Pro-Environmental Behaviour in Russia. A Systematic Review

Pro-environmental behavior plays one of the most important roles in reducing global environmental change. This systematic review critically analyzes methodology and synthesizes results of 49 empirical studies of pro-environmental behavior in Russia published between 1999 and 2021. Methodological advantages of the studies include the use of primary data and sample sizes. The shortcomings include a lack of experimental studies, the use of self-reports and descriptive data analyses. Recently, however, the methodological quality of studies has been improving. The most common forms of pro-environmental behavior in Russia are: household waste management and reduction, land clearing and greening, resource conservation and eco-consumption. The determinants of pro-environmental behavior include gender (female), level of education (higher), biospheric values, environmental concern, environmental motivation, personal and descriptive norms. The expansion of evidence base on pro-environmental behavior and its determinants in Russia should be accompanied by a wider use of laboratory and natural experiments, and improvements in data collection and analysis methodology.

1. Aksenova P.V. Ekologicheskoe vospitanie doshkol'nikov v obrazovatel'noi srede prirodnogo zapovednika: Diss. kand. ped. nauk. [Environmental education of preschool children in the educational environment of a suburb reserve. D. (Pedagogy) Thesis]. Voronezh, 2012. 245 p. (In Russ.).
2. Alexandrova E.S. Vzaimosviaz lichnostnyh cennostei individa I proekologicheskogo povedenia v usloviah vozrastania antropogennoi nagruzki na okruzhaiuschuiu sredu [Relationship between personal values and proenvironmental behavior in the conditions of increasing anthropogenic impact on the environment]. Voprosy ustoichivogo razvitia obschestva [Sustainable development issues], 2021, no 10. pp. 328—338. (In Russ.).
3. Aleksandrova T.V. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti otnoshenii k energosberezheniyu i ikh struktura u detei 6—10 let: Na materiale vliyaniya raznykh obrazovatel'nykh programm: Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Psychological characteristics of attitudes towards energy conservation and their structure in children of 6—10 years old: Based on the material of the influence of different educational programs. D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Kazan', 2002. 153 p. (In Russ.).
4. Alekseeva G.G. Ekologicheskoye volonterstvo v Yakutii kak napravleniye zdorovogo obraza zhizni [Environmental volunteering in Yakutia as a direction of a healthy lifestyle]. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (g. Nizhniy Novgorod, 26—27 oktyabrya 2019 g.) [Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Nizhny Novgorod. p. 342—346. (In Russ.).
5. Antipina O.V. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti i struktura povedeniya podrostka po vzaimodeistviyu s energeticheskim potentsialom: Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Psychological characteristics and structure of adolescent behavior in interaction with energy potential. D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Kazan', 2003. 154 p. (In Russ.).
6. Basheva O.A., Ermolaeva Yu.V. Povsednevnye ekopraktiki rossiyan, sposobstvuyushchie ustoichivomu razvitiyu megapolisov Gosudarstvennaya molodezhnaya politika: natsional'nye proekty 2019—2024 gg. v sotsial'nom razvitii molodezhi [Everyday eco-practices of Russians, contributing to the sustainable development of megacities State youth policy: national projects 2019—2024 in the social development of youth]. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (g. Moskva, 20—21 aprelya 2020 g.) [Proceedings of the Russian Scientific and Practical Conference]. P. 233—238. (In Russ.).
7. Belonogov V.A., Baibakov E.I., Guzel'baeva G.Ya., Egorova L.G., Eflova M.Yu. Ekologicheskie problemy g. Kazani v soznanii naseleniya goroda [Environmental problems of Kazan in the minds of the city population]. Ekologicheskii konsalting [Environmental Consulting], 2005, no 1(17), pp. 10—16. (In Russ.).
8. Bel'skaya O.G. Ekologicheskaya kul'tura i ekologicheskoe soznanie sovremennykh gorozhan [Ecological culture and ecological consciousness of modern citizens]. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Irkutsk State Technical University], 2012, no 5 (64). (In Russ.).
