The impact of parental family on matrimonial family formation in future generation

9486

Abstract

The goal of the research was to define a degree of reproduction of parental family structure and the peculiarities of parental family influence on matrimonial family of future generation. In the research took part 49 subjects from 18 till 66 years old, the majority of them – the members of stuff of two Moscow scientific institutes, who have higher education and the students of Moscow universities. The author created the questionnaire to define how family structural disbalance influence on the future generations family structure, marriage stability, interpersonal interaction style and spouse adaptive resources. The received data confirm the laws of family system function. According to homeostasis law the system aspires to keep the position and once destroyed family is reproduced in future generations.

General Information

Keywords: : the system approach, the structure of parental family, parents divorce, incomplete family

Journal rubric: Developmental Psychology

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Dokuchaeva S.O. The impact of parental family on matrimonial family formation in future generation. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2005. Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 41–55. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Aleshina Yu.A,. Volovich A.S. Problemy usvo eniya role’ muzhchiny i zhenshiny // Voprosy psi hologii. 1991. № 4
  2. Bozhovich L.I. Etapy formirovaniya lichnosti v ontogeneze: Hrestomatiya po vozrastnoi psihologii / Red.sost. O.A Karabanova. M., 1999.
  3. Braun Dzh., Kristensen D. Teoriya i praktika seme’no’ psihoterapii. SPb., 2001.
  4. B’yudzhental’ D. Nauka byt’ zhivym: dialogi mezhdu terapevtom i pacientami v gumanisti chesko’ terapii / Per. s angl. A.B. Fen’ko. M., 1998. (Biblioteka psihologii i psihoterapii).
  5. Varga A.Ya. Sistemnaya seme’naya psihote rapia. SPb., 2001.
  6. Varlamova E.P. Kak zhit’ dolgo i schastlivo? Kak zhit’ posle razvoda? M., 2001.
  7. Veber G. Krizisy lyubvi: sistemnaya psiho terapiya Berta Hellingera. M., 2001.
  8. Vidra D. Pomosh’ razvedennym roditelyam i ih detyam: ot tragedii k nadezhde: Po stranicam nauchnyh trudov Gel’muta Figdora. M., 2000.
  9. Vinnikott D. Razgovor s roditelyami. M., 1995.
  10. Volkova A.N., Trapeznikova T.M. Metodiche skie priemy diagnostiki supruzheskih otnosheni’ // Voprosy psihologii. 1985. № 5
  11. Vygotskii L.S. Problema kul’turnogo razvitiya rebenka // Vestnik Mosk. unta. Ser. «Psiholo giya». 1991. №4.
  12. Druzhinin V.N. Psihologiya sem’i. M., 1996.
  13. Dymnova T.I. Zavisimost’ harakteristik supru zhesko’ sem’i ot roditel’sko’ // Voprosy psihologii. 1998. № 2.
  14. Ken R.K. Kak stat’ horoshim otcom. Sem’ sekretov: Per. s angl. M., 1999.
  15. Levi V. Kak vospityvat’ roditele,’ ili Novy’ nes tandartny’ rebenok. M., 2002.
  16. Logushko T. Kak perezhit’ razvod. SPb., 2002.
  17. Mackovskii M.S. Sem’ya na poroge tret’ego tysyacheletiya. M., 1990.
  18. NartovaBochaver S.K., Nesmeyanova M.I., Malyarova N.V., Muhortova E.A. Rebenok v karuseli razvoda. M., 2001.
  19. Obuhova L.F. Vozrastnaya psihologiya. M., 2000.
  20. Pikhart K.E. Rukovodstvo dlya odinokih roditele’. M., 1998.
  21. Rodzhers K. Psihologiya supruzheskih otno sheni’. M., 2001.
  22. Rossi’ski’ statisticheski’ ezhegodnik. 2001 g. M., 2002.
  23. Satir V. Vy i Vasha sem’ya. SPb., 2001.
  24. Satir V. Psihoterapiya sem’I. M., 2002.
  25. Seme’ny’ kodeks RF. М., 2003.
  26. Stepanov S.S. Zakony psihologii. SPb., 2000.
  27. Tiit E. Faktory riska, vyzyvayushie rastorzhe nie braka: Social’nodemograficheskie issle dovaniya. M., 1975.
  28. Homentauskas G.T. Sem’ya glazami reben ka. M., 2003.
  29. Celuiko V.M. Psihologiya neblagopoluchno’ sem’i. M., 2003.
  30. Shneider L.B. Psihologiya seme’nyh otno sheni’: Kurs lekcii. M., 2000.
  31. Eidemiller E.G., Dobryakov I.V., Nikol’ skaya I.M. Seme’ny’ diagnoz i seme’naya psi hoterapiya. SPb., 2003.
  32. Bowen M. Famile Therapy in Clinical Prac tice. N.Y., 1978.
  33. Minuchin S. Families and Family Therapy. Cambridge, 1974.
  34. Palazzoli-Selvini M. Paradox and Counter paradox. N. Y., 2002.

Information About the Authors

Svetlana O. Dokuchaeva, Teacher-Psychologist, Leading a Family Club in Social Networks.-Rehabilitation Center for Minors "Otradnoye" SVAO. Technology Teacher, Education Center (GOU) no. 1130 CJSC, Moscow, Russia

Metrics

Views

Total: 7118
Previous month: 35
Current month: 33

Downloads

Total: 9486
Previous month: 41
Current month: 45