Implementing Motivation Models in Blended Learning Environments: A Review of Foreign Studies

180

Abstract

The article presents a descriptive review of modern international studies of implementation and effectiveness of integration of motivational models during the educational process. In particular, the attention is paid to the status of the category “blended learning”/ “mixed forms of learning”, and the current state of the implementation of aspects and conditions for the integration of motivation models in the process of organizing mixed learning is considered. Through the analysis of more than 40 international studies, dissertations, educational laws in the field of organization of blended learning, the issue of introducing motivation models to improve the quality and effectiveness of education at different levels of education was considered. The results of the authors’ work on the systematization of information about modern methods of studying the motivation of students in the education system are presented. According to the data provided, the authors determine the limitations of existing research and prospects for further works.

General Information

Keywords: blended learning, blended learning models, blended learning courses, motivational models, student engagement, teachers’ motivation

Journal rubric: Educational Psychology

Article type: review article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2022110307

Funding. The study was carried out within the framework of the state task of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation dated 30.05.2022 No. 073-00110-22-04 «Diagnosis of learning difficulties in primary school students»

For citation: Lobanova A.V., Khaperskaya A.Y. Implementing Motivation Models in Blended Learning Environments: A Review of Foreign Studies [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2022. Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 71–83. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2022110307. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Andreyeva N. V. Pedagogika effektivnogo smeshannogo obucheniya [Pedagogy of Effective Blended Learning]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2020. Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 8—20. DOI:10.17759/jmfp.2020090301 (In Russ.).
  2. Ministerstvo obrazovaniya i nauki Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation] (ed.). Kontseptsiya razvitiya psikhologicheskoi sluzhby v sisteme obrazovaniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii na period do 2025 goda [Concept for the development of psychological service in the education system in the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025] [Elektronnyi resurs]: [Utverzhdeno Ministerstvom obrazovaniya i nauki Rossiiskoi Federatsii 19 dekabrya 2017 g.]. Ministerstvo obrazovaniya Orenburgskoi oblasti [Ministry of Education of the Orenburg Region]. Moscow, 2017. 13 p. URL: https://minobr.orb.ru/upload/uf/742/2017_2025_koncepcija.pdf (Accessed 04.07.2022). (In Russ.).
  3. Margolis A. A. Chto smeshivaet smeshannoe obuchenie? [What Kind of Blending Makes Blended Learning?]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2018. Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 5—19. DOI:10.17759/pse.2018230301 (In Russ.).
  4. Nikitskaya M. G., Tolstykh N. N. Zarubezhnye issledovaniya uchebnoi motivatsii: XXI vek [Foreign studies of learning motivation: XXI century]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2018. Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 100—113. DOI:10.17759/jmfp.2018070210 (In Russ.).
  5. Ministerstvo prosveshcheniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation] (ed). Ob utverzhdenii federal’nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel’nogo standarta nachal’nogo obshchego obrazovaniya [On approval of the federal state educational standard for primary general education] [Elektronnyi resurs]: Prikaz Ministerstva prosveshcheniya RF ot 31 maya 2021 g. N 286: s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami ot 18 iyulya 2022 g. Garant.ru. Moscow, 2022. URL: https://base.garant.ru/400907193/?ysclid=l64t4xm9tz268805454 (Accessed 04.07.2022). (In Russ.).
  6. Ministerstvo prosveshcheniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation] (ed). Ob utverzhdenii federal’nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel’nogo standarta osnovnogo obshchego obrazovaniya [On approval of the federal state educational standard for basic general education] [Elektronnyi resurs]: Prikaz Ministerstva prosveshcheniya RF ot 31 maya 2021 g. Garant.ru. Moscow, 2022. URL: https://base.garant.ru/401433920/?ysclid=l64t5ovdun692450633 (Accessed 04.07.2022). (In Russ.).
  7. Ministerstvo obrazovaniya i nauki Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation] (ed). Ob utverzhdenii federal’nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel’nogo standarta srednego obshchego obrazovaniya [On approval of the federal state educational standard of secondary general education] [Elektronnyi resurs]: Prikaz Ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki RF ot 17 maya 2012 g. N 413: s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami ot 29 dekabrya 2014 g., 31 dekabrya 2015 g., 29 iyunya 2017 g., 24 sentyabrya, 11 dekabrya 2020 g. Garant.ru. Moscow, 2017. URL: https://base.garant.ru/70188902/?ysclid=l64t6gpidt154577108 (Accessed 04.07.2022). (In Russ.).
