Empathically Caused Distress And The Possibilities Of Its Diagnostics ²³³²

Budagovskaya N.A., Dubrovskaya S.V., Karyagina T.D. Adaptatsiya mnogofak- tornogo oprosnika empatii M. Devisa [Adaptation of multifactor questionnaire of empathy by M. Davis]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2013, no. 1, pp. 202—227. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

Vasserman L.I., Iovlev B.V., Isaeva E.R., Trifonova E.A., Shchelkova O.Yu., No- vozhilova M.Yu., Vuks A.Ya. Metodika dlya psikhologicheskoi diagnostiki sposobov sovladaniya so stressovymi i problemnymi dlya lichnosti situatsiyami [A method for psychological diagnosis of coping with stressful and problematic situations]. Saint Petersburg: Publ. of St. Petersburg Psychoneurological Research Institute named after V. M. Bekhterev, 2009. 39 p.

Gavrilova T.P. Empatiya i ee osobennosti u detei mladshego i srednego shkol’nogo vozrasta: Avtoref. Dis kand. psihol. nauk. [Empathy and its features in primary and secondary school pupils. Ph. D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Moscow, 1977. 23 p.

Greben’ N.F. Psikhologicheskie testy dlya professionalov [Psychological tests for professionals]. Minsk: Sovremennaya shkola, 2007. 496 p.

Isaeva M.A. Stanovlenie professional’nykh aspektov empatii na nachal’nykh stupenyakh obucheniya psihologicheskomu konsul’tirovaniyu. Vyipusknaya kvalifikatsi- onnaya rabota. [The establishment of professional aspects of empathy in the early stages of counselors’ education. Diploma thesis]. Moscow, MGPPU. 2015.

Karyagina T.D. Problema formirovaniya empatii [The problem of empathy development]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2010. no. 1, pp. 38—54. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).

Karyagina T.D. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya «empatiya» v psikhologii: dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. [Evolution of the concept of empathy in psychology. Ph. D. (Psychology) Thesis]. Moscow, 2013, 175 p.

Karyagina T.D. Empatiya kak metod: filosofskii vzglyad [Empathy as a method: the philosophical point of view]. Konsultativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counsel- ing Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2015 . Vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 205—234. doi:10.17759/ cpp.2015230510 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).

Karyagina T.D., Ivanova A.V. Empatiya kak sposobnost’: struktura i razvitie v khode obucheniya psikhologicheskomu konsul’tirovaniyu [Empathy as an ability: struc- ture and development in the process]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2013, no. 4, pp. 182—207. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

Karyagina T.D., Kukhtova N.V. Test empatii M. Devisa: adaptatsiya v mezhkul’turnom kontekste [M. Davis empathy test: content validity and adaptation in cross-cultural context]. Konsul’tativnaia psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counsel- ing Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2016. Vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 33—61. doi:10.17759/ cpp.2016240403 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

Karyagina T.D., Kukhtova N.V., Olifirovich N.I., Shermazanyan L.G. Professional- izatsiya empatii i prediktory vygoraniya pomogayushchikh spetsialistov [Professional- ization of empathy and predictors of helping professionals’ burnout]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2017. Vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 39—58. doi: 10.17759/ cpp.2017250203. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)

Kukhtova N.V. Adaptatsiya metodiki «Mezhlichnostnyi indeks reaktivnosti» (M. Devis) [Adaptation of “Interpersonal Reactivity Index” test (M.Davis)]. In Berkov V.F (ed.) Nauchnye trudy Respublikanskogo instituta vysshei shkoly, no. 11, chast’ 2 [Scientific works of the Republican Institute of high school, no. 11, part 2]. Minsk: RIVSh, 2011, pp. 211—218. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

Lyusin D.V. Oprosnik na emotsional’nyi intellekt EmIn: novye psikhometricheskie dannye [Emotional intelligence questionnaire EmIn: new psychometric data]. In Lyusin D.V., Ushakov D.V. (eds.). Sotsial’nyi i emotsional’nyi intellekt [Social and emotional intelligence]. Moscow: IP RAN, 2009, pp. 264—278.

Sergienko  E.A.,  Vetrova  I.I.  Test  Dzh.  Meiera,  P.  Seloveya  i  D.  Karuzo «Emotsional’nyi intellekt» (MSCEIT v.2.0). Rukovodstvo [J. Mayer, P. Salovey and D. Caruso Emotional Intelligence test (MSCEIT 2.0). Guidelines]. Moscow: IP RAN, 2009. 415 p.

Sirota N.A., Moskovchenko D.V., Yaltonskii V.M., Kochetkov Ya.A., Yaltonskaya A.V. Psikhodiagnostika emotsional’nykh skhem: rezul’taty aprobatsii russkoyazych- noi kratkoi versii shkaly emotsional’nykh skhem R. Likhi [Psychodiagnostics of emo- tional schemas: the results of transcultural adaptation and assessment of psychometric properties of Russian Version of Leahy Emotional Schema Scale II (LESS II RUS)]. Obozrenie psikhiatrii i meditsinskoi psikhologii imeni V.M. Bekhtereva [V.M. Bekhterev review of psychiatry and medical psychology], 2016, no. 1, pp. 66—71.

