Analysis of the concepts of “vulnerability” and “vulnerable groups of the population” in the forensic psychological assessment

Context and relevance. The content and structure of the concept of "vulnerable population groups" are not defined for forensic psychological and psychiatric examination, as well as for psychology in general. Legal, economic and sociological approaches to the study of this concept determine its boundaries, criteria by which one can talk about the content.A scientific research review of domestic and foreign studies will reveal the definitions of "vulnerability" and "vulnerable population groups", as well as the possibilities of their application in forensic psychological retrospective and prognostic assessment. Goal. Analysis of the concepts of “vulnerability” and “vulnerable population groups” and the possibility of applying the concepts in forensic psychological assessment in complex forensic psychological and psychiatric examination. Theoretical approaches. The theoretical and methodological analysis is presented, including legal, economic, sociological and psychological approaches. The principles of forensic clinical and psychological expertise are used. Results. The criteria for the concept of "vulnerability" and "vulnerable groups of the population" were identified. In forensic psychological assessment, it is important not only to diagnose conscious regulation for a legally significant period, but also to study psychological vulnerability. Conclusion. In the forensic psychological assessment of deal-making capacity and legal capacity, the following are significant: psychological vulnerability to making a decision that entails financial and property losses; vulnerability to negative influence and fraud from another person when making a transaction; difficulties in social adaptation, the consequences of which may be deterioration of mental and somatic health and well-being, and a decrease in the quality of life. A promising direction for further research is the study of psychological mechanisms and the structure of psychological vulnerability of legally significant abilities.

1. Aismontas, B.B., Aleksandrova, L.A., Bartsalkina, V.V., Gurova, E.V. (Eds.). (2023). Psychological assistance to socially vulnerable individuals using distance technologies (Internet counseling and distance learning): Proceedings of the IX All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation, Moscow, December 9, 2022. Moscow: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education Publ., Publishing House “Bakhrakh-M”. (In Russ.)
2. Alisievich, E.S. (2015). Protection of girls as a vulnerable group under international law. RUDN Journal of Law, 1, 37—47. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23567094 (viewed: 12.02.2025).
3. Voronina O.A. (2010). Social and psychological work with vulnerable groups of youth: a training manual. Kirov: Publishing house of Vyatka State University. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/qolrtr (viewed: 12.02.2025).
4. Declaration of the Rights of the Child. Adopted by resolution 1386 (XIV) of the UN General Assembly on November 20, 1959. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/childdec.shtml (In Russ.). (viewed: 12.02.2025).
5. Dukhnovsky, S.V., Zlokazov, K.V. (2024). Information and psychological vulnerability of employees of internal affairs bodies with different levels of stability and fatigue. Psychology and Law, 14(4), 50—67. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140404
6. Statement of the Government of the Russian Federation and the Bank of Russia “On Economic Policy for 2001 and Some Aspects of the Medium-term Strategy” (approved at the meeting of the Board of Directors of the Bank of Russia on 04/06/2001, at the meeting of the Government of the Russian Federation on 04/13/2001). (2001). Moscow. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_31312/ (viewed: 12.02.2025).
7. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Adopted by General Assembly resolution 61/106 of 13 December 2006. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/disability.shtml (viewed: 12.02.2025).
8. Koroleva, Yu.A., Matasov, Yu.T (2018). Social and psychological competence of adolescents with developmental disabilities: monograph. Kirov: Interregional Center for Innovative Technologies in Education Publ. (In Russ.).
9. Koroleva, Yu.A. (2021). Social and psychological vulnerability of adolescents with hearing impairment. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, 70-4, 372—375. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46326714 (viewed: 12.02.2025). https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2022110206
10. Lawlor, C.E., Goodson, J.T., Haeffel, G.J. (2022). Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Primer. Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 11(2), 97—107. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2022110206
11. Makhnach, A.V. (2016) Viability of a person and family: a socio-psychological paradigm. Moscow: Publishing house «Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences». (In Russ.).
12. Melehin, A.I. (2016). The trajectory change of theory of mind in the elderly. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 24(1), 24—43. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2016240103
13. Mikrina, V.G., Bekyashev, D.K. (2019). Special aspects of the protection of vulnerable groups in international law. Advances in Law Studies, 1, 46—50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29039/article_5d1290f30677a2.95247555
14. Nalichaeva, S.A., Borisenko, Z.V., Tkachenko, A.A., Lukina, E.M., Terentyev, B.I. (2021). Human Viability and Mentality: A Textbook. Sevastopol: RIBEST Publ. (In Russ.).
15. Nesmeyanova, S.E., Kalinina, E.G. (2017). “Vulnerable groups” concept: international and national approaches. Russian Law: Education, Practice, Research, 4(100), 7—12. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30692523 (viewed: 12.02.2025).
