Assessment of the semantic sphere in clinical practice: adaptation and differential-diagnostic potential of J. Nuttin's motivational induction method

Context and relevance. Modern forensic psychological and psychiatric examination requires a systemic analysis of the individual's semantic sphere, which serves as the highest level of behavioral regulation. Hypothesis. The modified version of J. Nuttin's Motivational Induction Method (MIM) is a reliable and valid tool capable of identifying nosology-specific features of the motivational-semantic sphere in individuals who have committed unlawful acts. Objective. To analyze the psychometric properties of the adapted method and to explore the features of the semantic sphere in personality disorders (PD) and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). Methods and materials. The study involved 148 male participants, including individuals with personality disorders (PD), schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), and mentally healthy individuals. To assess the motivational-semantic structure and time perspective, J. Nuttin’s Motivational Induction Method (MIM) and V.E. Milman’s motivational structure assessment technique were used. Method modification. To solve the set tasks, J. Nuttin’s MIM was modified and translated into a quantitative assessment system: the temporal code was used to encode responses regarding the moment of the illegal act; the list of "persons" was divided into three groups in the assessment of the content of motivation; the assessment of the content of motivational objects was modified to reflect the goals and objectives of the expert assessment of the semantic perception of a legally significant situation. Results. Psychometric analysis confirmed the reliability and validity of MIM. Factor analysis revealed qualitative differences in the structure of the groups' meaning sphere, enabling the empirical substantiation of the method's differential-diagnostic potential: individuals with PD demonstrate temporal ambivalence, a dominance of hedonistic motives, and a passive-dependent social stance. Meanwhile, examinees with SSD were characterized by a narrowed future perspective, contradictory self-reflection, and semantic fragmentation. Conclusions. MIM is a reliable tool for clinical psychodiagnostics. The method allows for the objectification of the characteristics of the meaning sphere and possesses high differential-diagnostic potential in distinguishing between pathocharacterological and endogenous types of response. Limitations and future prospects. A necessary step toward integrating MIM into forensic psychiatric expert practice is the addition of variables related to legally relevant circumstances, as well as expanding the sample and the nosological spectrum of the participants.

1. Bocharova, E.E. (2017). Time Prospective of Senior High School Students with Different Levels of Subjective Control. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 6(2), 157—163. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2017-6-2-157-163
2. Bratukhina, E.A., Bratukhin, A.G., Razhina, N.Yu. (2023). Features of time perception in the semantic regulation of personality. International Journal of Medicine and Psychology, 6(2), 102—108. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/zauluz (viewed: 01.07.2025).
3. Gaivoronskaya, A.A. (2023). Portrait of a personality and its study by psychosemantics. Psychologist, 5, 138—145. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8701.2023.5.39269
4. Gilenko, T.D., Gadisov, T.G., Zeiger, M.V., Samylkin, D.V., Tkachenko, A.A. (2024). Special aspects of motivational and emotional profiles of individuals with personality disorder who have committed aggressive offenses against person. Russian Journal of Psychiatry, 1, 23—36. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/lomvia (viewed: 01.07.2025).
5. Demidova, L.Y., Tkachenko, A.A. (2025). Categories of motive and purpose in criminal law and forensic psychology. Psychology and Law, 15(1), 29—43. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2025150103
6. Zeygarnik, B.V., Kholmogorova, A.B., Mazur, E.S. (1989). Self-regulation of behavior in norm and pathology. Psychological Journal, 10(2), 122—132. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/pojelz (viewed: 01.07.2025).
7. Kashirskiy, D.V. (2014). Psychology of personal values: Extended abstr. Diss. Dr. Sci. (Psychol.). Moscow. (In Russ.).
8. Kashirskiy, D.V., Staroseltseva, O.V. (2021). Values, Self-Identification and Personality Motivation of Persons Charged with Particularly Serious Crimes. Psychology and Law, 11(1), 121—134. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2021110110
9. Kashirskiy, D.V., Staroseltseva, O.V. (2024). Features of Criminal Behavior of the Accused of the Particularly Serious Crime with Violations of Programming, Regulation and Control Functions of Mental Activity (Part 2). Psychology and Law, 14(1), 183—196. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140112
10. Kudryavtsev, I.A. (1988). Forensic psychological and psychiatric examination. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literature Publ. (In Russ.).
11. Kudryavtsev, I.A., Ratinova, N.A. (2000). Criminal aggression. Expert typology and forensic psychological assessment. Moscow: Moscow State University Publ. (In Russ.).
12. Leontiev, D.A. (2003). Psychology of meaning: Nature, structure and dynamics of semantic reality. Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.).
