Russian Psychological Issues
JournalsTopicsAuthorsEditor's Choice Manuscript SubmissionAbout PsyJournals.ruContact Us
Psychological Science and Education - №1 / 2022 | Перейти к описанию
Web of Science СС

  Previous issue (2021. Vol. 26, no. 6)

Included in Scopus

Journal Quartiles 2020

CiteScore : Q4

Details on


Psychological Science and Education

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

ISSN (printed version): 1814-2052

ISSN (online): 2311-7273


License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published since 1996

Published 6 times a year

Free of fees
Open Access Journal


Assessment of Inclusive Process as a Tool for Designing Inclusion in Educational Institution 175


Alekhina S.V.
PhD in Psychology, Vice-Rector on Inclusive Education, Chief, Institute of Inclusive Education Problems, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia

Mel’nik Y.V.
PhD in Education, Senior Researcher of Scientific and Methodological Center of the Institute of Inclusive Education Problems, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia

Samsonova E.V.
PhD in Psychology, Head of the Research and Methodological Centre of the Institute of Inclusive Education Problems, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia

Shemanov A.Yu.
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Special Psychology and Rehabilitation of the Faculty of Clinical and Special Psychology, Leading Researcher of the Scientific and Methodological Center of the Institute for Problems of Inclusive Education, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia

The paper presents results of a study aimed at exploring how comprehensive assessment of inclusive process may be used as a tool for designing inclusion The paper presents results of a study aimed at exploring how comprehensive assessment of inclusive process may be used as a tool for designing inclusion within an educational institution. The assessment technique is based on three methodological foundations: activity, participatory and human rights based approaches which imply active involvement of the key subject groups in joint activities aimed at developing inclusion. The assessment model is built into the development cycle of an inclusive process and includes, along with self-examination and external expertise, the analysis of the assessment results by the school community with the participation of an external expert, the design of changes, their implementation and re-assessment. The participatory approach enabled us to involve the parent community as one of the subjects of assessing the state of the inclusive process at school. We focused on the following research tasks: to describe the stages in the assessment of inclusive educational process by its participants; to show, using the case of one of the schools involved in testing as an example, how the assessment and its discussion by the participants of the educational process and by the external expert affect the choices in the design of changes, making the educational institution more inclusion-oriented. To analyze the results of applying the assessment technique, one of the Moscow schools was selected which has extensive experience in the implementation of inclusive education and has reached the stage of change design in the cycle of inclusion development. The participatory approach made it possible, on the one hand, to involve the parent community as one of the subjects of assessing the state of the inclusive process at school. On the other hand, the assessment by an external expert was used as a tool for developing the institution’s inclusiveness. All groups of respondents gave a fairly high level of assessment of the inclusive process, although there were statistically significant differences (p <0.01) between the assessments of the teaching staff and parents (lower) in all indicators, except for Redeployment of Resources, Community Building, and Information Accessibility. These differences in the assessments, including the expert ones, were used by the institution to design changes and increase the involvement of the parent community in this process. Thus, the offered methodology can be used as a mechanism for self-analysis and a tool for designing inclusive process in an educational institution within the cycle of inclusive development.

Keywords: inclusive educational process, activity approach, participatory approach, human rights based approach, assessment as a development tool, educational institution

Column: Developmental Psychology


Funding. The article was prepared according to the state assignment of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation No. 073-00041-21-03 dated 06/11/2021 “Scientific and methodological support for the development of an inclusive educational environment in the system of general and vocational education.”

Acknowledgements. The authors are grateful to L.M. Prokopyeva for her assistance in mathematical data processing.

