Psychological Prerequisites of Reflection Development in the Conditions of Digital Technologies Use



This article is based on the results of the international research project «Global Perspectives on Learning and Development with Digital Video- Editing Media: A Qualitative Inquiry in Everyday Lives of Marginalized Young People», which took place in 2012-2014 under the program «Marie Curie actions» with the financial support of the European Commission. The project involved research groups from Russia, Brazil, Britain, Germany, Greece India, and the Netherlands. The general direction of the work was to study the peculiarities of application of digital technologies by modern youth in different cultural contexts.

General Information

Keywords: digital technology, mediation, tools and signs, reflection, reflective communication, drama, dramatic conflict, position-role experimentation

Journal rubric: Educational Psychology

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Rubtsova O.V., Ulanova N.S. Psychological Prerequisites of Reflection Development in the Conditions of Digital Technologies Use. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2014. Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 101–112. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)


  1. Veresov N. N. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya L. S. Vygotskogo: trudnaya rabota ponimaniya [Elektronnyi resurs] [Vigotsky’s cultural-historical
    psychology: hard work of understanding]. Nezavisimyi filologicheskii zhurnal [Independent philological journal], 2007, no. 85. Available at: http:// (Accessed: 15.10.2014).
  2. Vygotskii L. S. Sobranie sochinenii: v 6-ti t. Т. 1. Voprosy teorii i istorii psihologii [Collected works, Vol. 1: Theory and history of psychology].
    Luriya A. R., Yaroshevskii M. G. (eds.). Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983. 488 p.
  3. Vygotskii L. S. Sobranie sochinenii: v 6-ti t. T. 3. Problemy razvitiya psikhiki [Collected works, Vol. 3: Problems of psyche development]. Matyushkin A. M. (ed.). Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983. 368 p.
  4. Vygotskii L. S. Sobranie sochinenii: V 6-ti t. T. 6. Nauchnoe nasledstvo [Collected works, Vol. 6: Scientific legacy]. Yaroshevskii M. G. (ed.). Moscow: Pedagogika, 1984. 400 p.
  5. Vygotskii L. S. Dinamika i struktura lichnosti podrostka [Dynamics and structure of adolescent’s person]. Khrestomatiya po vozrastnoi i pedagogicheskoi
    psikhologii [Chrestomathy on age and pedagogical psychology]. Moscow: Publ. Mosk. un-ta, 1980, pp. 138–142.
  6. Davydov V. V. Poslednie vystupleniya [Last speeches]. Riga: Eksperiment, 1998. 88 p.
  7. Kazakov A., Orekhov M., Roshchin N., Kuznetsova K., Kirillkina A., Troitskaya S., Sapkovskii N., Belya ev P., Prilukova D., Abdullaev E., Samorodskii I.
    iFomina V.
    Dokumental’nyi fil’m «Ya lyublyu» [Documentary ”I love“] [Elektronnyi resurs] Available at: (Accessed: 20.08.2014).
  8. Leont’ev A. N. Deyatel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’. [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1977. 302 p.
  9. Rubtsov V. V. Sotsial’nye vzaimodeistviya i obuchenie: kul’turno-istoricheskii kontekst [Social interactions and education: cultural-historical context]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural- historical psychology], 2005, no. 1, pp. 14–24 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  10. Bonk J. C. The world is open: how web technology is revolutionizing education. Wiley Desktop Editions, Wiley, 2009. 512 p.
  11. Christensen C. M., Johnson C. W. & Horn M. B. Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw, 2008. 272 p.
  12. Cope B., Kalantzis M. Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 2009, no. 4, pp. 164–195.
  13. Giesecke M. Von den Mythen der Buchkultur zu den Visionen der Informationsgesellschaft. Frankfurt am. Main, 2002. 458 p.
  14. Hartz D. Literacy leaps as blind students embrace technology. The English Journal, 2000, no. 90(2), pp. 52–59.
  15. Heldberg J. G. Towards a disruptive pedagogy: changing classroom practice with technologies and digital content. Educational Media International, 2011, no. 48(1), pp. 1–16.
  16. Jenkins H. Media literacy: Who needs it? In T. Willoughby and E. Wood (eds.) Children’s
    learning in a digital world. Oxford: 2008, Blackwell, pp. 16–39.
  17. Kress G. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge, 2010. 236 p.
  18. Rückriem G. Digital technology and mediation –
    a challenge to activity theory. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2010, no. 4, pp. 30–38 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  19. Verlager A. K. Literacy as process: The multiple literacies of blind readers [Electronic resource]. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 2009. no. 55(1&2). Available at: n1a2/23-literacy-as-process-the-multiple-literaciesof- blind-readers (Accessed: 20.08.2014).
  20. Volman M. Variety of roles for a new type of teacher. Educational technology and the teacher profession. Teacher and Teacher Education, 2005, no. 21, pp. 15–31.
  21. Westby C. Multiliteracies: The changing world of communication. Topics in Language Disorders, 2010, no. 30(1), pp. 64–71.

Information About the Authors

Olga V. Rubtsova, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor of the Department of "Age Psychology named after prof .L.F. Obukhova" of the Faculty of "Psychology of Education", Head of the "Center for Interdisciplinary Studies of Modern Childhood", Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID:, e-mail:

N. S. Ulanova, PhD in Psychology, Moscow, Russia, e-mail:



Total: 2785
Previous month: 23
Current month: 16


Total: 1257
Previous month: 3
Current month: 6