Mikhailov’s Concept of ‘Appeal’: Philosophical and Pedagogical Meaning

 
Audio is AI-generated
189

Abstract

The article discusses the philosophical and educational meaning of F.T. Mikhailov's concept of ‘appeal’. The appeal from within human subjectivity to the subjectivity of others (and thereby to oneself) in search of compassion, co-thinking and co-action is understood by the philosopher as a generative relation of an individual and his/her way of being, as all subjective qualities of a person. Thus, the emphasis is transferred from the externally determining factors to the subjective self, to its self-movement as causa sui. If appeal is a generative relation for the individual, then in the educational process, where individuals are elevated to the image of man, it is it that should dominate, and not the translation of knowledge, skills and abilities. Everything that is introduced into the context of communication between students should in one way or another appear in the form of appeals to living people, to students in the first place, and only then is it a culture proper. Culture in this eidos becomes the ‘third subject’ of the normal educational process which promotes the integral development of personality.

General Information

Keywords: generative relation, person, appeal, education, culture

Journal rubric: Memorable Dates

OpenAlex citations: 0

OpenAlex trends: Psychology of Development and Education, Innovative Education and Learning Practices, Educational Environments and Student Outcomes

Information about the work in OpenAlex

Number of citations: 0

Topics

Psychology of Development and Education

This cluster of papers explores various aspects of psychology in education, focusing on topics such as the Zone of Proximal Development, inclusive education, cultural-historical theory, educational environment, psychological well-being, teacher training, learning motivation, adolescent development, social cognition, and digital learning. The papers delve into the intersection of psychology and education to understand the developmental processes and challenges in educational settings.

Number of works: 77902  |  Total number of citations: 232078

Topic detailsв OpenAlex

Innovative Education and Learning Practices

This cluster of papers explores workplace learning, informal and formal learning, communities of practice, expansive learning, and the application of activity theory in understanding learning in professional work settings. It delves into the role of Vygotsky's theories, boundary crossing, and tacit knowledge in shaping learning experiences within organizations.

Number of works: 29928  |  Total number of citations: 381405

Topic detailsв OpenAlex

Educational Environments and Student Outcomes

This cluster of papers focuses on research related to learning environments in education, including topics such as classroom environment, teacher-student relationships, learning spaces, student perceptions, educational design, interpersonal behavior, academic achievement, school architecture, pedagogic change, and student outcomes.

Number of works: 48777  |  Total number of citations: 252223

Topic detailsв OpenAlex

Work details in OpenAlex

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170103

Published

For citation: Voznyak, V.S., Konyk, R.S. (2021). Mikhailov’s Concept of ‘Appeal’: Philosophical and Pedagogical Meaning. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 17(1), 12–19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170103