9. Bykanova N.A. Formirovanie ekologicheskoi kul'tury gorodskogo naseleniya v sovremennykh usloviyakh: Regional'nyi aspekt: Diss. kand. soc. nauk. [Formation of the ecological culture of the urban population in modern conditions. D. (Sociology) Thesis]. Kursk, 2005. 161 p. (In Russ.).
10. Grechikhina D.V., Ivanova T.N. Ekologicheskaya kul'tura molodezhi v kontekste gorodskoi sredy [Ecological culture of youth in the context of the urban environment]. Materialy II Vserossiiskoi natsional'noi nauchnoi konferentsii studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh "Molodezh' i nauka: aktual'nye problemy fundamental'nykh i prikladnykh issledovanii" (g. Komsomol'sk-na-Amure, 8—12 aprelya 2019 g.) [Proceedings of the II Russian National Scientific Conference of Students, Postgraduates and Young Scientists "Youth and Science: Actual Problems of Fundamental and Applied Research"]. Komsomol'sk-na- Amure: Publ. FGBOU VO "KnAGU", 2019. (In Russ.).
11. Grigor'eva L.I. Formirovanie ekologicheskogo soznaniya sel'skikh shkol'nikov: Diss. kand. ped. nauk. [Formation of ecological awareness of rural schoolchildren. Ph. D. (Pedagogy) Thesis]. Yakutsk, 2000. 171 p. (In Russ.).
12. Egorova L.G., Ermolaeva P.O., Noskova E.P. Dinamika ekologicheskogo soznaniya gorozhan (na primere g. Kazani) [The dynamics of the ecological consciousness of the townspeople (on the example of Kazan)]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki. [Scientific notes of Kazan University. Series Humanities], 2013, vol. 155, no. 6, pp. 23—33. (In Russ.).
13. Ermolaeva P.O. Novye tendentsii v ekologicheskom potreblenii rossiyan pod vliyaniem sportivnykh mega-sobytii (na primere Universiady 2013 g., Kazan') [New trends in the ecological consumption of Russians under the influence of sports mega-events (on the example of the 2013 Universiade, Kazan)]. Zhurnal sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh issledovanii [Labyrinth. Journal of Social and Humanitarian Research], 2014, no. 2, pp. 52—63. (In Russ.).
14. Ermolaeva P.O. Osobennosti formirovaniya ekologicheskoi kul'tury rossiiskikh i amerikanskikh studentov: kross-kul'turnyi proekt: Diss. kand. soc. nauk. [Features of the formation of the ecological culture of Russian and American students: cross-cultural project. D. (Sociology) Thesis]. Kazan', 2011. 285 p. (In Russ.).
15. Ermolaeva P.O. Pro ekologicheskii aktivizm kazanskogo studenchestva [About the environmental activism of Kazan students]. Nauchnye trudy Tsentra perspektivnykh ekonomicheskikh issledovanii [Scientific works of the Center for Advanced Economic Research], 2012, no. 5, pp. 303—308. (In Russ.).
16. Ermolaeva P.O. Ekologicheskaya kul'tura rossiiskogo i amerikanskogo studenchestva [Ecological culture of Russian and American students]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies], 2012, no. 12, pp. 80—88. (In Russ.).
17. Ermolaeva Yu.V. Potreblenie ekoproduktsii v megapolisakh (na materialakh oprosa grazhdan Moskvy i Kazani) [Consumption of organic products in megacities (based on a survey of citizens of Moscow and Kazan)]. Elektronnyi ekonomicheskii vestnik Tatarstana [Electronic economic bulletin of Tatarstan], 2020, no. 1, pp. 65—70. (In Russ.).
18. Efanova O.A., Pisklakova-Parker M.P. Gendernye aspekty povsednevnogo ekologicheskogo povedeniya [Elektronnyi resurs] [Gender Aspects of Everyday Environmental Behavior]. Credo New, 2020, no. 4, pp. 9. Available at: http://credo-new.ru/archives/2286 (Accessed: 14.07.2021). (In Russ.).
