The School as Ecosystem of Developing Child-Adult Communities: Activity Approach to Designing the School of the Future

The paper analyses the main paths of designing an effective model of the ‘School of the Future’ through the lens of cultural-historical theory and activity approach. Contrary to the existing models (such as the ‘Chinese School of the Future’, ‘European School of the Future’ etc), the design strategy in cultural-historical approach is aimed at creating a communication- and activity-based environment of sign which is based on the variety of child-adult communities and activity types. Thus in such an environment the process of growing up is shaped by the children’s inclusion into various communities and by the rich opportunities for self-determination through the acquisition of different social practices which, in turn, promote the development of individual cognitive strategies. According to the principles of cultural-historical psychology, the source of human development in the school of the future is closely related to the acquisition of patterns of action and sign means that mediate the individual’s status in different communities mastering different activities. Acquiring such socially adopted patterns of action enables the children to participate in the activities of various social communities that have their own practices, to understand the general principles of their functioning, to coordinate different activity types while preserving their self in many social communities simultaneously, and, eventually, to influence the development of these very communities; and, the last but not the least, to establish new social communities, if necessary, and design their new activities.

1. Gritsai Yu.V. et. al. Uklad shkoly budushchego, v dvukh chastyakh s prilozheniem [The way of the school of the future, in two parts with the app]. Moscow: Publ.: NII shkol’nykh tekhnologii, 2007. 464 р.
2. Gromyko Yu.V. On the Issue of Establishing Public Schools of the Future: A Synthesis of Subject- and Project- Based Education. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2018. Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 93—105. doi:10.17759/pse.2018230108. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
3. Gromyko Yu.V., Davydov V.V. Obrazovanie kak sredstvo formirovaniya i vyrashchivaniya obshchestvenno-regional’nogo razvitiya . [Education as a means of forming and growing social and regional development]. Obrazovatel’naya politika [Educational policy], 2011, no. 2(52), pp. 24—38.
4. Davydov V. V. Vidy obobshcheniya v obuchenii (logiko-psikhologicheskie problemy postroeniya predmetov) [Types of generalization in training (logical and psychological problems of building objects)]. Moscow: Publ. Pedagogika, 1972. 424 p.
5. Davydov V. V. Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya [Theory of developmental learning]. Moscow, 1996. 544 p.
6. Detsko-vzroslaya obrazovatel’naya obshchnost’ v Shkole budushchego: Sbornik statei [Child-adult educational community in the School of the future: Collection of articles]. In Akopova E.S. (eds.) Moscow: Publ. Uchebnyi izdatel’skii tsentr «Berezka», 2007. 84 p.
7. Zimnyaya I.A. Klyuchevye kompetentsii — novaya paradigma rezul’tata obrazovaniya [Key competencies — a new paradigm of educational outcomes]. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya [Higher education today], 2003, no. 5, pp. 34—42.
8. Olyunin V.N., Sobolev A.B. Korporativnyi universitet UGMK — novaya model’ strategicheskogo partnerstva biznesa i obrazovaniya v regione. [UMMC Corporate University — a new model of strategic business and education partnership in the region]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis], 2012, no. 1, pp. 31—37. (In Russ.)
9. Polovkova M.V. Obrazovanie kak sredstvo razvitiya regional’nykh obshchestvennykh sistem. Filosofiya obrazovaniya v proekte «Shkola Budushchego» [Education as a means of developing regional social systems. Philosophy of education in the project “ School of the Future»]. Ekonomika i sotsium [Economy and society], 2014, no. 4 (13), pp. 447—453. (In Russ.)
10. Rubtsov V.V. Osnovy sotsial’no-geneticheskoi psikhologii [Fundamentals of social and genetic psychology]. Moscow, 1996. 384 p.
11. Rubtsov V.V., Margolis A.A., Guruzhapov V.A. Kul’turno-istoricheskii tip shkoly (proekt razrabotki). [Cultural and historical type of school]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological science and education], 1996. Vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 79—93. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
12. Slobodchikov V.I. Kategoriya vozrasta v psikhologii i pedagogike razvitiya [Age category in psychology and pedagogy of development]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of psychology], 1991, no. 2, pp. 37—50.
