Civil Litigation in the UK: сontemporary issues to ensure evidential reliability ¹⁰⁶⁸

The system for assessing appropriate damages for individuals who have suffered a personal injury, caused by another person or persons is well established in the UK. A claimant, for example, who has been in a road accident, work accident, medical accident or negligent action can make a claim for his/her physical and psychological injuries, time off work and future disability, provided it is proven that another person(s) is responsible. The system involves obtaining, medical-legal evidence on the diagnosis, causation, treatment and prognosis of any injuries, physical or psychological. One key aspect of this covers the crucial issue of evidential reliability. This paper explains the key questions facing lawyers and experts alike in the UK; fundamental postulates or beliefs about evidence; ways to improve reliability; the relevance of pre-event history and improving evidential reliability via Part 35 questioning. The UK, along with the USA, has the most advanced and developed system of personal injury litigation process.

Ключевые слова: judicial-psychological examination, moral damage, mental suffering

Рубрика: Зарубежные исследования по юридической психологии

Тип: научная статья

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2016060202

Evidential Reliability Post-CPR

Since the implementation of the UK-based Civil Procedure Rules in 1999, fifteen years have passed with the courts, lawyers and experts getting to grips with the various changes and their implications, and the aims to ensure access to justice which was just, fair, appropriate and effective.

<...>

1. Katyar A., Kerr P. Part 3 Questions to Experts. 12 Kings Benk Walk, London. 2015.
2. Koch H. Evidential Reliability: Practical Guide for lawyers: Solicitors Journal Practice Guide. October. 2015.
3. Koch H. Practice issues in Psychological Injury. Paper presented to IAMHL conference, Vienna, 2005, July.
4. Koch H. Robust Opinions needs robust reasoning – 15 medico-legal postulates. Solicitors Journal. 6th May.2005.
5. Koch H., Hetherton J., McGillion J. Evidential Reliability in Psychological/Psychiatric Opinion. EWI (in submission). 2015.
6. Koch H., Fraser F, Mackinnon J.M., Midgley S. Questioning Experts. In submission. 2015.
7. Koch H., Thorns T, Elson P., Fraser F. Implementation of CPR Solicitors Journal 2014.
8. Koch H., Holden N., Willows J. Testing the reliability and validity of evidence. Expert Witness Journal, Autumn. 2013.
9. Koch H., Hampton N. The experience, evidence and opinion on pain. Your Expert Witness Solicitors Choice, Autumn. 2011.
10. Koch H., Kevan T. Psychological Injuries. XPL Press. St Albans. 2005.
11. Koch H., Mackinnon J.M. (2004) GP records and the Medico-legal process. PI compensation, August 10 – 12.
12. Koch R. Die aetiologie der Milzbrand-Krankheit in Brock 1998 ASM Press.
13. Malan D H Individual Psychotherapy and The Science of Psychodynamics. Butterworths. 1979.
14. Vallano J.P Psychological Injuries and Legal Decision Making. Psychological Injury and Law .2013, 6, 99 – 112.