© Voznyak V.S., Konyk R.S., 2021

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Batishhev G.S. Vvedenie v dialektiku tvorchestva [Introduction to the dialectic of creativity]. Saint Petersburg: RKhGI, 1997. 460 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Berdyaev N.A. Ya i mir ob`ektov [I and the world of objects]. Berdyaev N.A. Dukh i real`nost`: Osnovy` bogochelovecheskoj dukhovnosti. Ya i mir ob`ektov: Opy`t filosofii odinochestva i obshheniya [Berdyaev N.A. Spirit and Reality: Fundamentals of Divine-Human Spirituality. The Self and the World of Objects: An Experience of the Philosophy of Solitude and Communication]. Moscow: AST: AST MOSKVA: Khranitel`. 2007, pp. 230—317. (In Russ.).
  3. Voznyak V.S. Zmi`st problemi gumani`tarizaczi`yi osvi`ti v konteksti` vzayemovi`dnoshennya rozsudku i` rozumu [The Content of the Problem of Humanitarianization of Education in the Context of Relationship to the Reason and the Mind]. Naukovij visnik Chernivecz`kogo universitetu. Vip. 264—265. Filosofiya [Scientific Bulletin of the Chernivetsky University. no. 264-265. Philosophy]. Chernivczi Ruta, 2005, pp. 131—136. (In Ukr.).
  4. Voznyak V.S. Metafizika rassudka i razuma [Metaphysics of reason and mind]. Kiev, Red. zhurn. «Samvatas», 1994. 320 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Voznyak V.S. Spivvidnoshennya rozsudku i` rozumu yak filosofs`ko-pedagogichna problema: Monografiya [The сorrelation of reason and mind as a philosophical and pedagogical problem. Monograph]. Drogobich: Redakczijno-vidavnichij viddi Drogobicz`kogo derzhavnogo pedagogichnogo universitetu imeni` Ivana-Franka, 2008. 357 p. (In Ukr.).
  6. Gegel` G.V.F. Fenomenologiya dukha [Phenomenology of spirit]. Gegel` G.V.F. Sochineniya [Hegel G.V.F. Compositions. V. IV]. Moscow, Socze`kgiz, 1959. 440 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Lektorskij V.A. K chitatelyu [To the reader]. Mikhajlov F.T. Izbrannoe [Mikhailov F.T. Favorites]. Moscow, Indrik, 2001, pp. 6 —8. (In Russ.).
  8. Lifshicz Mikh. Iskusstvo i fashizm v Germanii [Art and Fascism in Germany]. Lifshicz Mikh. Pochemu ya ne modernist? [Mikhail Lifshitz. Why am I not a modernist?]. Moscow. Ikusstvo—XXvek, 2009, pp. 201—275. (In Russ.).
  9. Lobastov G.V. By`tie i my`shlenie: k nachalam dialekticheskoj logiki [Being and thinking: to the beginnings of dialectical logic]. Eval`d Vasil`evich Il`enkov [Evald Vasilievich Ilyenkov]. Moscow, Rossijskaya politicheskaya e`ncziklopediya (ROSPEN), 2008, pp. 84—119. (In Russ.).
  10. Mamardashviti M.K. Nauka i kul`tura [Science and culture]. Mamardashvili M.K. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu [Mamardashvili M.K. As I understand philosophy]. Moscow: Progress, 1990, pp. 291—310. (In Russ.).
  11. Marks K. K kritike gegelevskoj filosofii prava [To criticism of the Hegelian philosophy of law]. Marks K., Engel`s F. Sochineniya: izd. 2. T. 1. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: ed. 2. V. 1]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1954, pp. 207—342. (In Russ.).
  12. Marks K. Tezisy` o Fejerbakhe (Tekst 1845 goda) [Theses on Feuerbach (Text of 1845)]. Marks K., E`ngel`s F. Sochineniya. Izd. 2. T. 42 [Marx K., Engels F. Works. Ed. 2. Vol. 42]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1974. pp. 261—263. (In Russ.).
  13. Mikhajlov F.T. Dialektika kak logika refleksivnogo myshleniya [Dialectics as the logic of reflexive thinking]. Mikhajlov F.T. Izbrannoe [Mikhailov F.T. Favorites]. Moscow: Indrik, 2001, pp. 110—118. (In Russ.).
  14. Mikhajlov F.T. Filosofiya obrazovaniya: ee vozmozhnosti i perspektivy [Philosophy of Education: Its Opportunities and Prospects]. Mikhajlov F.T. Izbrannoe [Mikhailov F.T. Favorites]. Moscow: Indrik, 2001, pp. 452—512. (In Russ.).
  15. Mikhajlov F.T. i dr. Teoreticheskaya kul`turologiya [Theoretical cultural studies]. Moscow: Akademicheskij Proekt; Ekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga; RIK, 2005. 624 p. (In Russ.).
  16. Mikhajlov F.T. Perspektivy` gumanitarizaczii obrazovaniya [Prospects for the humanization of education]. Mikhajlov F.T. Izbrannoe [ Mikhailov F.T. Favorites]. Moscow: Indrik, 2001, pp. 403—451. (In Russ.).
  17. Mikhajlov F.T. Proizvol`nost` predmetnoj deyatel`nosti [Arbitrariness of objective activity]. Razvivayushhee obrazovanie. T. 1. Dialog s V.V. Davydovym [Developing education. V. 1. Dialogue with V.V. Davydov]. Moscow: APK i PRO, 2002, pp. 103—127. (In Russ.).
  18. Mikhajlov F.T. Samoopredelenie kul`tury. Filosofskij poisk [Self-determination of culture. Philosophical search]. Moscow: Indrik, 2003. 272 p. (In Russ.).
  19. Frank S.L. Nepostizhimoe. Ontologicheskoe vvedenie v filosofiyu religii [Incomprehensible. Ontological introduction to the philosophy of religion]. Frank S.L. Sochineniya [Frank S.L. Compositions]. Moscow: Pravda, 1990, pp. 183— 559. (In Russ.).
  20. Khajdegger M. Chto zovyotsya myshleniem? [What is called thinking?]. Moscow: Akademicheskij Proekt, 2007. 351 p. (In Russ.).

Information About the Authors

Vladimir S. Voznyak, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor,, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Drohobych, Ukraine, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6877-3785, e-mail: volodimir.voznyak@gmail.com

Ruslan S. Konyk, PhD student, Department of Philosophy, Drohobych State Pedagogical University named after Ivan Franko, Drohobych, Ukraine, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4427-8325, e-mail: konek_m@i.ua

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 778
Previous month: 10
Current month: 11

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 189
Previous month: 5
Current month: 6

 Total

Whole time: 967
Previous month: 15
Current month: 17