The value foundations of classical and restorative mediation: a comparative analysis of the two mediation models

Context and relevance. Mediation is a widespread form of conflict resolution with its own unique principles. Restorative justice, as a new paradigm in criminal justice, utilizes mediation as a form of implementation while adapting it to its own core concepts. Objective. The study aims to identify the differences between the value foundations of classical and restorative mediation. Hypothesis. Restorative mediation, as a form of restorative justice, possesses significant distinctions from classical mediation. Methods and materials. The research involves an analysis of scientific publications on classical mediation, restorative mediation, and restorative justice, as well as a formal legal analysis of Russian regulatory acts governing mediation in legal proceedings. Results. The study reveals that restorative mediation differs substantially from classical mediation due to divergent underlying values. Restorative mediation is defined by the values of the restorative justice paradigm, which focus on reparation of harm, awareness of the consequences of the offense, healing of the victim, and the restoration of damaged social relationships. Conclusion. It is demonstrated that studying value foundations provides a crucial explanatory framework for interpreting the practical application of mediation across various case categories. Restorative mediation is not merely a technology for reaching an agreement, but rather a form of democratic participation by civil society, the goal of which is the humanization of criminal proceedings. A lack of understanding of these differences leads to a value imbalance and hinders the implementation of restorative practices in Russia.

1. Antsupov, A.Ya., Shipilov, A.I. (2000). Conflictology: A Textbook for Universities. Moscow: Unity Publ. (In Russ.).
2. Arbitral Procedure Code of the Russian Federation from 24.07.2002 No. 95-FZ (as amended on 15.12.2025) (as amended and supplemented, entered into force on 01.01.2026). (2026). Moscow. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_37800/ (viewed: 01.03.2026).
3. Bashmakova, N.I., Ryzhova, N.I., Kuznetsova, O.A. (2015). Historical Retrospective of Mediation as an Integrative Concept: Paradigms Studying and Interdisciplinary. Administrative Consulting, 6(78), 159—172. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/sbhddf (viewed: 01.03.2026).
4. Bessemer, H. (2004). Mediation: Conflict Mediation. Trans. from Germ. Kaluga: Dukhovnoe poznanie Publ. (In Russ.).
5. Brooks, D., Yen, M. (2016). Differences between Mediation and Restorative Justice/Practice. Restorative Justice Herald, 13, 108—123. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/xclfhl (viewed: 01.03.2026).
6. Bryukhina, E.R., Chertkova, E.A. (2021). Mediation as an Alternative Way to Resolve Family Disputes in the Russian Federation. Tomsk State University Journal of Law, 40, 133—147. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/40/12
7. Vorontsova, I.V., Rakhmatullina, R.M. (2025). Mediation Procedure in Russia: Concept, Essence, Principles and History of Development. Law Herald of DSU, 53(1), 77—84. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21779/2224-0241-2025-53-1-77-84
8. Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation from 14.11.2002 No. 138-FZ: ed. of 15.12.2025: with amendments of 22.12.2025.(2025). Moscow. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_39570/ (viewed: 01.03.2026).
9. Grishina, N.V. (2023). Psychology of Conflict (3rd ed.). Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.).
10. Gromov, V.G., Efremova, I.A. (2025). Restorative justice in places of deprivation of liberty. Penal Law, 20(1-4), 50—56. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33463/2687-122X.2025.20(1-4).1.050-056
11. Zehr, H. (2002). Restorative Justice: A New Perspective on Crime and Punishment (L.M. Karnozova, ed.). Trans. from Eng. Moscow: Center for Judicial and Legal Reform Publ. (In Russ.).
12. Zehr, H. (2015). Restorative justice, mediation and ADR. Restorative Justice Herald, 12, 10—11. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/xcbuot (viewed: 01.03.2026).
13. Ivanova, E.N. (2021). Mediation as Interdisciplinary Cooperation. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Pravo, 1(44), 343—348. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17308/vsu.proc.law.2021.1/3297
14. Ivanova, O.A., Surtaeva, N.N. (2015). Conflictology in Social Work: A Textbook and Practicum for Academic Bachelor's Degree. Moscow: Yurait Publ. (In Russ.).
15. Karnozova, L.M. (2010). Restorative Mediation: Basic Ideas and Directions of Development (Notes on the Discussion of the Topic). Restorative Justice Herald, 7, 18—28. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/xccgsd (viewed: 01.03.2026).
16. Karnozova, L.M. (2024a). Introduction to Restorative Justice (Mediation in Response to Crime). Moscow: Prospect Publ. (In Russ.).
17. Karnozova, L.M. (2024). Reconciliation Discourses and Problems of Institutionalization of Reconciliation Procedures in Criminal Cases. Psychology and Law, 14(2), 239—253. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140217
18. Karnozova, L.M. (2015). Distinguishing Mediation within Restorative Justice and Mediation in the Sphere of Private Law Disputes Resolution. Restorative Justice Herald, 12, 4—9. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/xcbuoj (viewed: 01.03.2026).
