Students’ Conceptions of Academic Success: Themes, Guiding Lines and Contradictions

888

Abstract

Academic success is a popular topic of psychological and pedagogical studies, but such studies usually emphasize factors that affect academic success or variables associated with it.What constitutes academic success remains an open question if at all posited.Researchers tend to use simplified operationalizations, mainly the academic performance, and ignore the students’ point of view.The purpose of this study is to clarify students’ perceptions of academic success.A qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews about learning experience was conducted.The study involved 20 students from various Moscow universities who completed their first academic year (aged 17—42).The technique of reflective thematic analysis was applied.Main themes are the following: “Performance” (learning is considered successful if grades are high and there are no academic troubles), “Knowledge” (learning is successful if the curriculum is being assimilated, or professional knowledge increasing, of one’s horizons are expanding), “Sense of self” (learning is considered successful if there is interest in studying, enthusiasm, as well as internal comfort and/or self-development).Themes are arranged in a sequence, moving from external criteria to internal ones.A number of contradictions are found in the informants’ perceptions of success.In the continuum of themes, different understandings of success are attributed to different instances (university, profession, life activities, Self) and allow us to see the diversity and inconsistency of higher education meanings that explain the observed paradoxes.

General Information

Keywords: academic success, higher education, academic achievement, educational performance, educational success.

Journal rubric: Educational Psychology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2021260106

For citation: Yaroshevskaya S.V., Sysoeva T.A. Students’ Conceptions of Academic Success: Themes, Guiding Lines and Contradictions. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2021. Vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 92–101. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2021260106. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Busygina N.P.Kachestvennye i kolichestvennye metody issledovanii v psikhologii [Qualitative and quantitative research methods in psychology].Moscow: Yurait, 2019.423 p.(In Russ.).
  2. Busygina N.P.Rakursy interpretacii v kachestvennyh issledovanijah [Aspects of interpretation in quality studies].Voprosy psihologii, 2017, no.2, pp. 121—133.(In Russ.).
  3. Busygina N.P., Jaroshevskaja S.V.Kul’turno-istoricheskaja psihologija kak teorija sub#ektivnosti v rabotah F.Gonsalesa Reja [Cultural-Historical Psychology as a Theory of Subjectivity in the Works of F.González Rey].Kul’turno-istoricheskaja psihologija = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2020, no.1, pp.68—77.DOI:10.17759/chp.2020160107.(In Russ.).
  4. Braun V., Clarke V.Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006.Vol.3, no.2, pp.77—101.DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  5. Braun V., Clarke V., Hayfield N., Terry G.Thematic Analysis.In Liamputtong P.(ed.).Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences.Singapore: Springer, 2019, pp.843—860.DOI:10.1007/978-981- 10-2779-6_103-1
  6. Cachia M., Lynam S., Stock R.Academic success: Is it just about the grades? Higher Education Pedagogies, 2018.Vol.3, no.1, pp.434—439.DOI:10.1080/237526 96.2018.1462096
  7. Clarke V., Braun V.Using thematic analysis in counselling and psychotherapy research: A critical reflection.Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 2018.Vol.18, no.2, pp.107—110.DOI:10.1002/ capr.12165
  8. Cloete N., Duncan C.Shifting from Disorientation to Orientation: Reading Student Discourses of Success.Perspectives in Education, 2016.Vol.34, no.2, pp.33— 42.DOI:10.18820/0258-2236/pie.v34i2.3
  9. Hannon O., Smith L., Lã Success at University: The Student Perspective.In Wood L.N., Breyer Y.A.(eds.).Success in Higher Education: Transitions to, within and from University.Singapore: Springer, 2017, pp.257—268.
  10. Kuh G.D., Kinzie J., Buckley J.A., Bridges B.K., Hayek J.C.What matters to student success: A review of the literature.Commissioned report for the National Symposium on Postsecondary Student Success: Spearheading a Dialog on Student Success.2006.Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.URL: https://nces.ed.gov/npec/pdf/Kuh_ Team_Report.pdf (Accessed 01.06.2020).
  11. Nyström A.-S., Jackson C., Salminen Karlsson M.What counts as success? Constructions of achievement in prestigious higher education programmes.Research Papers in Education, 2019.Vol.34, no.4, pp.465—482.DOI:10.1080/02671522.2018.1452964
  12. Picton C., Kahu E.R., Nelson K.‘Hardworking, determined and happy’: first-year students’ understanding and experience of success.Higher Education Research & Development, 2018.Vol.37, no. 1, pp.1—14.DOI:10.1080/07294360.2018.1478803
  13. Sá J.‘The secret to success’.Becoming a successful student in a fast-changing higher education environment.European Journal of Higher Education, 2020.in press.DOI:10.1080/21568235.2 020.1777445
  14. Xulu-Gama N., Nhari S.R., Alcock A., Cavanagh M.A student-centred approach: a qualitative exploration of how students experience access and success in a South African University of Technology.Higher Education Research & Development, 2018.Vol. 37, no.6, pp. 1302—1314.DOI:10.1080/07294360.2018 .1473844
  15. Yaroshevskaya S.V., Sysoeva T.A.Academic performance and educational success: relation to personality and students’ representations.The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 2018.Vol.XLIX, pp.794—802.DOI:10.15405/ epsbs.2018.11.02.91
  16. York T.T., Gibson C., Rankin S.Defining and Measuring Academic Success.Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2015.Vol.20, no.5, pp. 1—20.DOI:10.7275/hz5x-tx03

Information About the Authors

Svetlana V. Yaroshevskaya, Junior Research Fellow, Laboratory of Scientific Foundations of Child Practical Psychology, Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1906-3725, e-mail: yaroshevskaya@yandex.ru

Tatiana A. Sysoeva, PhD in Psychology, Research Fellow, Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1909-3537, e-mail: tatiana.sysoeva@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1271
Previous month: 24
Current month: 19

Downloads

Total: 888
Previous month: 14
Current month: 5