A Pilot Study of Self-assessment by Educational Psychologists of the Conditions and Deficits of their Professional Activities in an Inclusive School

The purpose of the pilot study was to identify problems, deficits and conditions for ensuring the readiness of educational psychologists for effective professional activities in psychological support of students with special educational needs and normatively developing children in an inclusive school. The research methods were self-assessment tools for readiness and ability for psychological and pedagogical support in inclusive education, developed on the basis of competency-based and activity-based approaches, which included 4 questionnaires: attitude towards inclusion, intention to implement inclusive practices, reflection of difficulties and self-efficacy in implementing inclusive practitioner The total sample size was 89 respondents, who were educational psychologists from inclusive schools with higher education from 5 regions of the Russian Federation. Responses to the questionnaire were collected remotely through the ‘Anketolog’ system. Descriptive statistics for the questionnaires (M±SD) were performed, the distribution of answers to the questionnaires was checked for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and correlation analysis was carried out using Spearman. Based on the average scores for the answers, the rating of answers on the “Effectiveness” and “Difficulties” questionnaires was determined. Analysis of the results of responses to the statements of the questionnaires showed a moderate positive correlation between all questionnaires, except for the Difficulties Questionnaire, where there was a negative correlation, which corresponds to the results of previously conducted studies on similar questionnaires. Almost all respondents have a positive attitude towards inclusion and a positive self-assessment of their readiness and ability to implement psychological and pedagogical support for students with special educational needs. The attitude of educational psychologists to the difficulties of implementing inclusion in school, expressed by a value of 2.714, corresponds to the prevailing choice of answers on a Likert scale between “Undecided” (3 points) and “Rather disagree” (2 points), which mainly reflects respondents’ disagreement with the presence of difficulties in their work, including disagreement with the lack of support from school administrators. Thus, in conditions of support from schools, educational psychologists show a positive attitude towards inclusion and evaluate their effectiveness in supporting students at a high level.

Supplementary data. Datasets are available online: https://doi.org/10.48612/MSUPE/2fgr-1kmd-r416

1. Alekhina S.V. Professional'naya pozitsiya pedagoga-psikhologa v proektirovanii inklyuzivnoi obrazovatel'noi sredy [Professional position of a teacher-psychologist in the design of an inclusive educational environment]. Vestnik prakticheskoi psikhologii obrazovaniya = Bulletin of practical psychology of education, 2024. Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 162–171. DOI:10.17759/bppe.2024210113 (In Russ.).
2. Andronnikova O.O. Psikhologicheskaya sluzhba v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya: problemy i aktual'nye zadachi [Psychological service in the system of higher education: problems and current tasks]. Vestnik prakticheskoi psikhologii obrazovaniya = Bulletin of practical psychology of education, 2020. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 85–94. DOI:10.17759/bppe.2020170110 (In Russ.).
3. Astakhova L.G., Buslaeva E.N. Formirovanie gotovnosti studentov i pedagogov k sozdaniyu psikhologicheski bezopasnoi inklyuzivnoi obrazovatel'noi sredy [Forming the readiness of students and teachers to create a psychologically safe inclusive educational environment]. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii [Pedagogical education in Russia], 2016, no. 1, pp. 116–122. (In Russ.).
4. Borozdina L.V. Samootsenka i psikhometricheskii intellekt v prognoze effektivnosti uchebnoi deyatel'nosti [Self-esteem and psychometric intelligence in predicting the effectiveness of educational activities]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Moscow University], 2012. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya, no. 3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/samootsenka-i-psihometricheskiy-intellekt-v-prognoze-effektivnosti-uchebnoy-deyatelnosti (Accessed 10.06.2024). (In Russ.).
5. Brykova A.S. Gotovnost' pedagogov-psikhologov k osushchestvleniyu soprovozhdeniya obuchayushchikhsya s osobennostyami psikhofizicheskogo razvitiya v usloviyakh inklyuzivnogo obrazovaniya [The readiness of educational psychologists to support students with special needs of psychophysical development in the conditions of inclusive education]. Teoriya i metodika professional'nogo obrazovaniya: sb. nauch. st.: v 2 ch. [Theory and methodology of professional education: collection. scientific art.: at 2 hours], 2018. Vyp. 5, ch. 1, pp. 11–16. Available at: http://elib.bspu.by/handle/doc/51610 (Accessed 07.05.2024). (In Russ.).
