Evaluation of psychological indicators of pedagogical conservatism of university teachers

23

Abstract

Context and relevance. Pedagogical conservatism is considered as a destructive phenomenon in the professional activity of a university teacher, leading to emotional dissatisfaction and stagnation. In this regard, the assessment of psychological indicators of pedagogical conservatism in the context of innovative transformations provides the opportunity to find effective conditions for overcoming such a state through the mechanism of psychological readiness for innovative activity as a result of professional success and productivity. Objective. To identify psychological indicators that determine different levels of pedagogical conservatism of university teachers. Hypothesis. The set of psychological indicators positively correlates with the level of pedagogical conservatism of university teachers. Methods and materials. The study involved 1754 university teachers in the humanities, socio-economic and technical fields (M = 42,3; SD = 8,7). The pedagogical conservatism of university teachers was assessed using the author's questionnaire "Assessment of pedagogical conservatism". The statistical methods used were the one-sample λ-Kolmogorov-Smirnov criterion, the Mann-Whitney U-test, the standardized effect size of Cohen's d, and discriminant analysis. Results. The results showed that the prevailing indicators of the level of pedagogical conservatism (low, medium, high) include changes in socio-pedagogical values of education (digitalization, computerization, and distance learning), psychological unpreparedness for innovative pedagogical activity, psychological defense mechanisms against psychotraumatic events, low self-esteem, and pedagogical stereotypes. At the same time, the dominant indicators of the opposite direction (ability for pedagogical reflection and behavioral flexibility) are considered in the perspective of further research as a condition for overcoming pedagogical conservatism. Conclusions. It was shown that the assessment of psychological indicators of pedagogical conservatism of university teachers plays a key role in predicting the success of innovative pedagogical activity. The need for high-quality organization of psychological support for pedagogical activity in the university, ensuring constructive overcoming of negative mental states of university teachers, is recommended.

General Information

Keywords: pedagogical conservatism, emotional burnout, innovative passivity, professional alienation, pedagogical stereotype, behavioral flexibility, resilience, reflection

Journal rubric: Psychology of Education

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2025170206

Acknowledgements. The author thanks the faculty of the universities that took part in the study, and also expresses gratitude to the reviewers for their high-quality and detailed analysis of the content of the article.

Received 26.07.2024

Accepted

Published

For citation: Avakyan, I.B. (2025). Evaluation of psychological indicators of pedagogical conservatism of university teachers. Psychological-Educational Studies, 17(2), 86–102. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2025170206

