Skip to Main Content

Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology
2026. Vol. 15, no. 1, 27–37
doi:10.17759/jmfp.2026150103
ISSN: 2304-4977 (online)

Social identity as a factor of young people’s attitude towards international integration in the era of globalization

 
Audio is AI-generated
  2 min read
7

, , , ,

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar
Metrics

Abstract

Context and relevance. The global tensions and increasing sanctions pressure on Russia create the context when it seems particularly important to study the factors influencing Russian youth’s attitudes toward cross-country integration. Social identity is known to be one of the key factors shaping perceptions and evaluations of integration processes between states is social identity. However, the potential of social identity as a socio-psychological resource for shaping youth attitudes toward international integration remains quite unexplored in the Russian context. Objective is to analyze foreign studies that examine the role of social identity in shaping youth attitudes toward cross-country integration. Methods and Materials. We used a theoretical analysis of articles from international scientometric databases on the research topic and based on the keywords: «social identity», «attitude to integration», «international integration», «intergroup interaction», «intergroup contact», and «perceived threat». Results. The study reveals that different types of social identity are ambiguously connected with cross-country integration. The nature of intergroup interactions between countries determines the youth perception of integration and a high level of ethnic, national (civic), and global identity acts as either a barrier or a resource of this process. Conclusions. The complexity of social identity itself, the quality and depth of intergroup contact, and the level of perceived intergroup threat are the key parameters mediating the relationship between social identity and youth attitudes toward cross-country integration.

General Information

Keywords: social identity, ethnic identity, civic identity, global identity, attitude to international integration, intergroup interaction, European Union, Eurasian Union, intergroup contact, intergroup threat, youth

Journal rubric: Social Psychology

Article type: review article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2026150103

Funding. The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project number 25-18-01020, https://rscf.ru/project/25-18-01020/.

Received 21.08.2025

Revised 14.11.2025

Accepted

Published

For citation: Gritsenko, V.V., Shorokhova, V.A., Uzoikina, A.I., Tsyplakova, E.A., Murashcenkova, N.V. (2026). Social identity as a factor of young people’s attitude towards international integration in the era of globalization. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 15(1), 27–37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2026150103

© Gritsenko V.V., Shorokhova V.A., Uzoikina A.I., Tsyplakova E.A., Murashcenkova N.V., 2026

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Full text

 