19. Karpenko, A.D., Osinovsky, A.D. (Eds.). (2016). Mediation: A Textbook. Saint Petersburg: Editorial Board of the Arbitration Court Journal Publ.; Moscow: Statut Publ. (In Russ.).
20. Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation from 08.03.2015 No. 21-FZ (ed. of 29.12.2025). (2025). Moscow. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_176147/ (viewed: 01.03.2026).
21. Konovalov, A.Yu. (2014). Mediation in the education system: a review of the experience of different countries. Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru, 6(3), 18—30. (In Russ.). URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/psyedu/archive/2014_n3/71332 (viewed: 01.03.2026).
22. Christie, N. (1999). Conflict as Property. Trans. from Eng. Moscow: Center for the Promotion of Criminal Justice Reform. (In Russ.).
23. Kushnareva, L.V. (2017). The Concept and History of the Formation of the Institution of Mediation. In: S.V. Potapenko (Ed.), Current Issues of Civil Procedure: Proceedings of the interuniversity scientific and practical conference (pp. 292—298). Krasnodar: Kuban State University Publ. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/zrhpsh (viewed: 01.03.2026).
24. Letova, N.V. (2024). Mediation as a Way to Resolving Family Disputes. Herald of the Russian Law Academy, 3, 189—199. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33874/2072-9936-2024-0-3-189-199
25. Maslova, V.M. (2020). The Mediation Process as a Method of Developing a Viable Solution to the Problem. Science. Scientific Personnel, 1, 114—116. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2073-3305-2020-10027
26. Momotov, V.V. (2024). Conciliation Procedures in the Civil Process: Legislative Innovations and Prospects for Further Development. Lex Russica, 77(5), 9—21. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2024.210.5.009-021
27. Nosyreva, E.I. (2005). Alternative Dispute Resolution in the USA. Moscow: Gorodets Publ. (In Russ.).
28. Pastukhova, E.G. (2025). From punishment to dialogue: the practice of school reconciliation services. Social Psychology and Society, 16(2), 155—176. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2025160210
29. Raspopova, N.I. (2026). Mediation: A Textbook for Universities (2nd rev. and exp. ed.). Moscow: Yurait Publ. (In Russ.).
30. Strebkov, A.I., Karpenko, A.D., Seidov, Sh.G. (2025). Philosophy of Mediation as a Method of Conflict Resolution: Conceptual Provisions. The Legal Culture, 1(60), 89—96. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/ikscya (viewed: 01.03.2026).
31. Sushkova, N.S., Kirilov, V.A., Vasilchenko, P.S. (2024). A three-component approach, as an extension of the possibilities of mediation in business. Modern Economics: Problems and Solutions, 11(179), 161—174. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17308/meps/2078-9017/2024/11/161-174
32. Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation from 18.12.2001 No. 174-FZ (ed. of 20.02.2026). (2026). Moscow. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34481/ (viewed: 01.03.2026).
33. Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR from 27.10.1960 (expired). (2001). Moscow. URL: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102010093 (viewed: 01.03.2026).
34. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation from 13.06.1996 No. 63-FZ (ed. of 20.02.2026). (2026). Moscow. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_10699/ (viewed: 01.03.2026).
35. Umbrait, M. (2001). Humanistic Approach to Mediation in Conflict Resolution: The Path of Transformation, the Path of Peacemaking. Restorative Justice Herald, 3, 88—101. (In Russ.).
36. Federal Law "On Alternative Procedure for Dispute Resolution with the Participation of a Mediator (Mediation Procedure)" from 27.07.2010 No. 193-FZ. (2010). Moscow. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_103038/ (viewed: 01.03.2026).
37. Fischer, R., Ury, W. (1990). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Trans. from Eng. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.).
38. Khanaeva, F.M., Shatveryan, N.G. (2025). Retrospective of the Development of the Institute of Mediation in the Sphere of Labor. Science Bulletin, 84(3), 140—150. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/qxwqdv (viewed: 01.03.2026).
39. Kholoimova, A.S., Klebanov, L.R. (2025). Criminal Law Contours of Restorative Justice. Penitentiary Science, 19(3), 252—260. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.46741/2686-9764.2025.71.3.003
40. Shamlikashvili, T.A. (2014). Mediation as an interdisciplinary science and socially important institute. Psychological Science and Education, 19(2), 5—14. (In Russ.). URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/pse/archive/2014_n2/69932 (viewed: 01.03.2026).
41. Daly, K., Immarigeon, R. (1998). The Past, Present, and Future of Restorative Justice: Some Critical Reflections. Contemporary Justice Review, 1(1), 21—45.