Russian Schoolchildren vs. Cyber Threats: Research in the Framework of Modern Childhood Digitalization

The paper aims to explore the behavior of Russian school-age children who are faced with a new social and psychological phenomenon: threats associated with the digital environment. Our focus was on the ability (psychological as well as technical) of teenagers to stand against cyber threats. At the preliminary stage of the research we analysed both Russian and international studies on how to promote cyber security awareness among school children and, in particular, how to respond to the cyber threats associated with the new social context formed by the COVID-19 pandemic. We used survey research as the main method and designed a special questionnaire that was then offered to a group of 7—11-grade students (N=5,682) from seven Russian regions in the late 2020. The research data was processed using the SPSS and STATISTICA programmes. The data allowed us to assess the degree in which the children were familiar with the methods and means of protecting sensitive personal information, as well as their ability to stand against cyber threats basing on their knowledge and skills. The research also helped us to identify the role of schools in promoting the children’s readiness for the modern digital reality. The typical shortcomings in the digital competences of school-age children are noteworthy here too, first of all, the ones concerning the knowledge of cyber risk types related to the use of social media and internet communication services. We conclude that there is a need for systemic measures on various levels of education that would help reduce the cyber risks for adolescents on the social media and promote the quality of digital competence development in Russian schools.

1. Sobkin V.S., Adamchuk D.V. Monitoring sotsial’nykh posledstvii informatizatsii: chto izmenilos’ v shkole za tri goda? [Monitoring the social consequences of informatization: what has changed at school in three years?]. Moscow: Publ. Institut sotsiologii obrazovaniya RAO, 2008. 159 p. (In Russ.).
2. Sobkin V.S., Evstigneeva Yu.M. Podrostok: virtual’naya i sotsial’naya real’nost’ [Teenager: virtual and social reality]. In Sobkin V.S. (ed.), Trudy po sotsiologii obrazovaniya. T. 6. Vyp. 10. [Works on the sociology of education. Vol. 6. No. 10.]. Moscow: Publ. Center sotsiologii obrazovaniya RAO, 2001. 156 p. (In Russ.).
3. Sobkin V.S., Skobel’tsina K.N. Predstavleniya roditelei ob osobennostyakh obshcheniya ikh rebenka s komp’yuterom [Parents’ ideas about the peculiarities of their child’s communication with a computer]. Sovremennoe doshkol’noe obrazovanie = Modern preschool education, 2012, no. 3, pp. 30—34. (In Russ.).
4. Sobkin V.S., Fedotova A.V. Podrostkovaya agressiya v sotsial’nykh setyakh: vospriyatie i lichnyi opyt [Teenage aggression in social networks: perception and personal experience]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2019. Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 5—18. DOI:10.17759/ pse.2019240201 (In Russ.).
5. Sobkin V.S., Fedotova A.V. Set’ kak prostranstvo sotsializatsii    sovremennogo    podrostka     [Network as a space of socialization of a modern teenager]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling    Psychology    and     Psychotherapy, 2019. Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 119—137. DOI:10.17759/ cpp.2019270308 (In Russ.).
6. Federal’nyi zakon ot 29.12.2010 № 436-FZ «O zashchite detei ot informatsii, prichinyayushchei vred ikh zdorov’yu i razvitiyu» [Federal Law of December 29, 2010 No. 436-FZ «On the Protection of Children from Information Harmful to Their Health and Development»]. Spravochnaya pravovaya sistema «Konsul’tantPlyus» [Reference legal system «ConsultantPlus»]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_ LAW_108808/ (Accessed 09.07.2021). (In Russ.).