19. Efimova O.A., Kapralova E.O., Semenova O.A., Chesnokova D.A., Shtreneva A.D., Aladyshkina A.S. Issledovanie gotovnosti zhitelei Nizhnego Novgoroda k sortirovke TKO v usloviyakh realizatsii reformy v oblasti obrashcheniya s otkhodami [Study of the readiness of the residents of Nizhny Novgorod to sort MSW in the context of the implementation of the reform in the field of waste management]. Materialy 21-go Mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-promyshlennogo foruma «Velikie Reki'2019» (g. Nizhnii Novgorod, 14—17 maya 2019 g.) [Proceedings of the 21st International Scientific and Industrial Forum "Great Rivers'2019"]. Novgorod: Publ. NNGASU, 2019. (In Russ.).
20. Zhuravleva L.A., Zarubina E.V., Ruchkin A.V., Simachkova N.N., Chupina I.P. Ekologicheskoe povedenie sovremennogo cheloveka [Healthy Lifestyle in Estimates of Youth]. Obrazovanie i pravo [Education and Law], 2020, no. 1, pp. 165—171. DOI: 10.24411/2076-1503-2020-10124 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
21. Ivanova A.A., Agissova F.B., Sautkina E.V. Proekologicheskoe povedenie v Rossii: adaptatsiya shkaly Kemerona Brika i svyaz' s ekologicheskoi obespokoennost'yu [Elektronnyi resurs] [Pro-environmental behavior in Russia: Adaptation of the Recurrent Pro-Environmental Behavior Scale (Brick et al., 2017) and the relationship with environmental concern]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya, 2020, vol. 13, no. 70, p. 7. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2020v13n70/1745-ivanova70.html (Accessed: 14.07.2021). (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
22. Ivanova L.Yu. Sotsial'nye ustanovki studentov v otnoshenii okruzhayushcheĭ sredy [Social attitudes of students towards the environment]. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology], 2014, vol. 2, no. 9. (In Russ.).
23. Ivanova T.N., Shchepalova A.A. Ekologicheskaya kul'turnaya sreda kak faktor razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya territorii (empiricheskii opyt issledovaniya) [Ecological cultural environment as a factor in the development and improvement of territories (empirical research experience)]. Jurnalul Umanitar Modern, 2020, Vol. 3. no. 2 (4), pp. 16—21. DOI: 10.46591/MHJM.2020.0302.0004 (In Russ.).
24. Ivanova A.A., Agissova F.B., Sautkina E.V., Kabanova V.S., Ivande K.S., Patrakova N.A. Razrabotka rossiiskoi shkaly proekologicheskogo povedeniya [Development of the Russian scale of pro-environmental behavior]. Materialy XXII Aprel'skoi mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva (g. Moskva, 13—30 aprelya 2021 g.) [Materials of the XXII April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development]. Moskva: Publ. NIU VShE, 2021. (In Russ.).
25. Irgit E.L., Erenchin D.O. K voprosu ob ekologicheskom soznanii studentov [On the question of the ecological consciousness of students]. Vestnik Tuvinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pedagogicheskie nauki [Bulletin of the Tuva State University. Pedagogical sciences], 2019, vol. 3, no. 51. DOI: 10.24411/2221- 0458-2019-10013 (In Russ.).
26. Kargapolova E.V., Dulina N.V., Shkurin D.V. Transformatsiya sotsial'no-ekologicheskoi sistemy regiona (na primere Nizhnego Povolzh'ya) [Transformation of the socio-ecological system of the region (on the example of the Lower Volga region)]. Voprosy territorial'nogo razvitiya [Questions of territorial development], 2019, vol. 2, no. 47, pp. 1—17. DOI: 10.15838/tdi.2019.2.47.1 (In Russ.).
