Deep hermeneutics in visual analysis (on an example of W. Allen’s movie Zelig)

789

Abstract

By the example of analysis of the Woody Allen’s movie Zelig the ego-states phenomenology of borderline personality with split identity is presented, of a person with inclination to various transfigurations (chameleonization), who deeply feels his foreignness in the social context, in the diversity of false facades and absurd conformism, which are designed to compensate the inner feeling of emptiness and emotional hunger with the help of manipulations. The clinical phenomenon resonates with the contemporary sociocultural trends of the society of transitivity and designates the risks of clinical deviations in the conditions of uncertainty and vagueness of boundaries of personal and social space. Deep hermeneutics, implemented in the methodology of visual analysis, is considered as a practice of research of modern culture and mass consciousness, which reveals such a scientific trend as the search for transdisciplinary intersections of clinical and social psychology in the study of social and cultural phenomena.

General Information

Keywords: transdisciplinarity, deep hermeneutics, psychoanalysis, visual analysis, visual signs and symbols, mentalization, diffusional identity

Journal rubric: Methodological Tools

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2018090312

For citation: Sokolova E.T., Khoroshilov D.A. Deep hermeneutics in visual analysis (on an example of W. Allen’s movie Zelig). Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2018. Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 118–126. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2018090312. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Andreeva G.M. Psihologija social’nogo poznanija [Social cognition]. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2005. 304 p.
  2. Busygina N.P. Kachestvennye i kolichestvennye metody issledovanij v psihologii [Qualitative and quantitative research methods in psychology]. Moscow: Jurajt, 2015. 423 p.
  3. Krejsman D., Straus H. Ja nenavizhu tebja, tol’ko ne brosaj menja: pogranichnye lichnosti i kak ih ponjat’ [I hate you — Don’t leave me. understanding the borderline personality]. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2018. 304 p.
  4. Marcinkovskaja T.D. Kul’tura i subkul’tura v prostranstve psihologicheskogo hronotopa [Culture and subculture in space of psychological hronotope]. Moscow: Smysl, 2016. 271 p.
  5. Petrovskaja E.V. Teorija obraza [Theory of image]. Moscow: RGGU, 2010. 281 p.
  6. Ren’jar P. Umstvennye jepidemii: istoriko-psihiatricheskie ocherki [Mental epidemics]. Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt, 2018. 221 p.
  7. Sokolova E.T. Narushenija mentalizacii v klinicheskoj i kul’turnoj paradigme L.S. Vygotskogo [jelektronnyj resurs] [Mentalization disorders in clinical and cultural Vygotsky’s paradigm]. Psihologicheskie issledovanija [Psychological Studies], 2017. Vol. 10, no. 56. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2017v10n56/1501-sokolova56. html (Accessed: 23.04.2018).
  8. Sokolova E.T. Utrata Ja: klinika ili novaja kul’turnaja norma [Loss of Self: clinical phenomena or new cultural norm?]. Jepistemologija i filosofskie nauki [Epistemology and philosophy of science], 2014. Vol. 41 (XLI), no 3, pp. 190—310.
  9. Fromm Je. Missija Zigmunda Frejda [S. Freud’s mission]. Moscow: Ves’ Mir, 1996. 144 p.
  10. Horoshilov D.A. Ot social’nogo poznanija — k jepistemologii obshhestva (pamjati G.M. Andreevoj) [From social cognition — to social epistemology (in memory of G.M. Andreeva)]. Nacional’nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal [National Psychological Journal], 2016, no 3, pp. 75—84.
  11. Horoshilov D.A. Jazyk i jestetika v social’nom poznanii [Jelektronnyj resurs] [Language and aesthetics in social cognition]. Psihologicheskie issledovanija [Psychological studies], 2016. Vol. 9, no 48. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2016v9n48/1310- khoroshilov48.html (Accessed: 23.04.2018).
  12. Hotchkis S. Adskaja pautina: kak vyzhit’ v mire narcissizma [Why is it always about you? The seven deadly sins of narcissism]. Moscow: Klass, 2010. 248 p.
  13. Shtompka P. Vizual’naja sociologija. Fotografija kak metod issledovanija [Visual sociology: photography as a research method]. Moscow: Logos, 2007. 168 p.

Information About the Authors

Elena T. Sokolova, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Department of Neuro- and Pathopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: etsokolova@yandex.ru

Dmitry A. Khoroshilov, PhD in Psychology, Senior Research Associate, Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4688-1934, e-mail: d.khoroshilov@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 1823
Previous month: 25
Current month: 15

Downloads

Total: 789
Previous month: 4
Current month: 12