Khromov A.B. Pyatifaktornyi oprosnik lichnosti [Five-factor personality questionnaire]. Kurgan: Publ. of Kurgan State University, 2000. 23 p.

Fetiskin N.P., Kozlov V.V., Manuilov G.M. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp [Socio-psychological diagnostics of personality de- velopment and small groups]. Moscow: Publ. of Psychotherapy Institute, 2002. 490 p.

Cialdini R., Kenrick D., Neuberg S., Sotsial’naya psikhologiya. Poimi drugikh, chtoby ponyat’ sebya! [Social psychology: Unraveling the Mystery]. Saint Peters- burg: Praim-EVROZNAK, 2002. 256 p. (In Russ.).

Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwriht S. The Empathy Quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger Syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2004. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 163—175. doi:10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00

Batson C.D. Self-other merging and the empathy-altruism hypothesis: Reply to Neuberg et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997. Vol. 73, pp. 517— 522. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.517

Batson C.D., Dyck J.L., Brandt J.G, Powell A.L., McMaster M.R., Griffitt С. Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypoth- esis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988. Vol. 55 (1), pp. 52—77. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.52

Batson C.D., Early S., Salvarini G. Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1997. Vol. 22, pp. 751—758. doi:10.1177/0146167297237008

Batson C.D., Fultz J., Schoenrade P.A. Distress and empathy: two qualitatively dis- tinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of per- sonality, 1987. Vol. 55 (1), pp. 19—40. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00426.x

Batson C.D., Batson J.G., Griffitt C.A. , Barrientos S., Brandt J.R., Sprengel- meyer P., Bayly M.J. Negative-state relief and the empathy-altruism hypothe- sis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989. Vol. 56 (6), pp. 922—933. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.6.922

Cialdini R.B., Neuberg S.L, Brown C.L., Sagarin B.J., Lewis B.P. Does empathy lead to anything more than superficial helping? Comment on Batson et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997. Vol. 73 (3), pp. 510—516. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.510

Davis M.H. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of selected documents in psychology, 1980. Vol. 10, p. 85.

Diego M.A., Jones N.A. Neonatal antecedents for empathy. In T.F.D. Farrow, P.W.R. Woodruff (eds.). Empathy in mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 145—168. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543753.010

Eisenberg N., Strayer J. (eds.). Empathy and its development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Farrow T.F.D., Woodruff P.W.R. (eds.). Empathy in mental illness. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 2007. 506 p.

Gallese V. The shared manifold hypothesis: embodied simulation and its role in empathy and social cognition. In T.F.D. Farrow, P.W.R. Woodruff (eds.). Empa- thy in mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 448—472. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543753.025

Gillespie S.M., McCleery J.P., Oberman L.M. Spontaneous versus deliberate vicari- ous representations: different routes to empathy in psychopathy and autism. Brain, 2014. Vol. 137, p. e272. doi:10.1093/brain/awt364

Hoffman M.L. Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and jus- tice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 342 p.

James R., Blair J.R. Empathic dysfunction in psychopathic individuals // Empathy in mental illness / T.F.D. Farrow, P.W.R. Woodruff (eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. P. 3—16. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543753.002

Keysers K., Meffert H., Gazzola V. Reply: Spontaneous versus deliberate vicari- ous representations: different routes to empathy in psychopathy and autism. Brain, 2014. Vol. 137, p. e273. doi:10.1093/brain/awt376

Koller I., Lamm C. Item Response Model Investigation of the (German) Interper- sonal Reactivity Index Empathy Questionnaire Implications for Analyses of Group Differences. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2014. Vol. 31, pp. 211— 221.   doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000227

Lamm C., Batson C.D., Decety J. The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective taking and emotion regulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2004. Vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 42—58. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.42

Lamm C., Majdandzic J. The role of shared neural activations, mirror neurons, and morality in empathy — A critical comment. Neuroscience Research, 2015. Vol. 90, pp. 15—24. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2014.10.008

Markram H, Markram K. The Intense World Syndrome — an alternative hypoth- esis for autism. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2007. Vol. 1, pp. 77—96. doi:10.3389/ neuro.01.1.1.006.2007

Meffert H, Gazzola V., Den Boer J.A., Bartels A.A., Keysers K. Reduced spon- taneous but relatively norrmal deliberate vicarious representations in psychopathy. Brain, 2013. Vol. 136, pp. 2550—2562. doi:10.1093/brain/awt190

Pérez-Albéniz А., de Paúl J., Etxeberría J., Montes P. M., Torres E. Adaptación de Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) al español. Psicothema, 2003. Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 267—272.

Preston S.D., de Waal F.B.M. Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav- ioral and brain sciences, 2002. Vol. 25, pp. 1—72. doi:10.1017/S0140525X02000018

Smith A. The empathy imbalance hypothesis of autism: a theoretical approach to cognitive and emotional empathy in autistic development. The Psychological Re- cord, 2009. Vol. 59, pp. 489—510.