6. But T., Einskou M. Pokazateli inklyuzii: prakticheskoe posobie [Indicators of inclusion: a practical guide]. Pod red. M. Vogana; per. I. Anikeeva. 2-e izd. Moscow: Tsentr issledovanii v oblasti inklyuzivnogo obrazovaniya (CSIE), 2013. 123 p. (In Russ.).
7. Volkova E.N. Programmy profilaktiki podrostkovogo bullinga v deyatel'nosti pedagoga-psikhologa [Programs for the prevention of teenage bullying in the activities of a teacher-psychologist]. Vestnik prakticheskoi psikhologii obrazovaniya = Bulletin of practical psychology of education, 2021. Vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 90–97. DOI:10.17759/bppe.2021180308 (In Russ.).
8. Volkova E.N. Professional'noe vzaimodeistvie pedagoga-psikhologa s uchitelem v shkole [Professional interaction between a teacher-psychologist and a teacher at school]. Vestnik prakticheskoi psikhologii obrazovaniya = Bulletin of practical psychology of education, 2021. Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 35–41. DOI:10.17759/bppe.2021180204 (In Russ.).
9. Lyubimova E.S. Komponentnaya model' gotovnosti studentov-bakalavrov pedagogicheskogo universiteta k inklyuzivnomu obrazovaniyu shkol'nikov [Component model of readiness of bachelor students of a pedagogical university for inclusive education of schoolchildren]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern problems of science and education], 2021, no. 4. DOI:10.17513/spno.30977 (In Russ.).
10. Prikaz Mintruda Rossii ot 24 iyulya 2015 g. № 514n “Ob utverzhdenii professional'nogo standarta “Pedagog-psikholog (psikholog v sfere obrazovaniya)” (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 18.08.2015 No. 38575) [Order of the Ministry of Labor of Russia dated July 24, 2015 No. 514n “On approval of the professional standard “Teacher-psychologist (psychologist in the field of education)” (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of Russia on August 18, 2015 No. 38575)]. Available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_185098/1d5a331e22b04694fd4ed9299de5f0008af6c799/ (Accessed 10.06.2024). (In Russ.).
11. Samsonova E.V. Issledovanie sub"ektivnoi otsenki gotovnosti i sposobnosti studentov i rabotayushchikh t'yutorov k t'yutorskomu soprovozhdeniyu v usloviyakh inklyuzivnogo obrazovaniya [Study of subjective assessment of the readiness and ability of students and working tutors for tutor support in the conditions of inclusive education]. E.V. Samsonova, Yu.A. Bystrova, A.Yu. Shemanov, L.M. Prokop'eva. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological and pedagogical research, 2023. Vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 43–61. DOI:10.17759/psyedu.2023150403 (In Russ.).
12. Samsonova E.V. Kompetentsii t'yutora v inklyuzivnom obrazovanii: spetsifika programm professional'noi podgotovki [Tutor competencies in inclusive education: specifics of professional training programs]. E.V. Samsonova, Yu.A. Bystrova, A.Yu. Shemanov, E.N. Kutepova. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological and pedagogical research, 2022. Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 84–99. DOI:10.17759/psyedu.2022140206 (In Russ.).
13. Samsonova E.V., Shemanov A.Yu., Alekhina S.V., Bystrova Yu.A. Samootsenka pedagogov-psikhologov inklyuzivnykh shkol: pilotnoe issledovanie: Nabor dannykh [Self-assessment of educators-psychologists from inclusive schools: pilot study]. RusPsyData: Repozitorii psikhologicheskikh issledovanii i instrumentov. Moskva. 2024. DOI:10.48612/MSUPE/2fgr-1kmd-r416 (In Russ.).
14. Ul'yanina O.A. Aktualizatsiya professional'nogo standarta “Pedagog-psikholog (psikholog v sfere obrazovaniya)”: soderzhatel'nyi analiz [Updating the professional standard “Teacher-psychologist (psychologist in the field of education)”: content analysis]. O.A. Ul'yanina, Yu.V. Tukfeeva, K.G. Semenova. Vestnik prakticheskoi psikhologii obrazovaniya = Bulletin of practical psychology of education, 2023. Vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 90–101. DOI:10.17759/bppe.2023200307 (In Russ.).
