Virtual Reality in Early and Preschool Childhood

Russian and foreign studies suggest that there is a significant increase in the use of computer programmes by preschool children, and that children are generally introduced to computers at a much younger age, practically in their first months of life. Even though the majority of sociological studies show that computer technologies are in high demand by small children and their parents, psychological exploration into this phenomenon is both insufficient and contradictory. Some researchers argue that computer games have a destructive effect upon the child’s development, while others present data proving their positive impacts. We suggest that sociological quantitative methods may not be appropriate in this case and that comparative analysis of the child’s activity with virtual and real material would provide a better understanding. The main part of our paper focuses on this very analysis. We describe outcomes of a study showing that children’s interactions with electronic gadgets differ substantially from the more traditional forms of child activity and cannot compensate for the lack of the latter. In the final part of the paper we provide some recommendations on how to choose computer programmes for children of late preschool age.

1. Denisenkova N.S. Erroziya norm razvitiya sovremennogo rebenka [The erosion of the norms of the development of a modern child]. Materialy mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma «L.S. Vygotskii i sovremennoe detstvo» [Proceedings of the international symposium “L.S. Vygotsky and Modern Childhood”]. Moscow: Publ. Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2017, pp. 37—40.
2. Korkina A.Yu. Kriterii psikhologicheskoi otsenki komp’yuternykh igr i razvivayushchikh komp’yuternykh programm [Criteria for the psychological evaluation of computer games and developing computer programs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2008, no. 3, pp. 20—29.
3. Ryabkova I.A. Postroenie igrovogo zamysla v syuzhetnoi igre doshkol’nika [Construction of game design in story game preschool child]. Voprosy psikhologii [Approaches to Psychology], 2016, no. 4, pp. 28—37.
4. Smirnova E.O., Abdulaeva E.A. Opyt postroeniya diagnostiki prostranstvennogo obraza sebya v rannem vozraste [Experience in constructing a diagnosis of the spatial image of oneself at an early age]. Voprosy psikhologii [Approaches to Psychology], 2014, no. 3, pp. 58—68.
5. Workshop on Virtual Reality of Modern Childhood. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [ Cultural- Historical Psychology], 2017. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 71—76. Doi: 10.17759/chp.2017130208.
6. Smirnova E.O., Radeva R.E. Psikhologicheskiye osobennosti komp’iuternykh igr: novyi context detskoyi sub kul’tury [Psychological features of computer games: a new context of children’s subculture]. Obrazovaniie i informa/ ctzionnayia kul’tura. Sotziologicheskiye aspekty. Trudy po sotzi/ ologii obrazovaniya [Education and information culture. Socilogical aspects. Proceedings of the sociology of education]. Sobkin V. S. (ed.). Moscow: Centre for the sociology of edu cation RAO, 2000. Vol. V. Issue VII, pp. 330—369.
7. Sobkin V.S., Skobel’tsina K.N. Komp’yuter v zhizni rebenka doshkol’nika [Computer in the life of a preschool child]. Ditya chelovecheskoe [The Human Child], 2014, no. 2, pp. 20—24.
8. Soldatova G.U., Teslavskaia O.I. Videogames, academic performance and attention problems: practices and results of foreign empirical studies of children and adolescents. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia [Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology], 2017. Vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 21—28. doi:10.17759/jmfp.2017060402
9. Shmelev A.G. Psikhodiagnostika i novye informatsionnye tekhnologii. Komp’yutery i poznanie [Psychodiagnostics and new information technologies]. Moscow. Publ. Nauka, 1990, pp. 95.
10. Barr N., Pennycook G., Stolz J.A., Fugelsang J.A. The brain in your pocket. Computers in Human Behaviour, 2015, no. 48, pp. 473—480.
11. Blum-Ross A., Livingstone S. Families and screen time: Current advice and emerging research. London: London School of Economics and Political Science, 2017. 52 p.