© Avakyan I.B., 2025

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Авакян, И.Б., Виноградова, Г.А. (2020). Оценка инновационной готовности педагогических коллективов вузов. Психолого-педагогические исследования, 12(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2020120102
    Avakyan, I.B., Vinogradova, G.A. (2020). Assessment of innovative readiness of teaching staff of universities. Psychological and pedagogical research, 12(1), 16–30. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2020120102
  2. Авакян, И.Б. (2020). Стремление к саморазвитию как фактор инновационной готовности преподавателей вузов. Образование и саморазвитие, 15(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd15/2/08
    Avakyan, I.B. (2020). The desire for self-development as a factor in the innovative readiness of university teachers. Education and Self-Development, 15(2), 88–102. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26907/esd15/2/08
  3. Авакян, И.Б. (2019). Факторный анализ развития инновационной готовности преподавателей вуза. Sciencefor Education Today, 1, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1901.03
    Avakyan, I.B. (2019). Factor analysis of the development of innovative readiness of university teachers. Science for Education Today, 1, 43–56. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1901.03
  4. Авакян, И.Б., Минияров, В.М. (2024). Педагогический консерватизм преподавателя вуза в условиях профессионального стресса. Научный результат. Педагогика и психология образования, 10(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8971-2024-10-1-0-5
    Avakyan, I.B., Miniyarov, V.M. (2024). Pedagogical conservatism of a university teacher under professional stress. Scientific result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 10(1), 63–82. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8971-2024-10-1-0-5
  5. Алкаед, З.С., АльАли, С.М., Аль-Масаде, М.М. (2024). Удовлетворенность работой среди педагогов специального образования. Образование и наука, 26(1), 202–225. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-1-202-225
    Alkaed, Z.S., AlAli, S.M., Al-Masadeh, M.M. (2024). Job satisfaction among special education teachers. Education and Science, 26(1), 202–225. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-1-202-225
  6. Белолуцкая, А.К., Криштофик, И.С., Мкртчян, В.А. (2022). Особенности рефлексии педагогов: связь с личностными и профессиональными ценностными ориентациями. Образование и наука, 24(7), 160–190. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-7-160-190
    Belolutskaya, A.K., Kristofik, I.S., Mkrtchyan, V.A. (2022). Features of teachers' reflection: connection with personal and professional value orientations. Education and Science, 24(7), 160–190. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-7-160-190
  7. Верченко, И.А. (2021). Влияние тревожности на профессиональное выгорание педагогов. Мир науки. Педагогика и психология, 3(9), 1–12. URL: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/40PSMN321.pdf (дата обращения: 01.07.2024).
    Verchenko, I.A. (2021). The Impact of Anxiety on Professional Burnout of Teachers. The World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 3(9), 1–12. (In Russ.). URL: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/40PSMN321.pdf (accessed: 01.07.2024).
  8. Мерзлякова, Д.Р. (2022). Особенности психологического здоровья педагогов с разным уровнем профессионального мастерства в условиях цифровой трансформации образовательного процесса. Психолого-педагогические исследования, 14(8), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2022140204
    Merzlyakova, D.R. (2022). Features of psychological health of teachers with different levels of professional skills in the context of digital transformation of the educational process. Psychological and pedagogical research, 14(8), 48–63. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2022140204
  9. Никифорова, Т.Ю. (2021). Особенности взаимосвязи фрустрационных реакций учителей в профессиональных и житейских ситуациях. Доказательная педагогика и психология, 1, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.18323/2221-5662-2021-1-65-72
    Nikiforova, T.Yu. (2021). Peculiarities of the relationship between teachers' frustration reactions in professional and everyday situations. Evidence-Based Pedagogy and Psychology, 1, 65–72. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18323/2221-5662-2021-1-65-72
  10. Никулина, И.В. (2023). Профессиональное выгорание преподавателей вуза. Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наук. Социальные, гуманитарные, медико-биологические науки, 3(90), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.37313/2413-9645-2023-25-90-32-37
    Nikulina, I.V. (2023). Professional burnout of university teachers. Bulletin of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social, Humanitarian, Medical and Biological Sciences, 3(90), 32–37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37313/2413-9645-2023-25-90-32-37
  11. Осин, Е.Н. (2015). Отчуждение от учебы как предиктор выгорания у студентов вузов: роль характеристик образовательной среды. Психологическая наука и образование, 20(4), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2015200406
    Osin, E.N. (2015). Alienation from learning as a predictor of burnout in university students: the role of educational environment characteristics. Psychological Science and Education, 20(4), 57–74. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2015200406
  12. Павлова, Е.М., Корнилова, Т.В. (2019). Триада «толерантность к неопределенности – эмоциональный интеллект – интуитивный стиль» и самооценка креативности у лиц творческих профессий. Психолого-педагогические исследования, 11(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2019110109
    Pavlova, E.M., Kornilova, T.V. (2019). The triad "tolerance of uncertainty – emotional intelligence – intuitive style" and self-assessment of creativity in creative professions. Psychological and pedagogical studies, 11(1), 107–117. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2019110109
  13. Певнева, А.Н. (2023). Ригидность в структуре личности: история вопроса и проблема исследования. Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, 20(2), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2023-2-320-337
    Pevneva, A.N. (2023). Rigidity in the personality structure: history of the issue and research problem. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 20(2), 320–337. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2023-2-320-337
  14. Рубанцова, Т.А., Крутько, Е.А. (2018). Процессы отчуждения в современном профессиональном образовании. Профессиональное образование в современном мире, 8(3), 2018–2023. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20180307 (дата обращения: 04.06.2024).
    Rubantsova, T.A., Krutko, E.A. (2018). Alienation processes in modern professional education. Professional education in the modern world, 8(3), 2018–2023. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20180307 (accessed: 04.06.2024).
  15. Силакова, Л.В., Соснило, А.И. (2023). Исследование готовности участников образовательного процесса к применению цифровых технологий в образовании. Психологическая наука и образование, 28(4), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2023280407
    Silakova, L.V., Sosnilo, A.I. (2023). A study of the readiness of participants in the educational process to use digital technologies in education. Psychological Science and Education, 28(4), 112–133. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2023280407
  16. Тылец, В.Г., Краснянская, Т.М. (2023). Взаимосвязь потребности в безопасности и ее личностных смыслов у студентов вуза. Психолого-педагогические исследования, 15(2), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2023150202
    Tylets, V.G., Krasnyanskaya, T.M. (2023). The relationship between the need for security and its personal meanings in university students. Psychological and pedagogical studies, 15(2), 18–31. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2023150202
  17. Филиппова, С.А., Пазухина, С.В., Куликова, Т.И., Степанова, Н.А. (2019). Эмоциональная устойчивость будущих педагогов к негативному влиянию современной информационной среды. Психологическая наука и образование, 24(5), 80–90. https://doi.org/1017759/pse2019240508
    Filippova, S.A., Pazukhina, S.V., Kulikova, T.I., Stepanova, N.A. (2019). Emotional stability of future teachers to the negative influence of the modern information environment. Psychological Science and Education, 24(5), 80–90. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/1017759/pse2019240508
  18. Alieva, S.A., Kasumova, B.S.A., Tulupova, O.V., Afonina, E.A., Tsahaeva, A.A. (2018). Innovative pedagogical experiences as a key factor of professional advancement. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 5, 142–145. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi5.142.145
  19. de la Fuente, J., Kauffman, D., Díaz-Orueta, U., Kauffman, Y. (2018). Adapting the Research Development and Innovation (RD & I) Value Chain in Psychology to Educational Psychology Area. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01188
  20. M.A.R. (2017). Pedagogical European Higher Education Area-Driven Educational Innovation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 1505–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.237
  21. Stupnisky, R.H., BrckaLorenz, A., Yuhas, B., Guay, F. (2018). Faculty members’ motivation for teaching and best practices: Testing a model based on self-determination theory across institution types. Educational Psychology, 53, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych. 2018.01.004

Information About the Authors

Inna B. Avakyan, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Associate Professor of the Department of Military-Political Work in the Troops (Forces), Krasnodar Higher Military School named after Army General S.M. Shtemenko, Krasnodar, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9259-8323, e-mail: avakjaninna@rambler.ru

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 33
Previous month: 21
Current month: 12

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 23
Previous month: 11
Current month: 12

 Total

Whole time: 56
Previous month: 32
Current month: 24