Received: 20.08.2021

Accepted: 10.10.2021

For Reference

  1. Alekhina S.V. Inklyuzivnoe obrazovanie: ot politiki k praktike [Inclusive Education: from Policy to Practice]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2016. Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 136—145. DOI:10.17759/pse.2016210112 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  2. Alekhina S.V., Mel’nik Yu.V., Samsonova E.V., Shemanov A.Yu. K voprosu otsenki inklyuzivnogo protsessa v obrazovatel’noi organizatsii: pilotazhnoe issledovanie [On the issue of assessing the inclusive process in an educational organization: a pilot study] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologo-Pedagogicheskie Issledovaniya = Psychological-Educational Studies, 2019. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 121—132. DOI:10.17759/ psyedu.2019110410 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  3. Alekhina S.V., Mel’nik Yu.V., Samsonova E.V., Shemanov A.Yu. Ekspertnaya otsenka parametrov inklyuzivnogo Protsessa v obrazovanii [The expert assessing of inclusive process parameters in education] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Klinicheskaia i Spetsial’naia Psikhologiia = Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 2020. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 62—78. DOI:10.17759/cpse.2020090203 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  4. Booth T., Ainscow M. Pokazateli inklyuzii. Prakticheskoe posobie [Index for inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools. Practical guide]. M. Vogan (Ed.), N. Borisova (Sc. Ed.), M. Perfil’eva (Gen. Ed.). Moscow: Publ. ROOI “Perspektiva”, 2007. 124 p. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  5. Vil’shanskaya A.D., Egupova O.V. Kontrol’ kachestva obucheniya v usloviyakh inklyuzii: metodicheskie rekomendatsii [Quality control of education in conditions of inclusion: methodical Guide] [Elektronnyi resurs]. N.V. Babkina (Gen. Ed.). Moscow: Institute of Special Education of the Russian Academy of Education, 2020. Available at: (Accessed 20.08.2020). (In Russ.).
  6. Nesterova A.A. Kriterii otsenki kachestva inklyuzivnogo obrazovaniya [Criteria for assessing the quality of inclusive education]. In Alekhina S.V. (ed.). Inklyuzivnoe obrazovanie: preemstvennost’ inklyuzivnoi kul’tury i praktiki. Sbornik materialov Chetvertoi Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Inclusive education: the continuity of inclusive culture and practice. Proceedings of the Forth International Scientific-Practical Conference]. Moscow: MSUPE, 2017, pp. 38—41. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  7. Ob obrazovanii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Federal’nyi zakon № 273-FZ (29 dekabrya 2012 g.) [On education in the Russian Federation. Federal Law No. 273-FZ (2012, December 29)]. Available at: obrazovanie-dok.html (Accessed 10.08.2021). (In Russ.).
  8. Pinskaya M. et. al. Poverkh bar’erov: issleduem rezil’entnye shkoly [Above barriers: a survey of resilient schools] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies, 2018, no. 2, pp. 198—227. DOI:10.17323/1814-9545-2018-2-198-227 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  9. Shemanov A.Yu., Samsonova E.V. Special Education as a Resource for the Inclusive Educational Process. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2019. Vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 38—46. DOI:10.17759/pse.2019240604 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  10. Tikhomirova E.L., Shadrova E.V. Metodika otsenki sformirovannosti inklyuzivnoi kul’tury vuza [Research instruments to evaluate the development of inclusive culture at universities] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Istoricheskaya i sotsial’no-obrazovatel’naya mysl’ = Historical and social educational ideas, 2016. Vol. 8, no. 5/3, pp. 163—167. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  11. Alekhina S.V., Samsonova E.V., Yudina T.A. The foundation of an inclusive paradigm for contemporary education. Specialusis ugdymas / Special Education, 2018. Vol. 1, pp. 47—60. DOI:10.21277/se.v1i38.366
  12. Boyle C., Koutsouris G., Salia Mateu A., and Anderson J. The matter of ‘evidence’ in the inclusive education debate. In Sharma U. and Salend S. (Eds.). Oxford Encyclopedia of Inclusive and Special Education, 2020. Oxford University Press, pp. 1041— 1054. DOI:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1019
  13. Gierczyk M., Hornby G. Twice-Exceptional Students: Review of Implications for Special and Inclusive Education. Education Sciences, 2021. Vol. 11, p. 85. DOI:10.3390/educsci11020085
  14. Hornby G. Inclusive special education: development of a new theory for the education of children with special educational needs and disabilities [Elektronnyi resurs]. British Journal of Special Education, 2015. Vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 234—256. DOI:10.1111/1467-8578.12101
  15. Iarskaia-Smirnova E., Goriainova A. Inclusive Education in Today’s Russia: Room for Maneuver. Europe & Asia Studies, 2021. Published online: 10 May 2021. DOI:10.1080/09668136.2021.1918062
  16. Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: sites/default/files/documents/education-2030-incheon-framework-for-action-implementation-of-sdg4-2016- en_2.pdf (Accessed 16.08.2021).
  17. Indicators of inclusive schools: continuing the conversation [Elektronnyi resurs]. Represented by the Minister of Education. Alberta, Canada: Minister of Education, 2013. 33 р. Available at: https://open. 294c951a9ece/resource/634472a9-c069-4886-a4e1- 459a123f3946/download/2013-indicators-of-inclusive-schools-continuing-conversation.pdf (Accessed 16.08.2021).
  18. Jorgensen С.M., McSheehan M., Schuh M., Sonnenmeier R.M. Quality indicators of inclusive education. New Hampshire, NE: National Center on Inclusive Education, Institute on Disability/UCEDD, University of New Hampshire, 2012. 24 р.
  19. Participation in inclusive education — a Framework for developing indicators [Elektronnyi resurs]. Odense, Denmark: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education (Ed.). 2011. 58 p. Available at: files/participation-in-inclusive-education-a-framework-for-developing-indicators_Participation-in-Inclusive- Education.pdf (Аccessed 05.08.2021).
  20. Sprunta B., Deppelerb J., Ravuloc K., Tinaivunivalud S., Sharma U. Entering the SDG era: What do Fijians prioritise as indicators of disability-inclusive education? [Elektronnyi resurs]. Disability and the Global South, 2017. Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1065— 1087. Available at: https://disabilityglobalsouth.files. (Accessed 20.08.2020).
  21. The Right of Children with Disabilities to Education: A Rights-Based Approach to Inclusive Education [Elektronnyi resurs]. Represented by the UNICEF Regional Office for Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States in Geneva, 2012. 124 p. URL: UNICEF_Right_to_Education _Children_Disabilities_ En_Web.pdf (Accessed 29.03.2020).

© 2007–2022 Portal of Russian Psychological Publications. All rights reserved in Russian

Publisher: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Catalogue of academic journals in psychology & education MSUPE

Creative Commons License Open Access Repository     Webometrics Ranking of Repositories

RSS Psyjournals at Youtube ??????.???????