Skip to Main Content

Psychology and Law
2016. Vol. 6, no. 3, 61–78
doi:10.17759/psylaw.2016060306
ISSN: 2222-5196 (online)

About illegality determination of the validity of evidence through forensic examination. Information letter.

3564

S. Smirnova, E.V. Makushkin, A. Asnis, E. Vaske, E.G. Dozortseva, F.S. Safuanov, S.N. Shishkov, S.S. Shipshin, D.S. Oshevsky, D. Berdnikov, T.N. Sekerazh, A. Kalinina

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

This letter prepared in connection with a growing number of complaints of investigators and making decisions on the appointment of psychological examination of the credibility of the video recording of interrogations and dictated by the need to arrange expert practice on the study of video footage of carrying out certain investigative actions with various actors in the criminal process. The newsletter discusses the purpose of such examinations and grounds the studies, in accordance with scientific principles of professional activity of experts. The letter was prepared under the supervision of the Director of the FBI, Federal center of forensic expertise under the Ministry of justice of Russia, doctor of legal Sciences, Professor, honored lawyer of the Russian Federation, honorary worker of justice of Russia of S. A. Smirnova, Deputy General Director for science of Federal State Budgetary Institution "V. Serbsky Federal Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, doctor of medical Sciences, Professor E. V., Makushkina (doctor of juridical science A. Ya. Asnis, doctor of psychological Sciences, Vaske E. V., doctor of psychological Sciences, Professor E. G. Dozortseva, doctor of psychological Sciences, Professor F. S. Safuanov, PhD, associate Professor S. N. Shishkov, PhD, Professor S. S. Shipshin, PhD, associate Professor D. S. Oshevsky, PhD V. Berdnikov, PhD, associate Professor T. N. Sekerazh, PhD A. N. Kalinin. For investigators, judges, prosecutors, heads of Federal budgetary establishments of the Ministry of justice, judicial psychologists. For investigators, judges, prosecutors, heads of Federal budgetary establishments of the Ministry of justice, judicial psychologists.

General Information

Keywords: forensic-psychological examination, examination of the reliability of evidence, examination of the video materials of the investigative action.

