Cognitive metaphor as a tool for study of work perception by different professional groups

1409

Abstract

This article contains an analysis of cognitive approach to metaphor and of pos- sibility to use it in researching objects perception by people. Metaphor is considered as a part of thinking process and at the same time as its product, which can be meaning- ful for thinking process analysis itself. The main basics of metaphor were formulated. Methods were modified for creating metaphors. A wide range of respondents were at- tracted to help many of them with creating metaphors as it is too difficult task from their point of view. To open diagnostically potential of cognitive metaphor it was held comparative analysis of metaphors for perception of work among 124 teachers and 52 medicine workers. The result of content analysis helped to find metaphor groups reflecting some patterns of perception of work. It was shown that cognitive metaphor is effective and precise tool which helps to understand characteristic perception people have about their work.

General Information

Keywords: cognitive metaphor, world picture, image of profession, perceptions, cognitive constructions, teachers, medicine workers

Journal rubric: Methodological Tools

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2016070209

For citation: Sukhanov E.P. Cognitive metaphor as a tool for study of work perception by different professional groups. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2016. Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 126–141. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2016070209. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Arutyunova N.D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka [The language and the man’s world]. Mos- cow: Yazyki russkoi kul’tury, 1998. 896 p.
  2. Vezhbitskaya A. Semanticheskie universalii i opisanie yazykov [Semantic universals and the description of languages]. Moscow: Yazyki russkoi kul’tury, 1999. 780 p.
  3. Gak V.G. Metafora: Universal’noe i spetsificheskoe [Metaphor: the universal and the specific]. In V.N. Teliya (edc.) Metafora v yazyke i tekste [Metaphor in language and text]. Moscow: Nauka, 1988, pp. 11—26.
  4. Gevorkyan I.A. Kognitivnaya teoriya metafory Erla Makkormaka [Earl McCor- mack’s cognitive theory of metaphor]. Filologiya i kul’tura [Philology and culture], 2012, no. 1 (27). Kazan’, pp. 18—21.
  5. Davidson D. Chto oznachayut metafory [What metaphors mean]. In N.D. Arutyu- nova, M.A. Zhurinskaya (edc.) Teoriya metafory: Sbornik [The theory of metaphors: collec- tion]. Moscow: Progress, 1990, pp. 175—193.
  6. Zvegintsev V.A. Teoretiko-lingvisticheskie predposylki gipotezy Sepira-Uorfa [The the- oretical linguistics background of the Sepir-Worf hypothesis]. Novoe v lingvistike. Vyp. 1. [The new in linguistics]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoi literatury, 1960, pp. 111—134.
  7. Lakoff D., Dzhonson. M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors we live by]. In
  8. N.D. Arutyunova, M.A. Zhurinskaya (edc.)Teoriya metafory: Sbornik [The theory of meta- phors: collection]. Moscow: Progress, 1990, pp. 387—415.
  9. Riker P. Metaforicheskii protsess kak poznanie, voobrazhenie i oshchushchenie [The metaphorical process as the cognition, imagination and feeling]. In N.D. Arutyunova,
  10. M.A. Zhurinskaya (edc.)Teoriya metafory: Sbornik [The theory of metaphors: collection]. Moscow: Progress, 1990, pp. 416—434.
  11. Rol’ chelovecheskogo faktora v yazyke: Yazyk i kartina mira In Serebrennikov B.A. (edc.) [The Role of the human factor in the language: The language and world’s image]. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. 216 p.
  12. Teliya V. N. Metaforizatsiya i ee rol’ v sozdanii yazykovoi kartiny mira [The metapho- rization and its role in the creation of a language world’s image]. In Serebrennikov B.A. (edc.) Rol’ chelovecheskogo faktora v yazyke. Yazyk i kartina mira [The Role of the human factor in the language: The language and world image]. Moscow: Nauka, 1988, pp. 173—203.
  13. Ulanovskii A.M. Konstruktivizm, radikal’nyi konstruktivizm, sotsial’nyi konstrukt- sionizm: mir kak interpretatsiya [Constructivism, radical constructivism, social construc- tionism: the world as an interpretation]. Voprosy psikhologii [The questions of psychology], 2009, no. 2, pp. 35—45.
  14. Kholodnaya M.A. Psikhologiya intellekta: Paradoksy issledovaniya [Psychology of intelligence: Paradoxes of the research]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter, 2002. 272 p.
  15. Shragina L.I. Logika voobrazheniya [The logic of the imagination]. Odessa: Polis, 1995. 111 p.
  16. Shchepanskaya T.B. Antropologiya professii [The anthropology of profession]. Zhur- nal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii [Sociology and social anthropology journal], 2003, no. 1 (21). pp. 139—161.
  17. Black М. Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. 55, 1955, pp. 273—294.
  18. Boyd R. Metaphor and theory change: What is “metaphor” a metaphor for? In Metaphor and Thought (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 481—532.
  19. Denham A.E. Metaphor and Moral Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press Oxford Philosophical Monographs, 2000. 376 p.
  20. Kuhn T. Metaphor in Science. In Metaphor and Thought (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 409—419.
  21. Lakoff G. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought (2nd edi- tion). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 202—255
  22. Putnam H. Reason, truth and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. 117 p.
  23. Raskin J.D. Constructivism in psychology: Personal construct psychology, radical con- structivism, and social constructionism. In J.D. Raskin, S.K. Bridges (eds.), Studies in mean- ing: Exploring constructivist psychology. New York: Pace University Press, 2002, pp. 1—25.

Information About the Authors

Evgeny P. Sukhanov, Post — graduate, Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, e-mail: skvisgaar@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 2403
Previous month: 16
Current month: 9

Downloads

Total: 1409
Previous month: 17
Current month: 4