cox, K., Okame, T., Kojima, Y., Eramo, A., Potkin, S.G. (2020). Effect of brexpiprazole on control of impulsivity in schizophrenia: A randomized functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 301, art. 111085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111085
  33. Yung, A.R., Nelson, B. (2013). The ultra-high risk concept—a review. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 58(1), 5—12. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371305800103

Information About the Authors

Daria I. Shulgina, Postgraduate Student, Chair of Neuro- and Pathopsychology, Department of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU), Junior Researcher, Department of Monitoring and Program Regulation of Public Mental Health, Scientific Center for Mental Health, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4412-6063, e-mail: dshshulgina@gmail.com

Eugene R. Kafarov, Junior Researcher, Department for the Study of Borderline Mental Pathology and Psychosomatic Disorders, Mental Health Research Centre, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0346-8787, e-mail: kafarov.e@yandex.ru

Tatiana I. Shishkovskaia, Junior Research Fellow, Center for Language and Brain, HSE University, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9154-4104, e-mail: tszyszkowska@gmail.com

Georgiy E. Rupchev, Candidate of Science (Psychology), research fellow of the Laboratory of psychopharmacology, Mental Health Research Center, Senior Research Fellow, Chair of Neuroand Pathopsychology, Department of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1948-6090, e-mail: rupchevgeorg@mail.ru

Mikhail I. Oleychik, Junior Researcher, Department of Medical Psychology, Mental Health Research Center, Postgraduate student, Department of Neuro- and Pathopsychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4102-5978, e-mail: mr.oleychik@mail.ru

Sergey N. Enikolopov, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Docent, Head of Department of Clinical Psychology, Mental Health Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0615-6703, e-mail: enikolopov@mail.ru

Contribution of the authors

Shulgina D.I. — annotation, writing and formatting of the manuscript; collection and analysis of literature; conducting the experiment; collection, statistical processing and analysis of data.

Kafarov E.R. — conducting the experiment; collection and analysis of data; analysis of results; editing.

Shishkovskaya T.I. — clinical and psychopathological assessment of patients, analysis of results; editing.

Rupchev G.E. — development of study design and supervision; analysis and interpretation of results; editing.

Oleychik M.I. — interpretation of results; editing.

Enikolopov S.N. — study supervision; scientific editing.

All authors participated in the discussion of the results and approved the final text of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

The study was reviewed and approved by the Local Ethics Committee of Mental Health Research Center (report no. 746, 2021/03/18).

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 16
Previous month: 0
Current month: 16

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 6
Previous month: 0
Current month: 6

 Total

Whole time: 22
Previous month: 0
Current month: 22