Social Psychology and Society
2020. Vol. 11, no. 3, 5–21
doi:10.17759/sps.2020110301
ISSN: 2221-1527 / 2311-7052 (online)
The Dynamics of the Subject in Sociological and Psychological Studies of the Family and Parenthood in Changing Sociocultural Context
Abstract
General Information
Keywords: family and partnerships, social representations, gender roles, desired family size, large families
Journal rubric: Theoretical Research
Article type: scientific article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2020110301
Funding. This work was supported by grant RFBR, project № 18-513-00022 Bel_а, BRFFR, project № G18Р-307
For citation: Golzitskaya A.A., Kiselnikova N.V., Kuminskaya E.A., Lavrova E.V., Karpinskii K.V., Greskova P.A. The Dynamics of the Subject in Sociological and Psychological Studies of the Family and Parenthood in Changing Sociocultural Context. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2020. Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 5–21. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2020110301. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
References
1. Barash M.S. Polovaya zhizn’ rabochikh Moskvy [Sexual life of Moscow workers]. Venerologiya
i dermatologiya = Venereology and Dermatology, 1925, no. 6, pp. 137—147.
2. Gel’man I.I. Polovaya zhizn’ sovremennoi molodezhi. Opyt sotsial’no-biologicheskogo
obsledovaniya [Sexual life of modern youth. The experience of socio-biological examination].
Moscow: Mespoligraf, 1923. 150 p.
3. Golod S.I. Perspektivy monogamnoi sem’i: sravnitel’nyi mezhkul’turnyi analiz [Prospects
for a monogamous family: a comparative intercultural analysis]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi
antropologii = Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2003. Vol. VI, no. 2, pp. 106—119.
4. Golod S.I. Sovremennaya sem’ya: plyuralizm modelei [Modern family: pluralism of models].
Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal = Sociological Journal, 1996, no. 3—4, pp. 99—108.
5. Golod S.I. Sotsiologo-demograficheskii analiz sostoyaniya i evolyutsiya sem’i [Sociological and
demographic analysis of the state and the evolution of the family]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya =
Sociological research, 2008, no. 1(285), pp. 40—49.
6. Golubova T.N., Makhkamova Z.R., Litvinenko A.I. Fenomen ≪chaildfri≫ i problemy
rozhdaemosti v sovremennoi Rossii [The phenomenon of childfree and fertility problems in modern
Russia]. Tavricheskii mediko-biologicheskii vestnik = Tavricheskiy Mediko-Biologicheskiy Vestnik,
2016. Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 18—22.
7. Golubova T.N., Makhkamova Z.R., Litvinenko A.I., Sanina G.N. Analiz zhiznennykh tsennostei
predstavitelei techeniya shildfree (chaildfri) [Analysis of life values of the representatives of the flow
of childfree (childfree)]. Innovatsii v nauke = Innovations in science, 2016, no. 11 (60), pp. 57—62.
8. Demograficheskaya modernizatsiya Rossii: 1900-2000 [Elektronnyi resurs] [Demographic
modernization of Russia]. In A. Vishnevskogo (eds.). Seriya “Novaya istoriya” = Series “New History”.
Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2006. 601 p. URL: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/knigi/modern/
modernizacija.html (Accessed 29.09.2019).
9. Ezhemesyachnyi monitoring sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo polozheniya i samochuvstviya
naseleniya [Elektronnyi resurs] [Monthly monitoring of the socio-economic situation and wellbeing
of the population]. In Maleevа T.M. (ed.). 2015. 608 p. URL: https://www.ranepa.ru/images/
News/2019-04/08-04-2019-monitoring.pdf (Accessed 29.09.2019).
10. Zakharov S.V. Kuda dvizhetsya supruzhestvo v Rossii? [Elektronnyi resurs] [Where is marriage
going in Russia?]. Demoskop weekly = Demoskop weekly, 2013, no. 545—546. URL: http://www.
demoscope.ru/weekly/2013/0545/demoscope545.pdf (Accessed 14.12.2019).
11. Ivanova E.I. Transformatsiya brachnosti v Rossii v KhKh veke: osnovnye etapy [Elektronnyi
resurs] [The transformation of marriage in Russia in the twentieth century: the main stages].
Elektronnaya versiya byulletenya Naselenie i obshchestvo = Electronic version of the bulletin
Population and Society. 2010. URL: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/knigi/konfer/konfer_010.
html (Accessed 14.12.2019).
