Comparative Analysis of Teacher's Professional Position in Different Types of Training

906

Abstract

This research analyses the professional position of primary school teacher in different forms of education. The hypothesis proposed that teacher's professional position reflected in teacher's priority values will be different in frontal and individual forms of training. Regular primary school teachers from Moscow and Moscow region participated in the study. All teachers used frontal or individual form of training in their classwork. The peculiarities of professional position content were examined in the study as well as teachers' attitudes which impact their practical actions towards their students. The article presents an analysis of the revealed differences in pedagogical aims, teachers' perceptions of the child image and the ways of children behavior correction. The functioning mechanism of teacher's professional position in frontal and individual forms of training is considered. It is revealed that the individual form of training is a factor and a source of such pedagogical activity content that makes the teacher a student’s partner.

General Information

Keywords: teacher's professional position; frontal and individual forms of training; priority values; self-esteem; authoritarianism index.

Journal rubric: Perspectives of Inclusive Education

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Alekhina S.V., Dmitrieva S.M. Comparative Analysis of Teacher's Professional Position in Different Types of Training. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2011. Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 32–40. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Vostokova E. V. Formy obuchenija: kategorija didaktiki i predmetnyh metodik // Pedagogika. 2002. № 4.
  2. Markova A. K. Psihologija truda uchitelja. M., 1993.
  3. Mitina L. M. Nuzhen li shkole uchitel'? Psihologicheskie problemy professional'nogo razvitija pedagoga // Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie. 2008. № 2.
  4. Mitina L. M. Uchitel' kak lichnost' i professional. M., 1994.
  5. Novikov A. M. Metodologija obrazovanija. M., 2006.
  6. Rezapkina G. V. Psihologicheskij portret uchitelja // Shkol'nyj psiholog. 2006. № 6.
  7. Rubcov V. V. Psihologo-pedagogicheskaja podgotovka uchitelja dlja novoj shkoly // Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie. 2010. № 1.
  8. Slastenin V. A., Isaev I. F. i dr. Pedagogika: Ucheb. posobie. M., 2002.
  9. Sochen' L. T. Vlijanie professional'noj pozicii pedagoga na uroven' samostojatel'nosti uchashihsja: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. psihol. nauk. M., 2000.
  10. Federal'nyj Gosudarstvennyj obrazovatel'nyj standart nachal'nogo obshego obrazovanija. Utverzhden prikazom Ministerstva obrazovanija i nauki Rossijskoj Federacii ot 6 oktjabrja 2009 g. M., 2009. Jelektronnaja versija: http://standart.edu.ru/catalog.aspx?CatalogId=959.
  11. Judina E. G. Pozicija pedagogov: avtoritarizm i partnerstvo // Teorija i praktika razvivajushego obrazovanija v shkole V. V. Davydova. Po materialam Jubilejnoj konferencii, posvjashennoj 75-letiju V. V. Davydova. M., 2007.
  12. Judina E. G. Professional'noe soznanie pedagoga: Opyt postanovki problemy v sovremennom obrazovanii // Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie. 2001. № 1.

Information About the Authors

Svetlana V. Alekhina, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Chief of the Federal Center for the Development of Inclusive General and Additional Education, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9374-5639, e-mail: ipio.mgppu@gmail.com

Svetlana M. Dmitrieva, PhD Student, Chair of Educational Psychology, Department of Psychology of Education, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education; Educational Psychologist, Secondary School № 3, Protvino, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: smdmitrieva@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 2466
Previous month: 7
Current month: 14

Downloads

Total: 906
Previous month: 2
Current month: 0