Journal rubric: Forensic and Clinical Psychology in Legal Context

Article type: document

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2016060306

For citation: Smirnova S., Makushkin E.V., Asnis A., Vaske E., Dozortseva E.G., Safuanov F.S., Shishkov S.N., Shipshin S.S., Oshevsky D.S., Berdnikov D., Sekerazh T.N., Kalinina A. About illegality determination of the validity of evidence through forensic examination. Information letter. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2016. Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 61–78. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2016060306. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Vaskje E.V. Osobennosti provedenija sudebno-psihologicheskih jekspertiz v hode predvaritel'nogo rassledovanija: Prakticheskoe posobie. –N.Novgorod: GUVD po Nizhegorodskoj oblasti, 2007. – 71 s.
  2. Vaskje E.V., Vinogradov A.P. Sudebno-psihiatricheskie, sudebno-psihologicheskie i kompleksnye s nimi jekspertizy: osobennosti nazna-chenija i provedenija v hode predvaritel'nogo sledstvija: Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. –N.Novgorod: SU SK RF po Nizhegorodskoj ob-lasti, 2016. – 88 s.
  3. Dozorceva E.G., Afanas'eva A.G. Ocenka dostovernosti svidetel'skih pokazanij nesovershennoletnih // Sovremennaja zarubezhnaja psihologija 2015. T. 4. № 3. S. 47-56.
  4. Dozorceva E.G., Zhbankova O.V., Gavrilova T.V.Kompleksnaja metodika doprosa nesovershennoletnih (maloletnih) poterpevshih ot prestuple-nij seksual'nogo haraktera //Prakticheskoe posobie po provedeniju do-prosa nesovershennoletnih (maloletnih) poterpevshih ot prestuplenij seksual'nogo haraktera (v pechati).
  5. Engalychev V.F., Kravcova G.K., Holopova E.N.Sudebnaja psihologicheskaja jekspertiza po vyjavleniju priznakov dostovernosti/nedostovernosti informacii, soobshhaemoj uchastnikami ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (po videozapisjam sledstvennyh dejstvij i operativno-razysknyh mero-prijatij): monografija. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2016. – 328 s.
  6. Morozova M.V. Kompleksnaja sudebnaja psihologo-psihiatricheskaja jeks-pertiza sposobnosti davat' pokazanija // Medicinskaja i sudebnaja psiho-logija: Kurs lekcij: ucheb. posobie / Pod red. T.B. Dmitrievoj, F.S. Sa-fuanova. M.: Genezis, 2009. S. 506—527.
  7. Safuanov F.S. Ob osnovnyh kategorijah sudebno-psihologicheskoj jeks-pertizy v ugolovnom processe // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 1994, № 3. S.50-54.
  8. Safuanov F.S., Shishkov S.N. Jekspertiza «pravdivosti» pokazanij (Vozmozhnosti psihologicheskoj jekspertizy) / F.S. Safuanov, // Zakon-nost', № 2, 1992.–S. 13-14.
  9. Safuanov F.S. Sudebno-psihologicheskaja jekspertiza: uchebnik dlja aka-demicheskogo bakalavriata. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Jurajt»,2014. –421 s.
  10. Sitkovskaja O.D., Konysheva L.P. Psihologicheskaja jekspertiza nesover-shennoletnih v ugolovnom processe: Nauchno-metodicheskoe posobie. M.: Juniti-Dana, 2001. – 72 s.
  11. Sitkovskaja O.D. Psihologija svidetel'skih pokazanij: Nauchno-metodicheskoe posobie. M.: Izd-vo NII pro¬blem ukreplenija zakonnosti i pravoporjadka pri General'noj prokurature RF, 2007. – 80 s.
  12. Fraj O. Detekcija lzhi i obmana. SPb.: PRAJM-Evroznak, 2005. – 320 s.
  13. Fraj O. Lozh'. Tri sposoba vyjavlenija lzhi. SPb.: PRAJM-Evroznak, 2006. – 286 s.
  14. Holevchuk A.G. Kriminalisticheskij analiz zarubezhnyh metodov detek-cii lzhi: tendencii i opredelenie perspektiv// Innovacii v nauke / Sb. st. po materialam LIII mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. № 1 (50). Chast' I. Novosibirsk: Izd. ANS «SibAK», 2016. 124 s.
  15. Amado B.G., Arce R., Farina F. Undeutsch hypothesis and Criteria Based Content Analysis: A meta-analytic review. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context. 2015. Vol. 7.№ 1. pp. 3 – 12. doi:10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.11.002
  16. Anson D.A., Golding S.L., Gully K.J. Child sexual abuse allegations: Reliability of criteria-based content analysis // Law and Human Behavior. 1993. Vol. 17.№3. pp. 331 – 341. doi:10.1007/BF01044512
  17. Arntzen F. Psychologie der Zeugenaussage. System der Glaubwürdigkeitsmerkmale. München: Beck, 1983. 171 p.
  18. Assessment of child witness statements using criteria-based content analysis (CBCA): The effects of age, verbal ability, and interviewer's emotional style / Santtila P., Roppola H., Runtti M., Niemi P. // Psychology, Crime and Law. 2000. Vol. 6.№ 3. pp. 159-179. doi:10.1080/10683160008409802
  19. Bauer P.J., Wewerka S.S. Saying is revealing: Verbal expression of event memory in the transition from infancy to early childhood / P. van den Broek, P.J. Bauer, T. Bourg (eds.) Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation: Bridging fictional and actual events. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997. pp. 139 – 168.
  20. Boychuk T. Criteria-Based Content Analysis of children’s statements about sexual abuse: A field-based validation study / Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University. 1991.
  21. Brown J.M. Statement Validity Analysis / J.M. Brown, E.A. Campbell The Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 319 – 326.
  22. Bruner J., Haste H. Making sense: The child construction of reality. New York: Methuen, 1987.
  23. Colewell K., Hiscock C.K., Memnon A. Interviewing techniques and the assessment of statement credibility // Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2002. Vol. 16.№ 3. pp. 287-300. doi: 10.1002/acp.788.
  24. Content cues to veracity: A meta-analysis of the validity of Criteria-Based Content Analysis / Sporer S., Blandon-Gitlin I., Masip J., Hauch V. // EAPL + World Conference 2015 (Nuremberg, Germany, 4 – 7 August 2015). Abstracts.2015. p. 238.
  25. Contextual Bias in Verbal Credibility Assessment: Criteria-Based Content Analysis, Rality Monitoring and Scientific Content Analysis / Bogaard G., Meijer E.H., Vrij A., Broers N.J., Merkelbach H. // Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2014. Vol. 28.№ 1. pp. 79 – 90. doi: 10.1002/acp.2959.
