The Role of Value Orientations in Psychological Well-being of Adolescents: Structural Modeling Results

99

Abstract

The study is aimed at identifying the contribution of value orientations to the psychological well-being in older adolescents. The structural modeling method (SEM) tested hypotheses about the relationship between subjective well-being, various personal characteristics and value orientations. The study involved 2647 students of professional educational organizations aged 16 to 19 years (mean age=17±1 years, median=17 years), of which 734 people (28%) were female, 1913 were male. Subjective well-being was measured using WHO-5 Well-Being Index and Ryff Scale of Psychological Well-Being. To assess personal characteristics, the Muddy hardiness test, the Tromsø Social Intelligence Questionnaire, and the BPAQ Bass-Perry Aggressiveness Questionnaire were selected. To study value orientations, Schwartz Value Survey was used. Modeling results show that values content and interrelations not only do not contribute to subjective well-being, but are also an "extra" component. The best model (TLI=0,90; SRMR=0,04; GFI=0,95; RMSEA=0,05) shows that the main contribution to the subjective well-being of a person is made by the degree of correspondence between the value orientations of the individual and the reference group (in the country, environment, etc.): if ideas about what values should be coincide with those a person has, then his/her subjective well-being increases.

General Information

Keywords: structural modeling method; subjective well-being; hardiness; social intelligence; aggression; values; adolescents

Journal rubric: Age-Related Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/ssc.2023040101

Received: 05.05.2023

Accepted:

For citation: Radchikova N.P., Sorokova M.G. The Role of Value Orientations in Psychological Well-being of Adolescents: Structural Modeling Results [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sotsial’nye nauki i detstvo = Social Sciences and Childhood, 2023. Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 7–17. DOI: 10.17759/ssc.2023040101. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Baeva I.A., Ulyanina O.A., Vikhristyuk O.V., Gayazova L.A., Radchikova N.P., Faizullina K.A. Faktory sotsial'no-psikhologicheskoi dezadaptatsii i tsennostnye orientatsii podrostkov i molodezhi [Factors of socio-psychological maladaptation and value orientations of adolescents and youth]. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, 2022, no. 206, pp. 228–242. DOI:10.33910/1992-6464-2022-206-228-242 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  2. Yenikolopov S.N., Tsibul'skiy N.P. Psikhometricheskiy analiz russkoyazychnoy versii Oprosnika diagnostiki agressii A. Bassa i M. Perri [Psychometric analysis of the Russian version of the Bass–Perry aggression questionnaire]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 2007, no. 28(1), pp. 115–124. (In Russ.).
  3. Karandashev V.N. Metodika Shvartsa dlya izucheniya tsennostej lichnosti: kontseptsiya i metodicheskoe rukovodstvo [Sh. Schwartz Questionnaire for Personal Values Study: Concept and Methodological Guide]. Saint Petersburg: Rech’, 2004. 70 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Leontiev D.A., Rasskazova E.I. Test zhiznestoikosti [Hardiness Questionnaire]. Moscow: Smysl, 2006. 63 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii dlya pedagogov-psikhologov obrazovatel’nykh organizatsij po diagnostike faktorov riska razvitiya krizisnykh sostoyanij s suitsidal’nymi tendentsiyami u obuchayushchikhsya 7–11 klassov [Guidelines for educational psychologists of educational organizations on diagnosing risk factors for the development of crisis states with suicidal tendencies in 7-11 grades students] (O.V. Vikhristyuk, Ed.). Moscow: MSUPE, 2017. 58 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Odintsova M., Lubovsky D., Gusarova E., Ivanova P. Profili zhiznestoikosti podrostkov (na primere podrostkov s vrozhdennoi, priobretennoi invalidnost'yu i zdorovykh sverstnikov) [Elektronnyi resurs] [Adolescent Resilience Profiles (on the Example of Adolescents with Congenital, Acquired Disabilities and Healthy Peers)]. Klinicheskaia i spetsial'naia psikhologiia = Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 2022. Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 181–204. DOI:10.17759/cpse.2022110308 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  7. Persiyantseva S.V. Psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie i tsennostnye orientatsii v strukture lichnostnogo potentsiala rossiiskoi molodezhi [Psychological well-being and value orientations in the structure of personal potential of Russian youth]. Gertsenovskie chteniya: psikhologicheskie issledovaniya v obrazovanii [The Herzen University Studies: Psychology in Education], 2022. Issue 5, pp. 321–328. DOI:10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2022-5-41 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  8. Smoleva E.O., Morev M.V. Kachestvo zhizni i tsennostnye orientatsii naseleniya regiona [Living standard and value orientations of population in the region]. Problemy razvitiya territorii [Problems of Territory's Development], 2015, no. 6(80), pp. 108–126. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  9. Shevelev V.V. Psikhometricheskoe obosnovanie oprosnika «Shkala sotsial'nogo intellekta Tromso» (“The Tromso Social Intelligence Scale”, TSIS) na vyborke gorodskikh podrostkov [Psychometric substantiation of The Tromso Social Intelligence Scale, TSIS on a sample of urban adolescents]. Nauchnoe mnenie: nauchnyi zhurnal [The Scientific Opinion], 2016, no. 16, pp. 144–156. (In Russ.).
  10. Shevelenkova T.D., Fesenko T.P. Psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie lichnosti [Personal psychological well-being]. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika [Psychological diagnostics], 2005, no. 3, pp. 95–121. (In Russ.).
  11. Bojanowska A., Urba´nska B. Individual values and well-being: The moderating role of personality traits. International Journal of Psychology, 2021. Vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 698–709. DOI:10.1002/ijop.12751
  12. Bojanowska A., Kaczmarek Ł.D. How Healthy and Unhealthy Values Predict Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being: Dissecting Value-Related Beliefs and Behaviours. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2022, no. 23, pp. 211–231. DOI:10.1007/s10902-021-00396-z
  13. Hanel P.H.P., Wolfradt U., Wolf L.J., Coelho G.L. de H., Maio G.R. Well-being as a function of person-country fit in human values. Nature Communications, 2020, no. 11, p. 5150. DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-18831-9
  14. Sagiv L., Roccas S., Oppenheim-Weller S. Values and Well-Being. In: Positive Psychology in Practice, 2015. DOI:10.1002/9781118996874.ch7
  15. Schwartz S.H., Sortheix F.M. Values and subjective well-being. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, L. Tay (Eds.). Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers, 2018. DOI:nobascholar.com

Information About the Authors

Nataly P. Radchikova, PhD in Psychology, Leading Researcher of Scientific and Practical Center for Comprehensive Support of Psychological Research «PsyDATA», Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Chief Specialist of the Laboratory of Biophysics of Excitable Media, Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino;, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5139-8288, e-mail: nataly.radchikova@gmail.com

Marina G. Sorokova, Doctor of Education, PhD in Physics and Matematics, docent, Head of Scientific and Practical Center for Comprehensive Support of Psychological Research "PsyDATA", Head of the Department of Digital Education, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-6487, e-mail: sorokovamg@mgppu.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 319
Previous month: 52
Current month: 85

Downloads

Total: 99
Previous month: 22
Current month: 23