12. Fröhlich-Gildhoff K. Digitale Medien in der Kita — die Risiken werden unterschaetzt. Frühe Bildung, 2017. Vol. 6 (4), pp. 225—228.
13. Inactivity and screen time. Australian Department of Health. [Elektronnyi resurs] 2012. URL: http://www. health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/ Content/gug-indig-hb~inactivitiy (Accessed 21.05.2018).
14. Kiefer M., Schzuler S., Mayer C., Trumpp N., Hille K., Sachse S. Handwriting or Typewriting? The Influence of Pen- or Keyboard-Based Writing Training on Reading and Writing Performance in Preschool Children. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2015, no. 11, pp. 136—146.
15. Livingstone S., Davidson J., Bryce J., Hargrave A., Grove-Hills J. Children’s online activities, risks and safety. The UK evidence base. London, UK: Council for Child Internet Safety, 2012.
16. Maaß E. E., Hahlweg K., Naumann S., Bertram H., Heinrichs N., Kuschel A. Sind moderne Bildschirmmedien ein Risikofaktor für ADHS? Eine Längsschnittuntersuchung an deutschen Kindergartenkindern. Vierteljahresschrift für Heilpädagogik und ihre Nachbargebiete, 2010, no. 79, pp. 50 — 65.
17. Media and young minds. AAP Council on Communications and Media. Pediatrics, 2016, 138(5), e20162591.
18. Mifsud C.L., Petrova R. Young children (0—8) and digital technology: The national report for Malta. University of Malta. EU Joint Research Centre, 2017. [Elektronnyi resurs] URL:http://www.um.edu.mt/__data/assets/pdf_ file/0012/314400/YoungChildrenandDigitalTechnology- TheNationalReportforMalta.pdf (Accessed 18.05.2018).
19. Miner R. Television is now the second screen for kids with tablets [Elektronnyi resurs] [Survey report], 2015. URL:http://www.minerandcostudio.com/tv-is-now-the-second-screen (Accessed 15.05.2018).
20. National Association for the Education of Young Children & Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning Children’s Media at Saint Vincent College. Technology and interactive media as tools in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Washington, DC, 2012. URL:http:// www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/PS_ technology_WEB2.pdf (Accessed 11.05.2018).
21. Rideout V. The Common Sense census: Media use by kids age zero to eight [Elektronnyi resurs]. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media, 2017. URL:https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/ the-common-sense-census-media-use-by-kids-age-zero-to-eight-2017 (Accessed 30.04.2018).
22. Smirnova E., Kremleva A. Psychological and Pedagogical Approach to Disigning Developmental Computer Programs for Senior Preschool Children. E-Journal for Activity Theoretical Research in Germany, 2014. Vol.12, 1, рp. 81—94.
23. Spitzer M. Cyberkrank! Wie das digitalisierte Leben unsere Gesundheit runiniert. Droemer, München, 2015. 432 p.
24. The Common Sense Census: Media use by kids age zero to eight. Common Sense Media [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL:https://www.commonsensemedia.org/ research/the-common-sense-census-media-use-by-kids-age-zero-to-eight-2017 (Accessed 28.04.2018).
25. US Department of Education & US Department of Health and Human Services. Policy brief on early learning and use of technology [Elektronnyi resurs]. Washington, DC, 2016. URL:http://tech.ed.gov/files/2016/10/Early- Learning-Tech-Policy-Brief.pdf (Accessed 25.04.2018).
26. Using digital touch technologies to support children’s learning. Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: https://wehearyou. acecqa.gov.au/2015/07/15/using-digital-touch-technologies-to-support-childrens-learning/ (Accessed 20.04.2018).
27. Vaala S., Hornik R. Predicting US infants’ and toddlers’ TV/video viewing rates: Mothers’ cognitions and structural life circumstances. Journal of Children and Media, 2014, no. 8, pp. 163—182.
28. Wartella E., Rideout V., Lauricella A.R., Connell S.L. Parenting in the Age of Digital Technology: A National Survey. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, 2013. 27 p.