  8. Prudnikova T. A., Poskakalova T. A. Zarubezhnyi opyt primeneniya informatsionno-kommunikatsionnykh tekhnologii v tselyakh povysheniya uchebnoi motivatsii [The experience of Application of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) as a Tool to Enhance Learning Motivation]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2019. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 67—82. DOI:10.17759/jmfp.2019080207 (In Russ.).
  9. Ermolova T. V., Balygina E. A., Litvinov A. V., Guzova A. V. Formirovanie motivatsii dostizheniya u podrostkov v sovremennom obrazovatel’nom prostranstve [Formation of Adolescents’ Achievement Motivation in Modern Educational Space]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2019. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 7—18. DOI:10.17759/jmfp.2019080201 (In Russ.).
  10. Colreavy-Donelly S., Ryan A., O’Connor S., Caraffini F., Kuhn S., Hasshu S. A Proposed VR Platform for Supporting Blended Learning Post COVID-19. Education Sciences, 2022. Vol. 12, no. 7, article ID 435, 17 p. DOI:10.3390/educsci12070435
  11. Halverson L. R., Graham C. R., Spring K. J., Drysdale J. S., Henrie C. R. A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. Internet and Higher Education, 2014. Vol. 20, pp. 20—34. DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004
  12. Akyol Z., Garrison D. R., Ozden M. Y. Online and Blended Communities of Inquiry: Exploring the Developmental and Perceptional Differences. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2009. Vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 65—83. DOI:10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.765
  13. Alammary A., Carbone A., Sheard J. Blended learning in higher education: delivery methods selection [Elektronnyi resurs]. 24th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2016 (Istanbul, 12—15 June 2016). Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 2016. 13 p. URL: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2016_rp/150/ (Accessed 19.09.2022).
  14. Alammary A., Sheard J., Carbone A. Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2014. Vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 440—454. DOI:10.14742/ajet.693
  15. Alkiş N., Temizel T. T. The impact of motivation and personality on academic performance in online and blended learning environments [Elektronnyi resurs]. Educational Technology and Society, 2018. Vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 35—47. URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nJY5_D0ghMVnjvZLr9Rm1FyBOsZxG22K/view (Accessed 19.09.2022).
  16. Allcoat D. Effects and Applications of Video Games and Virtual Environments [Elektronnyi resurs]: Thesis Submitted to the University of Warwick for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology. Coventry, 2020. 302 p. URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/141711/ (Accessed 19.09.2022).
  17. Conoley J. C., Powers K., Gutkin T. B. How is school psychology doing: Why hasn’t school psychology realized its promise? School Psychology, 2020. Vol. 35, no. 6. 367—374 p. DOI:10.1037/spq0000404
  18. Davenport C. E. Evolution in Student Perceptions of a Flipped Classroom in a Computer Programming Course [Elektronnyi resurs]. Journal of College Science Teaching, 2018. Vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 30—35. URL: https://my.nsta.org/resource/?id=10.2505/4/jcst18_047_04_30 (Accessed 20.09.2022).
  19. Delgado-Cedeno Y. C., Chancay-Garcia L. J., Zambrano-Acosta J. M. La Gamificacion como Aprendizaje Innovador en los Estudiantes de Basica Media [Elektronnyi resurs]. Polo del Conocimiento, 2022. Vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 883—899. URL: https://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/3862 (Accessed 20.09.2022).
  20. Demirci C., Sariay S. A., Avci H. S. The Evaluation of Flipped Classroom Themed Master’s Theses and Dissertations in Turkey between 2015 and 2020 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Osmangazi Journal of Educational Research, 2022. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 205—226. URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ojer/issue/71103/1023164 (Accessed 20.09.2022).
  21. Driscoll M. Blended Learning: Let’s get beyond the hype [Elektronnyi resurs]. e-learning, 2002. Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 54. URL: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=6421919&lang=ru&site=ehost-live (Accessed 20.09.2022).
  22. Elias E. Muddled Measurement: A Historical Perspective on Questionable Practices in School Psychology’s Assessment of Learning Disabilities. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2021. Vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 142—152. DOI:10.1177/0829573521999946
  23. Fresen J. W. Embracing distance education in a blended learning model: challenges and prospects. Distance Education, 2018. Vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 224—240. DOI:10.1080/01587919.2018.1457949
  24. International Telecommunication Union. Global Connectivity Report 2022 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Geneva: ITU Publications, 2022.xxi, 163 p. URL: https://itu.int/hub/publication/d-ind-global-01-2022/ (Accessed 19.09.2022).