27. Korunova V.O., Prygunova M.I., Ermolaeva P.O. Izuchenie protsessa ekologizatsii soznaniya molodezhi v kontekste kompleksnoi sotsial'noi politiki (po materialam oprosa studentov v Respublike Tatarstan) [Studying the process of greening the consciousness of youth in the context of a comprehensive social policy (based on a survey of students in the Republic of Tatarstan)]. Elektronnyi ekonomicheskii vestnik Tatarstana [Electronic Economic Bulletin of Tatarstan], 2017, no. 4, pp. 25—34. (In Russ.).
28. Marar O.I. Ekologicheskaya kul'tura v sovremennom rossiiskom obshchestve. Diss. dokt. psikhol. nauk. [Environmental culture in modern Russian society. Sci. (Psychology) diss.]. Moscow, 2012. 320 p. (In Russ.).
29. Nedospasova O.P., Kaida A.Yu., Efremova E.A., Kuznetsov A.A. Formirovanie ekologicheskogo samosoznaniya: tsennost' opyta stran OESR dlya sovremennoi Rossii [Formation of ecological identity: the value of the experience of the OECD countries for modern Russia]. Vektory blagopoluchiya: ekonomika i sotsium [Well-being vectors: economy and society], 2020, vol. 2, no. 37, P. 36—47. DOI: 10.18799/26584956 /2020/2(37)/1012 (In Russ.).
30. Nestik T.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Psikhologiya global'nykh riskov [Psychology of Globa Risks]. Moscow: Publ. Institut psikhologii RAN, 2018. 402 p. (In Russ.).
31. Panov V.I. Ekologicheskoe soznanie v paradigmal'nom kontekste ponyatiya "Priroda" [Ecological consciousness in the paradigmatic context of the concept of "Nature"]. Noosfernye issledovaniya [Noosphere studies], 2017, vol. 2, no. 18, pp. 17—30. (In Russ.).
32. Rodionova E.V., Arlyapova P.A., Primakov A.S., Kaz'mina O.V. Ekologicheskoe soznanie naseleniya: retsikling stekloboya v gorodskom prostranstve (na primere goroda Tomska) [Elektronnyi resurs] [Ecological consciousness of the population: Cullet recycling in urban space (on the example of the Tomsk city)]. Vestnik nauki Sibiri [Siberian Science Bulletin], 2017, vol. 3, no. 26. Available at: http://sjs2.tpu.ru/ journal/article/view/1578 (Accessed: 14.07.2021). (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
33. Rybakova M.V. Sotsial'nye ekologicheskie praktiki: sostoyanie i sistema vzaimodeistviya. Diss. dokt. soc. nauk. [Social ecological practices: state and system of interaction. Sci. (Sociology) diss.]. Moscow, 2010. 482 p. (In Russ.).
34. Ryazhskaya T.V. Sotsiologicheskii analiz protsessa ekologizatsii obshchestvennogo soznaniya: Gendernyi aspekt. Diss. kand. soc. nauk. [Sociological analysis of the process of increasing environmentalism in the public consciousness: Gender aspect. D. (Sociology) Thesis]. Moscow, 1999. 137 p. (In Russ.).
35. Tikhomirov D.A. Ekologicheskoe soznanie molodezhi Moskvy [Ecological consciousness of Moscow youth]. Gorizonty gumanitarnogo znaniya [Horizons of humanitarian knowledge], 2018, no. 2. DOI: 10.17805/ ggz.2018.2.6 (In Russ.).
36. Tsvetkova I.V., Ivanova T.N. Sotsial'nye kriterii ekologicheskoi otvetstvennosti molodezhi [Social criteria for the environmental responsibility of youth]. Integratsiya obrazovaniya [Integration of education], 2020, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 723—735. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.089.021.201704.723-735 (In Russ.).
37. Cherdymova E.I. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskoe issledovanie modeli sootnosheniya ekologicheskoi ustanovki i ekologicheskogo povedeniya shkol'nikov. Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Socio-psychological study of the model of the relationship between the ecological attitude and the ecological behavior of schoolchildren. D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Samara, 1999. 188 p. (In Russ.).
