Social concepts about the success of teenagers with different intragroup status and different levels of intellectual success

1753

Abstract

The article presents the results of research of social concepts about the success of teenagers with the various combinations of intellectual and social success. In the research were participated 456 teenagers, who study in Moscow schools. To get the results about the structure of social concepts were used method of P. Verges, and individual interviews and method of focus-group were used for control. There were shown the differences in the content of social concepts about the success of teenagers in the list of notions and in their interpretations by the participants of research. Determined that intellectual successful teenagers are tending to perceive success like the result of the own action while peers are tending to exaggerate the role of circumstance. The biggest differences in the core of social concepts than in the buffer zone and periphery were recorded in intellectual successful teenagers with intragroup integral status, the biggest differences between “stars” and “losers”. All participants of the research interpret the success like feature which connected to future regardless of the actual achievements.

General Information

Keywords: social concepts, success, teenagers, intellectual success, social success, integral intragroup status.

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2017080208

For citation: Kondratyev M.D. Social concepts about the success of teenagers with different intragroup status and different levels of intellectual success. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2017. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 116–130. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2017080208. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Andreeva G.M. Psikhologiya sotsial’nogo poznaniya [Psychology of social knowledge]. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2005. 303 p.
  2. Bovina I.B., Dvoryanchikov N.V., Konopleva I.N. Osobennosti obydennykh predstavlenii molodezhi o samoubiitsakh [Elektronnyi resurs] [Features of common representations of suiciders in young people]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru. [ Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru], 2013, no. 1. RL: http:// psyjournals.ru/psyedu_ru/2013/n1/59084.shtml (Accessed 09. 08.2016)
  3. Bogoyavlenskaya D.B. Rabochaya kontseptsiya odarennosti. [The working concept of giftedness]. Мoscow, 2003. 90 p.
  4. Volovikova I.M., Mustafina L.Sh. Struktura sotsial’nykh predstavlenii rossiiskoi molodezhi [Structure of social representations of Russian youth]. In A.L. Zhuravlev (ed.) Psikhologicheskie problemy sovremennogo rossiiskogo obshchestva [Psychological problems of modern Russian society]. Moscow: Publ. «Institut psikhologii RAN», 2012 . 575 p.
  5. Dontsov A.I., Emel’yanova T.P. Kontseptsiya sotsial’nykh predstavlenii v sovremennoi frantsuzskoi psikhologii [Conception of social representation at contemporary psychology in France]. Moscow: Publ. MGU, 1987. 178 р.
  6. Kondratyev M.Yu. Metodicheskii algoritm opredeleniya integral’nogo vnutrigruppovogo statusa chlena kontaktnogo soobshchestva [Methodological Algorithm of Integral Intragroup Status Definition in Members of Contact Community]. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2014, no. 3, pp. 125—142.
  7. Meshkova N.V. Zarubezhnye issledovaniya odarennosti: sotsial’no-psikhologicheskii aspekt [Elektronnyi resurs] [Research of academic giftedness in foreign studies: socio-psychological aspect]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia [Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology], 2015. Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 26—44.
  8. Nuttin J. Motivatsiya, deistvie i perspektiva budushchego. [Motivation, action and time perspective]. Moscow: Smysl, 2004. 608 p.
  9. Ob utverzhdenii Pravil vyyavleniya detei, proyavivshikh ydayushchiesya sposobnosti, soprovozhdeniya i monitoringa ikh dal’neishego razvitiya: postanovlenie Pravitel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 17 noyabrya 2015 g. № 1239. [On approval of the Rules for the identification of children who have shown outstanding abilities, support and monitoring of their further development: Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation] [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://government.ru/media/files/oxUAa6PpURsefK00tP z6M5vhRX3qC81D.pdf (Accessed: 19.07.2016)
  10. Timoshina I.N. Struktura sotsial’nykh predstavlenii studentov o statuse v sovremennom obshchestve [The structure of students’ perception of social status in contemporary society]. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2016. Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 51—64. doi:10.17759/sps.2016070204.
  11. Fedotova S.V. Struktura sotsial’nykh predstavlenii molodezhi o sotsial’nom statuse [Structure of social representations of youth about social status]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo novogo universiteta. Seriya “Chelovek v sovremennom mire” [Bulletin of the Russian New University. Series “Man in the modern world.”], 2015, no. 4, pp. 37—45.
  12. Erikson EH. Identichnost’: yunost’ i krizis [Identity: Youth and Crisis]. Moscow: Progress, 1996 (2006). 344 p.
  13. Yurkevich V.S. Odarennye deti: segodnyashnie tendentsii i zavtrashnie vyzovy [Gifted children: current trends and tomorrow’s challenges]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2011, no. 4, pp. 99—108.
  14. Nuttin J. Motivation, Planning, and Action: A Relational Theory of Behavior Dynamics. Leuven and Hillsdale. NJ: Leuven University Press and Erlbaum, 1984. 251 p.

Information About the Authors

Mikhail D. Kondratyev, PhD in Psychology, RANEPA, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: mdkondr@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 2477
Previous month: 11
Current month: 4

Downloads

Total: 1753
Previous month: 11
Current month: 3