15. Federal'nyi zakon Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 29 dekabrya 2012 g. № 273-FZ “Ob obrazovanii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii” [Federal Law of the Russian Federation of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ “On Education in the Russian Federation”]. Available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140174/b819c620a8c698de35861ad4c9d9696ee0c3ee7a/ (Accessed 24.03.2024). (In Russ.).
16. Fedoreeva E.V. Analiz predstavlenii pedagogov-psikhologov o psikhologicheskoi sluzhbe v sisteme obrazovaniya Krasnoyarskogo kraya [Analysis of the ideas of educational psychologists about psychological service in the education system of the Krasnoyarsk region]. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V.P. Astaf'eva (Vestnik KGPU) [Bulletin of the Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after. V.P. Astafieva (Bulletin of KSPU)], 2023, no. 2(64), pp. 161‒173. (In Russ.).
17. Khitryuk V.V. Inklyuzivnaya gotovnost' pedagoga: motivatsionno-konativnyi komponent [Inclusive readiness of a teacher: motivational-conative component]. Vesnіk MDPU іmya І.P. Shamyakіna [Bulletin of MDPU named after I.P. ShamyakinaI], 2015, no. 1(45), pp. 98–103. (In Russ.).
18. Shemanov A.Yu. Podkhod k otsenke osobennostei professional'noi kompetentnosti t'yutora v usloviyakh inklyuzivnogo obrazovaniya: pilotnoe issledovanie [An approach to assessing the characteristics of a tutor’s professional competence in the conditions of inclusive education: a pilot study]. A.Yu. Shemanov, E.V. Samsonova, Yu.A. Bystrova, E.N. Kutepova. Klinicheskaya i spetsial'naya psikhologiya = Clinical and special psychology, 2022. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 233–263. DOI:10.17759/cpse.2022110410 (In Russ.).
19. Almalky H.A., Alrabiah A.H. Predictors of teachers’ intention to implement inclusive education. Children and Youth Services Review, 2024. Vol. 158, 107457. DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107457
20. Arboiz A.C., Aoanan G.O. Teacher efficacy and attitude in inclusive education as predictors of readiness for inclusive education: an explanatory sequential design. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 2024. Vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 838–851. DOI:10.36713/epra17137
21. Carvalho M. Inclusive education in Portugal: Exploring sentiments, concerns and attitudes of teachers. M. Carvalho, D. Simó-Pinatella, H. Azevedo, A.L.A. Alcocer. J Res Spec Educ Needs, 2024, no. 00, pp. 1–13. DOI:10.1111/1471-3802.12663
22. Fernandez I.L. Teachers’ Involvement in Inclusive Education: Attitudes of Future Teachers. I.L. Fernandez, M. Dosil-Santamaria, N. Idoiaga Mondragon, N. Ozamiz-Etxebarria. Education Sciences, 2023. Vol. 13, 851. DOI:10.3390/educsci13090851
23. Harkins-Brown A.R. Results of a Competency-Based Approach to Prepare General Educators to Effectively Include Students with Disabilities. A.R. Harkins-Brown, N. Gillon, A. Schanbacher. Education Sciences, 2024. Vol. 14, 475. DOI:10.3390/educsci14050475
24. Loyd D. Examining teachers' perceived competence in implementing inclusive education practices in the United Arab Emirates. D. Loyd, M.P. Opoku, Z. Walker et al. Journal of Research in Special Educational Need, 2024, № 00, pp. 1–18. DOI:10.1111/1471-3802.12673
25. Lozano C.S. How Do Attitudes and Self-Efficacy Predict Teachers’ Intentions to Use Inclusive Practices? A Cross-National Comparison between Canada, Germany, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland. C.S. Lozano, S. Wüthrich, H. Kullmann et al. Exceptionality Education International, 2024. Vol. 34, no 1: Inclusive Education: Canada’s Connection to the World. DOI:10.5206/eei.v34i1.16803
26. Sharma U. Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. U. Sharma, T. Loreman, C. Forlin. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 2012. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 12–21. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01200.x
27. Sharma U., Jacobs D.K. Predicting in-service educators’ intentions to teach in inclusive classrooms in India and Australia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2016. Vol. 55, pp. 13–23. DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2015.12.004
28. Stellai G. Teachers’ sentiments, attitudes and concerns about inclusive education and self-efficacy for inclusive practices. G. Stellai, K. Stylianos, G. Krinanthi. European Journal of Special Education Research, 2024. Vol. 10, no. 3. DOI:10.46827/ejse.v10i3.5302