38. Shabanova M.A. Razdel'nyi sbor bytovykh otkhodov v Rossii: uroven', faktory i potentsial vklyucheniya naseleniya [Socio-economic practices of the population as a resource for weakening the waste problem in Russia]. Mir Rossii [World of Russia], 2019, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 88—112. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2019-28- 3-88-112 (In Russ.).
39. Shabanova M.A. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie praktiki naseleniya kak resurs oslableniya musornoi problemy v Rossii [Socio-economic practices of the population as a resource for weakening the waste problem in Russia]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies], 2019, no. 6, pp. 50—63. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250005481-2 (In Russ.).
40. Shishkina E.A. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie ekologicheskoi kul'tury na regional'nom urovne globalizatsii. Diss. dokt. soc. nauk. [Social construction of ecological culture at the regional level of globalization. Sci. (Sociology) diss.]. Saratov, 2009. 367 p. (In Russ.).
41. Shurupova M.F. Povsednevnoe povedenie v bytu i ekologicheskoe soznanie rossiyan [Everyday behavior in everyday life and the ecological consciousness of Russians]. Materialy VIII mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Problemy sotsiokul'turnoi i politicheskoi modernizatsii: chelovek, kommunikatsiya, sreda» (g. Sankt-Peterburg, 18—19 maya 2018 g.) [Proceedings of the VIII international scientific-practical conference "Problems of socio-cultural and political modernization: people, communication, environment"]. Saint Petersburg: Publ. SPbGLTU, 2014. (In Russ.).
42. Erkinbek Uluu S., Reznikov D.A. Povedenie Nizhegorodskogo potrebitelya pri vybore ekotovarov [Behavior of the Nizhny Novgorod consumer when choosing eco-goods]. Materialy 21-go Mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-promyshlennogo foruma «Velikie Reki'2019» (g. Nizhnii Novgorod, 14—17 maya 2019 g.) [Proceedings of the 21st International Scientific and Industrial Forum "Great Rivers'2019"]. Novgorod: Publ. NNGASU, 2019. (In Russ.).
43. Agissova F., Sautkina E. The Role of Personal and Political Values in Predicting Environmental Attitudes and Pro-environmental Behavior in Kazakhstan. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020. Vol. 11. P. 3660.
44. Bamberg S., Möser G. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2007. Vol. 27. № 1. P. 14—25.
45. Bertoldo R., Castro P. The outer influence inside us: Exploring the relation between social and personal norms. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. Vol. 112. P. 45—53.
46. Bond L., Sautkina E., Kearns A. Mixed messages about mixed tenure: do reviews tell the real story? Housing studies. Vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 69—94. DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2010.512752.
47. Brick C., Sherman D.K., Kim H.S. “Green to be seen” and “brown to keep down”: Visibility moderates the effect of identity on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2017. Vol. 51. P. 226—238.
48. Chan H.W. When do values promote pro-environmental behaviors? Multilevel evidence on the self-expression hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2020. Vol. 71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101361.
49. Chen X., Peterson M.N., Hull V., Lu C., Lee G.D., Hong D., Liu J. Effects of attitudinal and sociodemographic factors on pro-environmental behaviour in urban China. Environmental Conservation. 2011. Vol. 38. №1. P. 45—52.
50. Chwialkowska A., Akbar Bhatti W., Glowik M. The influence of cultural values on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020. Vol. 268. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122305.
51. Clayton S., Czellar S., Nartova-Bochaver S., Skibins J.C., Salazar G., Tseng Y.C., Irkhin B., Monge- Rodriguez F.S. Cross-cultural validation of a revised environmental identity scale. Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13. № 4. P. 2387. DOI: 10.3390/su13042387.
52. Daryanto A., Song Z. A meta-analysis of the relationship between place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Business Research. 2021. Vol. 123. P. 208—219
53. De Groot J.I.M., Van Den Berg A.E., Steg L. Environmental Psychology : An Introduction. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. 2019.
