The Difficulties of Adapting the Main Educational Program for University Students with Disabilities Hearing

547

Abstract

The article analyzes in detail various features of how learning process participants interact with each other, as well as classifies possible (observed) impairments of cognitive qualities in students, as compared to the normal level. It also determines and scrutinizes mutual connections between certain impairments, along with their effect on perception during learning. The usage of orientated graphs measuring labour-intensiveness during the acquisition of the main educational program (MEP) provided a comparative characteristic of impaired students’ performance (hearing impairments) as compared to unimpaired ones. The solution that allows for MEP adaptation is presented in the form of courses that accompany every profile discipline, along with special cognitive technologies. The account of minimization or/and compensation of certain cognitive impairments in disabled students, as practiced at Bauman Moscow State Technical University, is given. Generalized goals of accompaniment courses are formulated. The examples are given (based on calculus and geometry courses) of using logical matrixes as a universal method of teaching conceptual systems that involve generic and specific relations. The accompaniment courses are shown to meet the metasubjective requirements. Special requirements for teachers working with hearing impaired students are formulated.

General Information

Keywords: The educational process (ЕP), adaptation, maintenance of specialized disciplines, cognitive technologies, management, defect, deviation, correction, management goal to minimize the deviation, overflow effect graph antigraf, Array system of concepts, development of criteria metasubject approach

Journal rubric: Psychology of Education

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2017090103

For citation: Stanevskiy A.G., Stolyarova Z.F. The Difficulties of Adapting the Main Educational Program for University Students with Disabilities Hearing [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru [Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru], 2017. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 23–37. DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2017090103. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Leongard E.I., Stanevskii A.G. Slukhorechevaya reabilitatsiya glukhikh i slaboslyshashchikh studentov. Real'nost' i perspektivy [Oral-aural rehabilitation of deaf and hearing impaired students. Reality and prospects]. Raduga zvukov [Rainbow of sounds], 2009, no. 2 (34), pp. 22-23.
  2. Stanevskii A.G., Aslamazova V.I., Saletikova G.M., Parshin G.N., Kravchenko L.I. Dinamicheskaya otsenka otdel'nykh parametrov umstvennoi rabotosposobnosti i razvitie adaptatsionnykh mekhanizmov v protsesse obucheniya v vysshei shkole lits s ogranichennymi vozmozhnostyami (po slukhu): metodicheskie rekomendatsii [The dynamic evaluation of individual parameters of mental capacity and the development of adaptation mechanisms in the learning process in higher education of persons with disabilities (hearing)]. Moscow: Publ. Bauman MSTU, 2000. 31 p.
  3. Stanevskii A.G., Stolyarova Z.F. Ideya i obosnovanie predmetnykh korrektsionnykh kursov [The idea and grounds of subject correctional courses]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2012, no. 1, pp. 46-55.
  4. Stanevskii A.G., Stolyarova Z.F. Zadachi korrektsionnogo kursa matematiki [The tasks of a correctional course of mathematics]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2012, no. 2, pp. 48-58.
  5. Stolyarova Z.F. Obobshchennye zadachi i tekhnologii provedeniya predmetnykh korrektsionnykh kursov [Generalized problems and technologies of conducting subject remedial courses]. Rossiiskii nauchnyi zhurnal [Russian scientific journal], 2014, no. 3 (41), pp. 188-204.
  6. Stolyarova Z.F. Formalizatsiya sistemy ponyatii pri pomoshchi logicheskoi matritsy [Formalization of the concepts system by means of a logical matrix]. Voprosy kibernetiki [Problems of Cybernetics], 1978, no. 51, pp. 173-177.
  7. Stolyarova Z.F. Ispol'zovanie logicheskoi matritsy sistemy ponyatii v tselyakh obucheniya [Using the logical matrix of the concepts system for training purposes]. Voprosy kibernetiki [Problems of Cybernetics], 1978, no. 51, pp. 177-184.
  8. Talyzina N.F. Upravlenie protsessom usvoeniya znanii [Management of mstering knowledges process]. Moscow: Publ. MGU, 1975. 344 p.
  9. Tatur Yu.G. Obrazovatel'nyi protsess v vuze [The educational process at the university]. Moscow: Publ. Bauman MSTU, 2009. 264 p.
  10. Fokin Yu.G. Psikhodidaktika vysshei shkoly [Psychodidaktics of the Higher School]. Moscow: Publ. Bauman MSTU, 2000. 424 p.
  11. Tsvetkov Yu.B. Osobennosti proektirovaniya uchebnykh tselei distsiplin inzhenernykh obrazovatel'nykh program [Features of planning of the educational purposes disciplines of engineering education programs]. Nauka i obrazovanie [Science and education], 2015, no. 3, pp. 331-344.

Information About the Authors

Aleksandr G. Stanevskiy, PhD in Engineering, associate prof., Head of the Core Research and Methodological Center for Professional Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities, Moscow State Technical University named after N.E. Bauman, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: stan@bmstu.ru

Zukhra F. Stolyarova, Senior Lecturer of the department of rehabilitation for disabled people, Head scientific and educational center of professional rehabilitation for disabled people, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: stoliarova66@tokmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 1828
Previous month: 14
Current month: 8

Downloads

Total: 547
Previous month: 4
Current month: 1