7. Brittan T., Jahankhani H., McCarthy J. An Examination into the Effect of Early Education on Cyber Security Awareness Within the U.K. In Jahankhani H. (ed.), Cyber Criminology. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham, 2018. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-97181-0_14
8. Mikhaylovsky M.N. et al. Cyberbulling as A New Form of a Threat: A Physiological, Psychological and Medicinal Aspects. Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 2019. Vol. 16, no. 6. DOI:10.29333/ ejgm/114268
9. Gkiomisi A. et al. Cyberbullying Among Greek High School Adolescents. Indian J Pediatr, 2017. Vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 364—368. DOI:10.1007/s12098-016-2256-2
10. Ron M. et al. Cybersecurity Baseline, An Exploration, Which Permits to Delineate National Cybersecurity Strategy in Ecuador. In Rocha Á., Ferrás C., Paredes M. (eds.) Information Technology and Systems. Springer, Cham, 2019. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-11890-7_79
11. Dishkova M., Papancheva R. Estimation of Parents’ Opinion How the Time Spent in Front of a Screen for Learning Affects the Likelihood of Developing Cyber- Addiction in Children in Primary School. ICERI 2020 Proceedings (Online Conference, 9—10 November 2020). IATED Academy, 2020, pp. 8925—8933. DOI:10.21125/iceri.2020
12. Lonigro A. et al. Is Cyberbullying Related to Trait or State Anger? Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 2015. Vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 445—454. DOI:10.1007/s10578-014-0484-0
13. Kniffin K.M., Palacio D. Trash-Talking and Trolling. Human Nature, 2018, no. 29, pp. 353—369. DOI:10.1007/s12110-018-9317-3
14. Kuznetsov A., Skobeltsina K. Social Educational Infrastructure for Russian School Students: Baseline Study in Availability and Accessibility under Regular and Critical Conditions. INTED2021 Proceedings (Online Conference, 8—9 March 2021). IATED Academy, 2021, pp. 8247—8251. DOI:10.21125/inted.2021.1676
15. Legate N. et al. Parenting Strategies and Adolescents’ Cyberbullying Behaviors: Evidence from a Preregistered Study of Parent—Child Dyads. J Youth Adolescence, 2019. Vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 399—409. DOI:10.1007/s10964-018-0962-y
16. Nicolaidou I., Venizelou A. «Be Smart When Online!»: Kids Learn How to Protect Personal Data, Stop Cyber-Bullying and Avoid Hackers. ICERI2016 Proceedings (Seville, Spain, 14—16 November 2016). IATED Academy, 2016, pp. 3374—3384. DOI:10.21125/ iceri.2016.1789
17. Shutikova M., Beshenkov S. Digital Educational Environment and Media Education — Platforms for Transforming Education System. Mediaobrazovanie = Мedia Education, 2020. Vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 736—744. DOI:I0.i3i87/me.2020.4.736
18. Skobeltsina K.N., Kuznetsov A.N. Research on Public Satisfaction with Educational Infrastructure of Advanced Development Territories. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference for Science Educators and Teachers (Moscow, Russia, 4—5 April 2019). Atlantis Press, 2019, pp. 36—41. DOI:10.2991/icdee-19.2019.7
19. Mitchell I. et al. SMERF: Social Media, Ethics and Risk Framework. In Jahankhani H. (ed.) Cyber Criminology. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham, 2018. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-97181-0_10
20. Lim W.Y. et al. Toward Digital Citizenship in Primary Schools: Leveraging on Our Enhanced Cyberwellness Framework. In Chai C., Lim C., Tan C. (eds.) Future Learning in Primary Schools. Springer, Singapore, 2016. DOI:10.1007/978-981-287-579-2_7
21. Mathur P. et al. Utilizing Temporal Psycholinguistic Cues for Suicidal Intent Estimation. In Jose J. et al. (eds.) Advances in Information Retrieval. Springer, Cham, 2020. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-45442-5_33
22. Yildiz Durak H. Cyber Human Values Displayed by University Students in Online Social Networking Sites: The Relationship of Cyber Human Values to Cyberbullying and Cyber Victimization Behaviors. INTED2019   Proceedings    (Valencia,    Spain,    11— 13 March 2019). IATED Academy, 2019, pp. 10035— 10038. DOI:10.21125/inted.2019.2531