13. Frumin I.D. et. al. Universal’nye kompetentnosti i novaya gramotnost’: chemu uchit’ segodnya dlya uspekha zavtra. Predvaritel’nye vyvody mezhdunarodnogo doklada o tendentsiyakh transformatsii shkol’nogo obrazovaniya [Universal competencies and new literacy: what to teach today for success tomorrow. Preliminary conclusions of the international report on trends in the transformation of school education]. Natsional’nyi issledovatel’skii universitet «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki», Institut obrazovaniya [National research University Higher school of Economics, Institute of education]. Moscow: Publ. NIU VShE, 2018. 28 p. [Electronic recurs]. URL: https://ioe.hse. ru/data/2018/07/12/1151646087/2_19.pdf (Accessed 05.02.2020)
14. Fedoseev A., Vdovenko D. Playing Science: Role- Playing Games as a Way to Enter Scientific Activity. 2014. In: Meijer S.A., Smeds R. (eds.) Frontiers in Gaming Simulation. ISAGA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8264. Springer, Cham.
15. Baker M. Teaching and Learning About and Beyond Eurocentrism: A Proposal for the Creation of an Other School Revised March 16, 2008. [Electronic recurs]. URL: https://www.academia.edu/1516858/Teaching_ and_Learning_About_and_Beyond_Eurocentrism_A_ Proposal_for_the_Creation_of_an_Other_School (Accessed 05.02.2020)
16. Forster J., & Rittelmeyer C. Gestaltung von Schulbauten. Ein Diskussionsbeitrag aus erziehungswissenschaftlicher Sicht. Zurich, Switzerland: Education Authority, 2010.
17. Designing the future classroom Issue 2 — August 2014. Future Classroom Lab by European Schoolnet [Electronic recurs].URL: http://fcl.eun.org/documents/10180/13526/ FCL+learning+zones+Dec+2016/a091a761-7a63-443e-afe0- d1870e430686 (Accessed 05.02.2020); http://fcl.eun.org/ learning-zones (Accessed 05.02.2020)
18. Jäppinen A.-K., Sarja A. Distributed pedagogical leadership and generative dialogue in educational nodes. Management in Education. April 2012. Vol. 38 (2), pp. 55—64.
19. Haynes D. Harvard Biz School Adds Massive 62-Foot Fine-Pitch LED Screen To Main Auditorium, in Sixteen Nine, November 9, 2019. [Electronic recurs]. URL: https:// www.sixteen-nine.net/2019/11/08/harvard-biz-school-adds-massive-62-foot-fine-pitch-led-screen-to-main-auditorium/ (Accessed 05.02.2020)
20. Knight J. International Education Hubs. 2018. In: Meusburger P., Heffernan M., Suarsana L. (eds) Geographies of the University. Knowledge and Space. Vol 12. Springer, ChamMcLaren, P.: Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundations of Education, 4th edn. Pearson Education, Boston 2003. URL: https://link.springer.com/chap ter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-75593-9_21 (Accessed 05.02.2020)
21. McLaren P. Critical Pedagogy and Predatory Culture, Routledge, 1995
22. Walden R. (еd.), Schools for the future: Design proposals from architectural psychology. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber, 2009
23. Williamson B. Startup schools, fast policies, and full-stack education companies: digitizing education reform in Silicon Valley, [Chapter forthcoming in Means, A. & Saltman, K. Handbook of Global Education Reform. Wiley-Blackwell.] [Electronic recurs]. URL: https://www.researchgate. net/publication/327404706_Startup_Schools_Fast_ Policies_and_Full-Stack_Education_Companies (Accessed 05.02.2020)
24. 王素：数据驱动的中国未来学校课堂变革 [Electronic resurs]. URL: http://www.sohu. com/a/211196079_99950984 (Accessed 05.02.2020)