12. Kazachikhina M.V. Chaildfri kak odna iz form sovremennoi sem’i [Childfree as one of the forms
of the modern family]. Vestnik sotsial’no-gumanitarnogo obrazovaniya i nauki = Bulletin of social and
humanitarian education and science, 2014, no. 3, pp. 10—14.
13. Kaz’mina O.E., Pushkareva N.L. Brak v Rossii XX veka: traditsionnye ustanovki i
innovatsionnye eksperimenty [Marriage in Russia of the XX century: traditional attitudes and
innovative experiments]. In Ushakin S. (ed.). Semeinye uzy. Modeli dlya sborki: sbornik statei.
Kn. 1. = Family ties. Models for assembly: a collection of articles. Book 1. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe
obozrenie, 2004, pp. 185-—219.
14. Kautskii K. Razmnozhenie i razvitie v prirode i obshchestve [Reproduction and development in
nature and society]. St. Petersburg: Lenand, 1923. 163 p.
15. Kletsin A.A. Istoriya sotsiologii sem’i v Rossii. Dis. kand. sotsiol. nauk [The history of the
sociology of the family in Russia. PhD (Sociology) diss.]. St. Petersburg, 1999. 145 p.
16. Kollontai A.M. Tezisy o kommunisticheskoi morali v oblasti brachnykh otnoshenii [Theses on
communist morality in the field of marriage]. Kommunistka = Communist, 1921, no. 12—13, pp. 29—
32.
17. Lebedeva I.V. Chaildfri na Zapade i v Rossii [Childfree in the West and in Russia]. Uspekhi
sovremennoi nauki = Successes of modern science, 2016, no. 1, pp. 11—14.
18. Matskovskii M.S. Sotsiologiya sem’i. Problemy teorii, metodologii i metodiki [Sociology of the
family. Problems of theory, methodology and methodology]. Moscow: Nauka, 1989. 116 p.
19. Polutova M.A., Zhanbaz O.O. Tsennostnye i motivatsionnye ustanovki soobshchestva ≪chaildfri≫
s pozitsii postmodernizma [The value and motivational attitudes of the childfree community from the
perspective of postmodernism]. Vestnik ZabGU = Bulletin of ZabSU, 2015, no. 01 (116), pp. 89—100.
20. Ryazanov D.B. Vzglyady Marksa i Engel’sa na brak i sem’yu [The views of Marx and Engels on
marriage and family]. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya, 1927. 68 p.
21. Snegireva T.V. ≪Dobrovol’no bezdetnaya≫ sem’ya glazami semeinogo psikhologa [“Voluntarily
childless” family through the eyes of a family psychologist]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya =
Cultural-historical psychology, 2010, no. 3, pp. 99—109.
22. Sorokin P.A. Krizis sovremennoi sem’i (sotsiologicheskii ocherk) [Cultural-historical
psychology]. Ezhemesyachnyi zhurnal =Monthly journal, 1916, no. 3, pp. 165—168.
23. Kharchev A.G. Byt i sem’ya v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve [Life and family in a socialist
society]. St. Peterburg: Znanie, 1968. 40 p.
24. Kharchev A.G. Brak i sem’ya v SSSR. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop [Marriage and family in the USSR.
2nd ed., revised. and add.]. Moscow: Mysl’, 1979. 367 p.
25. Khoroshilov D.A. Kriterii validnosti kachestvennogo issledovaniya v sotsial’noi psikhologii.
Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk [Validity criteria for a qualitative study in social psychology. PhD
(Psychology) diss.]. Moscow, 2012. 183 p.
26. Yurkevich N.G. Sovetskaya sem’ya. Funktsii i usloviya stabil’nosti [Soviet family. Functions
and conditions of stability]. Minsk: BGU, 1970. 208 p.
27. Yatsina E.F. K voprosu o chaildfri: otkaz ot materinstva i ottsovstva kak sotsial’nopsikhologicheskii
simptom [To the issue of childfree: rejection of motherhood and fatherhood as
a socio-psychological symptom]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii
“Nauchnaya diskussiya: voprosy pedagogiki i psikhologii” (g. Moskva, 5 avgusta 2013) [Proceedings
of the international scientific-practical conference “Scientific discussion: issues of pedagogy and
psychology”]. Moscow: Nauchnoe obozrenie, 2013, pp. 98—106.
28. Agrillio С., Nelini C. Childfree by choice: a review. Journal of Cultural Geography, 2008, no. 25:3,
pp. 347—363. DOI: 10.1080/08873630802476292
29. Albertini M., Arpino B. Childlessness, parenthood and subjective wellbeing: The relevance of
conceptualizing parenthood and childlessness as a continuum. Brussels, 2018. p. 16. DOI: 10.31235/
osf.io/xtfq6
30. Blake J. Family size and the quality of children. Demography, 1981. Vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 416—421.