References

  1. Кузнецова, Е.В. (2018). Восприятие населением евразийской интеграции: Мониторинг общественного мнения. Журнал исторических, политологических и международных исследований, 1(64), 42—48. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35124514 (дата обращения: 04.02.2026).
    Kuznetsova, E.V. (2018). Perception of the peoples of Eurasian youth: Monitoring public opinion. Journal of history, politics and international studies, 1(64), 42—48. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35124514 (viewed: 04.02.2026).
  2. Рыбакова, М.В., Паламарчук, А.В. (2020). Евразийская интеграция: Контент-анализ электронных ресурсов. Научный результат. Социология и управление, 6(2), 132—144. https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-2-0-9
    Rybakova, M.V., Palamarchuk, A.V. (2020). Eurasian integration: Сontent analysis of web-resources. Research result. Sociology and management, 6(2), 132—144. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-2-0-9
  3. Aichholzer, J., Kritzinger, S., Plescia, C. (2021). National identity profiles and support for the European Union. European Union Politics, 22(2), 293—315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116520980068
  4. Arıkan, G. (2012). Attitudes towards the European Union in Turkey: The role of perceived threats and benefits. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 17(3), 81—103. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284837654 (viewed: 04.02.2026).
  5. Bagci, S.C., Stathi, S., Golec de Zavala, A. (2023). Social identity threat across group status: Links to psychological well-being and intergroup bias through collective narcissism and ingroup satisfaction. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 29(2), 208—220. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000509
  6. Borz, G., Brandenburg, H., Mendez, C. (2022). The impact of EU Cohesion Policy on European identity: A comparative analysis of EU regions. European Union Politics, 23(2), 259—281. https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221076444
  7. Cameron, J.E. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3(3), 239—262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500444000047
  8. Cinnirella, M., Hamilton, S. (2007). Are all Britons reluctant Europeans? Exploring European identity and attitudes to Europe among British citizens of South Asian ethnicity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(3), 481—501. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701217530
  9. Clark, N.J., Rohrschneider, R. (2019). The relationship between national identity and European Union evaluations, 1993—2017. European Union Politics, 20(3), 384—405 https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116519840428
  10. Clark, N.J., Rohrschneider, R. (2021). Tracing the development of nationalist attitudes in the EU. European Union Politics, 22(2), 181—201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116520988902
  11. Craith, I.N., Corbett, B., Tomašić Humer, J., Tomovska Misoska, A., Maloku, E., Dautel, J.B., Taylor, L.K. (2024). Supraordinate identity integration in childhood: Intergroup implications of ethno-national and supraordinate identification in three divided societies. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), Article e2754. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2754
  12. Crocetti, E., Albarello, F., Meeus, W., Rubini, M. (2023). Identities: A developmental social-psychological perspective. European Review of Social Psychology, 34(1), 161—201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2022.2104987
  13. Dalton, R.J. (2021). National/European identities and political alignments. European Union Politics, 22(2), 340—350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116521992878
  14. Damiani, V., Losito, B., Agrusti, G., Schulz, W. (2025). Young Citizens' Views and Engagement in a Changing Europe: IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2022 European Report. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68631-3
  15. Dellmuth, L.M., Scholte, J.A., Tallberg, J., Verhaegen, S. (2022). The elite–citizen gap in international organization legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 116(1), 283—300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000824
  16. Devine, D., Valgarðsson, V., Smith, J., Jennings, W., Scotto di Vettimo, M., Bunting, H., McKay, L. (2023). Political trust in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: A meta-analysis of 67 studies. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(3), 657—679. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2169741
  17. Dovidio, J.F., Love, A., Schellhaas, F.M.H., Hewstone, M. (2017). Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 606—620. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217712052
  18. Duncan, K.B. (2020). Invisible social identity exercise. Management Teaching Review, 5(4), 324—334. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298118815249
  19. Göregenli, M., Akalm, P.K. (2018). The relationship between ethnic identity, European identity and attitudes towards EU. Turk Psikoloji Yazilari, 21, 35—37.
  20. Grimalda, G., Buchan, N.R., Brewer, M.B. (2023). Global social identity predicts cooperation at local, national, and global levels: Results from international experiments. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1008567. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1008567
  21. Gur, F.A., Mathias, B.D. (2021). Finding self among others: Navigating the tensions between personal and social identity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(6), 1463—1495. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211038109
  22. Ho, A.K., Kteily, N.S. (2025). Using the sociopolitical motive × intergroup threat model of intergroup relations to understand opposition to policies that promote social equality. Social Issues and Policy Review, 19(1), Article e12109. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12109
  23. Hooghe, L., Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1—23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409
  24. Huang, A.X., Chen, J.M., Degner, J. (2025). Being one or the other, both or neither: Self-categorization theory, social identity theory and the issue of mixed identities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 55(4), 727—743. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3155
  25. Jackson, J.W., Smith, E.R. (1999). Conceptualizing social identity: A new framework and evidence for the impact of different dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(1), 120—135. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616729902500101
  26. Joyce, N., Sandras, D., Soliz, J. (2024). Intergroup contact and intergroup dialogue: communicative pathways to addressing prejudice and intergroup bias. In: E. Nshom, S. Croucher (Eds.), Research Handbook on Communication and Prejudice (pp. 91—103). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  27. Khadka, C. (2024). Social identity theory and group behavior. TUTA Journal, 12(1), 105—120. https://doi.org/10.3126/tutaj.v12i1.74063
  28. Khan, S.R. (2021). Different and better than you: The interplay between social identity, moral identity, and social comparison. Journal of Community Applied Social Psychology, 31(5), 615—635. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2549
  29. Konings, R., De Coninck, D., d'Haenens, L. (2023). The role of European and national identity and threat perceptions in attitudes towards immigrants. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 31(2), 446—460. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2021.2007058
  30. Kostakopoulou, T. (2024). Citizenship, identity and immigration in the European Union: Between past and future. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  31. Larsen, E.G., Cutts, D., Goodwin, M.J. (2020). Do terrorist attacks feed populist Eurosceptics? Evidence from two comparative quasi-experiments. European Journal of Political Research, 59(1), 182—205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12342
  32. Li, X., Meng, X., Ruiz, R.A., Wang, J., Liew, J. (2025). Types of relations between national identity and global identity and their associated factors: A scoping review. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 105, Article 102142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102142
  33. Lubbers, T., Haverland, M., Zhelyazkova, A. (2026). National satisfaction vs. European support? Explaining attitudes towards the EU in candidate member states. Journal of European Integration, 48(1), 67—95. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2025.2489160
  34. Marinucci, M., Maunder, R., Sanchez, K., Thai, M., McKeown, S., Turner, R.N., Stevenson, C. (2021). Intimate intergroup contact across the lifespan. Journal of Social Issues, 77(1), 64—85. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12399
  35. Mayer, A.M., Bobba, B., Jugert, P., Crocetti, E. (2026). Young Europeans – the interplay between short- and medium-term development of European identification across adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 55, 196—210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02256-y
  36. Mayer, A.M., Crocetti, E., Eckstein, K., Noack, P., Jugert, P. (2025). Becoming European: Mid- and short-term development of a European identity among adolescents. Identity, 25(4), 467—485. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2024.2394874
  37. Neamț, N.S. (2025). Exploring perceptions of academic and social integration through intercultural competence development among French-speaking medical students. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia, 70(2), 145—166. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2025.2.07
  38. Neville, F.G., Novelli, D., Drury, J., Reicher, S.D. (2022). Shared social identity transforms social relations in imaginary crowds. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(1), 158—173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220936759
  39. Page-Gould, E., Harris, K., MacInnis, C.C., Danyluck, C.M., Miller, I.D. (2022). The intergroup perspective on cross-group friendship. In: B. Gawronski (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 65 (pp. 1—56). Cambridge: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2021.10.001
  40. Paolini, S., Gibbs, M., Sales, B., Anderson, D., McIntyre, K. (2024). Negativity bias in intergroup contact: Meta-analytical evidence that bad is stronger than good, especially when people have the opportunity and motivation to opt out of contact. Psychological Bulletin, 150(8), 921—964. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000439
  41. Policardo, G.R., Karataş, S., Prati, F. (2025). A blind spot in intergroup contact: A systematic review on predictors and outcomes of inter-minority contact experiences. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 104, Article 102099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102099
  42. Quaranta, M., Cancela, J., Martín, I., Tsirbas, Y. (2023). Trust, satisfaction and political engagement during economic crisis: Young citizens in Southern Europe. In: E. Tsatsanis, M. Lisi, A. Freire (Eds.), A Generational Divide? Age-related Aspects of Political Transformation in Post-crisis Southern Europe (pp. 20—46). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003323143-2
  43. Rast, D.E., van Knippenberg, D., Hogg, M.A. (2020). Intergroup relational identity: Development and validation of a scale and construct. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(7), 943—966. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219883350
  44. Roccas, S., Brewer, M.B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88—106. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0602_01
  45. Roth, J., Steffens, M.C., Strack, F. (2025). Multiple social identities: A cognitive consistency model on identity integration. Self and Identity, 24(7), 803—830. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2025.2526465
  46. Schlipphak, B., Schäfer, C., Treib, O. (2024). Cosmopolitan identity, authority, and domestic support of international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 1—20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-024-09573-0
  47. Stephan, W.G., Stephan, C.W. (2017). Intergroup threat theory. In: Y.Y. Kim (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0162
  48. Todd, J., Chakravarty, D., McEvoy, J. (2025). Youth repertoires and cosmopolitan horizons in deeply divided contexts. The Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261251338099
  49. Verkuyten, M. (2021). Group identity and ingroup bias: The social identity approach. Human Development, 65(5—6), 311—324. https://doi.org/10.1159/000519089
  50.  