13. Leontiev, D.A. (1987). Structural organization of the semantic sphere of personality: Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psychol.). (In Russ.).
14. Luzakov, A.A. (2008). Psychosemantics of personality traits: Normative and comparative approaches. Community. Management, 3, 64—76 (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/pzvfcl (viewed: 01.07.2025).
15. Nuttin, J. (2004). Motivation, action and future perspective. Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.).
16. Oshevsky, D.S., Nazarova, N.G. (2016). The semantic sphere of juvenile offenders. Psychology and Law, 6(4), 58—71. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2016060407
17. Plotnikova, N.N. (2017). Pedagogic specialties students’ career image dynamics in the course of professional education. Vestnik of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics, 23(4), 98—102. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/yosoje (viewed: 23.01.2026).
18. Rozanov, I.A. (2026). Tructural-dynamic model of value-semantic regulation of activities: theoretical-mathematical reconstruction based on the K. Levin equation. Medical Psychology in Russia, 18(2), 79—93. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24884/2219-8245-2026-18-2-80-94
19. Rubinshteyn, S.L. (2003). Being and consciousness. Man and the world. Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/lbqest (viewed: 23.01.2026).
20. Rychkova, O.V., Kholmogorova, A.B. (2014). The main theoretical approaches to the study of disorders of social cognition in schizophrenia: current status and prospects of development. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 22(4), 30—43. (In Russ.). URL: https://psyjournals.ru/en/journals/cpp/archive/2014_n4/74202 (viewed: 10.04.2026).
21. Samylkin, D.V., Tkachenko, A.A. (2025). Features of the personality system relevant to the processes. Russian Journal of Psychiatry, 2, 27—37. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/fyqvgy (viewed: 10.04.2026).
22. Samylkin, D.V., Tkachenko, A.A. (2021). Structure of anomalous personality as a violation of time perspective of self-regulation in defendants with personality disorders. Russian Journal of Psychiatry, 3, 32—44. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47877/1560-957X-2021-10304
23. Safuanov, F.S. (2024). Comprehensive forensic psychological and psychiatric examination. Moscow: Yurait Publ. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/zouzfi (viewed: 10.04.2026).
24. Sobolev, I.V., Tagil’tseva, A.V. (2025). Features of sign-symbolic mediation of concepts in patients with schizophrenia in the presence or absence of the motive of social significance (pilot study). M. Bekhterev Review of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, 59(2), 90—99. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31363/2313-7053-2025-2-1011
25. Starosel’tseva, O.V. (2020). Criminal activity of the accused in grave crimes in the context of disorders in motivational and target levels of regulation of activity. Psychologist, 3, 87—102. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8701.2020.3.32973
26. Terekhina, N.S. (2014). The subjective and personal characteristics ratio in the construction of time perspective planning in people of different professions. Psychological Studies, 7(35). (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v7i35.628
27. Tkachenko, A.A., Samylkin, D.V., Gilenko, T.D., Nikitskiy, I.S., Proskurina, V.V. (2025). Forensic psychiatric significance of distortions in the processes of understanding (awareness), inner speech, and probabilistic forecasting: Analytical review. Moscow: V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center for Psychiatry and Narcology of the Ministry of Health of Russia Publ. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/hvbvmc (viewed: 10.04.2026).
28. Kholmogorova, A.B., Minakova, K.Yu. (2014). Social cognition, social anhedonia, and depressive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia: Is there a connection? Mental Health, 12(12), 52—59. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22800911 https://elibrary.ru/teytpd (viewed: 22.02.2026).
29. Shekhovtsova, E.S. (2025). Possibilities of assessing the motivational-semantic level of self-regulation in persons with personality disorder accused of committing illegal actions. In: Psychiatry and Narcology: Clinical-Diagnostic, Treatment-Rehabilitation and Medical-Social Issues: Proceedings of the XIII All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (Krasnodar, March 18, 2025) (pp. 52—58). Krasnodar. (In Russ.).
30. Shekhovtsova, E.S., Gilenko, T.D. (2025). Nosological specificity of the motivational-semantic sphere as criteria of the ability to consciously regulate one’s actions. In: Zeigarnik Readings. Clinical Psychology in the Modern World: Challenges and Resources: Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference. Moscow, November 13–15, 2025 (pp. 551—554). Moscow: MSUPE Publ. (In Russ.). URL: https://psyjournals.ru/nonserialpublications/zeigarnikovskie_chteniya_2025/ (viewed: 22.02.2026).
31. Shekhovtsova, E.S., Nikitskiy, I.S., Gilenko, T.D. (2026). Assessment of the capacity for perception and comprehension in forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology practice. Social and Clinical Psychiatry, 36(2), 77—88. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/awxgcy (viewed: 22.02.2026).
