Problems of an assessment of loyalty of governmental employees to formal groups of membership

367

Abstract

The article suggests a solution to the previously raised problem of contradictions of administrative-legal and phenomenological approaches to assessing loyalty of law enforcing governmental employees. It is shown that the application of the phenomenological approach in combination with the administrative-legal approach is not just expedient, but necessary. Argued that loyalty to the formal social group «governmental employees» can not be estimated directly from the point of view of socio-psychological criteria, since it is not a group subject with a formed psycho-behavioral pattern shared by group members. It is suggested that the term «loyalty» is conditionally applicable for assessing loyalty to the group «governmental employees» and similar formal groups. The authors propose an indirect way of assessing loyalty to formal groups of governmental employees, created and tested by S.V. Gornostaev in researching the official loyalties of the staff of the Russian penitentiary system. This method involves the identification of groups operating in the professional and service environment, which the employee has formed loyalty and comparison of key norms of these groups with formal norms.

General Information

Keywords: loyalty, governmental employees, formal groups, informal groups, assessment of loyalty.

Journal rubric: Psychology of Professional Activity

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2018080414

For citation: Gornostaev S.V., Pozdnyakov V.M. Problems of an assessment of loyalty of governmental employees to formal groups of membership [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2018. Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 155–167. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2018080414. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Bobrus O.N. Sovremennye podkhody k izucheniyu korporativnoi loyal'nosti personala [Modern approaches to the study of corporate loyalty personnel]. Uchenye zapiski Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial'nogo universiteta [RSSU Proceedings], 2009, no. 9, pp. 117—120.
  2. Vasil'eva E.A. Transformatsiya gosudarstvennoi sluzhby v usloviyakh administrativnoi reformy: sotsiologicheskii analiz. Diss. kand. sociol. nauk. [Transformation of the civil service in the conditions of administrative reform: sociological analysis: Cand. Sci. (Sociology) diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2016. 364 p.
  3. Gornostaev S.V. Metodika tsvetovykh metafor kak sredstvo diagnostiki sluzhebnoi loyal'nosti [Colour Metaphors Method as the Means of Diagnosing Officers'. Loyalty] // Psikhopedagogika v pravookhranitel'nykh organakh [Psychopedagogy in Law Enforcement], 2017, no. 3(70), pp. 67—72.
  4. Gornostaev S.V. Official loyalty as the factor of official activity: administratively-legal and phenomenological approaches [Sluzhebnaya loyal'nost' kak faktor sluzhebnoi deyatel'nosti: administrativno-pravovoi i fenomenologicheskii podkhody] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiia i pravo [Psychology and Law], 2017, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 68-79. doi: 10.17759/psylaw.2017070106.
  5. Gornostaev S.V. Osnovy psikhologicheskoi teorii loyal'nosti [Fundamentals of the psychological theory of loyalty]. Ryazan, 2017. 224 p.
  6. Dominyak V.I. Organizatsionnaya loyal'nost': model' realizatsii ozhidanii rabotnika ot svoei organizatsii. Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Organizational loyalty: the model for realizing the employee's expectations from his organization. Cand. Sci. (Psychology) diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2006. 280 p.
  7. Dukhovnoe izmerenie sovremennoi politiki [Spiritual Dimension of Modern Politics] / RAN, In-t filosofii [RAS, Institute of Philosophy]. Ed. by V.N. Shevchenko. Moscow: IF RAS, 2003. 190 p.
  8. Elisarov S.G. Vklyuchennost' sub"ekta v sotsial'nuyu sredu: osnovnye napravleniya issledovanii v zarubezhnoi i otechestvennoi psikhologii [The involvement of subject in the social environment: the basic directions of researches in foreign, soviet and russian psychology]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologicheskie nauki [Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Psychological sciences], 2009, no. 2, pp. 135-141.
  9. Efremova G.Kh., Ratinov A.R. Izuchenie pravosoznaniya i obshchestvennogo mneniya o prestupnosti i deyatel'nosti pravookhranitel'nykh organov [Examination lawfulness and public opinion on crime and law enforcement]. Moscow, 1989. 118 p.
  10. Katomina V.A., Sanisalova N.A. Zakonnost' i spravedlivost': edinstvo, razlichiya i vzaimodeistvie [Legitimacy and justice: unity, differences and interaction] // Vestnik penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Penza State University], 2013, no. 3, pp. 40-45.
  11. Zakharov N.L. Sotsial'nye regulyatory deyatel'nosti rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo sluzhashchego [Social regulators of the Russian civil servant]. Moscow: Publishing house RAGS, 2002. 118 p.
  12. Kroz M.V. Psikhologiya prokurorskoi deyatel'nosti : posobie dlya prokurorov [Psychology of prosecution: a manual for prosecutors]. Moscow, 2009. 69 p.
