Representations of justice of parents as factor of moral development of teenagers

Interrelations between representations of parents of justice and features of moral development of the senior teenagers are investigated. The statistical analysis of interrelation between representations of parents and teenagers of justice where positive correlations concerning level of indicators of sensitivity to justice from four positions are found (the victim, the perpetrator, the observer and the beneficiary) is submitted. Positive significant interrelation between the level of conscience of teenagers and fathers are shown; between components of style of education of parents and indicators of sensitivity to justice of teenagers and also representations of teenagers of style of education of their parents. In style of education of parents the most significant were following components: level of a patronage, requirements, satisfactions of needs and projection of children’s qualities to the teenager. Differences in influence of an educational position of mothers and fathers on sensitivity to justice are found in teenagers, in particular negative impact of a maternal infantilization.

1. Golovei L.A., Danilova M.V., Danilova Y.Y. Samootnoshenie i otnosheniya so znachimymi vzroslymi kak faktory udovletvorennosti zhizn’yu u podrostkov [The self- relation and the relations with significant adults as factors of satisfaction with life of teenagers]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social psychology and society], 2017, Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 108—125. doi:10.17759/sps.2017080107.
2. Gulevich O.A. Osnovnye stadii moral’noi sotsializatsii [Main stages of moral socialization]. In A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Yurevich (ed.). Psikhologiya nravstvennosti. Moscow: Publ. «IPRAN», 2010, pp. 52—66.
3. Guseinov A.A. Ponyatiya nasiliya i nenasiliya [Concepts of violence and non-violence].
4. Voprosy filosofii [Philosophy questions], 1994, no. 6. pp. 39.
5. Karmakar R. The impact of perception of consistency and inconsistency in parenting style on pro-social motives of adolescents. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2017. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 101—115. doi:10.17759/sps.2017080207. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
6. Mironenko I.A. Problema nravstvennosti v sovremennoi rossiiskoi psikhologii [Morality problem in modern Russian psychology]. In Zhuravlev A.L., Yurevich A.V. (ed.). Psikhologiya nravstvennosti. Moscow: Publ. «IPRAN», 2010, pp. 15—28.
7. Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Astanina N.B. Psikhologicheskie problemy spravedlivosti v zarubezhnoi personologii: teorii i empiricheskie issledovaniya [Theories and empirical researches of justice in the foreign personality psychology]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2014, no. 1, pp. 16—32.
8. Rawls J. Teoriya spravedlivosti [A Theory of Justice]. Novosibirsk: Publ. NGU, 1995. 535 p.
9. Sobkin V.S., Burelomova A.S., Smyslova M.M. Modern Russian Adolescents’ Notions of Significant Personal Traits. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2011, no. 1, pp. 44—55. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
10. Hoffman M.L. Moral Development. In P.H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manuals of child psychology. New York, 1970. Vol. 2, pp. 712—722.
11. Lotz S., Baumert A., Fechtenhauer D., Gresser F., Schlösser T. Justice Sensitivity, Moral Emotions, and Altruistic Punishment. IACM 23rd Annual Conference Paper. SSRN. URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1612791 (дата обращения:  1.12.2017).
12. Palmer E.J., Hollin C.R. Sociomoral reasoning perceptions of parenting and self- reported delinquency in  adolescents.  Applied  Cognitive  Psychology,  2001.  Vol.  37, pp. 822—829.
13. Siegler R., Children`s Thinking (2-nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1991. 528 p.