Longitudinal Study of the Relationship Between Conscious Self-Regulation, School Engagement and Student Academic Achievement

The study seeks to examine the longitudinal relationship between school en¬gagement, conscious self-regulation, and student academic achievement. Research analysis covers the data obtained in two longitudinal studies of two student groups: 8—9 graders (N=106) and 10—11 graders (N=96). Diagnostics of self-regulation was carried out by means of “Self-Regulation Profile of Learn¬ing Activity Questionnaire — SRPLAQ”, school engagement was assessed using “A Multidimensional School Engagement Scale» (Wang et al., 2019; Fomina, Mo¬rosanova, 2020). The average value of annual marks in core academic subjects served as an indicator of academic achievement. The measurements were taken twice, with one-year interval. The study revealed significant changes (decrease) in the level of students’ school engagement during their transition from grade 8 to grade 9. When moving from grade 10 to grade 11, the students significantly increase their levels of self-regulation, school engagement, and academic perfor¬mance. Cross-lagged panel analysis made it possible to establish that conscious self-regulation is a significant predictor of successful learning and high student engagement during the transition to the 9th grade. Whereas in grade 11, student engagement in the educational process, as well as previous academic success, plays a more significant role for successful learning. The data obtained allowed for specifying the directions of the causal relationship between school engage¬ment, conscious self-regulation, and academic achievement of students in differ¬ent periods of schooling.

1. Bondarenko I.N., Ishmuratova Yu.A., Tsyganov I.Yu. Problemy vzaimosvyazi shkol’noi vovlechennosti i akademicheskikh dostizhenii u sovremennykh podrostkov [Problems of the relationship between school involvement and academic achievements in modern teenagers]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2020. Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 77—88. DOI:10.17759/jmfp.2020090407 (In Russ.)
2. Morosanova V.I. Osoznannaya samoregulyatsiya kak psikhologicheskii resurs dostizheniya uchebnykh i professional’nykh tselei [Conscious selfregulation as a psychological resource to achieve educational and professional goals]. Pedagogika = Pedagogika, 2016, no. 10, pp. 13—24. (In Russ.).
3. Morosanova V.I., Bondarenko I.N. V pomoshch’ prakticheskomu psikhologu: oprosnik Morosanovoi «Stil’ samoregulyatsii uchebnoi deyatel’nosti (SSUD-M)» [To help a practical psychologist: «Style of self-regulation of learning activity» questionnaire (SRLAQ-M, Morosanova, 2020)]. In Zinchenko Yu.P., Morosanovoi V.I. (eds.). Psikhologiya samoregulyatsii: evolyutsiya podkhodov i vyzovy vremeni [Psychology of self-regulation: evolution of approaches and challenges of the time]. Moscow; Saint-Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2020, pp. 151—172. (In Russ.).
4. Morosanova V.I., Fomina T.G. Osoznannaya samoregulyatsiya v sisteme psikhologicheskikh prediktorov dostizheniya uchebnykh tselei [Conscious self-regulation and attitude to learning as resources of academic success]. Voprosy psikhologii = Voprosy psikhologii, 2016, no. 2, pp. 124—135. (In Russ.).
5. Fomina T.G., Potanina A.M., Morosanova V.I. The Relationship Between School Engagement and Conscious Self-regulation of Learning Activity: The Current State of the Problem and Research Perspectives in Russia and Abroad. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics. 2020. Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 390—411. DOI:10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-3-390-411 (In Russ.).
6. Fomina T.G., Morosanova V.I. Adaptatsiya i validizatsiya shkal oprosnika «Mnogomernaya shkala shkol’noi vovlechennosti» [Russian adaptation and validation of the «Multidimensional School Engagement Scale»]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta = Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 2020, no. 3, pp. 194— 213. DOI:10.11621/vsp.2020.03.09 (In Russ.).
7. Appleton J.J., Christenson S.L., Kim D., Reschly A.L. Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 2006. Vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 427—445. DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101753
8. Bae C.L., De Busk-Lane M. Middle school engagement profiles: Implications for motivation and achievement in science. Learning and Individual Differences, 2019. Vol. 74, p. 101753. DOI:10.1016/j. lindif.2019.101753
9. Bakracevic Vukman K., Licardo M. How cognitive, metacognitive, motivational and emotional self-regulation influence school performance in adolescence and early adulthood. Educational Studies, 2010. Vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 259—268. DOI:10.1080/03055690903180376
10. Bouffard T., Bouchard M., Goulet G., Denoncourt I., Couture N. Influence of achievement goals and self-efficacy on students’ self-regulation and performance. International journal of psychology, 2005. Vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 373—384. DOI:10.1080/00207590444000302
11. Burns E.C., Martin A.J., Collie R.J. A future time perspective of secondary school students’ academic engagement and disengagement: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 2021. Vol. 84, pp. 109—123. DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2020.12.003
12. Caraway K., Tucker C.M., Reinke W.M., Hall C. Self-efficacy, goal orientation, and fear of failure as predictors of school engagement in high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 2003. Vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 417—427. DOI:10.1002/pits.10092
13. Demetriou A. Organization and development of self-understanding and self-regulation: Toward a general theory. Handbook of self-regulation. Academic Press, 2000, pp. 209—251.
14. Fredricks J.A., Blumenfeld P.C., Paris A.H. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 2004. Vol. 74, pp. 59—109. DOI:10.3102%2F00346543074001059
15. Lam S.F., Jimerson S., Shin H., Cefai C., Veiga F.H., Hatzichristou C. Cultural universality and specificity of student engagement in school: The results of an international study from 12 countries. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2016. Vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 137— 153. DOI:10.1111/bjep.12079
16. Lei H., Cui Y., Zhou W. Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 2018. Vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 517—528. DOI:10.2224/sbp.7054
17. Olivier E., Archambault I., De Clercq M. et al. Student self-efficacy, classroom engagement, and academic achievement: Comparing three theoretical frameworks. Journal of youth and adolescence, 2019. Vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 326—340. DOI:10.1007/s10964-018-0952-0
18. Schnitzler K., Holzberger D., Seidel T. All better than being disengaged: Student engagement patterns and their relations to academic self-concept and achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2020. Vol. 35, pp. 1—26. DOI:10.1007/ s10212-020-00500-6
19. Stefansson K.K., Gestsdottir S., Birgisdottir F., Lerner R.M. School engagement and intentional self-regulation: A reciprocal relation in adolescence. Journal of adolescence, 2018. Vol. 64, pp. 23—33. DOI:10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.01.005
20. Vasalampi K., Salmela-Aro K., Nurmi J.E. Adolescents’ self-concordance, school engagement, and burnout predict their educational trajectories. European psychologist, 2009. Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 332— 341. DOI:10.1027/1016-9040.14.4.332
21. Wang M.T., Eccles J.S. Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child development, 2012. Vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 877—895. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x
22. Wang M.T., Peck S.C. Adolescent educational success and mental health vary across school engagement profiles. Developmental psychology, 2013. Vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1266—1276. DOI:10.1037/a0030028
23. Wang M.T., Fredricks J., Ye F., Hofkens T., Linn J.S. Conceptualization and assessment of adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school: A Multidimensional School Engagement Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2019. Vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 592—606. DOI:10.1027/1015-5759/ a000431
24. Wolters C.A., Taylor D.J. Self-regulated Learning Perspective on Student Engagement. Handbook of research on student engagement. Ed. by S.L. Christenson et al. MA, Boston, Springer, 2012, pp. 635—653. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_37
25. Zimmerman B.J., Schunk D.H. (ed.). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Routledge, 2001.

PlumX

article metrics