Information About the Authors

Valentina V. Gritsenko, Doctor of Psychology, Professor of the Department of Cross-Cultural Psychology & Psychological Problems of Multicultural Education, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7543-5709, e-mail: gricenkovv@mgppu.ru

Valeriya A. Shorokhova, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Associate Professor of the Department of Cross-cultural Psychology and Multicultural Education, Faculty of Social Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5424-2350, e-mail: shorokhovava@gmail.com

Alena I. Uzoikina, Master Student of the Department of Cross-cultural Psychology and Multicultural Education, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2220-6192, e-mail: uzoikina.ai@gmail.com

Elizaveta A. Tsyplakova, Master Student of the Department of Cross-cultural Psychology and Multicultural Education, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4999-2994, e-mail: elisatsy@mail.ru

Nadezhda V. Murashcenkova, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Associate Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Psychology, HSE University, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0793-3490, e-mail: ncel@yandex.ru

Contribution of the authors

Valentina V. Gritsenko — ideas; planning of the research; data collection and analysis; annotation; writing of the manuscript, control over the research.
Valeriya A. Shorokhova — ideas; planning of the research; data collection and analysis; writing of the manuscript.
Alena I. Uzoikina — ideas; data collection and analysis; writing and design of the manuscript.
Elizaveta A. Tsyplakova — ideas; data collection and analysis; writing and design of the manuscript.
Nadezhda V. Murashcenkova — ideas; planning of the research; annotation; writing of the manuscript; control over the research.
All authors participated in the discussion of the results and approved the final text of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 6
Previous month: 0
Current month: 6

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 7
Previous month: 0
Current month: 7

 Total

Whole time: 13
Previous month: 0
Current month: 13