Научная психология Выготского: непознанная территория ¹³⁶⁶

This article presents a brief overview of the developments in Marxist psychology and its achievement over the past first Marx's century (1883—1983) and then preview how Marxist psychology looks like in the second Marx's century (1983—2083). Marxist psychology of the second Marx's century will shape the ontological, epistemological, theoretical, and methodological outlook of psychological studies. Marx research investigations guide the scope of our theoretical and empirical scientific activities and lead to the conclusion that human higher mental functions are rooted in Marx's four levels of the organization of production that regulate and organize all forms of human life including human higher mental functions. Marx's archives possessed a wealth of fragmented psychological ideas and concepts. This article concludes with the idea that, the second century Marx will be more productive and for the first time we are perhaps nearer to a Marxist psychology than ever. This view is essentially possible if it has an important market and an influence in the United States. Here I join Marx's conclusion that the real change for a better world will begin in the United States, this change will shape the world. In the last three decades, Vygotsky was re-discovered and promoted by North American psychologists, and his ideas spread around the world including Russia.

Ключевые слова: диалектика, реальность, праксис, тотальность, психологический кризис, социальные отношения, сознание, Выготский Л.С.

Рубрика: Выготсковедение

Тип: научная статья

It is from this perspective that Vygotsky, quickly, directed his attention to the concept of social relations of production. For the first time, the question of the psychological unit of analysis is approached scientifically and analytically.Conclusion Vygotsky explicitly sees himself as completing Marx's project in the realm of Psychology, and argued for the primacy of human consciousness as the object of study of a Marxist psychology. Thus, Vygotsky wants to extend a particular view of Marx's psychological ideas, that it «is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on the contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness» (Marx, 1978, p. 4). It is not possible to separate human higher mental functions from the concrete life of the thinking person. Our higher mental functions are shaped and carved by our concrete social reality. These higher mental functions and its conceptions in turn affect every aspect of human lives from the way human individuals organize their every day activities, to raising children, to worshiping and laboring. In conclusion, Vygotsky actually rejected the philosophical premise that human individual is selfcreating being arising out of the dialectic between his laboractivity and the natural as well as social world it transforms. Vygotsky turned Marx fragmented psychological ideas into a constructive system, and provides a detailed argument for why it is urgent to develop a scientific psychology, a Marxist psychology.

Thus, we are perhaps nearer to a Marxist psychology than ever.

I conclude this paper with Georges Canguilhem remarks in his famous article titled «What is psychology?» he said, «It is therefore, with a degree of vulgarity that philosophy confronts psychology with the crucial question: tell me what you are up to [tendez] so that l know what you are? But once in a while, the philosopher must be allowed to approach the psychologist as a counselor and say: when one leaves Sorbonne University by the exit Rue SaintJacques, you can either ascend the hill or go downhill: if you go up, you will get to the Pantheon which is the resting place for several great men, but if you go downhill then you're surely end up at the Prefecture de Police» (1958, p. 25).

1. Althusser L. For Marx. London: New Left Books, 1970.
2. Asmolov A. G. Vygotsky today: On the verge of nonclassical psychology. New York: Nova Science, 1998.
3. Blanck G. Vygotsky: the man and his cause. In L. Moll (Ed.). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. New York:Cambridge University Press, 1990.
4. Canguilhem G. Qu'estce que la psychologie? [What is psychology?]. Revue de Metaphysique et de Morales, 1, 12—25. Original work lecture delivered in College Philosophique de Paris on December 18th 1956., 1958.
5. Clot Y. (Eds.). Avec Vygotski [With Vygotski ]. Paris:La Dispute, 1999.
6. Cole M. Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
7. Crews F. Dialectical materialism. American Scholar,84 (4). 1985.
8. Daniels H. Vygotsky and pedagogy. London; New York:Routledge / Falmer. 2002.
9. Elhammoumi M. Sociohistoricocultural psychology: Lev Semenovich Vygotsly (1896—1934). Lanham, MD:University Press of America. 1997.
10. Elhammoumi M. Lostor merely domesticated? The boom in sociohistoricocultural theory emphasizes some concepts, overlooks others. In S. Chaiklin (Ed.), The theory and practice of culturalhistorical psychology. Aarhus, Denmark:Aarhus University Press, 2001.
11. Elhammoumi M. Recepcion de Vigotsky en America Latina: Terreno fertil para una psicologia materialista [The reception of Lev Vygotsky in South America: A fertile terrain for a materialist
    psychology]. In M. Golder (Ed.). Vigotsky: Psicologo radical [Vygotsky: A radical psychologist]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ateneo Vigotskiano de la Argentina. [In Spanish], 2001.
12.  Elhammoumi M. To create psychology's own capital. Journal for The Theory of Social Behavior, 32 (1). 2002.
13. Elhammoumi M. Vygotsky via Marx: Toward a Marxist psychology. Paper presented at the Fifth Congress of the International Society for Cultural Research and Activity Theory (ISCRAT). Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 18—22, June 2002.
14. Elhammoumi M. Vygotsky's concept of culture:A Hegelian and Marxist analysis. Paper presented at the Fifth Congress of the International Society for Cultural Research and Activity Theory (ISCRAT). Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 18—22 June 2002.
15. Elhammoumi M. Is there a Marxist psychology? In P. Sawchuk, N. Duarte & M. Elhammoumi (Eds.). Critical perspectives on activity theory: Explorations across education, work and the everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
16. Elhammoumi M. Toward a Marxist psychology: Vygotsky's legacy, 2007.