32. Shport, S.V., Dubinsky, A.A., Pronicheva, M.M., Rozanov, I.A. (2025). Value-semantic and individual-psychological characteristics as risk factors of deviant behavior. Psychology and Law, 15(2), 185—206. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2025150213
33. Shtoda, D.P. (2025). Features of the value-motivational sphere of adolescents prone to deviant behavior. In: A.N. Dvortsova (Ed.), First Step into Science: Proceedings of the X All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference: In 2 vol. Vol. 1 (pp. 265—268). Lugansk: Lugansk State Pedagogical University Publ. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/ouzmnk (viewed: 22.02.2026).
34. Allemand, M., Olaru, G., Hill, P.L. (2024). Future time perspective and depression, anxiety, and stress in adulthood. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 38(1), 58—72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2024.2383220
35. Bandhu, D., Mohan, M.M., Nittala, N.A.P., Jadhav, P., Bhadauria, A., Saxena, K.K. (2024). Theories of motivation: A comprehensive analysis of human behavior drivers. Acta Psychologica, 244, Article 104177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104177
36. Bondareva, E., Karamyan, M., Mullabaeva, N., Bondarchuk, O. (2024). The life perspectives of students as a factor of mindful attitude towards learning. SPAST Reports, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.69848/sreports.v1i1.4597
37. Damiani, S., Zarbo, C., Stolarski, M., Zamparini, M., Casiraghi, L., Rocchetti, M., Starace, F., Fusar-Poli, P., de Girolamo, G. (2023). Time will tell: Associations between unbalanced time perspectives and symptom severity in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Schizophrenia Research, 261, 116—124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2023.09.016
38. Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Moral intuition — fast and frugal heuristics? In: W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral Psychology, Volume 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity(pp. 1—28). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Lens, W., Paixão, M.P., Herrera, D., Grobler, A. (2012). Future time perspective as a motivational variable: Content and extension of future goals affect the quantity and quality of motivation. Japanese Psychological Research, 54(3), 321—333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5884.2012.00520.x
40. Martin, H., Stenling, A., Hargreaves, E.A. (2024). Motivational profiles for eating behavior and their associations with intuitive eating. Appetite, 201, Article 107603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107603
41. Nuttin, J., Lens, W. (1985). Future time perspective and motivation: Theory and research method.Leuven: Leuven University Press; Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
42. O’Connor, R.C., Smyth, R., Williams, J.M.G. (2015). Intrapersonal positive future thinking predicts repeat suicide attempts in hospital-treated suicide attempters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(1), 169—176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037846
43. Oyanadel, C., Buela-Casal, G. (2014). Time perception and psychopathology: Influence of time perspective on quality of life of severe mental illness. Actas Espanolas de Psiquiatria, 42(3), 99—107 URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24844809/ (viewed: 22.02.2026).
44. Quinton, T.S., Brunton, J.A. (2017). Implicit processes, self-regulation and interventions for behavior change. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 346. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00346
45. Read, S.J., Miller, L.C. (2023). Behavioral regulation relies on interacting forces and predictive models. Journal of Personality, 91(4), 917—927. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12815
46. Sterna, A., Sakakibara, E., Moskalewicz, M. (2025). Time perception and lived experience in personality disorders: differences across types, dimensions and severity. PeerJ, 13, Article e19403. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19403
47. Stolarski, M., Fieulaine, N., Zimbardo, P.G. (2018). Putting time in a wider perspective: The past, the present, and the future of time perspective theory. In: V. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. Shackelford (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Personality and Individual Differences: Volume I: The Science of Personality and Individual Differences(pp. 592—628). Thousand Oaks: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451163.n28
48. Styła, R., Zajenkowski, M. (2023). Time perspective and working memory impairments among persons diagnosed with schizophrenia. Personality and Individual Differences, 210(16), Article 112215 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112215
49. Van Beek, W., Berghuis, H., Kerkhof, A., Beekman, A. (2011). Time perspective, personality and psychopathology: Zimbardo’s time perspective inventory in psychiatry. Time & Society, 20(3), 364—374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X10373960
50. Vázquez, S.M., Rapetti, M.V. (2006). Future time perspective and motivational categories in Argentinean adolescents. Adolescence, 41(163), 511—532. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17225665/ (viewed: 23.11.2025).
51. Zarbo, C., Stolarski, M., Martella, D., Toffol, E., de Girolamo, G. (2025). Time perspective matters for working alliance in schizophrenia care: Insights from the DiAPAson project. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 32(5), Article e70151. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.70151
52. Zimbardo, P.G., Boyd, J.N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271—1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271