Time knowledge questionnaire for children 7—13 years old: methodological recommendations and norming

13

Abstract

Context and relevance. Time representations are important for goal-setting and self activity prediction, which becomes especially important in the beginning of schooling. Time understanding level depends on the child's age and relates to the socialization and development of cognitive functions degree. Despite the fact that various approaches to psychological diagnostics of children's time knowledge are offered, in recent years, the Russian-language psychological literature has not presented normative indicators of 7—13 aged children's time ideas development. Objective. To provide a study of actual children's time knowledge on the Russian-speaking 7—13 aged children sample, to present methodological recommendations on diagnosing 7—13 aged children's time knowledge, to actualize age norms of children's time knowledge. Hypothesis. Actualized children time knowledge indicator of modern norm typical schoolchildren differ from normative indicators previously presented in psychological literature. Methods and Materials. A total of 237 students in grades 1—6 of comprehensive schools participated in the study (M = 118 months; SD = 19.5 months; F = 56%). The knowledge time level was measured using the author's Russian-language modification of the time knowledge questionnaire by F. Labrell et al. Diagnostics was carried out individually in the format of a conversation. Results. Methodological recommendations for diagnosing the time knowledge of children aged 7-13 years using a modified two-factor questionnaire of time knowledge are presented; normative indicators for six subtests of the questionnaire in seven age ranges from 7 to 13 years are given. The time knowledge scores of 11—year-old children were lower than those of 10- and 12- to 13—year-old children. These results are discussed in the context of the age crisis experienced in grade 5. Conclusions. The modified Time Knowledge Questionnaire for children aged 7—13 can be used to diagnoze children's time perceptions by practicing psychologists, educators, and researchers.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

General Information

Keywords: time knowledge, conception of time, time knowledge questionnaire, normative indicators of time knowledge, primary school age, adolescence

Journal rubric: Developmental Psychology and Age-Related Psychology

Article type: review article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2025140212

Funding. The work was carried out within the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (topic No. 0138-2025-0015).

Received 01.03.2025

Accepted

Published

For citation: Solodkova, A.V., Shepeleva, E.A. (2025). Time knowledge questionnaire for children 7—13 years old: methodological recommendations and norming. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 14(2), 114–130. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2025140212

© Solodkova A.V., Shepeleva E.A., 2025

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

A Part of Article

 

