Subjective criteria of correctness / incorrectness of a personal significant choice

1328

Abstract

The article presents a study on the identification and description of subjective criteria for correctness / incorrectness of a personally significant choice. Using the method of semi-structured interview the hypothesis was tested: that these criteria will reflect the state of the choice subject, and phenomenology of this state will coincide with the phenomenology of meaningful / meaningless life. As a result of qualitative analysis of the interview data the categories that describe the subjective criteria of correctness / incorrectness of a personally significant choice were shown.

General Information

Journal rubric: General Psychology

For citation: Filonik M.S. Subjective criteria of correctness / incorrectness of a personal significant choice. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2008. Vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 141–154. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. 1. Asmolov A. G. Po tu storonu soznaniya: metodologicheskie problemy neklassicheskoi psihologii. M.: Smysl, 2002.
    2. Asmolov A. G. Psihologiya lichnosti: principy obshepsihologicheskogo analiza. M.: Smysl, 2001.
    3. Bratus' B. S. Anomalii lichnosti. M.: Mysl', 1988.
    4. Bratus' B. S. Nravstvennoe soznanie lichnosti: psihologicheskoe issledovanie. M.: Znanie, 1985.
    5. Vasilyuk F. E. Metodologicheskii analiz v psihologii. M.: MGPPU; Smysl, 2003.
    6. Vasilyuk F. E. Ot psihologicheskoi praktiki k psihotehnicheskoi teorii // Mosk. psihoterapevt. zhurn. 1992. № 1.
    7. Vasilyuk F. E. Psihotehnika vybora // Psihologiya s chelovecheskim licom: gumanisticheskaya
    perspektiva v postsovetskoi psihologii. / Pod red. D. A. Leont'eva, V. G. Shur. M.: Smysl, 1997.
    8. Vasilyuk F. E. Psihologiya perezhivaniya. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1984.
    9. Derner D. Logika neudach. M.: Smysl, 1997.
    10. Kaneman D., Tverski A. Racional'nyi vybor, cennosti i freimy // Psihologicheskii zhurnal. 2003. T. 42. № 4.
    11. Kvale S. Issledovatel'skoe interv'yu. M.: Smysl, 2003.
    12. Kozeleckii Yu. Psihologicheskaya teoriya reshenii. M.: Progress, 1979.
    13. Komlev A. A. Psihologicheskie faktory znachimogo zhiznennogo vybora: Dis. ... kand. psihol. nauk. Tambov, 2003.
    14. Kornilova T. V. Psihologiya riska i prinyatiya reshenii: Uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. M.: Aspekt Press, 2003.
    15. Kornilova T. V., Tihomirov O. K. Prinyatie intellektual'nyh reshenii v dialoge s komp'yuterom. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1990.
    16. Kravchenko L. S. Zhiznennyi vybor lichnosti (psihologicheskii analiz): Diss. ... kand. psihol. nauk. M., 1987.
    17. Larichev O. I. Nauka i iskusstvo prinyatiya reshenii. M.: Nauka,1979.
    18. Leont'ev A. N. Deyatel'nost'. Soznanie. Lichnost'. M.: Politizdat, 1977.
    19. Leont'ev D. A. K psihologii postupka.
    20. Leont'ev D. A. Novye gorizonty problemy smyla v psihologii. // Problema smysla v naukah o cheloveke (k 100-letiyu Viktora Frankla): materialy mezhdunarodnoi konferencii. Pod red.
    D. A. Leont'eva. M.: Smysl, 2005.

Information About the Authors

Maria S. Filonik, Research Fellow, Federal Institute for Educational Development, Psychotherapist and Teacher of the Association of Understanding Psychotherapy, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: fpc_grant@mail.ru