54. Dono J., Webb J., Richardson B. The relationship between environmental activism, pro-environmental behaviour and social identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2010. Vol. 30. № 2. P. 178—186. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.006
55. Frick J., Kaiser F.G., Wilson M. Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences. 2004. Vol. 37. № 8. P. 1597—1613.
56. Gatersleben B., Murtagh N., Abrahamse W. Values, identity and pro-environmental behaviour. Contemporary Social Science. 2014. Vol. 9. №4. P. 374—392.
57. Gatersleben B., Steg L., Vlek C. Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior. 2002. Vol. 34. № 3. 335—362. DOI: 10.1177/0013916502034003004
58. Gifford R., Nilsson A. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology. 2014. Vol. 49. № 3. P. 141—157.
59. Global Risks Report 2021.16th Edition / World Economic Forum. Geneva: WEF, 2021.
60. Graves L.M., Sarkis J., Gold N. Employee proenvironmental behavior in Russia: The roles of top management commitment, managerial leadership, and employee motives. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2019. Vol. 140, pp. 54—64. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.007.
61. Grilli G., Curtis J. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviours: A review of methods and approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021. Vol. 135. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110039.
62. He J., Morrison, A.M., Zhang H. Being sustainable: The three-way interactive effects of CSR, green human resource management, and responsible leadership on employee green behavior and task performance. Corporal Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2020. Vol. 28. № 3. P. 1043—1054. DOI: 10.1002/csr.2104
63. Kaiser F.G., Wilson M. Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences. 2004. Vol. 36. № 7. P. 1531—1544.
64. Khalina E.V., Solovjova J.N., Yuldasheva O.U., Pogrebova O.A. Values of sustainable development in consumer behavior: Case of Russia. Revista ESPACIOS. 2017. Vol. 38. № 54. P. 21.
65. Klaniecki K., Leventon J., Abson D.J. Human—nature connectedness as a ‘treatment’ for pro-environmental behavior: making the case for spatial considerations. Sustainability Science. 2018. Vol. 13. № 5. P. 1375—1388.
66. Larionova N.S., Pyankova T.V. Readiness of residents of Arkhangelsk for garbage reform changes. Proceedings of the Vth International Conference on Arctic: History and Modernity, Saint-Petersburg, 18—19 March 2020.
67. Larson L.R., Stedman R.C., Cooper C.B., Decker D.J. Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2015. Vol. 43. P. 112—124.
68. Li D., Zhao L., Ma S., Shao S., Zhang L. What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2019. Vol. 146. P. 28—34.
69. Liu P., Teng M., Han C. How does environmental knowledge translate into pro-environmental behaviors?: The mediating role of environmental attitudes and behavioral intentions. Science of The Total Environment. 2020. Vol. 728. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138126.
70. Markle G.L. Pro-Environmental Behavior: Does It Matter How It’s Measured? Development and Validation of the Pro-Environmental Behavior Scale (PEBS). Human Ecology. 2013. Vol. 41. № 6. P. 905— 914. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-013-9614-8
71. Melo P.C., Ge J., Craig T., Brewer M.J., Thronicker I. Does work-life balance affect pro-environmental behaviour? Evidence for the UK using longitudinal microdata. Ecological Economics. 2018. Vol. 145. 170—181.
72. Meyer A. Does education increase pro-environmental behavior? Evidence from Europe. Ecological Economics. Vol. 116. P. 108—121.
73. Morren M., Grinstein A. Explaining environmental behavior across borders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2016. Vol. 47. P. 91—106.
74. Nash N., Whitmarsh L., Capstick S., Hargreaves T., Poortinga W., Thomas G., Sautkina E., Xenias D. Climate-relevant behavioral spillover and the potential contribution of social practice theory. WIREs Climate Change. 2017. Vol. 8. № 6. P. 1—16.
75. Nielsen K. S., Cologna V., Lange F., Brick C., Stern P. C. The case for impact-focused environmental psychology. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2021. Vol. 74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101559.