DOI: 10.2307/2060941
31. Buss D.M., Kenrick D.T. Evolutionary social psychology. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, G. Lindzey
(ed.). The handbook of social psychology. NY: Oxford, 1998, pp. 982—1026.
32. Christiansen S.L., Palkovitz R. Why the “good provider” role still matters: Providing as
a form of paternal involvement. Journal of Family Issues, 2001, Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 84—106. DOI:
10.1177/019251301022001004
33. Crosby F.J., Jaskar K.L. Women and men at home and at work: Realities and illusions. In
S. Oskamp, M. Costanzo (eds.). Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Vol. 6. Gender
issues in contemporary society. Sage Publications, Inc., 1993, pp. 143—171.
34. Homer C. [et al.]. Does continuity of care impact decision making in the next birth after a
caesarean section (VBAC)? А randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2013,
no. 13:140. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-140
35. Eagly A.H., Crowley M. Gender and helping behavior. A meta-analytic review of the
social psychological literature. Psychological bulletin, 1986. Vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 283—308. DOI:
10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283
36. Evers-Kiebooms G. [et al]. Family planning decisions after the birth of a cystic fibrosis child.
The impact of prenatal diagnosis. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl, 1988, no. 143, pp. 38—46.
37. Goodman A., Greaves E. Cohabitation, marriage and child outcomes. London: The Institute for
Fiscal Studies, 2010. 75 p. DOI: 10.1920/co.ifs.2010.0114
38. Hare-Mustin R.T., Marecek J. The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and
psychology. American Psychologist, 1988, no. 43(6), pp. 455—464. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.43.6.455
39. Hyde J.S., Plant E.A. Magnitude of psychological gender differences: Another side to the story.
Am Psychol, 1995, no. 50(3), pp. 159—171. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.50.3.159
40. Nelson S.K. [et al.]. In defense of parenthood: Children are associated with more joy than
misery. Psychological Science, 2013. Vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3—10. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612447798
41. Karraker M.W., Grochowski J.R. Families with futures: family studies into the 21st century.
Oxford: Routledge, 2012. 480 p.
42. Kaufman G., Uhlenberg P. The influence of parenthood on the work effort of married men and
women. Social forces, 2000. Vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 931—947. DOI: 10.2307/3005936
43. Shorten A. [et al.]. Making choices for childbirth: development and testing of adecision-aid for
women who have experienced previous caesarean. Patient Education and Counseling, 2004, no. 52,
pp. 307—313. DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00106-X
44. Massah R., Abushaikha L. The roles of the father during childbirth: the lived experiences of
Arab Syrian parents. Health Care For Women International, 2012. Vol. 33(2), pp. 168—181. DOI:
10.1080/07399332.2011.610534
45. Miller W.B., Pasta D.J. Motivational and nonmotivational determinants of child-number
desires. Population and Environment, 1993. Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 113—138. DOI: 10.1007/BF02209405
46. Musick K., Bumpass L. Reexamining the case for marriage: Union formation and changes in
well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 2012. Vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 1—18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-
3737.2011.00873.x
47. Pebley A.R., Westoff C.F. Women’s sex preferences in the United States: 1970 to 1975.
Demography, 1982. Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 177—189. DOI: 10.2307/2061189
48. Raskin J.D. Constructivist theories. In J.C. Thomas, D.L. Segal, M. Hersen (eds.). Comprehensive
handbook of personality and psychopathology. Vol. 1. Personality and everyday functioning. John
Wiley & Sons Inc, 2006, pp. 212—229.
49. Reinhold S. Reassessing the link between premarital cohabitation and marital instability.
Demography, 2010. Vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 719—733. DOI: 10.1353/dem.0.0122
50. Teachman J.D., Schollaert P.T. Gender of children and birth timing. Demography, 1989. Vol.
26, no. 3, pp. 411—423.
51. Twenge J.M., Campbell W.K., Foster C.A. Parenthood and marital satisfaction: a meta-analytic
review. Journal of marriage and family, 2003. Vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 574—583. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-
3737.2003.00574.x
52. Wethington E., Kessler R.C. Employment, parental responsibility, and psychological distress:
A longitudinal study of married women. Journal of Family Issues, 1989. Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 527—546.
DOI: 10.1177/019251389010004006
Information About the Authors
Metrics
Views
Total: 590
Previous month: 6
Current month: 1
Downloads
Total: 251
Previous month: 1
Current month: 0