Environmental Awareness of Children Aged 6—10 Years from the Standpoint of Dialectical Thinking

The article presents results of an empirical research of cognitive, affective (emotional) and behavioral components of ecological consciousness in 323 children of preschool and primary school age (6—10 years).It was found that preschool age children underestimate the impact of nature on man, but at the same time overestimate the human impact on nature. Children of this age attributed greater importance to being emotionally close with nature than children of primary school age. When choosing between the industrial, social or natural environment, children of both age groups give preference to the natural environment, leaving the industrial one the least preferred. The outcomes of this research were used to analyze the development of dialectical thinking (actions of transformation and association) in children of these age groups. As it was revealed, dialectical thinking in children of preschool age is predominantly visual. In primary school children, the visual form is replaced by conceptual and symbolic thinking, although still in an underdeveloped form. The article concludes that the first two years of school education have little influence on the development of dialectical thinking in the part that concerns actions of transformation.

1. Belolutskaya A.K.Analiz osobennostei dialekticheskikh struktur myshleniya detei i vzroslyk.Diss.kand.psikhol.nauk.[Analysis of features of dialectic structures of thinking of children and adults.Ph. D.(Psychology) diss.].Moscow, 2006.188 p.
2. Veraksa N.E.Dialekticheskoe myshlenie rebenka i vozmozhnosti ego aktivizatsii [Dialectical thinking of the child and the possibility of its activation].Vestnik MGPU [Messenger MGPU], 2010, no.2(12), pp.46—53.
3. Deklaratsiya sammita “Rio+20” — predatel’stvo budushchikh pokolenii [Elektronnyi resurs] [The declaration of the summit “Rio+20” — betrayal of future generations].URL: http://the-day-x.ru/deklaraciya-sammita-rio20-predatelstvo-budushhix-pokolenij.html (Accessed 28.10.2014).
4. Mdivani M.O.Razrabotka metoda diagnostiki ekologicheskogo soznaniya [Development of a method of diagnostics of ecological consciousness].In Panov V.I., Khisambeev Sh.R.(eds.), Ekopsikhologiya razvitiya psikhiki cheloveka na raznykh etapakh ontogeneza: kollektivnaya monografiya [Ecopsychology development of the human psycheat different stages of ontogenesis: the collective monograph].Moscow: FGNU “Psikhologicheskii institut” RAO; Saint-Petersburg: Nestor‑Istoriya, 2013, pp.263—304.
5. Panov V.I.Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie aspekty ekologicheskogo soznaniya [Psycho-pedagogical aspects of ecological consciousness].Pedagogika [Pedagogy], 2015, no.5, pp.59—70.
6. Khashchenko N.N.Tipologiya aktual’nogo ekologicheskogo soznaniya lichnosti [Typology of contemporary ecological consciousness of the person].In Panov V.I.(eds.), Chetviortaya Rossiiskaya konferentsiya po ekologicheskoi psikhologii: Materialy konferentsii [Proceedings of the Forth Russian Ecopsyhological Conference].Moscow: RUDN, 2006, pp.43—54.
7. Shiyan O.A.Razvivayushchee obrazovanie v vuze: dialekticheskaya struktura uchebnogo kursa kak uslovie razvitiya studentov [Developing education in high school: the dialectical structure of the training course as a condition of development of students].Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie [ Psychological science and education], 2008, no.2, pp.45—57.
8. Yasvin V.A.Psikhologiya otnosheniya k prirode [Psychology of relationship to nature].Moscow: Smysl, 2000.456 p.
9. Basile C.G.Environmental Educationas a Catalyst for Transfer of Learningin Young Children.The Journal of Environmental Education, 2000, no.32(1), pp.21—27.
10. Dimopoulos D., Paraskevopoulos S., Pantis J.D.The Cognitive and Attitudinal Effects of a Conservation Educational Module on Elementary School Students.The Journal Environmental Education, 2008, no.39(3), pp.47—61.doi:10.3200/JOEE.39.3.47-61.
11. Domka L.Environmental education at preschool.International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 2004, no.13(3), pp.258— 263.
12. Fraser J., Gupta R., Krasny M.E.Practitioners’ Perspective on the Purpose of Environmental Education.Environmental Education Research, 2015, no.21(5), pp. 777—800.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.933777