  26. Criteria-based Content Analysis of True and Suggested Accounts of Events / Blandon-Gitlin I., Pezdek K., Lindsay D.S., Hagen L. // Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2009. Vol. 23.№ 7. pp. 901 - 917. doi: 10.1002/acp.1504.
  27. Criterion-Based Content Analysis: A field validation study / Lamb M.E., Sternberg K.J., Esplin P.W., Hershkowitz I., Orbach Y., Hovav M. // Child Abuse and Neglect. 1997. Vol. 21. № 3 pp. 255–264. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(96)00170-6.
  28. Detecting Deception in Children: Event Familiarity Affects Criterion-Based Content Analysis Rating / Pezdek K., Morrow A., Blandon-Gitlin I., Goodman G.S., Quas J.A., Saywitz K.J., Bidrose S., Pipe M.-E., Rogers M., Brodi L. // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2004. Vol. 89.№1. pp. 119 – 126. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.119.
  29. Dettenborn H., Fröhlich H.-H., Szewczyk H. Forensische Psychologie. Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, 1984. P. 394.
  30. Fivush R. Haden C.A. Narrating and representing experience: Preschoolers’ developing autobiographical recounts / In P. van den Broek, P.J. Bauer, T. Bourg (Eds.) Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation: Bridging fictional and actual events. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997. pp. 169 – 198.
  31. Goodman G.S. Commentary: On stress and accuracy in research on children’s testimony / J. Doris (Ed.) The suggestibility of children’s recollections.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1991. pp. 77 – 82.
  32. Halfmann E., Sporer S.L. Belief in Context: Effects of suspect preparation time on belief about Scientific Content Analysis // EAPL + World Conference 2015 (Nuremberg, Germany, 4 – 7 August 2015). Abstracts. 2015. p. 92 - 93.
  33. Honts C. R. Assessing children’s credibility: Scientific and legal issues in 1994 // North Dakota Law Review. 1994. Vol. 70.рр. 879–903.
  34. Interviewer questions and content analysis of children’s statements of sexual abuse / Craig R.A., Scheibe R., Raskin D.C., Kircher J.C., Dodd D.// Applied Developmental Science. 1999. Vol. 3.№ 5. pp. 77–85.doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0302_2.
  35. Köhnken G. Statement Validity Analysis and the detection of the truth / In P.A. Granhag, L.A. Stromwall (Eds.) The detection of deception in forensic context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004. pp. 41 – 63.
  36. Köhnken G.Mythen und Missverständnissebei der Beurteilung von (Zeugen)Aussagen / N. Saimeh (Hrsg.) KriminalitätalsbiographischesScheitern. Forensikals Lebenshilfe? Bonn: Psychiatrie‐Verlag, 2010. S. 50‐62.
  37. Köhnken G.,Manzanero A.L., Scott M.T. Statement validity assessment: myths and limitations // Anuario de PsicologíaJurídica. 2015. № 25. pp. 13–19.doi:10.1016/j.apj. 2015.01.004.
  38. Lamers-Winkelman F., Buffing F. Children’s testimony in the Netherlands: A study of statement validity Analysis // International perspectives on child abuse and children testimoniy: Psychological Research and law. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1996. pp. 45 – 62.
  39. Moston S. How children interpret and respond to questions: situation sources of suggestibility in eyewitness interviews // Social Behavior. 1990. № 5. pp. 155 – 167.
  40. Nelson K. Event knowledge and cognitive development / K. Nelson (Ed.) Event knowledge: Structure and functions in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986. pp. 1 – 19.
  41. Nelson K. Remembering and telling: A Developmental story // Journal of Narrative and Life History. 1991. №1. pp. 109 – 127. doi: 10.1075/jnlh.1.1.05chi.
  42. Parker A.D., Brown J. Detection of deception: Statement Validity Analysis as a means of determining truthfulness or falsity of rape allegations // Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2000. Vol. 5.№2. pp. 237 – 259. doi: 10.1348/135532500168119.
  43. Raskin D.C., Esplin P.W. Statement Validity Assessment: Interview procedures and content analysis of children’s statements of sexual abuse // Behavioral Assessment. 1991. Vol. 13.рр. 265–291.
  44. Reliability of criteria-based content analysis of child witness statements / Horowitz S.W., Lamb M.E., Esplin P.W, Boychuk T.D., Krispin O., Reiter-Lavery L. // Legal and Criminological Psychology. 1997. Vol. 2.№ 1. pp. 11 – 21. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.1997.tb00329.x.
  45. Ruby C.L., Brigham J.C. The usefulness of the Criteria-Based Content Analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations // Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 1997. Vol. 3.№ 4. pp. 705–737. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.3.4.705.
  46. Steller M., Köhnken G. Criteria-Based Content Analysis / In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989. pp. 217 – 245.
  47. The relationships among interviewer utterance type, CBCA scores and the richness of children’s responses / Herschkowitz I., Lamb M.E., Sternberg K.J., Esplin P.W. // Legal and Criminological Psychology. 1997. Vol. 2.№ 2. pp. 169 – 176. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.1997.tb00341.x.
  48. Volbert R., Hoff K., Lehmann R.Criteria-Based Content Analysis: Empirical analysis of diagnostic value and latent structures // EAPL + World Conference 2015 (Nuremberg, Germany, 4 – 7 August 2015). Abstracts.2015. p. 268.
  49. Volbert R., Steller M. Glaubhaftigkeit / T. Bliesener, F. Lösel, G. Köhnken (Hrsg.) Lehrbuch der Rechtpsychologie. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber, Hogrefe AG, 2014. S. 391 – 407.
  50. Vrij A. Criteria-based content analysis a qualitative review of the first 37 Studies // Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2005. Vol. 11.№ 1. pp. 3–41. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3.
  51. Wells G.L., Loftus E.F. Commentary: Is this child fabricating? Reactions to a new assessment technique / In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children’s recollections. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1991. pp. 168–171.
  52. Wojciechowski B. Classification tree: A step forward to standardized and accurate content analysis // EAPL + World Conference 2015 (Nuremberg, Germany, 4 – 7 August 2015). Abstracts. 2015. p. 292 – 293.