  13. Meshkova L.V., Pozdnyakov V.M. Organizatsionnaya identichnost' sotrudnikov pravookhranitel'nykh organov, vklyuchennykh v rezerv rukovodyashchikh kadrov, i puti ee izucheniya [Organizational identity of law enforcement officials, included in a reserve of the managerial personnel, and how to study] // Psikhologiya upravleniya v organakh vnutrennikh del: stanovlenie metodologii i pomoshch' praktike. Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakt. konferentsii [Psychology of management in the Ministry of Internal Affairs: establishment of methodology and assistance practice. Thesis of the international scientifically-practical conference] (Moscow, December 15, 2014)]. Moscow: Academy of management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Publ., 2014. pp. 128-135.
  14. Monitoring obshhestvennogo doverija: rossijskij i zarubezhnyj opyt (Serija «Analiticheskie obzory Instituta gosudarstvennoj sluzhby i upravlenija Rossijskoj akademii narodnogo hozjajstva i gosudarstvennoj sluzhby pri Prezidente Rossijskoj Federacii» Monitoring of public trust: Russian and foreign experience (Series 'Analytical reviews of the Institute of Public Service and Management of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation', 2016, no. 5). Moscow, 2016. 49 p.
  15. Orlova A.A. Pravosoznanie i zakonnost' v deyatel'nosti Federal'noi sluzhby ispolneniya nakazanii. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Legal awareness and legality in the activities of the Federal Penitentiary Service: Cand. Sci. (Law) diss.]. Moscow, 2010. 210 p.
  16. Pavlov A.V. Zakon i pravo: dva obraza «obshchego blaga» v aspekte sotsial'nogo vremeni. Diss. kand. philos. nauk [Law and law: two images of the 'common good' in the aspect of social time: Cand. Sci. (Philosophy) diss.]. Veliky Novgorod, 2005. 151 p.
  17. Pchelintsev S.S. Realizatsiya printsipa zakonnosti na gosudarstvennoi sluzhbe v kontekste pravovogo gosudarstva: konstitutsionno-pravovye aspekty. Diss. kand. yurid. Nauk. [Realization of the principle of legality in the civil service in the context of the rule of law: constitutional and legal aspects: Cand. Sci. (Law) diss.]. Moscow, 2010. 197 p.
  18. Reforma gosudarstvennoi sluzhby: kanadskii opyt i rossiiskaya deistvitel'nost' [Reform of the civil service: Canadian experience and Russian reality] / Ed. by A.G. Barabashev, S.V. Kabyshev. Moscow: The formula of law Publ., 2006. 148 p.
  19. Serkova N.V. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie osobennosti loyal'nosti i faktory, opredelyayushchie ee formirovanie [Socio-psychological features of loyalty and the factors that determine its formation]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika [Bulletin of the Tomsk State Pedagogical University. Series: Pedagogy], 2004, vol. 5(42), pp. 131—134.
  20. Sidorenkov A.V. Mikrogruppovaya teoriya [Microgroup theory]. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social psychology and society], 2011, no. 1, pp. 17-30.
  21. Boszormenyi-Nagy I., Spark G. Invisible loyalties: reciprocity in intergenerational family therapy. Hagerstown: Harper & Row, 1973. 409 p.
  22. De Graaf G. The Loyalties of Top Public Administrators. Jnl. of Public Admin. Research and Theory, 2001, vol. 21(2), pp. 285-306. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muq028.
  23. Kasiński M. Lojalność urzędnika w świetle prawa i etyki. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Annales. Etyka w życiu gospodarczym, 2010, vol. 13(1). Available at: http://dspace.uni.lodz.pl: 8080/xmlui/handle/11089/1575 (Accessed: 8.07.2014).
  24. Maynard-Moody S., Musheno M. Cops, Teachers, Counselors. Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Michigan: University of Michigan, 2003. 221 p.
  25. Mentzelopoulos A.M. Federal government public service ethics: managing public expectations. Carleton University, 1990. 159 p. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: https://dspace.library.uvic.ca//handle/1828/2361 (Accessed: 15.07.2014).
  26. Merton R.K. Bureaucratic Structure and Personality. Social Forces, 1940, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 560—568. doi: 10.1037/11302-024.
  27. Royce J. The philosophy of loyalty. Norwood: Norwood Press, J.S.Cushing Co, Berwick&Smith Co., 1914. 409 p.
  28. Thornberry P. Human Rights and the Shaping of Loyalties. Political Loyalty and the Nation-State. Ed. by M. Waller, A. Linklater. London and New York: Routledge, 2003. pp. 91—104.

Information About the Authors

Stanislav V. Gornostaev, Doctor of Psychology, Docent, Professor, Department of Legal Psychology and Pedagogy, Academy of Law Management of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, Ryazan, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5259-0258, e-mail: stanislavrz@yandex.ru

Vyacheslav M. Pozdnyakov, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor, Chair of Scientific Foundations of Extreme Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9487-4435, e-mail: pozdnyakov53@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1674
Previous month: 12
Current month: 1

Downloads

Total: 367
Previous month: 2
Current month: 0