Ethical issues of psychological expertise and interdisciplinary interaction between psychologists and lawyers

Context and relevance. Effective law enforcement practice, including investigative and judicial actions, involves intensive interactions and collaboration of specialists of various profiles, which requires, in particular, a mutual understanding of the specifics of the work and the implementation of professional ethical standards by lawyers and psychologists. The most difficult problems are the ethical dilemmas and complexities in the field of judicial process and, in particular, the conduct and interpretation of the results of forensic psychological examination. Objective. Analysis of the ethical foundations and the most relevant ethical dilemmas in the field of forensic psychological examination practice and interaction between psychologists and lawyers. Methods and materials. Analysis of national and foreign literary sources, ethical regulation in the law enforcement practice of psychologists and lawyers, as well as materials of civil and criminal cases (100 cases concerning minors). Results. The most serious ethical problems for lawyers and psychologists working at the intersection of two applied disciplines in expert work are difficulties of a terminological and substantive nature, as well as understanding and implementing basic ethical principles and norms. Conclusions. Effective professional interaction and the resolution of ethical problems arising in the field of forensic psychological examination require active joint efforts of specialists in two fields - lawyers and psychologists both in terms of developing ethically sound interaction strategies and practical activities.

1. Ivanova,V., Kholopova, E.N. (2010). Modern problems of professional ethics of an expert psychologist. In: The current state and prospects of the development of forensic psychology in the Russian Federation. Collection of materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation. (pp. 151—157). Kaluga. Kaluga State University. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36850907 (viewed: 10.01.2025).
2. Kochenov, M.M. (2010). Forensic psychological examination: theory and practice. Selected works. Moscow: Genesis. (In Russ.).
3. Mamaichuk, I.I. (2002). Personality examination in judicial and investigative practice. Textbook. Saint Petersburg: Rech’ Publ. (In Russ.).
4. Mamaichuk, I.I. (2011). Methodological and systematic approaches to forensic psychological examination. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 12. Psychology. Sociology. Pedagogy, 3, 196—206. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/ogxvzp (viewed: 10.01.2025).
5. Mamaichuk, I.I., Arbuzova, E.N. (2024). Psychological expertise in the practice of a clinical psychologist. Рart 2: Psychological examination in forensic investigation Textbook. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University Publishing House. (In Russ.).
6. Nagaev, V.V. (2017). Fundamentals of forensic psychological examination. Textbook for universities. Moscow: Unity-Dana Publ. (In Russ.).
7. Safuanov, S. (2014). Ethical issues of using psychological knowledge in the proceedings of the non-procedural forms. Psychology and Law, 4(4), 79—87. (In Russ.). URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/psylaw/archive/2014_n4/73024 (viewed: 10.01.2025).
8. Safuanov, F.S. (2020). Lecture 4. Ethical foundations of an expert's activity. In: Sekerazh, T.N. (Ed.), Course of lectures on the additional professional retraining program according to an expert specialty 20.1 “Research of human psychology”. Moscow: The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science Publ. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/978-5-91133-217-4-2020-11
9. Safuanov, F.S. (2024). Forensic psychological examination. Textbook for universities (4th ed., trans. and add.). Moscow: Yurait Publ. (In Russ.).
10. Simakova, A.I., Arbuzova, E.N., Il'yankova, E.I. (2020). Psychological features and problems of support of civil cases connected with protection of the rights and interests of children. Applied Psychology and Pedagogy, 5(3), 167—180. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/2500-0543-2020-157-167
11. Kholopova, E.N., Vasilyeva, O.A. (2019). Forensic psychological examination to identify signs of reliability/unreliability of information as a means of forensically relevant information test and evaluation. Issues of Criminology, Forensics and Forensic Examination, 1(45), 131—137. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=40832926 (viewed: 10.01.2025).
12. Shaboltas, A.V. (2012). To discuss the draft Code of Ethics of the Russian Psychological Society. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 16. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2, 75—84. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17767892 (viewed: 10.01.2025).
13. Shaboltas, A.V., Arbuzova, E.N. (2024). Ethical problems in forensic psychological examination. In: Vakhninia V.V. (Ed.), Collection of materials of the Round table: Actual problems of psychological support for the activities of the prosecutor's office and law enforcement agencies (Moscow, March 28, 2024) (pp. 33—38). Moscow: University of Public Prosecutor's Office Publ. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=69217292 (viewed: 10.01.2025).
14. Shaboltas, A.V., Arzbuzova, E.N. (2024). Ethical problems in psychological support of law enforcement activity and forensic examination. The Judge, 7(163), 49—54. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52433/18178170_2024_07_49
15. Sharipova, E.R., Mudarisova, A.R., Grigorieva, M.S. (2023). Forensic psychological examination of minors. Science Bulletin, 2(6), 518—527. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?edn=fbbmjw (viewed: 10.01.2025).
16. Shaboltas, A.V., Gorbatov, S.V., Arbuzova, E.N., Khaleeva, M.V. (2020). The Ethical Problems in Forensic Psychological Expert Evaluation: A View from Modern Russia. Psychology In Russia: State of the Art, 13(1), 11—21. https://doi.org/11621/pir.2020.0102
17. Shaboltas A.V., Gorbatov S.V., Arbuzova E.N., Khaleeva M.V. (2023). The ethical problems in forensic psychological expertise: the results of qualitative study in Russia. International Journal of Psychology, 58(1), 485. https://doi.org/1002/ijop.13016