  25. Halverson L. R., Graham C. R. Learner Engagement in Blended Learning Environments: A Conceptual Framework. Online Learning, 2019. Vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 145—178 DOI:10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481
  26. Hidayat A. S. E., Albar W. F., Martalyna W. Dealing with Challenges in Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Flipped Classroom Model in Pandemic Era. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education (ICMMEd 2020). Dordrecht: Atlantis Press, 2021, pp. 47—54. DOI:10.2991/assehr.k.210508.041
  27. Hsu C.-C., Sandford B. A. The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2007. Vol. 12, article ID 10, 8 p. DOI:10.7275/pdz9-th90
  28. Ibrahim M. M., Nat M. Blended learning motivation model for instructors in higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2019. Vol. 16, article ID 12, 21 p. DOI:10.1186/s41239-019-0145-2
  29. Lalima, Dangwal K. L. Blended Learning: An Innovative Approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2017. Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 129—136. DOI:10.13189/ujer.2017.050116
  30. Lan M., Hew K. F. Examining learning engagement in MOOCs: a self-determination theoretical perspective using mixed method. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2020. Vol. 17, article ID 7, 24 p. DOI:10.1186/s41239-020-0179-5
  31. Bolatov A. K., Gabbasova A. M., Baikanova R. K., Igenbayeva B. B., Pavalkis D. Online or blended learning: the COVID-19 pandemic and first-year medical students’ academic motivation. Medical Science Educator, 2022. Vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 221—228. DOI:10.1007/s40670-021-01464-y
  32. Oraif I. M. K. An Investigation into the Impact of the Flipped Classroom on Intrinsic Motivation (IM) and Learning Outcomes on an EFL Writing Course at a University in Saudi Arabia Based on Self-determination Theory (SDT) [Elektronnyi resurs]: Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Leicester. Leicester, 2018. 309 p. URL: https://hdl.handle.net/2381/42165 (Accessed 20.09.2022).
  33. Ozkan S. Koseler R. Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers and Education, 2009. Vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1285—1296. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.011
  34. Panteri M., Calmaestra J., Marin-Diaz V. Roles of the School Psychologist — Current versus Preferred Roles in the Greek Schools: A Case Study from the Island of Crete. Education Sciences, 2021. Vol. 11, no. 8, article ID 439, 16 p. DOI:10.3390/educsci11080439
  35. Young E. L., Butler R., Smith T. B., Hilton S. C., Smith A. Recruiting and retaining school psychologists: the experiences of district level administrative supervisors. Psychology in the Schools, 2021. Vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1501—1517. DOI:10.1002/ pits.22506
  36. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 2000. Vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68—78. DOI:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68
  37. Deublein A., Pfeifer A., Merbach K., Bruckner K., Mengelkamp C., Lugrin B. Scaffolding of motivation in learning using a social robot. Computers and Education, 2018. Vol. 125, pp. 182—190. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.015
  38. Shrestha B. K., Gautam N., Shakya M. Flipped Classes: New e-learning Object in Nepal and Perspective of Teachers [Elektronnyi resurs]. NaSCoIT 2016 Published Papers: 8th National Students’ Conference on Information Technology (Kathmandu, 27 August 2016). Kathmandu: Nepal College of Information Technology, 2016, pp. [80—86]. URL: https://ncit.edu.np/storage/downloads/attachment/YIqqnA1fFBwrpABbPnPkVCY5OBP9799rboukgKQa.pdf (Accessed 20.09.2022).
  39. Simvony Y. L., Santosa A. B., Nugroho W. The Role of Parents in Blended Learning Towards Student Character Values in The Covid-19 Pandemic. ZAHRA: Research and Tought Elementary School of Islam Journal, 2021. Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 134— 143. DOI:10.37812/zahra.v2i2.249
  40. Vanslambroucka S., Zhua C., Lombaertsa K., Philipsena B., Tondeurb J. Students’ motivation and subjective task value of participating in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 2018. Vol. 36, pp. 33—40. DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.002
  41. Wu J.-H., Tennyson R. D., Hsia T.-L. A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers and Education, 2010. Vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 155—164. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012

Information About the Authors

Anna V. Lobanova, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor of the Department of Educational Psychology named after Professor V.A. Guruzhapov Faculty of Educational Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8850-8647, e-mail: lobanovaav@mgppu.ru

Anna Y. Khaperskaya, PhD in Psychology, Senior Lecturer, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5755-431X, e-mail: khaperskayaau@mgppu.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 408
Previous month: 30
Current month: 13

Downloads

Total: 180
Previous month: 1
Current month: 7