Purpose Regulation of Human Behavior

In descriptions of the determination of human behavior, along with the influences of his past experience or the current situation, in modern personality psychology, the constructs of the future (life plans, possible I, etc.) begin to occupy an increasing place, among which the goals of a person play an important role. Goals are the most important regulator of human activity, the implementation of which requires an image of the result to which it is aimed (“the model of the necessary future” according to Bernstein). Goals, in contrast to motives and needs related to the same phenomenological field, are situational in nature. Lewin’s concept of life space emphasizes the inextricable connection of a person with situations and the context of life activity; to concretize this connection, Thomas introduces the concept of “defining a situation”, Vygotsky — “experiencing”. The notion of purpose must be included in these descriptions: “defining the situation” is cognitive, “experiencing” describes the affective component of this connection, “goal” refers to the missing “behavioral” (“efficient”) component; in interaction with the situation, all these components “work” together, ensuring its understanding, assessment of significance and its compliance with the goals of the person. In accordance with the concept of the contextual nature of goals, a level differentiation of goal regulation is proposed, which appears as tasks to be solved when interacting with specific situations, as goals proper in a life context, and as meanings when interacting with existential reality. We put the contex tual understanding of goals as the basis of a hypothetical model of goal regulation, which was tested in an empirical study. The results obtained showed the connection between a person’s goals and the probability of their achievement in the specific conditions of his life situation, assessed by him in terms of how much he has already managed to realize the plans and expectations of the past, and the significance of goals in specific areas of life is determined by what he is ready to do for them, achievements, including changing one’s life situation or changing oneself. Thus, the thesis about the contextual nature of goals was confirmed.+

Argyle, M., Furnham, A., Graham, J. (1981). Social Situations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Barlow, M. A., Wrosch, C., McGrath, J. (2020) Goal adjustment capacities and quality of life: A meta‐analytic review. Journal of Personality, 88, 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12492

Bernshtein, N. (1990). Physiology of movements and activity. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Buchinger, L., Entringer, TH ., Richter, D., Wehner, C., Gerstorf, D., Bleidorn, W. (2022). A longitudinal study on the link between life goals and personality. 2022: ECP20 European Association of Personality Psychology. P. 206.

Costin, V., Vignoles, V. L. (2022). What do people find most meaningful? How representations of the self and the world provide meaning in life. Journal of Personality, 90, 541–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12682

Feigenberg, I. M. (2011). Man Completed and ethics. Civilization as a stage in the development of life on Earth. Moscow, Medical Information Agency Publ. (In Russian)

Furnham, A., Argyle, M. (1981). Psychology of Social Situations. Oxford.

Geukes, K., Nestler, St., Hutteman, R., Küfner, A., Back, M. (2017). Trait personality and state variability: Predicting individual differences in within- and cross-context fluctuations in affect, self-evaluations, and behavior in everyday life. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 124–138.

Grishina, N. V., Kostromina, S. N., Mironenko, I. A. (2018). A problematic field structure of contemporary psychology of personality. Psychological Journal, 39, 1, 26–35. (In Russian)

Grishina, N. V. (2019). Processual approach in personality psychology. In: Grishina, N. V. (ed.). Psychology of Personality: Being in Change (pp. 117–153). St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press. (In Russian)

Kostromina, S. N., Grishina, N. V., Moskvicheva, N. L., Zinovieva, E. V. (2021). Life models of youth: changes and traditions. Vestnik RFBR. Humanities and social sciences, 1 (103), 79–98. (In Russian)

Leontiev, A. N. (1977). Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow, Politizdat Publ. (In Russian)

Leontiev, D. A. (2011). New guidelines for understanding personality in psychology: from the necessary to the possible. In: Leontiev, D. A. (ed.). Personal potential: structure and diagnostics (pp. 12–41). Moscow, Smysl Publ. (In Russian)

Magnusson, D., ed. (1981). Toward a Psychology of Situations: An Interactional Perspective. New Jersey, Hilsdate Publ.

McClelland, D. (2007). Human Motivation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Moore, A., Holding, A., Verner‐Filion, J., Harvey, B., Koestner, R. (2020). A longitudinal investigation of trait‐goal concordance on goal progress: The mediating role of autonomous goal motivation. Journal of Personality, 88, 530–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12508

Rauthmann, J., Sherman, R., Funder, D. (2015). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 63–381.

Rubinshtein, S. L. (2003). Being and consciousness. Man and the world. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ. (In Russian)

Sirotkina, I. E. (2018). The World as a Living Movement: An Intellectual Biography of Nikolai Bernstein. A. G. Asmolov, ed. Moscow, Kogito-Centre Publ. (In Russian)