References

  1. Веракса, Н.Е., Айрапетян, З.В., Алмазова, О.В. (2021). Понимание процессов развития детьми старшего дошкольного возраста: Методика «Циклы». Системная психология и социология, 2(38), 87—96. https://doi.org/10.25688/2223-6872.2021.38.2.08
    Veraksa, N.E., Airapetyan, Z.V., Almazova, O.V. (2021). Developmental processes understanding among preschool children: The «Сycles» task. System Psychology and Sociology, 2(38), 87—96. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25688/2223-6872.2021.38.2.08
  2. Истомина, С.В. (2022). Психологическое сопровождение процесса адаптации обучающихся при переходе на уровень основного общего образования. Вестник Костромского государственного университета. Серия: Педагогика. Психология. Социокинетика. 28(2), 113—121. https://doi.org/10.34216/2073-1426-2022-28-2-113-121
    Istomina, S.V. (2022). Psychological support of the process of adaptation of pupils during the transition to the level of basic general education. Vestnik of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics, 2022, 28(2), 113—121. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34216/2073-1426-2022-28-2-113-121
  3. Карпов, А.В. (2023). Психика и время. В 2 томах. Т. I. История. Методология. Структура. Ярославль: Филигрань.
    Karpov, A.V. (2023). Psyche and time. In 2 volumes. V. I. History. Methodology. Structure. Yaroslavl: Filigran (In Russ.).
  4. Семаго, Н.Я., Семаго, М.М. (2018). Теория и практика углубленной психологической диагностики. От раннего до подросткового возраста: Монография. М.: АРКТИ.
    Semago, N.Y., Semago, M.M. (2018). Theory and practice of profound psychological diagnostics. From early childhood to adolescence: Monograph. Moscow: ARCTI (In Russ.).
  5. Солодкова, А.В. (2022). Развитие представлений о времени в детском возрасте. Современная зарубежная психология, 11(2), 93—100. https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2022110208
    Solodkova, A.V. (2022). Development of time knowledge in childhood. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 11(2), 93—100. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2022110208
  6. Солодкова, А.В. (2024). Валидизация опросника знаний о времени для детей 6—13 лет. Психологические исследования, 17(97), 1—27. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v17i97.1667
    Solodkova, A.V. (2024). Validation of the time knowledge questionnaire for children aged 6—13. Psychological Studies, 17(97), 1—27. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v17i97.1667
  7. Шепелева, Е.А., Солодкова, А.В. (2022). Знания детей о времени как показатель возрастной и учебной зрелости. Психолого-педагогические исследования, 14(4), 3—16. https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2022140401
    Shepeleva, E.A., Solodkova, A.V. (2022) Children's time knowledge as a predictor of age and learning maturity. Psychological-Educational Studies, 14(4), 3—16. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2022140401
  8. Brace, N., Doran, C., Pambery, J., Fitzpatrick, E., Herman, R. (2019). Assessing time knowledge in children aged 10 to 11 years. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(4), 580—591. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.559678
  9. Castaldi, E., Tinelli, F., Filippo, G., Bartoli, M., Anobile, G. (2024). Auditory time perception impairment in children with developmental dyscalculia. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 149, Article 104733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104733
  10. Chin, H., Chew, C.M., Lim, H.L. (2021). Development and validation of online cognitive diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items for «Multiplication of Time». Journal of Computers in Education, 8, 289—316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00180-7
  11. Cooperrider, K. (2025). Time Tools. Topics in Cognitive Science, Preprint. (pp. 1—22.). https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.70005
  12. De la Charie, A., Delteil, F., Labrell, F., Colas, P., Vigneras, J., Câmara-Costa, H., Mikaeloff, Y. (2021). Time knowledge impairments in children with ADHD. Archives de Pédiatrie, 28(2), 129—135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2020.11.008
  13. Doran, C., Dutt, S., Pembery, J. (2015). Time Matters: A Practical Resource to Develop Time Concepts and Self-Organisational Skills in Older Children and Young People. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315173801
  14. Flavell, J.H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In: F.E. Weinert, R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21—29). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  15. Friedman, W.J. (2005). Developmental and cognitive perspectives on humans’ sense of the times of past and future events. Learning and Motivation, 36, 145—158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2005.02.005
  16. Gauci, J., Olds, T., Maher, C., Watson, A., Fraysse, F., Munzberg, M., Hoepfl, I., Dumuid, D. (2023). Characteristics associated with differences in 24-hour device-measured and self-reported sleep, sedentary behaviour and physical activity in a sample of Australian primary school children. Journal of Activity, Sedentary and Sleep Behaviors, 2, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44167-023-00023-7
  17. Goulding, B.W., Stonehouse, E.E., Friedman, O. (2025). Time from structure: Children infer the temporal order of past events from visual arrays. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02659-9
  18. Hallez, Q., Droit-Volet, S. (2021). Identification of an age maturity in time discrimination abilities. Timing & Time Perception, 9(1), 67—87. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134468-bja10017
  19. Labrell, F., Costa, H.C., Perdry, H., Dellatolas, G. (2020). The time knowledge questionnaire for children. Heliyon, 6(2). Article e03331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03331
  20. Maheshwari, U., Barner, D. (2024). Back to Reality: Children's Comprehension of Yesterday & Tomorrow for Real vs. University of California San Diego. San Diego. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/gs3r4
  21. McCormack, Т., Hoerl, С. (2017). The development of temporal concepts: Learning to locate events in time. Timing & Time Perception, 5, 297—327. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134468-00002094
  22. Mizuno, K., Tanaka, M., Fukuda, S. Imai-Matsumura, K., Watanabe Y. (2011). Relationship between cognitive function and prevalence of decrease in intrinsic academic motivation in adolescents. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 7, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-7—4
  23. Nazari, M.A., Sabaghypour, S., Pezhmanfard, M., Azizi, K., Vahedi, S. (2021). The influence of children’s mathematical competence on performance in mental number line, time knowledge and time perception. Psychological Research, 85, 2023—2035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01380-7
  24. Neufeld, J., Stewart, I. (2023). A behavioral approach to the human understanding of time: relational frame theory and temporal relational framing. The Psychological Record, 73, 301—332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-022-00529-7
  25. Nyhout, A., Mahy, C.E.V. (2023). Episodic thought in development: On the relation between memory and future thinking. Developmental Review, 70, Article 101103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2023.101103
  26. Odic, D. (2018). Children's intuitive sense of number develops independently of their perception of area, density, length, and time. Developmental science, 21(2), Article e12533. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12533
  27. Pathman, T., Deker, L., Coughlin, C., Ghetti, S. (2022). Examining temporal memory and flexible retrieval of conventional time knowledge across middle to late childhood. Journal of Cognition and Development, 23(4), 571—589. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2022.2072846
  28. Portnova, G., Rebreikina, A., Martynova, O. (2021). The ages of zone of proximal development for retrospective time assessment and anticipation of time event. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 11(4), 761—770. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2021.1961084
  29. Quartier, V. (2008). Le développement de la temporalité: théorie et instrument de mesure du temps notionnel chez l'enfant. Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages chez l'Enfant, 20(100), 345—352.
  30. Starr, A., Srinivasan, M. (2021). The future is in front, to the right, or below: Development of spatial representations of time in three dimensions. Cognition, 210, Article 104603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104603
  31. Shukla, A., Bapi, R.S. (2021). Attention mediates the influence of numerical magnitude on temporal processing. Scientific Reports, 11, Article 11030. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90466-2
  32. Tillman, K.A., Barner, D. (2015). Learning the language of time: Children’s acquisition of duration words. Cognitive Psychology, 78, 57—77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.03.001
  33. Tillman, K.A., Marghetis, T., Barner, D., Srinivasan, M. (2017). Today is tomorrow’s yesterday: Children’s acquisition of deictic time words. Cognitive Psychology, 92, 87—100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.10.003
  34. Timoszyk-Tomczak, C., Próchniak, P. (2024) Construction and validation of a new Generational Time Perspective Questionnaire. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 13279. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64185-3
  35. Thomas, M., Clarke, D.M., McDonough, A., Clarkson, P.C. (2023). Assessing students’ understanding of time concepts in years 3 and 4: Insights from the development and use of a one-to-one task-based interview. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35, 1—22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00451-3

Information About the Authors

Anna V. Solodkova, Psychologist, School 1286, PhD student, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1162-5693, e-mail: solodkovaa@mail.ru

Elena A. Shepeleva, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Leading Researcher, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-6524, e-mail: shepelevaea@mgppu.ru

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 51
Previous month: 13
Current month: 38

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 13
Previous month: 2
Current month: 11

 Total

Whole time: 64
Previous month: 15
Current month: 49