Information About the Authors

Svetlana Smirnova, Doctor of Law, Professor, Director, Russian Federal Center of Forensic Inquiry of the Russian Ministry of Justice, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: info@sudexpert.ru

Evgenij V. Makushkin, Doctor of Medicine, Professor, deputy director of science, FSBI «National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology named after V.P. Serbsky» of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1937-5908, e-mail: eVm14@list.ru

Alexander Asnis, Doctor of Law, Member Of The Presidium, Moscow Board of lawyers, Moscow, Russia

Ekaterina Vaske, Doctor of Psychology, professor, Department of criminal law and process, Lobachevsky State Universitu of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia, e-mail: vaskeev@rambler.ru

Elena G. Dozortseva, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor, Department of Legal Psychology and Law, Faculty of Legal Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Senior Researcher, Laboratory for Child and Adolescent Psychology, V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation,Member of the editorial board of the scientific journal “Psychology and Law” member of the editorial board of the scientific journal “Psychological Science and Education”, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1309-0485, e-mail: edozortseva@mail.ru

Farit S. Safuanov, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Head of Chair of Clinical and Forensic Psychology, Department of Legal Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Head of the Laboratory of Psychology, Federal Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Addiction of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1703-7956, e-mail: safuanovf@rambler.ru

Sergey N. Shishkov, PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Chief Research Associate, FSBI «National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology named after V.P. Serbsky» of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4169-9447, e-mail: shishkov50@mail.ru

Sergey S. Shipshin, PhD in Psychology, Deputy Chief, Southern Regional Centre of Forensic Expertise of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation., Rostov-na-Donu, Russia

Dmitry S. Oshevsky, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher at the Laboratory of Child and Adolescent Psychology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Associate Professor of the Department of Legal Psychology and Law, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Federal State Budgetary Institution "Research Center for Mental Health" Leading Researcher of the Department of Organization of Psychiatric Services, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3465-6302, e-mail: oshevsky@serbsky.ru

Dmitry Berdnikov, Doctor of Medicine, Superior State Forensic Expert, Federal Budget Institution Kursk Forensic Laboratory of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Kursk, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8201-8156, e-mail: berdnikov@rambler.ru

Tatiana N. Sekerazh, PhD in Law, Docent, Head, Laboratory of Forensic Psychology, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7619-6992, e-mail: sekerage@mail.ru

Anastasiya Kalinina, PhD in Law, expert, Laboratory of judicial and psychological examination, Moscow, Russia

Metrics

Views

Total: 9540
Previous month: 44
Current month: 57

Downloads

Total: 3564
Previous month: 4
Current month: 8