16. Osaulenko, L.N. (2018). Vulnerability as a specific category of consumer risk. Health Risk Analysis, 3, 24—29. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2018.3.03
17. Ovcharova, L.N. (Ed.). (2005). Income and social services: inequality, vulnerability, poverty: collective monograph. Moscow: HSE University Publ. (In Russ.). URL: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01002838649 (viewed: 12.02.2025).
18. Perepravina, Y.O., Safuanov, F.S. (2023). Motivation in Persons with Mental Disorders Influencing the Deal-Making Capacity. Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Clinical Psychology, 14(3), 259—265. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34883/PI.2023.14.3.010
19. Pozdnyakov, V.M. (2024). On the development of a modern model for ensuring information and psychological security. Extreme Psychology and Personal Safety, 1(1), 44—58. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/epps.20240100105
20. Polskaya, N.A., Yakubovskaya, D.K., Razvalyaeva, A.Yu. (2023). Vulnerability to Interpersonal Rejection Due to Appearance in Body-Positive and Pro-Anorexic Online Communities. Social Psychology and Society, 14(1), 150—171. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140109
21. Ponomareva, E.V. (2023). The concept of vulnerability in the international law in the context of the access to justice. Education and Law, 1, 145—153. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-1503-2023-1-145-153
22. Pulko, T.A., Kivaiko, V.N. (2024). Information manipulations and psychological vulnerability in the conditions of a crisis information environment. Endless Light in Science, S1, 151—154. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2709-1201-2024-23-151-154
23. Rusakovskaya, O.A. (2024). “Problem Situations”: Testing as a Forensic Psychiatric Research Method when Changing Civil Legal Status. Psychology and Law, 14(1), 152—167. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140110
24. Safuanov, F.S., Kharitonova, N.K., Zeiger, M.V., Khristoforova, M.A., Perepravina, Yu.O. (2016). Complex forensic psychiatric examination of cases concerning restriction of legal capacity due to mental disorder: challenges and prospects. Russian Journal of Psychiatry, 2, 37—43. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26002149 (viewed: 12.02.2025).
25. Safuanov, F.S. (2014). Forensic psychological examination: a textbook for academic baccalaureate. Moscow: Yurayt Publishing House. (In Russ.).
26. Kharitonova, N.K., Safuanov, F.S., Malkin, D.A. (2006). Expert assessment of transactionability in civil cases within the framework of a comprehensive forensic psychological and psychiatric examination: a manual for doctors. Moscow. (In Russ.).
27. Shabunova, A.A., Kalachikova, O.N., Leonidova, G.V., Smoleva, E.O. (2016). Exclusion as a Criterion for Selecting Socially Vulnerable Population Groups. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2(44), 29—45. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2016.2.44.2
28. Bedard, R.M., Mart, E.G. (2007). Practical assessment of testamentary capacity and undue influence in wills. The American journal of Forensic Psychology, 25(4), 7—19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289153626_Practical_assessment_of_testamentary_capacity_and_undue_influence_in_wills (viewed: 12.02.2025).
29. He, T., Derfler-Rozin, R., Pitesa, M. (2019). Financial Vulnerability and the Reproduction of Disadvantage in Economic Exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(1), 80—96. http:// doi.org/10.1037/apl0000427
30. Mart, E.G. (2016). Neuropsychological Assessment of Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(6), 554—561. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acw048
31. Plotkin, D.A., Spar, J.E., Horwitz, H.L. (2016). Assessing Undue Influence. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 44(3), 344—351. https://jaapl.org/content/jaapl/44/3/344.full.pdf (viewed: 12.02.2025).
32. Poh, L.M., Sabri, M.F. (2017). Review of financial vulnerability studies. Archives of Business Research, 5(2), 127—134. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.52.2784
33. Rozanov, V.A., Mazo, G.E. (2024). Using the strategy of genome-wide association studies to identify genetic markers of suicidal behavior: a narrative review. Consortium Psychiatricum, 5(2), 63—77. https://doi.org/10.17816/CP15495
34. Syunyakov, T.S., Pavlichenko, A.V., Morozov, P.V., Fedotov, I.A., Filatova, V.E., Gayduk, A.J., Ignatenko, Yu.S., Spikina, A.A., Yashikhina, A.A., Patsali, M.E., Fountoulakis, K.N., Smirnova, D.A. (2022). Modeling suicidality risks and understanding the phenomenon of suicidality under the loupe of pandemic context: national findings of the COMET-G study in the Russian population. Consortium Psychiatricum, 3(2), 15—36. https://doi.org/10.17816/CP167