76. Nielsen, K. S., Clayton, S., Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Capstick, S., & Whitmarsh, L. How psychology can help limit climate change. American Psychologist. 2021. Vol. 76. №1. P. 130—144. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000624
77. Noble G., Pomering A., Johnson L.W. Gender and message appeal: Their influence in a pro-environmental social advertising context. Journal of Social Marketing. 2014. Vol. 4 № 1. P. 4—21.
78. Petticrew M., Roberts H. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford, Blackwell. 2006.
79. Poortinga W., Steg L., Vlek C. Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: a study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior. 2004. Vol. 36. P. 70—93. DOI: 10.1177/0013916503251466
80. Ratner S., Gomonov K. Barriers of Consumer Behavior for the Development of the Circular Economy in Russia. Proceedings of the XV International Conference "Russian Regions in the Focus of Changes" (ICRRFC 2020). 15 February 2021. DOI: 10.2991/aebmr.k.210213.019
81. Reznichenko S.I., Irkhin B.D., Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Do authentic people care about the environment? A view from two paradigms. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2021. 14, № 3. P. 81—102.
82. Rydzewski P. The implementation of sustainable development vs. environmental attitudes in international comparative studies. Problemy Ekorozwoju—Problems of Sustainable Development. 2013. Vol. 8. № 1. P. 125—137.
83. Sautkina E., Agissova F., Ivanova A., Ivande K., Kabanova V., Patrakova N. Political, Environmental And Social Determinants Of Pro-Environmental Behaviour In Russia. 2021. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 130/PSY/2021, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995972. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3995972
84. Sautkina E., Ivanova A. Who’s Business is it Anyway? Environmental Policy and Determinants of Environmental Behaviour in Russia. Proceedings of the International Conference of Environmental Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK, 2019.
85. Schultz P.W., Kaiser F.G. Promoting pro-environmental behavior. In S.D. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology. Oxford University Press. 2012. P. 556—580.
86. Steg L., Perlaviciute G., Van der Werff E., Lurvink J. The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences, and actions. Environment and Behavior. 2014. Vol. 46. № 2. P. 163—192.
87. Steg L., Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 29. № 3. P. 309—317.
88. Stern P.C. Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues. Vol. 56. № 3. P. 407—424.
89. Ünal A.B., Steg L., Granskaya J. “To support or not to support, that is the question”. Testing the VBN theory in predicting support for car use reduction policies in Russia. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. Vol. 119. P. 73—81.
90. Valko D. Environmental attitudes and contextual stimuli in emerging environmental culture: An empirical study from Russia. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2021. Vol. 27. P. 2075—2089. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.05.008
91. Van der Werff E., Steg L., Keizer K. It is a moral issue: The relationship between environmental self-identity, obligation-based intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour. Global Environmental Change. 2013. Vol. 23. № 5. P. 1258—1265.
92. van Valkengoed, A. M., Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., Schultz, P. W., Brosch, T., Gatersleben, B., Nordlund, A., Pahl, S., Whitmarsh, L. Theory enhances impact. Reply to: ‘The case for impact-focused environmental psychology’. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101597
93. Whitmarsh L., O’Neill S. Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2010. Vol. 30. №3. P. 305—314. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
94. Whitmarsh L., Poortinga W., Capstick S. Behaviour change to address climate change. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2021. Vol. 42. P. 76—81. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.002
95. Zelezny L.C., Chua P.P., Aldrich C. Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues. 2000. Vol. 56. № 3. P. 443—458
96. Zhang H., Mou Y., Wang T., Hu J. The Influence of Advertising Appeals on Consumers’ Willingness to Participate in Sustainable Tourism Consumption. Complexity. Vol. 20. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8812560
97. Zibenberg A., Greenspan I., Katz-Gerro T., Handy F. Environmental behavior among Russian youth: the role of self-direction and environmental concern. Environmental management. Vol. 62. № 2. P. 295— 304. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1032-7